This reverts commit 215684. The intention of the commit is great, but
unfortunately it seems to be the cause of 14 LNT test suite failures:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly/builds/116
To make our buildbots and performance testers green until this issue is solved,
we temporarily revert this commit.
llvm-svn: 215816
The support is limited to signed modulo access and condition
expressions with a constant right hand side, e.g., A[i % 2] or
A[i % 9]. Test cases are modified according to this new feature and
new test cases are added.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4843
llvm-svn: 215684
We move back to a simple approach where the liveout is the last must-write
statement for a data-location plus all may-write statements. The previous
approach did not work out. We would have to consider per-data-access
dependences, instead of per-statement dependences to correct it. As this adds
complexity and it seems we would not gain anything over the simpler approach
that we implement in this commit, I moved us back to the old approach of
computing the liveout, but enhanced it to also add may-write accesses.
We also fix the test case and explain why we can not perform dead code
elimination in this case.
llvm-svn: 212925
In 'obsequi' we have a scop in which the current dead code elimination works,
but the generated code is way too complex. To avoid this trouble (and to not
disable the DCE entirely) we add an additional approximative step before
the actual dead code elimination. This should fix one of the two current
nightly-test issues.
Polly could be improved to handle 'obsequi' by teaching it to introduce only a
single parameter for (%1 and zext %1) which halves the number of parameters and
allows polly to derive a simpler representation for the set of live iterations.
However, this needs some time to investigate.
I will commit a test case as soon as we have a reduced one.
llvm-svn: 202010
In case we do not have valid dependences, we do not run dead code elimination or
the schedule optimizer. This fixes an infinite loop in the dead code
elimination (PR12110).
llvm-svn: 201982
Instead of giving a choice between a precise (but possibly very complex)
analysis and an approximative analysis we now use a hybrid approach which uses N
precise steps followed by one approximating step. The precision of the analysis
can be changed by increasing N. With a default of 'N' = 2, we get fully precise
results for our current test cases and should not run into performance problems
for more complex test cases. We can adjust this value when we got more
experience with this dead code elimination.
llvm-svn: 201888
This pass eliminates loop iterations that compute results that are not used
later on. This can help e.g. in D, where the default zero-initialization is
often unnecessary if right after new values are assigned to an array.
Contributed-by: Peter Conn <conn.peter@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 201817
Tobias Grosser