Commit Graph

68 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Roman Lebedev a5baf86744 AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
  * All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
  * Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
  They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...

To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!

# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark                                                                                        Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0607         -0.0604           234           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0630         -0.0626           233           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            +0.2581         +0.2587             1             2             1             2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0770         -0.0767           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0767         -0.0763           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            -0.4170         -0.4156             1             0             1             0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0271         -0.0270           463           450           463           450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0093         -0.0093           453           449           453           449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7280         -0.7280            13             4            13             4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0065         -0.0065           569           565           569           565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0077         -0.0077           569           564           569           564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +1.0077         +1.0068             2             5             2             5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0220          0.0199      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0006         +0.0007           312           312           312           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         +0.0031         +0.0032           311           312           311           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7069         -0.7072             4             1             4             1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0015         -0.0015           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0010         -0.0011           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1486         -0.1456             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.6139          0.8766      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0008         -0.0005            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0006         -0.0002            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1467         -0.1390             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0137          0.0137      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0002         +0.0002           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0015         -0.0014           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +3.3687         +3.3587             0             2             0             2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.4041          0.3933      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      +0.0004         +0.0004            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0000         -0.0000            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +0.1947         +0.1995             0             0             0             0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                              0.0074          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                               -0.0092         +0.0074           547           542            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                             -0.0054         +0.0115           544           541            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                             -0.4086         -0.3486             8             5             0             0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.3320          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         +0.0015         +0.0204           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                                       +0.0001         +0.0203           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +0.2259         +0.2023             1             1             0             0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       -0.0209         -0.0179            96            94            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median                                     -0.0182         -0.0155            95            93            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.6164         -0.2703             2             1             2             1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      -0.0098         -0.0098           176           175           176           175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0126         -0.0126           176           174           176           174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +6.9789         +6.9157             0             2             0             2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                 0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                  -0.0237         -0.0238           474           463           474           463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median                -0.0267         -0.0267           473           461           473           461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                +0.7179         +0.7178             3             5             3             5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                   0.6837          0.6554      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean                    -0.0014         -0.0013          1375          1373          1375          1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median                  +0.0018         +0.0019          1371          1374          1371          1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                  -0.7457         -0.7382            11             3            10             3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         -0.0080         -0.0289            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                       -0.0070         -0.0287            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +1.0977         +0.6614             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                       0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                        +0.0132         +0.0967            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                      +0.0132         +0.0956            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                      -0.0407         -0.1695             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       +0.0331         +0.1307            13            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                     +0.0430         +0.1373            12            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.9006         -0.8847             1             0             0             0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                            0.0016          0.0010      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                             -0.0023         -0.0024           395           394           395           394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median                                           -0.0029         -0.0030           395           394           395           393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                           -0.0275         -0.0375             1             1             1             1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0232          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0047         +0.0039           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0050         +0.0037           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.0599         -0.2683             1             1             0             0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                           +0.0206         +0.0207           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                         +0.0204         +0.0205           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                         +0.2155         +0.2212             1             1             1             1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                          -0.0109         -0.0108           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                        -0.0104         -0.0103           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                        -0.4919         -0.4800             0             0             0             0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0149         -0.0147           220           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0173         -0.0169           221           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        +1.0337         +1.0341             1             3             1             3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0001          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0019         -0.0019           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0021         -0.0021           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        -0.4441         -0.4282             0             0             0             0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                0.0000          0.4263      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                 +0.0258         -0.0006            81            83            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                               +0.0235         -0.0011            81            82            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                               +0.1634         +0.1070             1             1             0             0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.

llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}

Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh

Reviewed By: andreadb

Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-27 20:46:30 +00:00
Roman Lebedev a51921877a [NFC][X86] Baseline tests for AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Scheduler model
Adding the baseline tests in a preparatory NFC commit,
so that the actual commit shows the *diff*.

Yes, i'm aware that a few of these codegen-based sched tests
are testing wrong instructions, i will fix that afterwards.

For https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345462
2018-10-27 20:36:11 +00:00
Craig Topper ec4b75f47a [X86] Type legalize v2f32 stores by widening to v4f32, casting to v2f64, extracting f64 and storing.
Summary: This is similar to what D52528 did for loads. It should match what generic type legalization does in 64-bit mode where it uses a v2i64 cast and an i64 store.

Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53173

llvm-svn: 344470
2018-10-14 03:36:27 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 90947214f3 [X86][SSE] Try to make MOVLPS/MOVHPS(+PD) instructions SimplifyDemandedElts proof
Fix for D52912 which was simplifying MOVLPS/MOVHPS(+PD) instructions as the tests were only touching one of the vector halfs

llvm-svn: 343858
2018-10-05 15:50:18 +00:00
Clement Courbet 8171bd8e0f [X86][Sched] Add zero idiom sched data to the SNB model.
Summary:
On SNB, renamer-based zeroing does not work for:
 - 16 and 8-bit GPRs[1].
 - MMX [2].
 - ANDN variants [3]

[1] echo 'sub %ax, %ax' | /tmp/llvm-exegesis -mode=uops -snippets-file=-
[2] echo 'pxor %mm0, %mm0' | /tmp/llvm-exegesis -mode=uops -snippets-file=-
[3] echo 'andnps %xmm0, %xmm0' | /tmp/llvm-exegesis -mode=uops -snippets-file=-

Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb

Subscribers: gbedwell, craig.topper, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52358

llvm-svn: 342736
2018-09-21 14:07:20 +00:00
Clement Courbet 0d9da88d18 [X86] Fix NOOP sched overrides on BDW/HSW/SKL.
Summary: Noop certainly does not use resources.

Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, andreadb

Subscribers: gbedwell, llvm-commits, gchatelet

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48028

llvm-svn: 334927
2018-06-18 06:48:22 +00:00
Clement Courbet 7db69cc08a [X86] Fix skylake server scheduling info.
Summary:
This fixes most of the scheduling info for SKX vector operations.
I had to split a lot of the YMM/ZMM classes into separate classes for YMM and ZMM.

The before/after llvm-exegesis analysis are in the phabricator diff.

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47721

llvm-svn: 334407
2018-06-11 14:37:53 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 59313be8d3 [CodeGen] assume max/default throughput for unspecified instructions
This is a fix for the problem arising in D47374 (PR37678):
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37678

We may not have throughput info because it's not specified in the model 
or it's not available with variant scheduling, so assume that those
instructions can execute/complete at max-issue-width.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47723

llvm-svn: 334055
2018-06-05 23:34:45 +00:00
Andrea Di Biagio 39e5a5695f [RFC][patch 3/3] Add support for variant scheduling classes in llvm-mca.
This patch is the last of a sequence of three patches related to LLVM-dev RFC
"MC support for variant scheduling classes".
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123181.html

This fixes PR36672.

The main goal of this patch is to teach llvm-mca how to solve variant scheduling
classes.  This patch does that, plus it adds new variant scheduling classes to
the BtVer2 scheduling model to identify so-called zero-idioms (i.e. so-called
dependency breaking instructions that are known to generate zero, and that are
optimized out in hardware at register renaming stage).

Without the BtVer2 change, this patch would not have had any meaningful tests.
This patch is effectively the union of two changes:
 1) a change that teaches llvm-mca how to resolve variant scheduling classes.
 2) a change to the BtVer2 scheduling model that allows us to special-case
    packed XOR zero-idioms (this partially fixes PR36671).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47374 

llvm-svn: 333909
2018-06-04 15:43:09 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 3ecb0b80f6 [X86][BtVer2] Partial vector stores (inc MMX) have a 2cy latency
llvm-svn: 332722
2018-05-18 14:22:22 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim f3ae50fca2 [X86] Split WriteFRcp/WriteFRsqrt/WriteFSqrt schedule classes
WriteFRcp/WriteFRsqrt are split to support scalar, XMM and YMM/ZMM instructions.

WriteFSqrt is split into single/double/long-double sizes and scalar, XMM, YMM and ZMM instructions.

This removes all InstrRW overrides for these instructions.

NOTE: There were a couple of typos in the Znver1 model - notably a 1cy throughput for SQRT that is highly unlikely and doesn't tally with Agner.

NOTE: I had to add Agner's numbers for several targets for WriteFSqrt80.
llvm-svn: 331629
2018-05-07 11:50:44 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 8fc2b49620 [X86][Atom] Convert Atom scheduler model to SchedRW (PR32431)
Atom is the only x86 target that still uses schedule itineraries, if we can remove this then we can begin the work on removing x86 itineraries. I've also found that it will help with PR36550.

I've focussed on matching the existing model as closely as possible (relying on the schedule tests), PR36895 indicated a lot of these were incorrect but we can just as easily fix these after this patch as before. Hopefully we can get llvm-exegesis to help here,

There are a few instructions that rely on itinerary scheduling (mainly push/pop/return) of multiple resource stages, but I don't think any of these are show stoppers.

There are also a few codegen changes that seem related to the post-ra scheduler acting a little differently, I haven't tracked these down but they don't seem critical.

