Commit Graph

427 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sanjay Patel a17f03bd93 [VectorCombine] new IR transform pass for partial vector ops
We have several bug reports that could be characterized as "reducing scalarization",
and this topic was also raised on llvm-dev recently:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-January/138157.html
...so I'm proposing that we deal with these patterns in a new, lightweight IR vector
pass that runs before/after other vectorization passes.

There are 4 alternate options that I can think of to deal with this kind of problem
(and we've seen various attempts at all of these), but they all have flaws:

    InstCombine - can't happen without TTI, but we don't want target-specific
                  folds there.
    SDAG - too late to assist other vectorization passes; TLI is not equipped
           for these kind of cost queries; limited to a single basic block.
    CGP - too late to assist other vectorization passes; would need to re-implement
          basic cleanups like CSE/instcombine.
    SLP - doesn't fit with existing transforms; limited to a single basic block.

This initial patch/transform is based on existing code in AggressiveInstCombine:
we walk backwards through the function looking for a pattern match. But we diverge
from that cost-independent IR canonicalization pass by using TTI to decide if the
vector alternative is profitable.

We probably have at least 10 similar bug reports/patterns (binops, constants,
inserts, cheap shuffles, etc) that would fit in this pass as follow-up enhancements.
It's possible that we could iterate on a worklist to fix-point like InstCombine does,
but it's safer to start with a most basic case and evolve from there, so I didn't
try to do anything fancy with this initial implementation.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73480
2020-02-09 10:04:41 -05:00
Johannes Doerfert b0c77c36d2 [Attributor] Add an Attributor CGSCC pass and run it
In addition to the module pass, this patch introduces a CGSCC pass that
runs the Attributor on a strongly connected component of the call graph
(both old and new PM). The Attributor was always design to be used on a
subset of functions which makes this patch mostly mechanical.

The one change is that we give up `norecurse` deduction in the module
pass in favor of doing it during the CGSCC pass. This makes the
interfaces simpler but can be revisited if needed.

Reviewed By: hfinkel

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70767
2020-02-08 21:27:34 -06:00
Johannes Doerfert 9548b74a83 [OpenMP] Introduce the OpenMPOpt transformation pass
The OpenMPOpt pass is a CGSCC pass in which OpenMP specific
optimizations can reside.

The OpenMPOpt pass uses the OpenMPKinds.def file to identify runtime
calls and their uses. This allows targeted transformations and eases
their implementation.

This initial patch deduplicates `__kmpc_global_thread_num` and
`omp_get_thread_num` calls. We can also identify arguments that are
equivalent to such a call result and use it instead. Later we can
determine "gtid" arguments based on the use in kernel functions etc.

Reviewed By: JonChesterfield

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69930
2020-02-08 14:47:03 -06:00
Teresa Johnson 25aa2eef99 Revert "[WPD/LowerTypeTests] Delay lowering/removal of type tests until after ICP"
This reverts commit 748bb5a0f1.

Due to Chromium CFI+ThinLTO test crashes reported on patch.
2020-02-05 19:27:32 -08:00
Alina Sbirlea 67904db23c [IRCE] Make IRCE a Function pass.
Summary: Make InductiveRangeCheckElimination a FunctionPass.

Reviewers: reames, mkazantsev

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73592
2020-02-05 09:22:41 -08:00
Teresa Johnson 748bb5a0f1 [WPD/LowerTypeTests] Delay lowering/removal of type tests until after ICP
Summary:
Currently type test assume sequences inserted for devirtualization are
removed during WPD. This patch delays their removal until later in the
optimization pipeline. This is an enabler for upcoming enhancements to
indirect call promotion, for example streamlined promotion guard
sequences that compare against vtable address instead of the target
function, when there are small number of possible vtables (either
determined via WPD or by in-progress type profiling). We need the type
tests to correlate the callsites with the address point offset needed in
the compare sequence, and optionally to associated type summary info
computed during WPD.

This depends on work in D71913 to enable invocation of LowerTypeTests to
drop type test assume sequences, which will now be invoked following ICP
in the ThinLTO post-LTO link pipelines, and also after the existing
export phase LowerTypeTests invocation in regular LTO (which is already
after ICP). We cannot simply move the existing import phase
LowerTypeTests pass later in the ThinLTO post link pipelines, as the
comment in PassBuilder.cpp notes (it must run early because when
performing CFI other passes may disturb the sequences it looks for).

