Summary:
This fixes a hole in the handling of devirtualized targets that were
local but need promoting due to devirtualization in another module. We
were not correctly referencing the promoted symbol in some cases. Make
sure the code that updates the name also looks at the ExportedGUIDs set
by utilizing a callback that checks all conditions (the callback
utilized by the internalization/promotion code).
Reviewers: pcc, davidxl, hiraditya
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68159
llvm-svn: 373485
This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's
annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and
discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a
prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300
We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the
LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in
addition to frontend instrumentation.
We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly
influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select)
when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains
information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can
check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the
compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight.
We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the
diagnostic to the user.
A future patch should address the comment at the top of
LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and
UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed
outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the
misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller.
In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the
misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have
avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata
tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions
are influenced by the use of llvm.expect
Patch By: paulkirth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324
llvm-svn: 371635
This reverts commit r371584. It introduced a dependency from compiler-rt
to llvm/include/ADT, which is problematic for multiple reasons.
One is that it is a novel dependency edge, which needs cross-compliation
machinery for llvm/include/ADT (yes, it is true that right now
compiler-rt included only header-only libraries, however, if we allow
compiler-rt to depend on anything from ADT, other libraries will
eventually get used).
Secondly, depending on ADT from compiler-rt exposes ADT symbols from
compiler-rt, which would cause ODR violations when Clang is built with
the profile library.
llvm-svn: 371598
This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's
annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and
discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a
prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300
We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the
LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in
addition to frontend instrumentation.
We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly
influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select)
when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains
information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can
check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the
compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight.
We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the
diagnostic to the user.
A future patch should address the comment at the top of
LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and
UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed
outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the
misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller.
In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the
misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have
avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata
tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions
are influenced by the use of llvm.expect
Patch By: paulkirth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324
llvm-svn: 371584
This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's
annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and
discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a
prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300
We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the
LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in
addition to frontend instrumentation.
We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly
influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select)
when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains
information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can
check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the
compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight.
We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the
diagnostic to the user.
A future patch should address the comment at the top of
LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and
UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed
outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the
misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller.
In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the
misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have
avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata
tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions
are influenced by the use of llvm.expect
Patch By: paulkirth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324
llvm-svn: 371484
Summary:
Keep aliasees alive if their alias is live, otherwise we end up with an
alias to a declaration, which is invalid. This can happen when the
aliasee is weak and non-prevailing.
This fix exposed the fact that we were then attempting to internalize
the weak symbol, which was not exported as it was not prevailing. We
should not internalize interposable symbols in general, unless this is
the prevailing copy, since it can lead to incorrect inlining and other
optimizations. Most of the changes in this patch are due to the
restructuring required to pass down the prevailing callback.
Finally, while implementing the test cases, I found that in the case of
a weak aliasee that is still marked not live because its alias isn't
live, after dropping the definition we incorrectly marked the
declaration with weak linkage when resolving prevailing symbols in the
module. This was due to some special case handling for symbols marked
WeakLinkage in the summary located before instead of after a subsequent
check for the symbol being a declaration. It turns out that we don't
actually need this special case handling any more (looking back at the
history, when that was added the code was structured quite differently)
- we will correctly mark with weak linkage further below when the
definition hasn't been dropped.
Fixes PR42542.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66264
llvm-svn: 369766
llvm-lto2 doesn't treat "-" as stdout, so the test added in r369024 creates a
file named "-.0". This patch makes the test look more like other tests that use
llvm-lto2.
llvm-svn: 369066
Summary: IR printing has not been correctly supported with (Thin)LTO if the new pass manager is enabled. Previously we only get outputs from backend(codegen) passes, as they are still under legacy pass manager even when the new pass manager is enabled. This patch addresses the issue and enables IR printing for optimization passes with new pass manager + (Thin)LTO setting.
Reviewers: fedor.sergeev, philip.pfaffe
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66253
llvm-svn: 369024
For consistency with normal instructions and clarity when reading IR,
it's best to print the %0, %1, ... names of function arguments in
definitions.
Also modifies the parser to accept IR in that form for obvious reasons.
llvm-svn: 367755
This patch adds support to the WholeProgramDevirt pass to perform
index-based WPD, which is invoked from ThinLTO during the thin link.
The ThinLTO backend (WPD import phase) behaves the same regardless of
whether the WPD decisions were made with the index-based or (the
existing) IR-based analysis.
