and even before that, it was never implemented. Just define it to zero
instead, so compiler-rt can compile on FreeBSD 11 and later.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7485
llvm-svn: 228871
Summary:
__ubsan::getFunctionLocation() used to issue a call to symbolizer, and
convert the result (SymbolizedStack) to one of UBSan structures:
SourceLocation, ModuleLocation or MemoryLocation. This:
(1) is inefficient: we do an extra allocation/deallocation to copy data,
while we can instead can just pass SymbolizedStack around (which
contains all the necessary data).
(2) leaks memory: strings stored in SourceLocation/MemoryLocation are
never deallocated, and Filipe Cabecinhas suggests this causes crashes
of UBSan-ified programs in the wild.
Instead, let Location store a pointer to SymbolizedStack object, and
make sure it's properly deallocated when UBSan handler exits.
ModuleLocation is made obsolete by this change, and is deleted.
Test Plan: check-ubsan test suite
Reviewers: rsmith, filcab
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7548
llvm-svn: 228869
We're still using global constructors when not on linux, so this was
causing warnings on Darwin. Reverting for now.
This reverts r228384.
llvm-svn: 228795
Summary:
Make sure we don't print the error report from -fsanitize=function
twice for the same source location, as we do in another UBSan handlers.
Test Plan: check-ubsan test suite
Reviewers: rsmith, pcc
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7524
llvm-svn: 228772
Make sure clear_cache() builtin has an appropriate definition for Linux.
Call syscall(NR_cacheflush, ...).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7205
llvm-svn: 228767
We currently skip all "Noinst" unit tests on OS X, which was probably caused when we removed the "allow_reexec" flag. The MaybeReexec function fails to re-execute when the runtime is linked statically, because there is no dylib to use. This patch adds an explicit DisableReexec function that is used from asan_noinst_test.cc and the runtime then doesn't try to re-execute.
Reviewed at http://reviews.llvm.org/D7493
llvm-svn: 228740
getCallerLocation() is expensive as it issues a call to symbolizer.
(In fact, this function has a memory leak at the moment, but this
will be fixed in the nearest future). We should only call it if
we're actually going to print an error report, in particular,
once for every reported source location.
__ubsan_handle_type_mismatch: call getCallerLocation() only if
provided source location is invalid, and only if the report is not
deduplicated.
__ubsan_handle_float_cast_overflow: call getSourceLocation with
correct CallerPC (the one in user code, not in UBSan handler). Source
location for this check is not currently emitted by frontend.
llvm-svn: 228732
Prior to this change we built two identical runtimes, named "powerpc64"
and "powerpc64le", while their actual endianness matched the host
endianness.
llvm-svn: 228650
MaybeReexec() in asan_mac.cc checks for presence of the ASan dylib in DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES, and if it is there, it will process this env. var. and remove the dylib from its value, so that spawned children don't have this variable set. However, the current implementation only works when using a canonical absolute path to the dylib, it fails to remove the dylib for example when using @executable_path.
This patch changes the processing of DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES to comparing values only based on filenames (ignoring directories).
Reviewed at http://reviews.llvm.org/D7160
llvm-svn: 228392
by manually adding __asan_mz_* to the generated interface functions list.
Declaring these functions in asan_interface_internal.h doesn't work quite well:
their prototypes must match the prototypes of zone functions in malloc/malloc.h,
but some of the types (e.g. malloc_zone_t and size_t) aren't available in
asan_interface_internal.h
llvm-svn: 228290
This reverts commit r227966, which turned ASAN on on AArhc64 and may be the
cause of the bots never finishing the check-all. I'll re-apply once we're
sure that bot can cope with it.
llvm-svn: 228023
Summary: This causes an invalid lvalue error when building for Android.
Reviewers: danalbert
Reviewed By: danalbert
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7306
llvm-svn: 227907
Alexey Samsonov