This necessitated adding a new type test resolution "Unknown" that we
can use on the type test assume sequences previously removed by WPD,
that we now want LTT to ignore.

Depends on D71913.

Reviewers: pcc, evgeny777

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, davidxl, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73242
2020-02-05 08:59:48 -08:00
Tyker a7bbe45a3e Build assume from call
Fix attempt

this is part of the implementation of http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

this patch gives the basis of building an assume to preserve all information from an instruction and add support for building an assume that preserve the information from a call.
2020-02-02 19:43:36 +01:00
Tyker 7cb5d96fbe Revert "[WIP] Build assume from call"
casued buildbot failure

This reverts commit 8ebe001553.
2020-02-02 18:35:19 +01:00
Tyker 8ebe001553 [WIP] Build assume from call
Summary:
this is part of the implementation of http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

this patch gives the basis of building an assume to preserve all information from an instruction and add support for building an assume that preserve the information from a call.

Reviewers: jdoerfert

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: mgrang, fhahn, mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72475
2020-02-02 18:15:50 +01:00
Tyker c2d0336208 Revert "[WIP] Build assume from call"
caused build bot failure

This reverts commit 780d2c532f.
2020-02-02 18:09:06 +01:00
Tyker 780d2c532f [WIP] Build assume from call
Summary:
this is part of the implementation of http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

this patch gives the basis of building an assume to preserve all information from an instruction and add support for building an assume that preserve the information from a call.

Reviewers: jdoerfert

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: mgrang, fhahn, mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72475
2020-02-02 17:54:31 +01:00
Tyker ad8ffc5010 Revert "[WIP] Build assume from call"
This reverts commit 355e4bfd78.
2020-02-02 17:49:23 +01:00
Tyker 355e4bfd78 [WIP] Build assume from call
Summary:
this is part of the implementation of http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

this patch gives the basis of building an assume to preserve all information from an instruction and add support for building an assume that preserve the information from a call.

Reviewers: jdoerfert

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: mgrang, fhahn, mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72475
2020-02-02 17:17:46 +01:00
Tyker 0adda3df92 Revert "[WIP] Build assume from call"
This reverts commit 2ff5602cb5.
2020-02-02 15:05:33 +01:00
Tyker 2ff5602cb5 [WIP] Build assume from call
Summary:
this is part of the implementation of http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

this patch gives the basis of building an assume to preserve all information from an instruction and add support for building an assume that preserve the information from a call.

Reviewers: jdoerfert

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: mgrang, fhahn, mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72475
2020-02-02 14:50:31 +01:00
Benjamin Kramer adcd026838 Make llvm::StringRef to std::string conversions explicit.
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.

This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.

This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
2020-01-28 23:25:25 +01:00
Fedor Sergeev 1f2dad1fd5 [GVN] add GVN parameters parsing to new pass manager
Introduce parsing, add a few instances of parameter use into GVN-PRE tests.

Reviewers: skatkov, asbirlea
Reviewed By: skatkov

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72752
2020-01-16 23:53:46 +03:00
Mircea Trofin 7acfda633f [llvm] Make new pass manager's OptimizationLevel a class
Summary:
The old pass manager separated speed optimization and size optimization
levels into two unsigned values. Coallescing both in an enum in the new
pass manager may lead to unintentional casts and comparisons.

In particular, taking a look at how the loop unroll passes were constructed
previously, the Os/Oz are now (==new pass manager) treated just like O3,
likely unintentionally.

This change disallows raw comparisons between optimization levels, to
avoid such unintended effects. As an effect, the O{s|z} behavior changes
for loop unrolling and loop unroll and jam, matching O2 rather than O3.

The change also parameterizes the threshold values used for loop
unrolling, primarily to aid testing.

Reviewers: tejohnson, davidxl

Reviewed By: tejohnson

Subscribers: zzheng, ychen, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72547
2020-01-16 09:00:56 -08:00
Nikita Popov 410331869d [NewPM] Port MergeFunctions pass
This ports the MergeFunctions pass to the NewPM. This was rather
straightforward, as no analyses are used.