Depends on D54815.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55153
llvm-svn: 367679
Summary: We emit CFI_FUNCTION_DEFS and CFI_FUNCTION_DECLS to
distributed ThinLTO indices to implement indirect function call
checking. This change causes us to only emit entries for functions
that are either defined or used by the module we're writing the index
for (instead of all functions in the combined index), which can make
the indices substantially smaller.
Fixes PR42378.
Reviewers: pcc, vitalybuka, eugenis
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, hiraditya, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63887
llvm-svn: 365537
For background of BPF CO-RE project, please refer to
http://vger.kernel.org/bpfconf2019.html
In summary, BPF CO-RE intends to compile bpf programs
adjustable on struct/union layout change so the same
program can run on multiple kernels with adjustment
before loading based on native kernel structures.
In order to do this, we need keep track of GEP(getelementptr)
instruction base and result debuginfo types, so we
can adjust on the host based on kernel BTF info.
Capturing such information as an IR optimization is hard
as various optimization may have tweaked GEP and also
union is replaced by structure it is impossible to track
fieldindex for union member accesses.
Three intrinsic functions, preserve_{array,union,struct}_access_index,
are introducted.
addr = preserve_array_access_index(base, index, dimension)
addr = preserve_union_access_index(base, di_index)
addr = preserve_struct_access_index(base, gep_index, di_index)
here,
base: the base pointer for the array/union/struct access.
index: the last access index for array, the same for IR/DebugInfo layout.
dimension: the array dimension.
gep_index: the access index based on IR layout.
di_index: the access index based on user/debuginfo types.
For example, for the following example,
$ cat test.c
struct sk_buff {
int i;
int b1:1;
int b2:2;
union {
struct {
int o1;
int o2;
} o;
struct {
char flags;
char dev_id;
} dev;
int netid;
} u[10];
};
static int (*bpf_probe_read)(void *dst, int size, const void *unsafe_ptr)
= (void *) 4;
#define _(x) (__builtin_preserve_access_index(x))
int bpf_prog(struct sk_buff *ctx) {
char dev_id;
bpf_probe_read(&dev_id, sizeof(char), _(&ctx->u[5].dev.dev_id));
return dev_id;
}
$ clang -target bpf -O2 -g -emit-llvm -S -mllvm -print-before-all \
test.c >& log
The generated IR looks like below:
...
define dso_local i32 @bpf_prog(%struct.sk_buff*) #0 !dbg !15 {
%2 = alloca %struct.sk_buff*, align 8
%3 = alloca i8, align 1
store %struct.sk_buff* %0, %struct.sk_buff** %2, align 8, !tbaa !45
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %struct.sk_buff** %2, metadata !43, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !49
call void @llvm.lifetime.start.p0i8(i64 1, i8* %3) #4, !dbg !50
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i8* %3, metadata !44, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !51
%4 = load i32 (i8*, i32, i8*)*, i32 (i8*, i32, i8*)** @bpf_probe_read, align 8, !dbg !52, !tbaa !45
%5 = load %struct.sk_buff*, %struct.sk_buff** %2, align 8, !dbg !53, !tbaa !45
%6 = call [10 x %union.anon]* @llvm.preserve.struct.access.index.p0a10s_union.anons.p0s_struct.sk_buffs(
%struct.sk_buff* %5, i32 2, i32 3), !dbg !53, !llvm.preserve.access.index !19
%7 = call %union.anon* @llvm.preserve.array.access.index.p0s_union.anons.p0a10s_union.anons(
[10 x %union.anon]* %6, i32 1, i32 5), !dbg !53
%8 = call %union.anon* @llvm.preserve.union.access.index.p0s_union.anons.p0s_union.anons(
%union.anon* %7, i32 1), !dbg !53, !llvm.preserve.access.index !26
%9 = bitcast %union.anon* %8 to %struct.anon.0*, !dbg !53
%10 = call i8* @llvm.preserve.struct.access.index.p0i8.p0s_struct.anon.0s(
%struct.anon.0* %9, i32 1, i32 1), !dbg !53, !llvm.preserve.access.index !34
%11 = call i32 %4(i8* %3, i32 1, i8* %10), !dbg !52
%12 = load i8, i8* %3, align 1, !dbg !54, !tbaa !55
%13 = sext i8 %12 to i32, !dbg !54
call void @llvm.lifetime.end.p0i8(i64 1, i8* %3) #4, !dbg !56
ret i32 %13, !dbg !57
}
!19 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "sk_buff", file: !3, line: 1, size: 704, elements: !20)
!26 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_union_type, scope: !19, file: !3, line: 5, size: 64, elements: !27)
!34 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, scope: !26, file: !3, line: 10, size: 16, elements: !35)
Note that @llvm.preserve.{struct,union}.access.index calls have metadata llvm.preserve.access.index
attached to instructions to provide struct/union debuginfo type information.
