There is now a direct way from value-use-iterator to incoming block in PHINode's API.
This way we avoid the iterator->index->iterator trip, and especially the costly
getOperandNo() invocation. Additionally there is now an assertion that the iterator
really refers to one of the PHI's Uses.
llvm-svn: 62869
we assumed a CFG structure that would be valid when all code in
the function is reachable, but not all code is necessarily
reachable. Do a simple, but horrible, CFG walk to check for this
case.
llvm-svn: 62487
because of dead code, a phi could use the speculated instruction
that was not in "BB2". Make this check explicit and tighten up
some other corners. This fixes PR3292. No testcase becauase this
depends entirely on visitation order of blocks and requires a
sequence of 8 passes to repro.
llvm-svn: 62476
doing very similar pointer capture analysis.
Factor out the common logic. The new version
is from FunctionAttrs since it does a better
job than the version in BasicAliasAnalysis
llvm-svn: 62461
putc, puts, perror, vscanf and vsscanf from getting annotations.
Add annotations for eight printf functions, memalign, pread and pwrite.
On Linux, llvm-gcc sometimes renames strdup, getc, putc, strtok_r, scanf and
sscanf. Match the alternate function names.
Fix a crash annotating opendir.
Don't mark fsetpos's second parameter as nocapture. It's supposed to be
captured.
Do mark fopen's path and mode strings as nocapture. Mark ferror as readonly,
but not fileno which may set errno.
llvm-svn: 62456
- Looking at the number of sign bits of the a sext instruction to determine whether new trunc + sext pair should be added when its source is being evaluated in a different type.
llvm-svn: 62263
my earlier patch to this file.
The issue there was that all uses of an IV inside a loop
are actually references to Base[IV*2], and there was one
use outside that was the same but LSR didn't see the base
or the scaling because it didn't recurse into uses outside
the loop; thus, it used base+IV*scale mode inside the loop
instead of pulling base out of the loop. This was extra bad
because register pressure later forced both base and IV into
memory. Doing that recursion, at least enough
to figure out addressing modes, is a good idea in general;
the change in AddUsersIfInteresting does this. However,
there were side effects....
It is also possible for recursing outside the loop to
introduce another IV where there was only 1 before (if
the refs inside are not scaled and the ref outside is).
I don't think this is a common case, but it's in the testsuite.
It is right to be very aggressive about getting rid of
such introduced IVs (CheckForIVReuse and the handling of
nonzero RewriteFactor in StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers).
In the testcase in question the new IV produced this way
has both a nonconstant stride and a nonzero base, neither
of which was handled before. And when inserting
new code that feeds into a PHI, it's right to put such
code at the original location rather than in the PHI's
immediate predecessor(s) when the original location is outside
the loop (a case that couldn't happen before)
(RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase); better to avoid making
multiple copies of it in this case.
Also, the mechanism for keeping SCEV's corresponding to GEP's
no longer works, as the GEP might change after its SCEV
is remembered, invalidating the SCEV, and we might get a bad
SCEV value when looking up the GEP again for a later loop.
This also couldn't happen before, as we weren't recursing
into GEP's outside the loop.
Also, when we build an expression that involves a (possibly
non-affine) IV from a different loop as well as an IV from
the one we're interested in (containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop),
don't recurse into that. We can't do much with it and will
get in trouble if we try to create new non-affine IVs or something.
More testcases are coming.
llvm-svn: 62212
vector and extraneous loop over it, 2) not delete globals used by
phis/selects etc which could actually be useful. This fixes PR3321.
Many thanks to Duncan for narrowing this down.
llvm-svn: 62201
compensation for turning off gcc's inliner. This gets
us closer to the amount of inlining we were getting before.
It is not a win on everything, of course, but seems to
gain overall.
llvm-svn: 62058
canonicalization transform based on duncan's comments:
1) improve the comment about %.
2) within our index loop make sure the offset stays
within the *type size*, instead of within the *abi size*.
This allows us to reason explicitly about landing in tail
padding and means that issues like non-zero offsets into
[0 x foo] types don't occur anymore.
llvm-svn: 62045
functions that don't already have a (dynamic) alloca.