Additionally MergeFunctions needs to be conditionally enabled in
the PassBuilder, but I left that part out of this patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72537
2020-01-14 20:55:41 +01:00
Kazu Hirata 6b686703e6 [Inlining] Add PreInlineThreshold for the new pass manager
Summary:
This patch makes it easy to try out different preinlining thresholds
with a command-line switch just like -preinline-threshold for the
legacy pass manager.

Reviewers: davidxl

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72618
2020-01-13 07:59:42 -08:00
Wei Mi 21a4710c67 [ThinLTO] Pass CodeGenOpts like UnrollLoops/VectorizeLoop/VectorizeSLP
down to pass builder in ltobackend.

Currently CodeGenOpts like UnrollLoops/VectorizeLoop/VectorizeSLP in clang
are not passed down to pass builder in ltobackend when new pass manager is
used. This is inconsistent with the behavior when new pass manager is used
and thinlto is not used. Such inconsistency causes slp vectorization pass
not being enabled in ltobackend for O3 + thinlto right now. This patch
fixes that.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72386
2020-01-09 21:13:11 -08:00
Whitney Tsang d27a15fed7 [NFCI][LoopUnrollAndJam] Changing LoopUnrollAndJamPass to a function
pass.

Summary: This patch changes LoopUnrollAndJamPass to a function pass, and
keeps the loops traversal order same as defined in
FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor LoopPassManager.h.

The next patch will change the loop traversal to outer to inner order,
so more loops can be transform.

Discussion in llvm-dev mailing list:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/LF4rUjkVI2g
Reviewer: dmgreen, jdoerfert, Meinersbur, kbarton, bmahjour, etiotto
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72230
2020-01-09 16:18:36 +00:00
Florian Hahn 526244b187 [Matrix] Add first set of matrix intrinsics and initial lowering pass.
This is the first patch adding an initial set of matrix intrinsics and a
corresponding lowering pass. This has been discussed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-October/136240.html

The first patch introduces four new intrinsics (transpose, multiply,
columnwise load and store) and a LowerMatrixIntrinsics pass, that
lowers those intrinsics to vector operations.

Matrixes are embedded in a 'flat' vector (e.g. a 4 x 4 float matrix
embedded in a <16 x float> vector) and the intrinsics take the dimension
information as parameters. Those parameters need to be ConstantInt.
For the memory layout, we initially assume column-major, but in the RFC
we also described how to extend the intrinsics to support row-major as
well.

For the initial lowering, we split the input of the intrinsics into a
set of column vectors, transform those column vectors and concatenate
the result columns to a flat result vector.

This allows us to lower the intrinsics without any shape propagation, as
mentioned in the RFC. In follow-up patches, we plan to submit the
following improvements:
 * Shape propagation to eliminate the embedding/splitting for each
   intrinsic.
 * Fused & tiled lowering of multiply and other operations.
 * Optimization remarks highlighting matrix expressions and costs.
 * Generate loops for operations on large matrixes.
 * More general block processing for operation on large vectors,
   exploiting shape information.

We would like to add dedicated transpose, columnwise load and store
intrinsics, even though they are not strictly necessary. For example, we
could instead emit a large shufflevector instruction instead of the
transpose. But we expect that to
  (1) become unwieldy for larger matrixes (even for 16x16 matrixes,
      the resulting shufflevector masks would be huge),
  (2) risk instcombine making small changes, causing us to fail to
      detect the transpose, preventing better lowerings

For the load/store, we are additionally planning on exploiting the
intrinsics for better alias analysis.

Reviewers: anemet, Gerolf, reames, hfinkel, andrew.w.kaylor, efriedma, rengolin

Reviewed By: anemet

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70456
2019-12-12 15:42:18 +00:00
Daniil Suchkov 259ca0418e [SCEV] Make SCEV verification available from command line with new PM
New pass manager doesn't use verifyAnalysis, so currently there is no
way to call SCEV verification from command line when new PM is used.
This patch adds a pass that allows you to do that.