For &ctx->u[5].dev.dev_id,
. The "%6 = ..." represents struct member "u" with index 2 for IR layout and index 3 for DI layout.
. The "%7 = ..." represents array subscript "5".
. The "%8 = ..." represents union member "dev" with index 1 for DI layout.
. The "%10 = ..." represents struct member "dev_id" with index 1 for both IR and DI layout.
Basically, traversing the use-def chain recursively for the 3rd argument of bpf_probe_read() and
examining all preserve_*_access_index calls, the debuginfo struct/union/array access index
can be achieved.
The intrinsics also contain enough information to regenerate codes for IR layout.
For array and structure intrinsics, the proper GEP can be constructed.
For union intrinsics, replacing all uses of "addr" with "base" should be enough.
The test case ThinLTO/X86/lazyload_metadata.ll is adjusted to reflect the
new addition of the metadata.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61810
llvm-svn: 365423
It's possible that some function can load and store the same
variable using the same constant expression:
store %Derived* @foo, %Derived** bitcast (%Base** @bar to %Derived**)
%42 = load %Derived*, %Derived** bitcast (%Base** @bar to %Derived**)
The bitcast expression was mistakenly cached while processing loads,
and never examined later when processing store. This caused @bar to
be mistakenly treated as read-only variable. See load-store-caching.ll.
llvm-svn: 365188
This reverts r365040 (git commit 5cacb91475)
Speculatively reverting, since this appears to have broken check-lld on
Linux. Partial analysis in https://crbug.com/981168.
llvm-svn: 365097
We previously marked all the tests with branch funnels as
`-verify-machineinstrs=0`.
This is an attempt to fix it.
1) `ICALL_BRANCH_FUNNEL` has no defs. Mark it as `let OutOperandList =
(outs)`
2) After that we hit an assert: ``` Assertion failed: (Op.getValueType()
!= MVT::Other && Op.getValueType() != MVT::Glue && "Chain and glue
operands should occur at end of operand list!"), function AddOperand,
file
/Users/francisvm/llvm/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/InstrEmitter.cpp,
line 461. ```
The chain operand was added at the beginning of the operand list. Move
that to the end.
3) After that we hit another verifier issue in the pseudo expansion
where the registers used in the cmps and jmps are not added to the
livein lists. Add the `EFLAGS` to all the new MBBs that we create.
PR39436
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54155
llvm-svn: 365058
Reenable the testing disabled in r364978 with the same workaround used
for this failure in the cfi-devirt.ll test. The known issue is PR39436,
and the workaround is to add -verify-machineinstrs=0.
llvm-svn: 364997
When adding summary entries for index-based WPD (r364960), an added
test also included some additional testing of the existing hybrid
Thin/Regular LTO WPD (test/ThinLTO/X86/devirt.ll). That part of the
test is producing a failure on the llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win
bot:
*** Bad machine code: Explicit definition marked as use ***
- function: __typeid__ZTS1A_0_branch_funnel
- basic block: %bb.0 (0x81d4c58)
- instruction: ICALL_BRANCH_FUNNEL %0:gr64, @0, 16, @_ZN1B1fEi, 48, @_ZN1C1fEi
- operand 0: %0:gr64
LLVM ERROR: Found 1 machine code errors.
This is functionality unrelated to the summary entries added with my
patch, so I am disabling this part of the new test until it is
addressed. I'll continue to investigate the failure.
llvm-svn: 364978
Summary:
If LTOUnit splitting is disabled, the module summary analysis computes
the summary information necessary to perform single implementation
devirtualization during the thin link with the index and no IR. The
information collected from the regular LTO IR in the current hybrid WPD
algorithm is summarized, including:
1) For vtable definitions, record the function pointers and their offset
within the vtable initializer (subsumes the information collected from
IR by tryFindVirtualCallTargets).
2) A record for each type metadata summarizing the vtable definitions
decorated with that metadata (subsumes the TypeIdentiferMap collected
from IR).
Also added are the necessary bitcode records, and the corresponding
assembly support.
The follow-on index-based WPD patch is D55153.
Depends on D53890.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54815
llvm-svn: 364960
Use -fsave-optimization-record=<format> to specify a different format
than the default, which is YAML.
For now, only YAML is supported.
llvm-svn: 363573
Summary:
When we import an alias, we do so by making a clone of the aliasee. Just
as this clone uses the original alias name and linkage, it should also
use the same visibility (not the aliasee's visibility). Otherwise,
linker behavior is affected (e.g. if the aliasee was hidden, but the
alias is not, the resulting imported clone should not be hidden,
otherwise the linker will make the final symbol hidden which is
incorrect).
