This patch adds the default value of 1 to drop_begin.
In the llvm codebase, 70% of calls to drop_begin have 1 as the second
argument. The interface similar to with std::next should improve
readability.
This patch converts a couple of calls to drop_begin as examples.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94858
It turns our that the BranchFolder and IfCvt does not like unanalyzable
branches that fall-through. This means that removing the unconditional
branches from the end of tail predicated instruction can run into
asserts and verifier issues.
This effectively reverts 372eb2bbb6, but
adds handling to t2DoLoopEndDec which are not branches, so can be safely
skipped.
This is to address https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48626.
When there are musttail calls that use parameters aliasing the newly created coroutine frame, the existing implementation will fatal.
We simply cannot perform CoroElide in such cases. In theory a precise analysis can be done to check whether the parameters of the musttail call
actually alias the frame, but it's very hard to do it before the transformation happens. Also in most cases the existence of musttail call is
generated due to symmetric transfers, and in those cases alias analysis won't be able to tell that they don't alias anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94834
In most cases, the dup(*ext) pattern can be rearranged to perform
the extension on the vector side, allowing for further vector-specific
optimisations to be made. However the initial checks for this conversion
were insufficient, allowing invalid encodings to be attempted (causing
compilation to fail).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94778
Now that the linker handles table symbols, we can allow the frontend to
produce them.
Depends on D91870.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92215
Specify LHS/RHS operands in matchShuffleWithUNPCK's calls to isTargetShuffleEquivalent, and handle VBROADCAST/VBROADCAST_LOAD matching in IsElementEquivalent
This will avoid confusion once we start matching
min/max intrinsics. All of these hacks to accomodate
cmp+sel idioms should disappear once we canonicalize
to min/max intrinsics.
The icmp opcode is now hard-coded in the cost model call.
This will make it easier to eventually remove all opcode
queries for min/max patterns as we transition to intrinsics.
In MipsDelaySlotFiller, when replacing old call-branch with
the compact branch instruction, an assertion is caused by erasing
the old call with unhandled CSInfo.
The problem was reported in PR48695.
This patch fixes it, by moving call site info from the old call
instruction to its replace.
Patch by Nikola Tesic
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94685
A bug in the system assembler can assemble the xxspltd extended
menemonic into the wrong instruction (extracting the wrong element).
Emit the full xxpermdi with all operands to work around the problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94419
This patch marks some library functions as willreturn. On the first pass, I
excluded most functions that interact with streams/the filesystem.
Along with willreturn, it also adds nounwind to a set of math functions.
There probably are a few additional attributes we can add for those, but
that should be done separately.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94684
This patch changes these functions:
vectorizeLoadInsert
isExtractExtractCheap
foldExtractedCmps
scalarizeBinopOrCmp
getShuffleExtract
foldBitcastShuf
to use the class InstructionCost when calling TTI.get<something>Cost().
This patch is part of a series of patches to use InstructionCost instead of
unsigned/int for the cost model functions.
See this thread for context:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146408.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D91174
ps.:This patch adds the test || !NewCost.isValid(), because we want to
return false when:
!NewCost.isValid && !OldCost.isValid()->the cost to transform it expensive
and
!NewCost.isValid() && OldCost.isValid()
Therefore for simplication we only add test for !NewCost.isValid()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94069
Currently when spilling statepoint register operands in FixupStatepoints
we do not pay attention that it might be `undef`. We just generate a
spill, which may lead to verifier error because we have a use without def.
To handle it, let FixupStateponts ignore `undef` register operands
completely and change them to some constant value when generating
stack map. Use same value as used by ISel for this purpose (0xFEFEFEFE).
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94703
Use the KnownBits icmp comparisons to determine when a ISD::UMIN/UMAX op is unnecessary should either op be known to be ULT/ULE or UGT/UGE than the other.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94532
Original patch by @rogfer01.
This patch supports vector truncates, which on RVV must be done in a
series of instructions truncating by one power-of-two at a time. This is
done through custom-lowering and a custom node to avoid LLVM
re-combining the split TRUNCATE nodes.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Fraser Cormack <fraser@codeplay.com>
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94796
The vcompress intrinsic is defined such that it requires a tail
undisturbed policy. This patch makes it so we can use the tail
agnostic policy if the user has passed vundefined to the dest
operand.
We need to do something similar for masked policy, but we need
annotation of which instructions use the mask policy first.
Not sure if this is sufficient for scheduling or if we'll need to
select different pseudos that don't have a tied def.
Reviewed By: evandro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94566
RISC-V would like to use a struct of scalable vectors to return multiple
values from intrinsics. This woud also be needed for target independent
intrinsics like llvm.sadd.overflow.
This patch removes the existing restriction for this. I've modified
StructType::isSized to consider a struct containing scalable vectors
as unsized so the verifier won't allow loads/stores/allocas of these
structs.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94142
Reassociating some patterns to generate more fma instructions to
reduce register pressure.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92071
This patch promotes result integer type of FP_TO_XINT in expanding.
So crash in conversion from ppc_fp128 to i1 will be fixed.
Reviewed By: steven.zhang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92473
add one use check to lookThruCopyLike.
