All target-parallel-based constructs can be run in SPMD mode from now
on. Even if num_threads clauses or if clauses are used, such constructs
can be executed in SPMD mode.
llvm-svn: 358595
This reverts r358591, which seems to have uncovered an actual bug and
causes the tsan CI to fail. We need to fix the bug and re-commit the
test.
llvm-svn: 358593
Summary: This fixes a large Dawn of War 3 performance regression with RADV from Mesa 19.0 to master which was caused by creating less code in some branches.
Reviewers: arsen, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60824
llvm-svn: 358592
Before this patch readability-misleading-indentation could issue diagnostics
with an invalid location, which would lead to an assertion failure in
ClangTidyContext::diag()
llvm-svn: 358589
This will change with the proposal in D60214.
Unfortunately, the triple is not supported for auto-generation
via script, and the multiple RUN lines have diffs on this test,
but I can't tell exactly what is required by this test.
PR7162 was an assert/crash, so hopefully, this is good enough.
llvm-svn: 358587
Summary:
In the following cases, unrolling can be beneficial, even when
optimizing for code size:
1) very low trip counts
2) potential to constant fold most instructions after fully unrolling.
We can unroll in those cases, by setting the unrolling threshold to the
loop size. This might highlight some cost modeling issues and fixing
them will have a positive impact in general.
Reviewers: vsk, efriedma, dmgreen, paquette
Reviewed By: paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60265
llvm-svn: 358586
Summary:
This patch adds support for ULEB128 and SLEB128 encoding and decoding to
BinaryStreamWriter and BinaryStreamReader respectively.
Support for ULEB128/SLEB128 will be used for eh-frame parsing in the JITLink
library currently under development (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704).
Reviewers: zturner, dblaikie
Subscribers: kristina, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60810
llvm-svn: 358584
Currently there is a single point in ScheduleDAGRRList, where we
actually query the topological order (besides init code). Currently we
are recomputing the order after adding a node (which does not have
predecessors) and then we add predecessors edge-by-edge.
We can avoid adding edges one-by-one after we added a new node. In that case, we can
just rebuild the order from scratch after adding the edges to the DAG
and avoid all the updates to the ordering.
Also, we can delay updating the DAG until we query the DAG, if we keep a
list of added edges. Depending on the number of updates, we can either
apply them when needed or recompute the order from scratch.
This brings down the geomean compile time for of CTMark with -O1 down 0.3% on X86,
with no regressions.
Reviewers: MatzeB, atrick, efriedma, niravd, paquette
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60125
llvm-svn: 358583
Summary:
Add accessors for the file, directory, source file name (curiously, an `Optional` value?), of a DIFile.
This is intended to replace the LLVMValueRef-based accessors used in D52239
Reviewers: whitequark, jberdine, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark, jberdine
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60489
llvm-svn: 358577
Summary:
Motivation/Context: in the code review system integrating with clang-tidy,
clang-tidy doesn't provide a human-readable description of the fix. Usually
developers have to preview a code diff (before vs after apply the fix) to
understand what the fix does before applying a fix.
This patch proposes that each clang-tidy check provides a short and
actional fix description that can be shown in the UI, so that users can know
what the fix does without previewing diff.
This patch extends clang-tidy framework to support fix descriptions (will add implementations for
existing checks in the future). Fix descriptions and fixes are emitted via diagnostic::Note (rather than
attaching the main warning diagnostic).
Before this patch:
```
void MyCheck::check(...) {
...
diag(loc, "my check warning") << FixtItHint::CreateReplacement(...);
}
```
After:
```
void MyCheck::check(...) {
...
diag(loc, "my check warning"); // Emit a check warning
diag(loc, "fix description", DiagnosticIDs::Note) << FixtItHint::CreateReplacement(...); // Emit a diagnostic note and a fix
}
```
Reviewers: sammccall, alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, Eugene.Zelenko, aaron.ballman, JonasToth, xazax.hun, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59932
llvm-svn: 358576
On pre-AVX512 targets we can use MOVMSK to extract reduced boolean results. This is properly optimized, annoyingly AVX512 isn't and produces code that is almost as bad as the (unchanged) costs suggest......