Dynamic allocas cause inefficient codegen and we shouldn't
propagate this (behavior follows gcc). Two existing tests
assumed such inlining would be done; they are hacked by
adding an alloca in the caller, preserving the point of
the tests.
llvm-svn: 61946
loads from allocas that cover the entire aggregate. This handles
some memcpy/byval cases that are produced by llvm-gcc. This triggers
a few times in kc++ (with std::pair<std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator
<kc::impl_abstract_phylum*>,bool>) and once in 176.gcc (with %struct..0anon).
llvm-svn: 61915
was it not very helpful, it was also wrong! The problem
is shown in the testcase: the alloca might be passed to
a nocapture callee which dereferences it and returns the
original pointer. But because it was a nocapture call we
think we don't need to track its uses, but we do.
llvm-svn: 61876
integer to a (transitive) bitcast the alloca and if that integer
has the full size of the alloca, then it clobbers the whole thing.
Handle this by extracting pieces out of the stored integer and
filing them away in the SROA'd elements.
This triggers fairly frequently because the CFE uses integers to
pass small structs by value and the inliner exposes these. For
example, in kimwitu++, I see a bunch of these with i64 stores to
"%struct.std::pair<std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator<kc::impl_abstract_phylum*>,bool>"
In 176.gcc I see a few i32 stores to "%struct..0anon".
In the testcase, this is a difference between compiling test1 to:
_test1:
subl $12, %esp
movl 20(%esp), %eax
movl %eax, 4(%esp)
movl 16(%esp), %eax
movl %eax, (%esp)
movl (%esp), %eax
addl 4(%esp), %eax
addl $12, %esp
ret
vs:
_test1:
movl 8(%esp), %eax
addl 4(%esp), %eax
ret
The second half of this will be to handle loads of the same form.
llvm-svn: 61853
In fact this also deletes those with linkonce linkage,
however this is currently dead because for the moment
aliases aren't allowed to have this linkage type.
llvm-svn: 61742
Finalization occurs after all the FunctionPasses in the group have run, which
is clearly not what we want.
This also means that we have to make sure that we apply the right param
attributes when creating a new function.
Also, add a missed optimization: strdup and strndup. NoCapture and
NoAlias return!
llvm-svn: 61658
not have pointer type. In particular, it may
be the condition argument for a select or a GEP
index. While I was unable to construct a testcase
for which some bits of the original pointer are
captured due to one of these, it's very very close
to being possible - so play safe and exclude these
possibilities.
llvm-svn: 61580
the argument to be stored to an alloca by tracking uses
of the alloca. This occurs 4 times (out of 7121, 0.05%)
in MultiSource/Applications, so may not be worth it. On
the other hand, it is easy to do and fairly cheap. The
functions it helps are: W_addcom and W_addlit in spiff;
process_args (argv) in d (make_dparser); ercPixConcealIMB
in JM/ldecod.
llvm-svn: 61570
functions that don't write can't leak a pointer except through
the return value, so a void readonly function is implicitly nocapture.
Test these, and add a test that verifies that f1 calling f2 with an
otherwise dead pointer gets both of them marked nocapture.
llvm-svn: 61552
to work out (in a very simplistic way) which function
arguments (pointer arguments only) are only dereferenced
and so do not escape. Mark such arguments 'nocapture'.
llvm-svn: 61525
and select instructions doesn't buy anything here
except extra complexity: the only difference in
the entire testsuite was that a readonly function
became readnone in MiBench/consumer-typeset. Add
a comment about this.
llvm-svn: 61478
constants, since doing so is irrelevant for aliasing
purposes. While this doesn't increase the total number
of functions marked readonly or readnone in MultiSource/
Applications (3089), it does result in 12 functions being
marked readnone rather than readonly.
Before:
readnone: 820
readonly: 2269
After:
readnone: 832
readonly: 2257
llvm-svn: 61469
my last patch to this file.
