We make the assumption in most of our constant folding code that a fp2int will target an integer of 128-bits or less, calling the APFloat::convertToInteger with only uint64_t[2] of raw bits for the result.
Fuzz testing (PR24662) showed that we don't handle other cases at all, resulting in stack overflows and all sorts of crashes.
This patch uses the APSInt version of APFloat::convertToInteger instead to better handle such cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31074
llvm-svn: 298226
If dominator tree is not calculated or is invalidated, set corresponding
pointer in the pass state to nullptr. Such pointer value will indicate
that operations with dominator tree are not allowed. In particular, it
allows to skip verification for such pass state. The dominator tree is
not calculated if the machine dominator pass was skipped, it occures in
the case of entities with linkage available_externally.
The change fixes some test fails observed when expensive checks
are enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29280
llvm-svn: 296742
Fixes PR 31921
Summary:
Predicateinfo requires an ugly workaround to try to avoid literal
struct types due to the intrinsic mangling not being implemented.
This workaround actually does not work in all cases (you can hit the
assert by bootstrapping with -print-predicateinfo), and can't be made
to work without DFS'ing the type (IE copying getMangledStr and using a
version that detects if it would crash).
Rather than do that, i just implemented the mangling. It seems
simple, since they are unified structurally.
Looking at the overloaded-mangling testcase we have, it actually turns
out the gc intrinsics will *also* crash if you try to use a literal
struct. Thus, the testcase added fails before this patch, and works
after, without needing to resort to predicateinfo.
Reviewers: chandlerc, davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29925
llvm-svn: 295253
There are about 3 underlying bugs causing the tests to fail.
On top of that, some tests just we're 'generic' enough. i.e. 32-bit
registers.
llvm-svn: 294434
If dominator tree has no roots, the pass that calculates it is
likely to be skipped. It occures, for instance, in the case of
entities with linkage available_externally. Do not run tree
verification in such case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28767
llvm-svn: 293033
Running tests with expensive checks enabled exhibits some problems with
verification of pass results.
First, the pass verification may require results of analysis that are not
available. For instance, verification of loop info requires results of dominator
tree analysis. A pass may be marked as conserving loop info but does not need to
be dependent on DominatorTreePass. When a pass manager tries to verify that loop
info is valid, it needs dominator tree, but corresponding analysis may be
already destroyed as no user of it remained.
Another case is a pass that is skipped. For instance, entities with linkage
available_externally do not need code generation and such passes are skipped for
them. In this case result verification must also be skipped.
To solve these problems this change introduces a special flag to the Pass
structure to mark passes that have valid results. If this flag is reset,
verifications dependent on the pass result are skipped.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27190
llvm-svn: 291882
Re-apply this patch, hopefully I will get away without any warnings
in the constructor now.
This patch removes the MachineFunctionAnalysis. Instead we keep a
map from IR Function to MachineFunction in the MachineModuleInfo.
This allows the insertion of ModulePasses into the codegen pipeline
without breaking it because the MachineFunctionAnalysis gets dropped
before a module pass.
Peak memory should stay unchanged without a ModulePass in the codegen
pipeline: Previously the MachineFunction was freed at the end of a codegen
function pipeline because the MachineFunctionAnalysis was dropped; With
this patch the MachineFunction is freed after the AsmPrinter has
finished.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23736
llvm-svn: 279602
Re-apply this commit with the deletion of a MachineFunction delegated to
a separate pass to avoid use after free when doing this directly in
AsmPrinter.
This patch removes the MachineFunctionAnalysis. Instead we keep a
map from IR Function to MachineFunction in the MachineModuleInfo.
This allows the insertion of ModulePasses into the codegen pipeline
without breaking it because the MachineFunctionAnalysis gets dropped
before a module pass.
Peak memory should stay unchanged without a ModulePass in the codegen
pipeline: Previously the MachineFunction was freed at the end of a codegen
function pipeline because the MachineFunctionAnalysis was dropped; With
this patch the MachineFunction is freed after the AsmPrinter has
finished.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23736
llvm-svn: 279564
This patch removes the MachineFunctionAnalysis. Instead we keep a
map from IR Function to MachineFunction in the MachineModuleInfo.
This allows the insertion of ModulePasses into the codegen pipeline
without breaking it because the MachineFunctionAnalysis gets dropped
before a module pass.
Peak memory should stay unchanged without a ModulePass in the codegen
pipeline: Previously the MachineFunction was freed at the end of a codegen
function pipeline because the MachineFunctionAnalysis was dropped; With
this patch the MachineFunction is freed after the AsmPrinter has
finished.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23736
llvm-svn: 279502
Adds a MachineFunctionPass that scans the body to find calls, and
update the register mask with the one saved by the
RegUsageInfoCollector analysis in PhysicalRegisterUsageInfo.