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60403
llvm-svn: 358574
Summary:
We do have some reports of include insertion behaving badly in some
codebases. Requiring header guards both makes sense in principle, and is
likely to disable this "nice-to-have" feature in codebases where headers don't
follow the expected pattern.
With this we can drop some other heuristics, such as looking at file
extensions to detect known non-headers - implementation files have no guards.
One wrinkle here is #import - objc headers may not have guards because
they're intended to be used via #import. If the header is the main file
or is #included, we won't collect locations - merge should take care of
this if we see the file #imported somewhere. Seems likely to be OK.
Headers which have a canonicalization (stdlib, IWYU) are exempt from this check.
*.inc files continue to be handled by looking up to the including file.
This patch also adds *.def here - tablegen wants this pattern too.
In terms of code structure, the division between SymbolCollector and
CanonicalIncludes has shifted: SymbolCollector is responsible for more.
This is because SymbolCollector has all the SourceManager/HeaderSearch access
needed for checking for guards, and we interleave these checks with the *.def
checks in a loop (potentially).
We could hand all the info into CanonicalIncludes and put the logic there
if that's preferable.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60316
llvm-svn: 358571
Summary:
This change takes the full list of bfd targets that lld supports (see `ScriptParser.cpp`), including generic handling for `*-freebsd` targets (which uses the same settings but with a FreeBSD OSABI). In particular this adds mips support for `--output-target` (but not yet via `--binary-architecture`).
lld and llvm-objcopy use their own different custom data structures, so I'd prefer to check this in as-is (add support directly in llvm-objcopy, including all the test coverage) and do a separate NFC patch(s) that consolidate the two by putting this mapping into libobject.
See [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41462 | PR41462 ]].
Reviewers: jhenderson, jakehehrlich, espindola, alexshap, arichardson
Reviewed By: arichardson
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, emaste, sdardis, krytarowski, atanasyan, llvm-commits, MaskRay, arichardson
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60773
llvm-svn: 358562
Summary:
Previously, write_cmake_config.py would raise an error while printing
the error, because `leftovers` in "'\n'.join(leftovers)" is a tuple.
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60766
llvm-svn: 358557
We have two versions of some instructions, VR128 versions and FR32 versions that
are marked as CodeGenOnly.
This change switches to using the VR128 versions for these copies. It's after
register allocation so the class size no longer matters. This matches how GR64
works.
llvm-svn: 358555
LLVM's wchar to UTF8 conversion routine expects an empty string to store the output.
GetHostName() on Windows is sometimes called with a non-empty string which triggers
an assert. The simple fix is to clear the output string before the conversion.
llvm-svn: 358550
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
Patch by Nicholas Allegra.
The Mach-O writer calculates the size of load commands multiple times.
First, Util::assignAddressesToSections() (in MachONormalizedFileFromAtoms.cpp)
calculates the size using headerAndLoadCommandsSize() (in
MachONormalizedFileBinaryWriter.cpp), which creates a temporary
MachOFileLayout for the NormalizedFile, only to retrieve its
headerAndLoadCommandsSize. Later, writeBinary() (in
MachONormalizedFileBinaryWriter.cpp) creates a new layout and uses the offsets
from that layout to actually write out everything in the NormalizedFile.
But the NormalizedFile changes between the first computation and the second.
When Util::assignAddressesToSections is called, file.functionStarts is always
empty because Util::addFunctionStarts has not yet been called. Yet
MachOFileLayout decides whether to include a LC_FUNCTION_STARTS command based
on whether file.functionStarts is nonempty. Therefore, the initial computation
always omits it.
Because padding for the __TEXT segment (to make its size a multiple of the
page size) is added between the load commands and the first section, LLD still
generates a valid binary as long as the amount of padding happens to be large
enough to fit LC_FUNCTION_STARTS command, which it usually is.