The issue there was that all uses of an IV inside a loop
are actually references to Base[IV*2], and there was one
use outside that was the same but LSR didn't see the base
or the scaling because it didn't recurse into uses outside
the loop; thus, it used base+IV*scale mode inside the loop
instead of pulling base out of the loop. This was extra bad
because register pressure later forced both base and IV into
memory. Doing that recursion, at least enough
to figure out addressing modes, is a good idea in general;
the change in AddUsersIfInteresting does this. However,
there were side effects....
It is also possible for recursing outside the loop to
introduce another IV where there was only 1 before (if
the refs inside are not scaled and the ref outside is).
I don't think this is a common case, but it's in the testsuite.
It is right to be very aggressive about getting rid of
such introduced IVs (CheckForIVReuse and the handling of
nonzero RewriteFactor in StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers).
In the testcase in question the new IV produced this way
has both a nonconstant stride and a nonzero base, neither
of which was handled before. And when inserting
new code that feeds into a PHI, it's right to put such
code at the original location rather than in the PHI's
immediate predecessor(s) when the original location is outside
the loop (a case that couldn't happen before)
(RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase); better to avoid making
multiple copies of it in this case.
Also, the mechanism for keeping SCEV's corresponding to GEP's
no longer works, as the GEP might change after its SCEV
is remembered, invalidating the SCEV, and we might get a bad
SCEV value when looking up the GEP again for a later loop.
This also couldn't happen before, as we weren't recursing
into GEP's outside the loop.
I owe some testcases for this, want to get it in for nightly runs.
llvm-svn: 61362
- Use SplitBlockPredecessors to factor out common predecessors of the critical edge destination. This is disabled for now due to some regressions.
llvm-svn: 61248
my last patch to this file.
The issue there was that all uses of an IV inside a loop
are actually references to Base[IV*2], and there was one
use outside that was the same but LSR didn't see the base
or the scaling because it didn't recurse into uses outside
the loop; thus, it used base+IV*scale mode inside the loop
instead of pulling base out of the loop. This was extra bad
because register pressure later forced both base and IV into
memory. Doing that recursion, at least enough
to figure out addressing modes, is a good idea in general;
the change in AddUsersIfInteresting does this. However,
there were side effects....
It is also possible for recursing outside the loop to
introduce another IV where there was only 1 before (if
the refs inside are not scaled and the ref outside is).
I don't think this is a common case, but it's in the testsuite.
It is right to be very aggressive about getting rid of
such introduced IVs (CheckForIVReuse and the handling of
nonzero RewriteFactor in StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers).
In the testcase in question the new IV produced this way
has both a nonconstant stride and a nonzero base, neither
of which was handled before. (This patch does not handle
all the cases where this can happen.) And when inserting
new code that feeds into a PHI, it's right to put such
code at the original location rather than in the PHI's
immediate predecessor(s) when the original location is outside
the loop (a case that couldn't happen before)
(RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase); better to avoid making
multiple copies of it in this case.
Everything above is exercised in
CodeGen/X86/lsr-negative-stride.ll (and ifcvt4 in ARM which is
the same IR).
llvm-svn: 61178
nodes. This allows it to do fairly general phi insertion if a
load from a pointer global wants to be SRAd but the load is used
by (recursive) phi nodes. This fixes a pessimization on ppc
introduced by Load PRE.
llvm-svn: 61123
consistently for deleting branches. In addition to being slightly
more readable, this makes SimplifyCFG a bit better
about cleaning up after itself when it makes conditions unused.
llvm-svn: 61100
CFG when there is exactly one predecessor where the load is not available.
This is designed to not increase code size but still eliminate partially
redundant loads. This fires 1765 times on 403.gcc even though it doesn't
do critical edge splitting yet (the most common reason for it to fail).
llvm-svn: 61027
cleans up the generated code a bit. This should have the added benefit of
not randomly renaming functions/globals like my previous patch did. :)
llvm-svn: 61023
llvm[2]: Linking Release executable opt (without symbols)
...