Reviewers: reames, fhahn, sanjoy.google, nikic

Reviewed By: fhahn

Subscribers: hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70423
2019-12-02 13:08:20 +07:00
Eric Christopher fd39b1bb20 Revert "Revert "As a follow-up to my initial mail to llvm-dev here's a first pass at the O1 described there.""
This reapplies: 8ff85ed905

Original commit message:

As a follow-up to my initial mail to llvm-dev here's a first pass at the O1 described there.

This change doesn't include any change to move from selection dag to fast isel
and that will come with other numbers that should help inform that decision.
There also haven't been any real debuggability studies with this pipeline yet,
this is just the initial start done so that people could see it and we could start
tweaking after.

Test updates: Outside of the newpm tests most of the updates are coming from either
optimization passes not run anymore (and without a compelling argument at the moment)
that were largely used for canonicalization in clang.

Original post:

http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131494.html

Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65410

This reverts commit c9ddb02659.
2019-11-26 20:28:52 -08:00
Muhammad Omair Javaid c9ddb02659 Revert "As a follow-up to my initial mail to llvm-dev here's a first pass at the O1 described there."
This reverts commit 8ff85ed905.

This commit introduced 9 new failures on lldb buildbot host at http://lab.llvm.org:8014/builders/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu

Following tests were failing:
    lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/ambiguous_tail_call_seq1/TestAmbiguousTailCallSeq1.py
    lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/ambiguous_tail_call_seq2/TestAmbiguousTailCallSeq2.py
    lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/disambiguate_call_site/TestDisambiguateCallSite.py
    lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/disambiguate_paths_to_common_sink/TestDisambiguatePathsToCommonSink.py
    lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/disambiguate_tail_call_seq/TestDisambiguateTailCallSeq.py
    lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/inlining_and_tail_calls/TestInliningAndTailCalls.py
    lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/sbapi_support/TestTailCallFrameSBAPI.py
    lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/thread_step_out_message/TestArtificialFrameStepOutMessage.py
    lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/thread_step_out_or_return/TestSteppingOutWithArtificialFrames.py
    lldb-api :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/unambiguous_sequence/TestUnambiguousTailCalls.py

Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65410
2019-11-26 09:32:13 +05:00
Eric Christopher 8ff85ed905 As a follow-up to my initial mail to llvm-dev here's a first pass at the O1 described there.
This change doesn't include any change to move from selection dag to fast isel
and that will come with other numbers that should help inform that decision.
There also haven't been any real debuggability studies with this pipeline yet,
this is just the initial start done so that people could see it and we could start
tweaking after.

Test updates: Outside of the newpm tests most of the updates are coming from either
optimization passes not run anymore (and without a compelling argument at the moment)
that were largely used for canonicalization in clang.

Original post:

http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131494.html

Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65410
2019-11-25 17:16:46 -08:00
Tom Stellard ab411801b8 [cmake] Explicitly mark libraries defined in lib/ as "Component Libraries"
Summary:
Most libraries are defined in the lib/ directory but there are also a
few libraries defined in tools/ e.g. libLLVM, libLTO.  I'm defining
"Component Libraries" as libraries defined in lib/ that may be included in
libLLVM.so.  Explicitly marking the libraries in lib/ as component
libraries allows us to remove some fragile checks that attempt to
differentiate between lib/ libraries and tools/ libraires:

1. In tools/llvm-shlib, because
llvm_map_components_to_libnames(LIB_NAMES "all") returned a list of
all libraries defined in the whole project, there was custom code
needed to filter out libraries defined in tools/, none of which should
be included in libLLVM.so.  This code assumed that any library
defined as static was from lib/ and everything else should be
excluded.

With this change, llvm_map_components_to_libnames(LIB_NAMES, "all")
only returns libraries that have been added to the LLVM_COMPONENT_LIBS
global cmake property, so this custom filtering logic can be removed.
Doing this also fixes the build with BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON
and LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON.

2. There was some code in llvm_add_library that assumed that
libraries defined in lib/ would not have LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS or
ARG_LINK_COMPONENTS set.  This is only true because libraries
defined lib lib/ use LLVMBuild.txt and don't set these values.
This code has been fixed now to check if the library has been
explicitly marked as a component library, which should now make it
easier to remove LLVMBuild at some point in the future.