However, it's easy to reproduce the issue by adding a section of a precise
size. Given foo.c:
__attribute__((section("__TEXT,__foo")))
char foo[0xd78] = {0};
Run:
clang -dynamiclib -o foo.dylib foo.c -fuse-ld=lld -install_name
/usr/lib/foo.dylib
otool -lvv foo.dylib
This should produce:
truncated or malformed object (offset field of section 1 in LC_SEGMENT_64
command 0 not past the headers of the file)
This commit:
- Changes MachOFileLayout to always assume LC_FUNCTION_STARTS is present for
the initial computation, as long as generating LC_FUNCTION_STARTS is
enabled. It would be slightly better to check whether there are actually
any functions, since no LC_FUNCTION_STARTS will be generated if not, but it
doesn't cause a problem if the initial computation is too high.
- Adds a test.
- Adds an assert in MachOFileLayout::writeSectionContent() that we are not
writing section content into the load commands region (which would happen
if the offset was calculated too low due to the initial load commands size
calculation being too low). Adds an assert in
MachOFileLayout::writeLoadCommands to validate a similar situation where
two size-of-load-commands computations are expected to be equivalent.
llvm-svn: 358545
Summary:
When -gsplit-dwarf is used together with other -g options, in most cases
the computed debug info level is decided by the last -g option, with one
special case (see below). This patch drops that special case and thus
makes it easy to reason about:
// If a lower debug level -g comes after -gsplit-dwarf, in some cases
// -gsplit-dwarf is cancelled.
-gsplit-dwarf -g0 => 0
-gsplit-dwarf -gline-directives-only => DebugDirectivesOnly
-gsplit-dwarf -gmlt -fsplit-dwarf-inlining => 1
-gsplit-dwarf -gmlt -fno-split-dwarf-inlining => 1 + split
// If -gsplit-dwarf comes after -g options, with this patch, the net
// effect is 2 + split for all combinations
-g0 -gsplit-dwarf => 2 + split
-gline-directives-only -gsplit-dwarf => 2 + split
-gmlt -gsplit-dwarf -fsplit-dwarf-inlining => 2 + split
-gmlt -gsplit-dwarf -fno-split-dwarf-inlining => 1 + split (before) 2 + split (after)
The last case has been changed. In general, if the user intends to lower
debug info level, place that -g option after -gsplit-dwarf.
Some context:
In gcc, the last of -gsplit-dwarf -g0 -g1 -g2 -g3 -ggdb[0-3] -gdwarf-*
... decides the debug info level (-gsplit-dwarf -gdwarf-* have level 2).
It is a bit unfortunate that -gsplit-dwarf -gdwarf-* ... participate in
the level computation but that is the status quo.
Reviewers: dblaikie, echristo, probinson
Reviewed By: dblaikie, probinson
Subscribers: probinson, aprantl, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59923
llvm-svn: 358544
This patch adds a basic loop fusion pass. It will fuse loops that conform to the
following 4 conditions:
1. Adjacent (no code between them)
2. Control flow equivalent (if one loop executes, the other loop executes)
3. Identical bounds (both loops iterate the same number of iterations)
4. No negative distance dependencies between the loop bodies.
The pass does not make any changes to the IR to create opportunities for fusion.
Instead, it checks if the necessary conditions are met and if so it fuses two
loops together.
The pass has not been added to the pass pipeline yet, and thus is not enabled by
default. It can be run stand alone using the -loop-fusion option.
Phabricator: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55851
llvm-svn: 358543
The generic version of comparesf2 defines __cmpsf2 alias for libgcc
compatibility, but the ARM overlay is missing the alias.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60805
llvm-svn: 358542
Summary:
Add to STLExtras a binary search function with a simple mental model:
You provide a range and a predicate which is true above a certain point.
bsearch() tells you that point.
Overloads are provided for integers, iterators, and containers.
This is more suitable than std:: alternatives in many cases:
- std::binary_search only indicates presence/absence
- upper_bound/lower_bound give you the opportunity to pick the wrong one
- all of the options have confusing names and definitions when your predicate
doesn't have simple "less than" semantics
- all of the options require iterators
- we plumb around a useless `value` parameter that should be a lambda capture
The API is inspired by Go's standard library, but we add an extra parameter as
well as some overloads and templates to show how clever C++ is.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, gribozavr
Subscribers: dexonsmith, kristina, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60779
llvm-svn: 358540