NOTE: I don't have access to any Atom hardware, so this hasn't been tested in the wild.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45486

llvm-svn: 329837
2018-04-11 18:23:01 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 6f97328b1f [X86][SSE] Tweak cmpps schedule test so that it works properly with just sse1
movhps/movlps test are still broken so we can't disable sse2 yet

llvm-svn: 329802
2018-04-11 13:15:36 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 6131286553 [X86][SSE] Fix f32 mul/div itinerary groups typo
The RM folded itineraries were incorrectly using the f64 version.

llvm-svn: 329556
2018-04-09 10:45:53 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 86588fc809 [X86][Btver2] Add vector extract costs
llvm-svn: 329524
2018-04-08 11:26:26 +00:00
Craig Topper c6bb36a3d0 [X86] Remove some InstRWs for plain store instructions on Sandy Bridge.
We were forcing the latency of these instructions to 5 cycles, but every other scheduler model had them as 1 cycle. I'm sure I didn't get everything, but this gets a big portion.

llvm-svn: 329339
2018-04-05 20:04:06 +00:00
Craig Topper 15303dda0d [X86] Revert r329251-329254
It's failing on the bots and I'm not sure why.

This reverts:

[X86] Synchronize the SchedRW on some EVEX instructions with their VEX equivalents.
[X86] Use WriteFShuffle256 for VEXTRACTF128 to be consistent with VEXTRACTI128 which uses WriteShuffle256.
[X86] Remove some InstRWs for plain store instructions on Sandy Bridge.
[X86] Auto-generate complete checks. NFC

llvm-svn: 329256
2018-04-05 05:19:36 +00:00
Craig Topper 5c36557426 [X86] Auto-generate complete checks. NFC
llvm-svn: 329251
2018-04-05 04:41:59 +00:00
Craig Topper 96729cd64b [X86][Silvermont] Use correct latency and throughput information for divide and square root in the scheduler model.
Data taken from Table 16-17 in the Intel Optimization Manual.

llvm-svn: 328962
2018-04-02 06:34:16 +00:00
Craig Topper 8104f266a4 [X86] Correct the throughput for divide instructions in Sandy Bridge/Haswell/Broadwell/Skylake scheduler models.
Fixes most of PR36898. Still need to fix the 512-bit instructions, but Agner's tables don't have those.

llvm-svn: 328960
2018-04-02 05:33:28 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim a2f26788a3 [X86] Add WriteFMOVMSK/WriteVecMOVMSK/WriteMMXMOVMSK scheduler classes
Currently MOVMSK instructions use the WriteVecLogic class, which is a very poor choice given that MOVMSK involves a SSE->GPR transfer.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44924

llvm-svn: 328664
2018-03-27 20:38:54 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 86ea53123d [X86][Btver2] Add CVTSI2SD/CVTSI2SS scheduler costs
We still need to account for how Jaguar passes data from GPR -> XMM, which isn't as clean as XMM -> GPR.....

llvm-svn: 328551
2018-03-26 17:02:02 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 0b73b29388 [X86][Btver2] Add CVTSD2SI/CVTSS2SI scheduler costs
Account for the "+i" integer pipe transfer cost (1cy use of JALU0 for GPR PRF write)

This also adds missing vcvttss2si tests 

llvm-svn: 328505
2018-03-26 15:30:47 +00:00
Craig Topper 6f28d3c954 [X86] Fix the SchedRW for intrinsic register form of SQRT/RCP/RSQRT.
llvm-svn: 328474
2018-03-26 05:05:12 +00:00
Craig Topper cdfcf8ecda [X86] Merge the SSE and AVX versions of fp divs and sqrts in the SandyBridge/Haswell/Broadwell/Skylake scheduler models.
I've used Agner's data as best I could to get the values to converge on.

llvm-svn: 328473
2018-03-26 05:05:10 +00:00
Craig Topper fbf2d850e3 [X86] Add itinerary to intrinsic version of sqrtss, rcpss, and rsqrtss instructions.
llvm-svn: 328472
2018-03-26 04:20:36 +00:00
Craig Topper 15fef89ad9 [X86] Move (v)movss to port 5 only for Skylake. Move (v)movups/d to port 015 for Skylake.
This matches Agner's data and is consistent with what the EVEX instructions were doing on SKX.

llvm-svn: 328465
2018-03-25 23:40:56 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 91fe24b8cf [X86][SSE] Ensure we're testing both non-VEX/VEX variants of SSE instructions on AVX targets
And ensure we don't use later instruction sets in SSE schedule tests

llvm-svn: 328423
2018-03-24 14:51:52 +00:00
Craig Topper fae4173b47 [X86] Add VEXTRB/W/D/Q to Zen scheduler model.
The SSE versions were present, but not the VEX version.