I have tested this patch on Windows, MacOS and Linux with release builds
and the following combinations of CMake options:

- "" (No options)
- -DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON
- -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON
- -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON
- -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON -DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON
- -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON

Reviewers: beanz, smeenai, compnerd, phosek

Reviewed By: beanz

Subscribers: wuzish, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, mgorny, mehdi_amini, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, steven_wu, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, dexonsmith, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, dang, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70179
2019-11-21 10:48:08 -08:00
Francesco Petrogalli d6de5f12d4 [SVFS] Inject TLI Mappings in VFABI attribute.
This patch introduces a function pass to inject the scalar-to-vector
mappings stored in the TargetLIbraryInfo (TLI) into the Vector
Function ABI (VFABI) variants attribute.

The test is testing the injection for three vector libraries supported
by the TLI (Accelerate, SVML, MASSV).

The pass does not change any of the analysis associated to the
function.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70107
2019-11-15 18:42:56 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 4c1a1d3cf9 Add missing includes needed to prune LLVMContext.h include, NFC
These are a pre-requisite to removing #include "llvm/Support/Options.h"
from LLVMContext.h: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70280
2019-11-14 15:23:15 -08:00
Guozhi Wei cecc0d27ad [NewPM] Add an SROA pass after loop unroll
If there is a small local array accessed in a loop, SROA can't handle memory
accesses with variant offset inside a loop, after the loop is fully unrolled,
all memory accesses to the array are with fixed offset, so now they can be
processed by SROA. But there is no more SROA passes after loop unroll. This
patch add an SROA pass after loop unroll to handle this pattern.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68593
2019-11-01 14:59:08 -07:00
Saleem Abdulrasool 418d1ea555 PM: silence `-Wpessimizing-move` from GCC 9.2.1 (NFC)
Remove the explicit move enabling NVRO.
2019-10-27 18:33:09 -04:00
Eric Christopher c3649a0871 In the new pass manager use PTO.LoopUnrolling to determine when and how
we will unroll loops. Also comment a few occasions where we need to
know whether or not we're forcing the unwinder or not.

The default before and after this patch is for LoopUnroll to be enabled,
and for it to use a cost model to determine whether to unroll the loop
(`OnlyWhenForced = false`). Before this patch, disabling loop unroll
would not run the LoopUnroll pass. After this patch, the LoopUnroll pass
is being run, but it restricts unrolling to only the loops marked by a
pragma (`OnlyWhenForced = true`).

In addition, this patch disables the UnrollAndJam pass when disabling unrolling.

Testcase is in clang because it's controlling how the loop optimizer
is being set up and there's no other way to trigger the behavior.

llvm-svn: 374838
2019-10-14 22:56:07 +00:00
Joerg Sonnenberger 9681ea9560 Reapply r374743 with a fix for the ocaml binding
Add a pass to lower is.constant and objectsize intrinsics

This pass lowers is.constant and objectsize intrinsics not simplified by
earlier constant folding, i.e. if the object given is not constant or if
not using the optimized pass chain. The result is recursively simplified
and constant conditionals are pruned, so that dead blocks are removed
even for -O0. This allows inline asm blocks with operand constraints to
work all the time.

The new pass replaces the existing lowering in the codegen-prepare pass
and fallbacks in SDAG/GlobalISEL and FastISel. The latter now assert
on the intrinsics.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65280

llvm-svn: 374784
2019-10-14 16:15:14 +00:00
Dmitri Gribenko 1a21f98ac3 Revert "Add a pass to lower is.constant and objectsize intrinsics"
This reverts commit r374743. It broke the build with Ocaml enabled:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/builds/19218

llvm-svn: 374768
2019-10-14 12:22:48 +00:00
Joerg Sonnenberger e4300c392d Add a pass to lower is.constant and objectsize intrinsics
This pass lowers is.constant and objectsize intrinsics not simplified by
earlier constant folding, i.e. if the object given is not constant or if
not using the optimized pass chain. The result is recursively simplified
and constant conditionals are pruned, so that dead blocks are removed
even for -O0. This allows inline asm blocks with operand constraints to
work all the time.

