This moves the existing code for CPATH into the driver and adds the environment lookup and path splitting there.
The paths are then passed down to cc1 with -I options (CPATH), added after the normal user-specified include dirs.
Language specific paths are passed via -LANG-isystem and the actual filtering is performed in the frontend.
I tried to match GCC's behavior as close as possible
Fixes PR8971.
llvm-svn: 140341
OpenCL 6.2.1 says: "Implicit conversions between built-in vector data types are
disallowed." OpenCL 6.2.2 says: "Explicit casts between vector types are not
legal." For example:
uint4 u = (uint4)(1);
int4 i = u; // invalid implicit conversion
int4 e = (int4)u; // invalid explicit conversion
Fixes PR10967. Submitted by: Anton Lokhmotov <Anton.lokhmotov@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 140300
OpenCL is different from AltiVec in the way it supports vector literals. OpenCL
is strict with regards to semantic checks. For example, implicit conversions
and explicit casts between vectors of different types are disallowed.
Fixes PR10975. Submitted by: Anton Lokhmotov <Anton.lokhmotov@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 140270
if the definition has a non-variadic prototype with compatible
parameters. Therefore, the default rule for such calls must be to
use a non-variadic convention. Achieve this by casting the callee to
the function type with which it is required to be compatible, unless
the target specifically opts out and insists that unprototyped calls
should use the variadic rules. The only case of that I'm aware of is
the x86-64 convention, which passes arguments the same way in both
cases but also sets a small amount of extra information; here we seek
to maintain compatibility with GCC, which does set this when calling
an unprototyped function.
Addresses PR10810 and PR10713.
llvm-svn: 140241
presence of an implicit move assignment operator. I think the implicit
copy assignment operator case was also wrong, but just in a "displaying
the wrong diagnostic" way.
llvm-svn: 140139
of false positive warnings that depend on noreturn destructors pruning
the CFGs, but only in C++0x mode!
This was really surprising as the debugger quickly reveals that the
attributes are parsed correctly (and using the same code) in both modes.
The warning fires in the same way in both modes. But between parsing and
building the destructor declaration with the noreturn attribute and the
warning, it magically disappears. The key? The 'noexcept' appears!
When we were rebuilding the destructor type with the computed implicit
noexcept we completely dropped the old type on the floor. This almost
makes sense (as the arguments and return type to a destructor aren't
exactly unpredictable), but lost any function type attributes as well.
The fix is simple, we build the new type off of the old one rather than
starting fresh.
Testing this is a bit awkward. I've done it by running the
noreturn-sensitive tests in both modes, which previous failed and now
passes, but if anyone has ideas about how to more specifically and
thoroughly test that the extended info on a destructor is preserved when
adding noexcept, I'm all ears.
llvm-svn: 140138
check whether the requested location points inside the precompiled preamble,
in which case the returned source location will be a "loaded" one.
llvm-svn: 140060
This model uses the 'landingpad' instruction, which is pinned to the top of the
landing pad. (A landing pad is defined as the destination of the unwind branch
of an invoke instruction.) All of the information needed to generate the correct
exception handling metadata during code generation is encoded into the
landingpad instruction.
The new 'resume' instruction takes the place of the llvm.eh.resume intrinsic
call. It's lowered in much the same way as the intrinsic is.
llvm-svn: 140049
For instance:
template <class T> void E() {};
class F {};
void test() {
::E<::F>();
E<::F>();
}
Gives the following error messages:
error: found '<::' after a template name which forms the
digraph '<:' (aka '[') and a ':', did you mean '< ::'?
::E<::F>();
^~~
< ::
error: expected expression
E<::F>();
^
error: expected ']'
note: to match this '['
E<::F>();
This patch adds the digraph fix-it check right before the name lookup,
moves the shared checking code to a new function, and adds new
tests to catch future regressions.
llvm-svn: 140039
We were failing to set source locations and ranges in isUnusedResultAWarning
for CXXOperatorCallExprs, leading to an "expression result unused" warning
with absolutely no context if the expression was inside a macro.
llvm-svn: 140036
For example:
void f(float);
void f(int);
int main {
long a;
f(a);
}
Here, MSVC will call f(int) instead of generating a compile error as clang will do in standard mode.
This fixes a few errors when parsing MFC code with clang.
llvm-svn: 140007
the AST reader), merge that header file information with whatever
header file information we already have. Otherwise, we might forget
something we already knew (e.g., that the header was #import'd already).
llvm-svn: 139979
arbitrary amount of code. This forces us to stage the AST writer more
strictly, ensuring that we don't assign a declaration ID to a
declaration until after we're certain that no more modules will get
loaded.
llvm-svn: 139974
- Get rid of PathDiagnosticLocation(SourceRange r,..) constructor by providing a bunch of create methods.
- The PathDiagnosticLocation(SourceLocation L,..), which is used by crate methods, will eventually become private.
- Test difference is in the case when the report starts at the beginning of the function. We used to represent that point as a range of the very first token in the first statement. Now, it's just a single location representing the first character of the first statement.
llvm-svn: 139932
- The closing brace is always a single location, not a range.
- The test case previously had a location key 57:1 followed by a range [57:1 - 57:1].
llvm-svn: 139832