Undefined symbols:
"llvm::APFloat::IEEEsingle", referenced from:
__ZN4llvm7APFloat10IEEEsingleE$non_lazy_ptr in libLLVMCore.a(Constants.o)
__ZN4llvm7APFloat10IEEEsingleE$non_lazy_ptr in libLLVMCore.a(AsmWriter.o)
__ZN4llvm7APFloat10IEEEsingleE$non_lazy_ptr in libLLVMCore.a(ConstantFold.o)
"llvm::APFloat::IEEEdouble", referenced from:
__ZN4llvm7APFloat10IEEEdoubleE$non_lazy_ptr in libLLVMCore.a(Constants.o)
__ZN4llvm7APFloat10IEEEdoubleE$non_lazy_ptr in libLLVMCore.a(AsmWriter.o)
__ZN4llvm7APFloat10IEEEdoubleE$non_lazy_ptr in libLLVMCore.a(ConstantFold.o)
ld: symbol(s) not found
This is in release mode. To replicate, compile llvm and llvm-gcc in optimized
mode. Then build llvm, in optimized mode, with the newly created compiler.
llvm-svn: 60977
of a pointer. This allows is to catch more equivalencies. For example,
the type_lists_compatible_p function used to require two iterations of
the gvn pass (!) to delete its 18 redundant loads because the first pass
would CSE all the addressing computation cruft, which would unblock the
second memdep/gvn passes from recognizing them. This change allows
memdep/gvn to catch all 18 when run just once on the function (as is
typical :) instead of just 3.
On all of 403.gcc, this bumps up the # reundandancies found from:
63 gvn - Number of instructions PRE'd
153991 gvn - Number of instructions deleted
50069 gvn - Number of loads deleted
to:
63 gvn - Number of instructions PRE'd
154137 gvn - Number of instructions deleted
50185 gvn - Number of loads deleted
+120 loads deleted isn't bad.
llvm-svn: 60799
MemDep::getNonLocalPointerDependency method. There are
some open issues with this (missed optimizations) and
plenty of future work, but this does allow GVN to eliminate
*slightly* more loads (49246 vs 49033).
Switching over now allows simplification of the other code
path in memdep.
llvm-svn: 60780
doesn't do its own local caching, and is slightly more aggressive about
free/store dse (see testcase). This eliminates the last external client
of MemDep::getDependenceFrom().
llvm-svn: 60619
loops when they can be subsumed into addressing modes.
Change X86 addressing mode check to realize that
some PIC references need an extra register.
(I believe this is correct for Linux, if not, I'm sure
someone will tell me.)
llvm-svn: 60608
1. Merge the 'None' result into 'Normal', making loads
and stores return their dependencies on allocations as Normal.
2. Split the 'Normal' result into 'Clobber' and 'Def' to
distinguish between the cases when memdep knows the value is
produced from when we just know if may be changed.
3. Move some of the logic for determining whether readonly calls
are CSEs into memdep instead of it being in GVN. This still
leaves verification that the arguments are hte same to GVN to
let it know about value equivalences in different contexts.
4. Change memdep's call/call dependency analysis to use
getModRefInfo(CallSite,CallSite) instead of doing something
very weak. This only really matters for things like DSA, but
someday maybe we'll have some other decent context sensitive
analyses :)
5. This reimplements the guts of memdep to handle the new results.
6. This simplifies GVN significantly:
a) readonly call CSE is slightly simpler
b) I eliminated the "getDependencyFrom" chaining for load
elimination and load CSE doesn't have to worry about
volatile (they are always clobbers) anymore.
c) GVN no longer does any 'lastLoad' caching, leaving it to
memdep.
7. The logic in DSE is simplified a bit and sped up. A potentially
unsafe case was eliminated.
llvm-svn: 60607
This fixes many bugs. I will add more test cases in a separate check-in.
Some day, the code that manipulates CFG and updates dom. info could use refactoring help.
llvm-svn: 60554
1) have it fold "br undef", which does occur with
surprising frequency as jump threading iterates.
2) teach j-t to delete dead blocks. This removes the successor
edges, reducing the in-edges of other blocks, allowing
recursive simplification.
3) Fold things like:
br COND, BBX, BBY
BBX:
br COND, BBZ, BBW
which also happens because jump threading iterates.
llvm-svn: 60470
straight-forward implementation. This does not require any extra
alias analysis queries beyond what we already do for non-local loads.
