- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
before r69391: typedef redefinition is an error by default, but if
*either* the old or new definition are from a system header, we silence
it.
llvm-svn: 70177
as decimal, even if it starts with 0. Also, since things like 0x1 are
completely illegal, don't even bother using numericliteralparser for them.
llvm-svn: 69454
1. We had logic in sema to decide whether or not to emit the error
based on manually checking whether in a system header file.
2. we were allowing redefinitions of typedefs in class scope in C++
if in header file.
3. there was no way to force typedef redefinitions to be accepted
by the C compiler, which annoys me when stripping linemarkers out
of .i files.
The fix is to split the C++ class typedef redefinition path from the
C path, and change the C path to be a warning that normally maps to
error. This causes it to properly be ignored in system headers,
etc. and gives us a way to control it. Passing
-Wtypedef-redefinition now turns the error into a warning.
One behavior change is that we now diagnose cases where you redefine
a typedef in your .c file that was defined in a header file. This
seems like reasonable behavior, and the diagnostic now indicates that
it can be controlled with -Wtypedef-redefinition.
llvm-svn: 69391
line markers, including maintenance of the virtual include stack.
For something like this:
# 42 "bar.c" 1
# 142 "bar2.c" 1
#warning zappa
# 92 "bar.c" 2
#warning gonzo
# 102 "foo.c" 2
#warning bonkta
we now produce these three warnings:
#1:
In file included from foo.c:3:
In file included from bar.c:42:
bar2.c:143:2: warning: #warning zappa
#warning zappa
^
#2:
In file included from foo.c:3:
bar.c:92:2: warning: #warning gonzo
#warning gonzo
^
#3:
foo.c:102:2: warning: #warning bonkta
#warning bonkta
^
llvm-svn: 63722