The new pass replaces the existing lowering in the codegen-prepare pass
and fallbacks in SDAG/GlobalISEL and FastISel. The latter now assert
on the intrinsics.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65280

llvm-svn: 374743
2019-10-13 23:00:15 +00:00
Vitaly Buka b46dd6e92a Insert module constructors in a module pass
Summary:
If we insert them from function pass some analysis may be missing or invalid.
Fixes PR42877.

Reviewers: eugenis, leonardchan

Reviewed By: leonardchan

Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68832

> llvm-svn: 374481
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka@google.com>

llvm-svn: 374527
2019-10-11 08:47:03 +00:00
Nico Weber d38332981f Revert 374481 "[tsan,msan] Insert module constructors in a module pass"
CodeGen/sanitizer-module-constructor.c fails on mac and windows, see e.g.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc/builds/11424

llvm-svn: 374503
2019-10-11 02:44:20 +00:00
Vitaly Buka 5c72aa232e [tsan,msan] Insert module constructors in a module pass
Summary:
If we insert them from function pass some analysis may be missing or invalid.
Fixes PR42877.

Reviewers: eugenis, leonardchan

Reviewed By: leonardchan

Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68832

llvm-svn: 374481
2019-10-10 23:49:10 +00:00
Yuanfang Chen cc382cf727 [NewPM] Port MachineModuleInfo to the new pass manager.
Existing clients are converted to use MachineModuleInfoWrapperPass. The
new interface is for defining a new pass manager API in CodeGen.

Reviewers: fedor.sergeev, philip.pfaffe, chandlerc, arsenm

Reviewed By: arsenm, fedor.sergeev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64183

llvm-svn: 373240
2019-09-30 17:54:50 +00:00
Thomas Preud'homme 5f738940b5 Regex: Make "match" and "sub" const member functions
Summary:
The Regex "match" and "sub" member functions were previously not "const"
because they wrote to the "error" member variable. This commit removes
those assignments, and instead assumes that the validity of the regex
is already known after the initial compilation of the regular
expression. As a result, these member functions were possible to make
"const". This makes it easier to do things like pre-compile Regexes
up-front, and makes "match" and "sub" thread-safe. The error status is
now returned as an optional output, which also makes the API of "match"
and "sub" more consistent with each other.

Also, some uses of Regex that could be refactored to be const were made const.

Patch by Nicolas Guillemot

Reviewers: jankratochvil, thopre

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67241

llvm-svn: 372764
2019-09-24 14:42:36 +00:00
Serguei Katkov a44768858c [Unroll] Add an option to control complete unrolling
Add an ability to specify the max full unroll count for LoopUnrollPass pass
in pass options.

Reviewers: fhahn, fedor.sergeev
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
Subscribers: hiraditya, zzheng, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67701

llvm-svn: 372305
2019-09-19 06:57:29 +00:00
Bardia Mahjour db800c267d Data Dependence Graph Basics
Summary:
This is the first patch in a series of patches that will implement data dependence graph in LLVM. Many of the ideas used in this implementation are based on the following paper:
D. J. Kuck, R. H. Kuhn, D. A. Padua, B. Leasure, and M. Wolfe (1981). DEPENDENCE GRAPHS AND COMPILER OPTIMIZATIONS.
This patch contains support for a basic DDGs containing only atomic nodes (one node for each instruction). The edges are two fold: def-use edges and memory-dependence edges.
The implementation takes a list of basic-blocks and only considers dependencies among instructions in those basic blocks. Any dependencies coming into or going out of instructions that do not belong to those basic blocks are ignored.

The algorithm for building the graph involves the following steps in order:

  1. For each instruction in the range of basic blocks to consider, create an atomic node in the resulting graph.
  2. For each node in the graph establish def-use edges to/from other nodes in the graph.
  3. For each pair of nodes containing memory instruction(s) create memory edges between them. This part of the algorithm goes through the instructions in lexicographical order and creates edges in reverse order if the sink of the dependence occurs before the source of it.

