Summary:
Fixes PR41828. Before this, LLD always emitted SafeSEH chunks and
defined __safe_se_handler_table & size. Now, /safeseh:no leaves those
undefined.
Additionally, we were checking for the safeseh @feat.00 flag in two
places: once to emit errors, and once during safeseh table construction.
The error was set up to be off by default, but safeseh is supposed to be
on by default. I combined the two checks, so now LLD emits an error if
an input object lacks @feat.00 and safeseh is enabled. This caused the
majority of 32-bit LLD tests to fail, since many test input object files
lack @feat.00 symbols. I explicitly added -safeseh:no to those tests to
preserve behavior.
Finally, LLD no longer sets IMAGE_DLL_CHARACTERISTICS_NO_SEH if any
input file wasn't compiled for safeseh.
Reviewers: mstorsjo, ruiu, thakis
Reviewed By: ruiu, thakis
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63570
llvm-svn: 366238
Also change some options that have different semantics (cause confusion) in llvm-readelf mode:
-s => -S
-t => --symbols
-sd => --section-data
llvm-svn: 359651
The TLS directory has a different layout depending on the bitness of the
machine the image will run on. LLD would always use the 64-bit TLS
directory for the data directory entry instead of an appropriately sized
TLS directory.
llvm-svn: 263539