The root node is safe to be deleted if we are sure that every
definition in the copy chain only has one use.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92069
We can fold x*C1/C2 <= x to true if C1 <= C2. This is valid even
if the multiplication is not nuw: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/vULors
The multiplication or division can be replaced by shifts. We don't
handle the case where both are shifts, as that should get folded
away by InstCombine.
There are no changes relative to the original commit. However, an issue
this exposed in BasicAA assumption tracking has been fixed in the
previous commit.
-----
An alias query currently works out roughly like this:
* Look up location pair in cache.
* Perform BasicAA logic (including cache lookup and insertion...)
* Perform a recursive query using BestAAResults.
* Look up location pair in cache (and thus do not recurse into BasicAA)
* Query all the other AA providers.
* Query all the other AA providers.
This is a lot of unnecessary work, all ultimately caused by the
BestAAResults query at the end of aliasCheck(). The reason we perform
it, is that aliasCheck() is getting called recursively, and we of
course want those recursive queries to also make use of other AA
providers, not just BasicAA. We can solve this by making the recursive
queries directly use BestAAResults (which will check both BasicAA
and other providers), rather than recursing into aliasCheck().
There are some tradeoffs:
* We can no longer pass through the precomputed underlying object
to aliasCheck(). This is not a major concern, because nowadays
getUnderlyingObject() is quite cheap.
* Results from other AA providers are no longer cached inside
BasicAA. The way this worked was already a bit iffy, in that a
result could be cached, but if it was MayAlias, we'd still end
up re-querying other providers anyway. If we want to cache
non-BasicAA results, we should do that in a more principled manner.
In any case, despite those tradeoffs, this works out to be a decent
compile-time improvment. I think it also simplifies the mental model
of how BasicAA works. It took me quite a while to fully understand
how these things interact.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90094
D91936 placed the tracking for the assumptions into BasicAA.
However, when recursing over phis, we may use fresh AAQI instances.
In this case AssumptionBasedResults from an inner AAQI can reesult
in a removal of an element from the outer AAQI.
To avoid this, move the tracking into AAQI. This generally makes
more sense, as the NoAlias assumptions themselves are also stored
in AAQI.
The test case only produces an assertion failure with D90094
reapplied. I think the issue exists independently of that change
as well, but I wasn't able to come up with a reproducer.
Fix PR48742: the D75203 assembler optimization locates MCRelaxableFragment's
within two MCSymbol's and relaxes some MCRelaxableFragment's to reduce the size
of a MCAlignFragment. A -g build has more MCSymbol's and therefore may have
different assembler output (e.g. a MCRelaxableFragment (jmp) may have 5 bytes
with -O1 while 2 bytes with -O1 -g).
`.p2align 4, 0x90` is common due to loops. For a larger program, with a
lot of temporary labels, the assembly output difference is somewhat
destined. The cost seems to overweigh the benefits so we default to
-x86-pad-for-align=false until the heuristic is improved.
Reviewed By: skan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94542
InstCombine already performs a fold where X == Y ? f(X) : Z is
transformed to X == Y ? f(Y) : Z if f(Y) simplifies. However,
if f(X) only has one use, then we can always directly replace the
use inside the instruction. To actually be profitable, limit it to
the case where Y is a non-expr constant.
This could be further extended to replace uses further up a one-use
instruction chain, but for now this only looks one level up.
Among other things, this also subsumes D94860.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94862
When removing catchpad's from catchswitch, if that removes a successor,
we need to record that in DomTreeUpdater.
This fixes PostDomTree preservation failure in an existing test.
This appears to be the single issue that i see in my current test coverage.
If the previous block in a function does not fallthough, adding nop's to
align it will never be executed. This means we can freely (except for
codesize) align more branches. This happens in constantislandspass (as
it cannot happen later) and only happens at aggressive optimization
levels as it does increase codesize.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94394
This is NFC-intended and another step towards supporting
intrinsics as reduction candidates.
The remaining bits of the OperationData class do not make
much sense as-is, so I will try to improve that, but I'm
trying to take minimal steps because it's still not clear
how this was intended to work.
This is another NFC-intended patch to allow matching
intrinsics (example: maxnum) as candidates for reductions.
It's possible that the loop/if logic can be reduced now,
but it's still difficult to understand how this all works.
This treats low overhead loop branches the same as jump tables and
indirect branches in analyzeBranch - they cannot be analyzed but the
direct branches on the end of the block may be removed. This helps
remove the unnecessary branches earlier, which can help produce better
codegen (and change block layout in a number of cases).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94392
This patch removes some ancient options as a clean-up before moving
code-gen to use LTOBackend in D94487.
I think it would preferable to remove those ancient options, because
1. There are no corresponding options in LTOBackend based tools,
2. There are no unit tests for them,
3. They are not passed through by Clang,
4. At least for GNVLoadPRE, users could just use GVN's `enable-load-pre`.
Alternatively we could add support for those options to lto::Config &
co, but I think it would be better to remove them, unless they are
actually used in practice.
Reviewed By: steven_wu, tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94783
According to "9. Vector Memory Alignment Constraints" in V
specification, the alignment of vector memory access is aligned to the
size of the element. In our current implementation, we support ELEN up
to 64. We could assume the alignment of vector registers is 64 under the
assumption.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94751
Kazu Hirata