Authored By: bmahjour

Reviewer: Meinersbur, fhahn, myhsu, xtian, dmgreen, kbarton, jdoerfert

Reviewed By: Meinersbur, fhahn, myhsu

Subscribers: ychen, arphaman, simoll, a.elovikov, mgorny, hiraditya, jfb, wuzish, llvm-commits, jsji, Whitney, etiotto

Tag: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65350

llvm-svn: 372238
2019-09-18 17:43:45 +00:00
Bardia Mahjour 6476d7cf0b Revert "Data Dependence Graph Basics"
This reverts commit c98ec60993, which broke the sphinx-docs build.

llvm-svn: 372168
2019-09-17 19:22:01 +00:00
Bardia Mahjour c98ec60993 Data Dependence Graph Basics
Summary:
This is the first patch in a series of patches that will implement data dependence graph in LLVM. Many of the ideas used in this implementation are based on the following paper:
D. J. Kuck, R. H. Kuhn, D. A. Padua, B. Leasure, and M. Wolfe (1981). DEPENDENCE GRAPHS AND COMPILER OPTIMIZATIONS.
This patch contains support for a basic DDGs containing only atomic nodes (one node for each instruction). The edges are two fold: def-use edges and memory-dependence edges.
The implementation takes a list of basic-blocks and only considers dependencies among instructions in those basic blocks. Any dependencies coming into or going out of instructions that do not belong to those basic blocks are ignored.

The algorithm for building the graph involves the following steps in order:

  1. For each instruction in the range of basic blocks to consider, create an atomic node in the resulting graph.
  2. For each node in the graph establish def-use edges to/from other nodes in the graph.
  3. For each pair of nodes containing memory instruction(s) create memory edges between them. This part of the algorithm goes through the instructions in lexicographical order and creates edges in reverse order if the sink of the dependence occurs before the source of it.

Authored By: bmahjour

Reviewer: Meinersbur, fhahn, myhsu, xtian, dmgreen, kbarton, jdoerfert

Reviewed By: Meinersbur, fhahn, myhsu

Subscribers: ychen, arphaman, simoll, a.elovikov, mgorny, hiraditya, jfb, wuzish, llvm-commits, jsji, Whitney, etiotto

Tag: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65350

llvm-svn: 372162
2019-09-17 18:55:44 +00:00
Teresa Johnson 9c27b59cec Change TargetLibraryInfo analysis passes to always require Function
Summary:
This is the first change to enable the TLI to be built per-function so
that -fno-builtin* handling can be migrated to use function attributes.
See discussion on D61634 for background. This is an enabler for fixing
handling of these options for LTO, for example.

This change should not affect behavior, as the provided function is not
yet used to build a specifically per-function TLI, but rather enables
that migration.

Most of the changes were very mechanical, e.g. passing a Function to the
legacy analysis pass's getTLI interface, or in Module level cases,
adding a callback. This is similar to the way the per-function TTI
analysis works.

There was one place where we were looking for builtins but not in the
context of a specific function. See FindCXAAtExit in
lib/Transforms/IPO/GlobalOpt.cpp. I'm somewhat concerned my workaround
could provide the wrong behavior in some corner cases. Suggestions
welcome.

Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel

Subscribers: arsenm, dschuff, jvesely, nhaehnle, mehdi_amini, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, eraman, aheejin, steven_wu, george.burgess.iv, dexonsmith, jfb, asbirlea, gchatelet, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66428

llvm-svn: 371284
2019-09-07 03:09:36 +00:00
Denis Bakhvalov 58f172f05a [MergedLoadStoreMotion] Sink stores to BB with more than 2 predecessors
If we have:

bb5:
  br i1 %arg3, label %bb6, label %bb7

bb6:
  %tmp = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %arg1, i64 2
  store i32 3, i32* %tmp, align 4
  br label %bb9

bb7:
  %tmp8 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %arg1, i64 2
  store i32 3, i32* %tmp8, align 4
  br label %bb9

bb9:  ; preds = %bb4, %bb6, %bb7
  ...

We can't sink stores directly into bb9.
This patch creates new BB that is successor of %bb6 and %bb7
and sinks stores into that block.

SplitFooterBB is the parameter to the pass that controls
that behavior.

Change-Id: I7fdf50a772b84633e4b1b860e905bf7e3e29940f
Differential: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66234
llvm-svn: 371089
2019-09-05 17:00:32 +00:00
Leonard Chan eca01b031d [NewPM][Sancov] Make Sancov a Module Pass instead of 2 Passes
This patch merges the sancov module and funciton passes into one module pass.