llvm-svn: 328290
2018-03-23 06:41:36 +00:00
Craig Topper 58afb4ea58 [X86][SkylakeClient] Fix a bunch of instructions that were incorrectly assigned Port015 instead of Port01.
The VEC ADD and VEC MUL units aren't present on port 5 on SkylakeClient.

llvm-svn: 328241
2018-03-22 21:10:07 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 05daae75ad [x86] put nops into the WriteNop class and customize for Jaguar
1. Given that we already have a classification bucket with 'nop' in the name, 
   that's where 'nop' belongs. Right now, it's only used for prefix bytes and 'pause'.
2. Make the latency of this class '1' for Jaguar to tell the scheduler (and presumably 
   llvm-mca) how to model the resource requirements better even though a nop has no 
   dependencies.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44608

llvm-svn: 327853
2018-03-19 14:26:50 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim fb7aa57bf1 [X86][SSE] Introduce Float/Vector WriteMove, WriteLoad and Writetore scheduler classes
As discussed on D44428 and PR36726, this patch splits off WriteFMove/WriteVecMove, WriteFLoad/WriteVecLoad and WriteFStore/WriteVecStore scheduler classes to permit vectors to be handled separately from gpr/scalar types.

I've minimised the diff here by only moving various basic SSE/AVX vector instructions across - we can fix the rest when called for. This does fix the MOVDQA vs MOVAPS/MOVAPD discrepancies mentioned on D44428.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44471

llvm-svn: 327630
2018-03-15 14:45:30 +00:00
Sanjay Patel bb45cc126d [x86] add test for WriteZero sched class instructions; NFC
Nops should have zero latency because there is no result.
Idioms like 'xorps xmm0, xmm0' may have zero latency because 
they are handled without using an execution unit.

llvm-svn: 327435
2018-03-13 19:20:01 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 8fb1dd8a1d [X86][SSE] Don't chain shuffles together in schedule tests
This is necessary to prevent the shuffles from being combined/simplified in an upcoming patch.

llvm-svn: 324178
2018-02-03 21:20:19 +00:00
Craig Topper 002657731b [X86] Move 'Int_' to the end of the name of the VCOMISS/VUCOMISS and instructions to get them picked up by the scheduler model regexs.
All other intrinsic instructions put the _Int on the end. This make these instructions consistent and gets the prefix instregexs in the scheduler models to pick them up.

llvm-svn: 323261
2018-01-23 21:37:51 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim a8e6b885bd [X86][BTVER2] Fix scheduling of VCMPSD/VCMPSS instructions
For some reason they don't have a trailing i like the packed equivalents.

llvm-svn: 322600
2018-01-16 22:15:41 +00:00
Andrew V. Tischenko e58c0c96b2 Update BTVER2 sched numbers for some AVX instructions (xmm version).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40067

llvm-svn: 322485
2018-01-15 14:21:11 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 0bd31a8360 [X86] Add PREFETCH schedule tests
llvm-svn: 320587
2017-12-13 15:12:02 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 1074eb225b Reapply "[X86] Flag BroadWell scheduler model as complete"
This reverts commit r320508, in effect re-applying r320308.  Simon has already
reverted the parts that caused the crash that motivated the revert in r320492.

llvm-svn: 320512
2017-12-12 19:11:31 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 81a4a02cbc Revert "[X86] Flag BroadWell scheduler model as complete"
This reverts commit r320308.  r320308 crashes LLC, please see the llvm-commits
thread for a reproducer.

llvm-svn: 320508
2017-12-12 18:40:58 +00:00
Craig Topper a0be5a06c1 [X86] Rename some instructions that start with Int_ to have the _Int at the end.
This matches AVX512 version and is more consistent overall. And improves our scheduler models.

In some cases this adds _Int to instructions that didn't have any Int_ before. It's a side effect of the adjustments made to some of the multiclasses.

llvm-svn: 320325
2017-12-10 19:47:56 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 1f8cfba0bb [X86] Flag BroadWell scheduler model as complete
Locally tag COPY as WriteMove, which has caused some reg-reg + reg-mem instruction tests to reorder.

llvm-svn: 320308
2017-12-10 13:49:51 +00:00
Craig Topper 391c6f9507 [X86] Fix bad regular expressions in the scheduler models. Question marks should be outside of multicharacter parenthesized expressions
If the question mark is inside the parentheses it only applies to the single character proceeding it.