Some programs really really like load PRE. For example, SPASS triggers
this ~1000 times, ~300 times in 255.vortex, and ~1500 times on 403.gcc.
The biggest limitation to the implementation is that it does not split
critical edges. This is a huge killer on many programs and should be
addressed after the initial patch is enabled by default.
The implementation of this should incidentally speed up rejection of
non-local loads because it avoids creating the repl densemap in cases
when it won't be used for fully redundant loads.
This is currently disabled by default.
Before I turn this on, I need to fix a couple of miscompilations in
the testsuite, look at compile time performance numbers, and look at
perf impact. This is pretty close to ready though.
llvm-svn: 60408
constant. If X is a constant, then this is folded elsewhere.
- Added a note to Target/README.txt to indicate that we'd like to implement
this when we're able.
llvm-svn: 60399
figuring out the base of the IV. This produces better
code in the example. (Addresses use (IV) instead of
(BASE,IV) - a significant improvement on low-register
machines like x86).
llvm-svn: 60374
instead of std::sort. This shrinks the release-asserts LSR.o file
by 1100 bytes of code on my system.
We should start using array_pod_sort where possible.
llvm-svn: 60335
buggy rewrite, this notifies ScalarEvolution of a pending instruction
about to be removed and then erases it, instead of erasing it then
notifying.
llvm-svn: 60329
new instructions it simplifies. Because we're threading jumps on edges
with constants coming in from PHI's, we inherently are exposing a lot more
constants to the new block. Folding them and deleting dead conditions
allows the cost model in jump threading to be more accurate as it iterates.
llvm-svn: 60327
elimination: when finding dependent load/stores, realize that
they are the same if aliasing claims must alias instead of relying
on the pointers to be exactly equal. This makes load elimination
more aggressive. For example, on 403.gcc, we had:
< 68 gvn - Number of instructions PRE'd
< 152718 gvn - Number of instructions deleted
< 49699 gvn - Number of loads deleted
< 6153 memdep - Number of dirty cached non-local responses
< 169336 memdep - Number of fully cached non-local responses
< 162428 memdep - Number of uncached non-local responses
now we have:
> 64 gvn - Number of instructions PRE'd
> 153623 gvn - Number of instructions deleted
> 49856 gvn - Number of loads deleted
> 5022 memdep - Number of dirty cached non-local responses
> 159030 memdep - Number of fully cached non-local responses
> 162443 memdep - Number of uncached non-local responses
That's an extra 157 loads deleted and extra 905 other instructions nuked.
This slows down GVN very slightly, from 3.91 to 3.96s.
llvm-svn: 60314
vector instead of a densemap. This shrinks the memory usage of this thing
substantially (the high water mark) as well as making operations like
scanning it faster. This speeds up memdep slightly, gvn goes from
3.9376 to 3.9118s on 403.gcc
This also splits out the statistics for the cached non-local case to
differentiate between the dirty and clean cached case. Here's the stats
for 403.gcc:
6153 memdep - Number of dirty cached non-local responses
169336 memdep - Number of fully cached non-local responses
162428 memdep - Number of uncached non-local responses
yay for caching :)
llvm-svn: 60313
Note that the FoldOpIntoPhi call is dead because it's impossible for the
first operand of a subtraction to be both a ConstantInt and a PHINode.
llvm-svn: 60306
"For signed integers, the determination of overflow of x*y is not so simple. If
x and y have the same sign, then overflow occurs iff xy > 2**31 - 1. If they
have opposite signs, then overflow occurs iff xy < -2**31."
In this case, x == -1.
llvm-svn: 60278
overflowed on negation. This commit checks to make sure that neithe C nor X
overflows. This requires that the RHS of X (a subtract instruction) be a
constant integer.
llvm-svn: 60275
If we see that a load depends on the allocation of its memory with no
intervening stores, we now return a 'None' depedency instead of "Normal".
This tweaks GVN to do its optimization with the new result.
llvm-svn: 60267
query. This makes it crystal clear what cases can escape from MemDep that
the clients have to handle. This also gives the clients a nice simplified
interface to it that is easy to poke at.
This patch also makes DepResultTy and MemoryDependenceAnalysis::DepType
private, yay.
llvm-svn: 60231
of a pointer/int pair instead of a manually bitmangled pointer.