Patch by Vivek Pandya <vivekvpandya@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21180
llvm-svn: 272414
We now construct a custom pass pipeline instead of injecting
start-before/stop-after into the default pipeline construction. This
allows to specify any pass known to the pass registry. Previously
specifying indirectly added analysis passes or passes not added to the
pipeline add all would not be added and we would silently do nothing.
This also restricts the -run-pass option to cases with .mir input.
llvm-svn: 269003
This intrinsic takes two arguments, ``%ptr`` and ``%offset``. It loads
a 32-bit value from the address ``%ptr + %offset``, adds ``%ptr`` to that
value and returns it. The constant folder specifically recognizes the form of
this intrinsic and the constant initializers it may load from; if a loaded
constant initializer is known to have the form ``i32 trunc(x - %ptr)``,
the intrinsic call is folded to ``x``.
LLVM provides that the calculation of such a constant initializer will
not overflow at link time under the medium code model if ``x`` is an
``unnamed_addr`` function. However, it does not provide this guarantee for
a constant initializer folded into a function body. This intrinsic can be
used to avoid the possibility of overflows when loading from such a constant.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18367
llvm-svn: 267223
Print aliases in topological order, that is, for any alias a = b,
b must be printed before a. This is because on some targets (e.g. PowerPC)
linker expects aliases in such an order to generate correct TOC information.
GCC also prints aliases in topological order.
llvm-svn: 265064
Minimum density for both optsize and non optsize are now options
-sparse-jump-table-density (default 10) for non optsize functions
-dense-jump-table-density (default 40) for optsize functions, which
matches the current default. This improves several benchmarks at google
at the cost of a small codesize increase. For code compiled with -Os,
the old behavior continues
llvm-svn: 264689
(This is the second attemp to commit this patch, after fixing pr26652 & pr26653).
This patch detects vector reductions before instruction selection. Vector
reductions are vectorized reduction operations, and for such operations we have
freedom to reorganize the elements of the result as long as the reduction of them
stay unchanged. This will enable some reduction pattern recognition during
instruction combine such as SAD/dot-product on X86. A flag is added to
SDNodeFlags to mark those vector reduction nodes to be checked during instruction
combine.
To detect those vector reductions, we search def-use chains starting from the
given instruction, and check if all uses fall into two categories:
1. Reduction with another vector.
2. Reduction on all elements.
in which 2 is detected by recognizing the pattern that the loop vectorizer
generates to reduce all elements in the vector outside of the loop, which
includes several ShuffleVector and one ExtractElement instructions.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15250
llvm-svn: 261804
This patch detects vector reductions before instruction selection. Vector
reductions are vectorized reduction operations, and for such operations we have
freedom to reorganize the elements of the result as long as the reduction of them
stay unchanged. This will enable some reduction pattern recognition during
instruction combine such as SAD/dot-product on X86. A flag is added to
SDNodeFlags to mark those vector reduction nodes to be checked during instruction
combine.
To detect those vector reductions, we search def-use chains starting from the
given instruction, and check if all uses fall into two categories:
1. Reduction with another vector.
2. Reduction on all elements.
in which 2 is detected by recognizing the pattern that the loop vectorizer
generates to reduce all elements in the vector outside of the loop, which
includes several ShuffleVector and one ExtractElement instructions.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15250
llvm-svn: 261070
Summary:
This patch is provided in preparation for removing autoconf on 1/26. The proposal to remove autoconf on 1/26 was discussed on the llvm-dev thread here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/093875.html
"I felt a great disturbance in the [build system], as if millions of [makefiles] suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something [amazing] has happened."
- Obi Wan Kenobi
Reviewers: chandlerc, grosbach, bob.wilson, tstellarAMD, echristo, whitequark
Subscribers: chfast, simoncook, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, jfb, danalbert, srhines, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dsanders, joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16471
llvm-svn: 258861
Summary: This patch changes gc.statepoint intrinsic's return type to token type instead of i32 type. Using token types could prevent LLVM to merge different gc.statepoint nodes into PHI nodes and cause further problems with gc relocations. The patch also changes the way on how gc.relocate and gc.result look for their corresponding gc.statepoint on unwind path. The current implementation uses the selector value extracted from a { i8*, i32 } landingpad as a hook to find the gc.statepoint, while the patch directly uses a token type landingpad (http://reviews.llvm.org/D15405) to find the gc.statepoint.
Reviewers: sanjoy, JosephTremoulet, pgavlin, igor-laevsky, mjacob
Subscribers: reames, mjacob, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15662
llvm-svn: 256443
CFI emits jump slots for indirect functions as a byte array
constant, and declares function-typed aliases to these constants.
This change fixes AsmPrinter to emit these aliases as function
symbols and not data symbols.
llvm-svn: 254674
(This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first caused two assertion
failures and was reverted. See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25687)
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254377
and the follow-up r254356: "Fix a bug in MachineBlockPlacement that may cause assertion failure during BranchProbability construction."
Asserts were firing in Chromium builds. See PR25687.
llvm-svn: 254366
Simon Pilgrim