Reviewers: wmi
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62535
llvm-svn: 361989
Variables with linkonce_odr and weak_odr linkage shouldn't be internalized
if they're not readonly. Otherwise we may end up with multiple copies of
such variable, so reads and writes will become inconsistent
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61255
llvm-svn: 360577
Summary:
We hit undefined references building with ThinLTO when one source file
contained explicit instantiations of a template method (weak_odr) but
there were also implicit instantiations in another file (linkonce_odr),
and the latter was the prevailing copy. In this case the symbol was
marked hidden when the prevailing linkonce_odr copy was promoted to
weak_odr. It led to unsats when the resulting shared library was linked
with other code that contained a reference (expecting to be resolved due
to the explicit instantiation).
Add a CanAutoHide flag to the GV summary to allow the thin link to
identify when all copies are eligible for auto-hiding (because they were
all originally linkonce_odr global unnamed addr), and only do the
auto-hide in that case.
Most of the changes here are due to plumbing the new flag through the
bitcode and llvm assembly, and resulting test changes. I augmented the
existing auto-hide test to check for this situation.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits, steven_wu, wmi
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59709
llvm-svn: 360466
This restores part of r359311 that was reverted by r359830.
Rewrite the symbol types to fix several issues.
Notable difference is that the type of __init_array_start changes from
't' to 'd'.
GNU nm used to mark ELF symbols relative to .init_array as 't'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24505 (before 2.33)
because ".init" is the prefix. The bug was copied by r287803.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61551
llvm-svn: 360339
-t is --symbols in llvm-readobj but --section-details (unimplemented) in readelf.
The confusing option should not be used since we aim for improving
compatibility.
Keep just one llvm-readobj -t use case in test/tools/llvm-readobj/symbols.test
llvm-svn: 359661
Summary:
For ThinLTOCodegenerator, it has an option to save the object file
outputs into a directory which is essential for debug info. Tools like lldb
and dsymutil will look for these object files for debug info.
On Darwin platform, you can link fat binaries with one single clang
driver invocation like:
$ clang -arch x86_64 -arch i386 -Wl,-object_path_lto,$TMPDIR ...
Unfornately, the output object files for one architecture is going to
overwrite the previous ones and one architecture slice will end up with
no debug info. One example for this is to turn on ThinLTO for sanitizer
dylibs in compiler-rt project.
To fix the issue, add the name for the architecture into the name of the
output object file.
rdar://problem/35482935
Reviewers: tejohnson, bd1976llvm, dexonsmith, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, aprantl, inglorion, eraman, hiraditya, jkorous, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60924
llvm-svn: 359508
Summary:
Reapply r357931 with fixes to ThinLTO testcases and llvm-lto tool.
ThinLTOCodeGenerator currently does not preserve llvm.used symbols and
it can internalize them. In order to pass the necessary information to the
legacy ThinLTOCodeGenerator, the input to the code generator is
rewritten to be based on lto::InputFile.
Now ThinLTO using the legacy LTO API will requires data layout in
Module.
"internalize" thinlto action in llvm-lto is updated to run both
"promote" and "internalize" with the same configuration as
ThinLTOCodeGenerator. The old "promote" + "internalize" option does not
produce the same output as ThinLTOCodeGenerator.
This fixes: PR41236
rdar://problem/49293439
Reviewers: tejohnson, pcc, kromanova, dexonsmith
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: ormris, bd1976llvm, mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, hiraditya, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60421
llvm-svn: 358601
Summary:
The AliasSummary previously contained the AliaseeGUID, which was only
populated when reading the summary from bitcode. This patch changes it
to instead hold the ValueInfo of the aliasee, and always populates it.
This enables more efficient access to the ValueInfo (specifically in the
recent patch r352438 which needed to perform an index hash table lookup
using the aliasee GUID).
As noted in the comments in AliasSummary, we no longer technically need
to keep a pointer to the corresponding aliasee summary, since it could
be obtained by walking the list of summaries on the ValueInfo looking
for the summary in the same module. However, I am concerned that this
would be inefficient when walking through the index during the thin
link for various analyses. That can be reevaluated in the future.
By always populating this new field, we can remove the guard and special
handling for a 0 aliasee GUID when dumping the dot graph of the summary.
An additional improvement in this patch is when reading the summaries
from LLVM assembly we now set the AliaseeSummary field to the aliasee
summary in that same module, which makes it consistent with the behavior
when reading the summary from bitcode.
Reviewers: pcc, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57470
llvm-svn: 356268
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
Original llvm-svn: 355964
llvm-svn: 355984
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
llvm-svn: 355964
Teresa Johnson