This forces clients to think a little more about checking the
appropriate pieces and will be useful for internal
implementation improvements later.
I'm not particularly happy with this. After going through this
I don't think that the clients of memdep should be exposed to
the internal type at all. I'll fix this in a subsequent commit.
This has no functionality change.
llvm-svn: 60230
wrappers around the interesting code and use an obscure iterator
abstraction that dates back many many years.
Move EraseDeadInstructions to Transforms/Utils and name it
RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions.
llvm-svn: 60191
1. Make it fold blocks separated by an unconditional branch. This enables
jump threading to see a broader scope.
2. Make jump threading able to eliminate locally redundant loads when they
feed the branch condition of a block. This frequently occurs due to
reg2mem running.
3. Make jump threading able to eliminate *partially redundant* loads when
they feed the branch condition of a block. This is common in code with
lots of loads and stores like C++ code and 255.vortex.
This implements thread-loads.ll and rdar://6402033.
Per the fixme's, several pieces of this should be moved into Transforms/Utils.
llvm-svn: 60148
performance in most cases on the Grawp tester, but does speed some
things up (like shootout/hash by 15%). This also doesn't impact
compile time in a noticable way on the Grawp tester.
It also, of course, gets the testcase it was designed for right :)
llvm-svn: 60120
heuristic: the value is already live at the new memory operation if
it is used by some other instruction in the memop's block. This is
cheap and simple to compute (moreso than full liveness).
This improves the new heuristic even more. For example, it cuts two
out of three new instructions out of 255.vortex:DbmFileInGrpHdr,
which is one of the functions that the heuristic regressed. This
overall eliminates another 40 instructions from 403.gcc and visibly
reduces register pressure in 255.vortex (though this only actually
ends up saving the 2 instructions from the whole program).
llvm-svn: 60084
phrased in terms of liveness instead of as a horrible hack. :)
In pratice, this doesn't change the generated code for either
255.vortex or 403.gcc, but it could cause minor code changes in
theory. This is framework for coming changes.
llvm-svn: 60082
-enable-smarter-addr-folding to llc) that gives CGP a better
cost model for when to sink computations into addressing modes.
The basic observation is that sinking increases register
pressure when part of the addr computation has to be available
for other reasons, such as having a use that is a non-memory
operation. In cases where it works, it can substantially reduce
register pressure.
This code is currently an overall win on 403.gcc and 255.vortex
(the two things I've been looking at), but there are several
things I want to do before enabling it by default:
1. This isn't doing any caching of results, so it is much slower
than it could be. It currently slows down release-asserts llc
by 1.7% on 176.gcc: 27.12s -> 27.60s.
2. This doesn't think about inline asm memory operands yet.
3. The cost model botches the case when the needed value is live
across the computation for other reasons.
I'll continue poking at this, and eventually turn it on as llcbeta.
llvm-svn: 60074
optimize addressing modes. This allows us to optimize things like isel-sink2.ll
into:
movl 4(%esp), %eax
cmpb $0, 4(%eax)
jne LBB1_2 ## F
LBB1_1: ## TB
movl $4, %eax
ret
LBB1_2: ## F
movzbl 7(%eax), %eax
ret
instead of:
_test:
movl 4(%esp), %eax
cmpb $0, 4(%eax)
leal 4(%eax), %eax
jne LBB1_2 ## F
LBB1_1: ## TB
movl $4, %eax
ret
LBB1_2: ## F
movzbl 3(%eax), %eax
ret
This shrinks (e.g.) 403.gcc from 1133510 to 1128345 lines of .s.
Note that the 2008-10-16-SpillerBug.ll testcase is dubious at best, I doubt
it is really testing what it thinks it is.
llvm-svn: 60068
can recursively match things) and scales by 0 by ignoring them.
This triggers once in 403.gcc, saving 1 (!!!!) instruction in the
whole huge app.
llvm-svn: 60013
into a new AddressingModeMatcher class. This makes it easier
to reason about and reduces passing around of stuff, but has
no functionality change.
llvm-svn: 60012
Dale Johannesen