I had to make a few additional cleanups to fix some duplicate warnings that were exposed by fixing this.

llvm-svn: 320279
2017-12-10 01:24:08 +00:00
Gadi Haber 2cf601f28f [X86][Haswell]: Updating the scheduling information for the Haswell subtarget.
Updated the scheduling information for the Haswell subtarget with the following changes:

Regrouped the instructions after adding appropriate load + store latencies.
Added scheduling for missing instructions such as the GATHER instrs.
The changes were made after revisiting the latencies impact of all memory uOps.

Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, craig.topper, apilipenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40021

Change-Id: Iaf6c1f5169add1552845a8a566af4e5a359217a7
llvm-svn: 320137
2017-12-08 09:48:44 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 7724b03cde [X86][SSE] Regenerate vpmovm2*/vpmov*2m avx512 schedule tests
llvm-svn: 319921
2017-12-06 18:47:37 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih 25528d6de7 [CodeGen] Unify MBB reference format in both MIR and debug output
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.

The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.

* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422

llvm-svn: 319665
2017-12-04 17:18:51 +00:00
Gadi Haber c9f2300652 [X86][SKX] Adding scheduling info of non-intrinsic + commutable SKX opcodes.
Updated the scheduling information of the SKX subtarget  in the file X86SchedSkylakeServer.td under lib/Target/X86 to:
1. add regular opcodes in addition to the suffixed "_Int" opcodes
2. add the (V)MAXCPD/MAXCPS/MAXCSD/MAXCSS/MINCPD/MINCPS/MINCSD/MINCSS
    instructions that are equivalent to their counterparts without the 'C' as they are part of a hack to
    make floating point min/max commutable under fast math.

Reviewers: zvi, RKSimon, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39833

Change-Id: Ie13702a5ce1b1a08af91ca637a52b6962881e7d6
llvm-svn: 318024
2017-11-13 08:42:07 +00:00
Craig Topper 692c8efe30 [X86] Don't use RCP14 and RSQRT14 for reciprocal estimations or for legacy SSE rcp/rsqrt intrinsics when AVX512 features are enabled.
Summary:
AVX512 added RCP14 and RSQRT instructions which improve accuracy over the legacy RCP and RSQRT instruction, but not enough accuracy to remove the need for a Newton Raphson refinement.

Currently we use these new instructions for the legacy packed SSE instrinics, but not the scalar instrinsics. And we use it for fast math optimization of division and reciprocal sqrt.

I think switching the legacy instrinsics maybe surprising to the user since it changes the answer based on which processor you're using regardless of any fastmath settings. It's also weird that we did something different between scalar and packed.

As far at the reciprocal estimation, I think it creates unnecessary deltas in our output behavior (and prevents EVEX->VEX). A little playing around with gcc and icc and godbolt suggest they don't change which instructions they use here.

This patch adds new X86ISD nodes for the RCP14/RSQRT14 and uses those for the new intrinsics. Leaving the old intrinsics to use the old instructions.

Going forward I think our focus should be on
-Supporting 512-bit vectors, which will have to use the RCP14/RSQRT14.
-Using RSQRT28/RCP28 to remove the Newton Raphson step on processors with AVX512ER
-Supporting double precision.

Reviewers: zvi, DavidKreitzer, RKSimon

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39583

llvm-svn: 317413
2017-11-04 18:26:41 +00:00
Andrew V. Tischenko 3c8bf5ec37 The patch updates sched numbers for YMM AVX instrs such as VMOVx, VORx, VXOR, VPERMILx, VBROADCASTx, etc.
PR32857 should be closed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39227

llvm-svn: 317196
2017-11-02 10:33:41 +00:00
Gadi Haber 323f2e1715 [X86][Broadwell] Added the instruction scheduling information for the Broadwell CPU.
Adding the scheduling information for the Browadwell (BDW) CPU target.

This patch adds the instruction scheduling information for the Broadwell (BDW) architecture target by adding the file X86SchedBroadwell.td located under the X86 Target.
We used the scheduling information retrieved from the Broadwell architects in order to create the file.
The scheduling information includes latency, number of micro-Ops and used ports by each BDW instruction.

The patch continues the scheduling replacement and insertion effort started with the SandyBridge (SNB) target in r310792, the Haswell (HSW) target in r311879, the SkylakeClient (SKL) target in rL313613 + rL315978 and the SkylakeServer (SKX) in rL315175.

Performance fluctuations may be expected due to code alignment effects.

Reviewers: zvi, RKSimon, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39054

Change-Id: If6f799e5ff60e1091c8d43b05ea78c53581bae01
llvm-svn: 316492
2017-10-24 20:19:47 +00:00