This is a direct port of the code from the X86 backend (r239486/r240361), which
uses the MachineCombiner to reassociate (floating-point) adds/muls to increase
ILP, to the PowerPC backend. The rationale is the same.
There is a lot of copy-and-paste here between the X86 code and the PowerPC
code, and we should extract at least some of this into CodeGen somewhere.
However, I don't want to do that until this code is enhanced to handle FMAs as
well. After that, we'll be in a better position to extract the common parts.
llvm-svn: 242279
If the source of the copy that defines the addend is a physical register, then
its existing live range may not extend to the FMA being mutated. Make sure we
extend the live range of the register to meet the FMA because it will become
its operand in this case.
I don't have an independent test case, but it will be exposed by change to be
committed shortly enabling the use of the machine combiner to do fadd/fmul
reassociation, and will be covered by one of the associated regression tests.
llvm-svn: 242278
MachineCombiner predicated its use of scheduling-based metrics on
hasInstrSchedModel(), but useful conclusions can be drawn from pipeline
itineraries as well. Almost all of the logic (except for resource tracking in
preservesResourceLen) can be used if we have an itinerary, so enable it in that
case as well.
This will be used by the PowerPC backend in an upcoming commit.
llvm-svn: 242277
Bitpatterns rejected by the decoder method of `MSR (immediate)` should be
decoded as the `extended MSR (register)` instruction.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7174
llvm-svn: 242276
When FixedLenDecoder matches an input bitpattern of form [01]+ with an
instruction bitpattern of form [01?]+ (where 0/1 are static bits and ? are
mixed/variable bits) it passes the input bitpattern to a specific instruction
decoder method which then makes a final decision whether the bitpattern is a
valid instruction or not. This means the decoder must handle all possible
values of the variable bits which sometimes leads to opcode rewrites in the
decoder method when the instructions are not fully orthogonal.
The patch provides a way for the decoder method to say that when it returns
Fail it does not necessarily mean the bitpattern is invalid, but rather that
the bitpattern is definitely not an instruction that is recognized by the
decoder method. The decoder can then try to match the input bitpattern with
other possible instruction bitpatterns.
For example, this allows to solve a situation on AArch64 where the `MSR
(immediate)` instruction has form:
1101 0101 0000 0??? 0100 ???? ???1 1111
but not all values of the ? bits are allowed. The rejected values should be
handled by the `extended MSR (register)` instruction:
1101 0101 000? ???? ???? ???? ???? ????
The decoder will first try to decode an input bitpattern that matches both
bitpatterns as `MSR (immediate)` but currently this puts the decoder method of
`MSR (immediate)` into a situation when it must be able to decode all possible
values of the ? bits, i.e. it would need to rewrite the instruction to `MSR
(register)` when it is not `MSR (immediate)`.
The patch allows to specify that the decoder method cannot determine if the
instruction is valid for all variable values. The decoder method can simply
return Fail when it knows it is definitely not `MSR (immediate)`. The decoder
will then backtrack the decoding and find that it can match the input
bitpattern with the more generic `MSR (register)` bitpattern too.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7174
llvm-svn: 242274
dejagnu.
I wonder if it would be useful to handle FileCheck prefixes specially?
Especially if we could get some error checking. Suggestions welcome.
Patches more welcome as I have no idea what I'm doing with vim
script....
llvm-svn: 242267
to intelligently wrap prose written in IR comment blocks. This has
bothered me for roughly ever, and my fellow IRC denziens convinced me to
fix it.
llvm-svn: 242266
The unsigned opcode argument here was the result of BinaryOperator->getOpcode().
That returns a BinaryOps enum which is more accurate than passing around an
unsigned.
llvm-svn: 242265
This code was checking if we are an ICmpInst or FCmpInst then throwing
unreachable if we are neither. We must be one or the other, so use a
cast on the FCmpInst case to ensure that we are that case. Then we can
avoid having an unreachable but still catch an error if we ever had another
subclass of CmpInst.
llvm-svn: 242264
Because thunks for dllimported symbols contain absolute addresses on x86,
they need to be relocated at load-time. This bug was a cause of crashes
in DLL initialization routines.
llvm-svn: 242259
During estimation of unrolling effect we should be able to propagate
constants through casts.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10207
llvm-svn: 242257
should send when detaching and leaving the remote process/system
halted. Previously only the 'D' initial char was sent, which
resumed the process like a normal detach.
llvm-svn: 242256
This code was breaking from the case statement if the getStoreSizeInBits()
value was not a multiple of 0. Given that the implementation returns
getStoreSize() * 8, it can only be a multiple of 8.
llvm-svn: 242255
The calls here were both to getStoreSizeInBits() which multiplies by 8.
We then immediately divided by 8. Calling getStoreSize() returns the
values we need without the extra arithmetic.
llvm-svn: 242254
This is useful when we want to do block frequency analysis
conditionally (e.g. only in PGO mode) but don't want to add
one more pass dependence.
Patch by congh.
Approved by dexonsmith.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11196
llvm-svn: 242248
-fapple-kext is an exception because calls will still go through
the vtable in that mode. Add a note to make the user aware of that.
PR: 23215
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10935
llvm-svn: 242246
Summary:
processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan was renamed to determineCalleeSaves and now takes a BitVector parameter as of rL242165, reviewed in http://reviews.llvm.org/D10909
WebAssembly is still marked as experimental and therefore doesn't build by default. It does, however, grep by default! I notice that processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan is still mentioned in a few comments and error messages, which I also fixed.
Reviewers: qcolombet, sunfish
Subscribers: jfb, dsanders, hfinkel, MatzeB, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11199
llvm-svn: 242242
Follow-up r235483, with the corresponding support in PPC. We use a regular call
for symbolic targets (because they're much cheaper than indirect calls).
llvm-svn: 242239
I am planning to add more nested classes inside RuntimePointerCheck so
all these triple-nesting would be hard to follow.
Also rename it to RuntimePointerChecking (i.e. append 'ing').
llvm-svn: 242218
We used to take the address specified as the direct target of the patchpoint
and did no TOC-pointer handling. This, however, as not all that useful,
because MCJIT tends to create a lot of modules, and they have their own TOC
sections. Thus, to call from the generated code to other generated code, you
really need to switch TOC pointers. Make this work as expected, and under
ELFv1, tread the address as the function descriptor address so that the correct
TOC pointer can be loaded.
llvm-svn: 242217
Hal Finkel