The reason for this is because we ran into an out of memory error when
attempting to run asan fuzzer on some protobufs (pc.cc files). I traced the OOM
error to the destructor of SanitizerCoverage where we only call
appendTo[Compiler]Used which calls appendToUsedList. I'm not sure where precisely
in appendToUsedList causes the OOM, but I am able to confirm that it's calling
this function *repeatedly* that causes the OOM. (I hacked sancov a bit such that
I can still create and destroy a new sancov on every function run, but only call
appendToUsedList after all functions in the module have finished. This passes, but
when I make it such that appendToUsedList is called on every sancov destruction,
we hit OOM.)

I don't think the OOM is from just adding to the SmallSet and SmallVector inside
appendToUsedList since in either case for a given module, they'll have the same
max size. I suspect that when the existing llvm.compiler.used global is erased,
the memory behind it isn't freed. I could be wrong on this though.

This patch works around the OOM issue by just calling appendToUsedList at the
end of every module run instead of function run. The same amount of constants
still get added to llvm.compiler.used, abd we make the pass usage and logic
simpler by not having any inter-pass dependencies.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66988

llvm-svn: 370971
2019-09-04 20:30:29 +00:00
Alina Sbirlea 7425179fee [LoopPassManager + MemorySSA] Only enable use of MemorySSA for LPMs known to preserve it.
Summary:
Add a flag to the FunctionToLoopAdaptor that allows enabling MemorySSA only for the loop pass managers that are known to preserve it.

If an LPM is known to have only loop transforms that *all* preserve MemorySSA, then use MemorySSA if `EnableMSSALoopDependency` is set.
If an LPM has loop passes that do not preserve MemorySSA, then the flag passed is `false`, regardless of the value of `EnableMSSALoopDependency`.

When using a custom loop pass pipeline via `passes=...`, use keyword `loop` vs `loop-mssa` to use MemorySSA in that LPM. If a loop that does not preserve MemorySSA is added while using the `loop-mssa` keyword, that's an error.

Add the new `loop-mssa` keyword to a few tests where a difference occurs when enabling MemorySSA.

Reviewers: chandlerc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66376

llvm-svn: 369548
2019-08-21 17:00:57 +00:00
Whitney Tsang dd3b6498b0 Title: Loop Cache Analysis
Summary: Implement a new analysis to estimate the number of cache lines
required by a loop nest.
The analysis is largely based on the following paper:

Compiler Optimizations for Improving Data Locality
By: Steve Carr, Katherine S. McKinley, Chau-Wen Tseng
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/mckinley/papers/asplos-1994.pdf
The analysis considers temporal reuse (accesses to the same memory
location) and spatial reuse (accesses to memory locations within a cache
line). For simplicity the analysis considers memory accesses in the
innermost loop in a loop nest, and thus determines the number of cache
lines used when the loop L in loop nest LN is placed in the innermost
position.

The result of the analysis can be used to drive several transformations.
As an example, loop interchange could use it determine which loops in a
perfect loop nest should be interchanged to maximize cache reuse.
Similarly, loop distribution could be enhanced to take into
consideration cache reuse between arrays when distributing a loop to
eliminate vectorization inhibiting dependencies.

The general approach taken to estimate the number of cache lines used by
the memory references in the inner loop of a loop nest is:

Partition memory references that exhibit temporal or spatial reuse into
reference groups.
For each loop L in the a loop nest LN: a. Compute the cost of the
reference group b. Compute the 'cache cost' of the loop nest by summing
up the reference groups costs
For further details of the algorithm please refer to the paper.
Authored By: etiotto
Reviewers: hfinkel, Meinersbur, jdoerfert, kbarton, bmahjour, anemet,
fhahn
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: reames, nemanjai, MaskRay, wuzish, Hahnfeld, xusx595,
venkataramanan.kumar.llvm, greened, dmgreen, steleman, fhahn, xblvaOO,
Whitney, mgorny, hiraditya, mgrang, jsji, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63459

llvm-svn: 368439
2019-08-09 13:56:29 +00:00