This will later be used by ThinLTOBitcodeWriter to add copies of readnone
functions to the regular LTO module.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29695
llvm-svn: 295008
This revealed that we actually have 8 more unused flag bits, and byval
size doesn't need to be a bitfield at all.
This came up during code review here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29668#inline-258469
llvm-svn: 294989
Make the whole thing testable by adding YAML I/O support for the WPD
summary information and adding some negative tests that exercise the
YAML support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29782
llvm-svn: 294981
This is consistent with what we do for GlobalISel. That way, it is easy
to see whether or not FastISel is able to fully select a function.
At some point we may want to switch that to an optimization remark.
llvm-svn: 294970
Summary:
Keep a vector of LocInfos around; one for each call to EmitInlineAsm.
Since each call to EmitInlineAsm creates a new buffer in the inline asm
SourceMgr, we can use the buffer number to map to the right LocInfo.
Reviewers: rengolin, grosbach, rnk, echristo
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29769
llvm-svn: 294947
Summary:
This adds support for placing predicateinfo such that it affects critical edges.
This fixes the issues mentioned by Nuno on the mailing list.
Depends on D29519
Reviewers: davide, nlopes
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29606
llvm-svn: 294921
The summary information includes all uses of llvm.type.test and
llvm.type.checked.load intrinsics that can be used to devirtualize calls,
including any constant arguments for virtual constant propagation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29734
llvm-svn: 294795
This makes this code much more similar to what ThinLTO is
using (also API wise), so now we can probably use a single
code path instead of copying stuff around.
llvm-svn: 294792
Summary:
This patch starts the implementation as discuss in the following RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/106532.html
When optimization duplicates code that will scale down the execution count of a basic block, we will record the duplication factor as part of discriminator so that the offline process tool can find the duplication factor and collect the accurate execution frequency of the corresponding source code. Two important optimization that fall into this category is loop vectorization and loop unroll. This patch records the duplication factor for these 2 optimizations.
The recording will be guarded by a flag encode-duplication-in-discriminators, which is off by default.
Reviewers: probinson, aprantl, davidxl, hfinkel, echristo
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, anemet, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26420
llvm-svn: 294782
This makes sure we get the same redefinition rules regardless of who
is printing (asm parser, codegen) and to what (asm, obj).
This fixes an unintentional regression in r293936.
llvm-svn: 294752
Without any loops, we don't even bother to build the standard analyses
used by loop passes. Without these, we can't run loop analyses or
invalidate them properly. Unfortunately, we did these things in the
wrong order which would allow a loop analysis manager's proxy to be
built but then not have the standard analyses built. When we went to do
the invalidation in the proxy thing would fall apart. In the test case
provided, it would actually crash.
The fix is to carefully check for loops first, and to in fact build the
standard analyses before building the proxy. This allows it to
correctly trigger invalidation for those standard analyses.
An alternative might seem to be to look at whether there are any loops
when doing invalidation, but this doesn't work when during the loop
pipeline run we delete the last loop. I've even included that as a test
case. It is both simpler and more robust to defer building the proxy
until there are definitely the standard set of analyses and indeed
loops.
This bug was uncovered by enabling GlobalsAA in the pipeline.
llvm-svn: 294728
Summary:
In preparation for graph comparison and filtering, this is a library for
representing graphs in LLVM. This will enable easier encapsulation and reuse
of graphs in llvm-xray.
Depends on D28999, D28225
Reviewers: dblaikie, dberris
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29005
llvm-svn: 294717
Summary:
In preparation for graph comparison and filtering, this is a library for
representing graphs in LLVM. This will enable easier encapsulation and reuse
of graphs in llvm-xray.
Depends on D28999, D28225
Reviewers: dblaikie, dberris
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29005
llvm-svn: 294713
The ARM target is getting really close to the current limit of 128
subtarget features already breaking out of tree enhancements. Increase
the size once more to 196.
I filed http://llvm.org/PR31926 to request a proper solution.
llvm-svn: 294704
Add support for padded SLEB128 values, and support for writing SLEB128
values to buffers rather than to ostreams, similar to the existing
ULEB128 support.
llvm-svn: 294675
Now that the call graph supports efficient replacement of a function and
spurious reference edges, we can port ArgumentPromotion to the new pass
manager very easily.
The old PM-specific bits are sunk into callbacks that the new PM simply
doesn't use. Unlike the old PM, the new PM simply does argument
promotion and afterward does the update to LCG reflecting the promoted
function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29580
llvm-svn: 294667
Gcc supports target armv7ve which is armv7-a with virtualization
extensions. This change adds support for this in llvm for gcc
compatibility.
Also remove redundant FeatureHWDiv, FeatureHWDivARM for a few models as
this is specified automatically by FeatureVirtualization.
Patch by Manoj Gupta.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29472
llvm-svn: 294661
disturbing the graph or having to update edges.
This is motivated by porting argument promotion to the new pass manager.
Because of how LLVM IR Function objects work, in order to change their
signature a new object needs to be created. This is efficient and
straight forward in the IR but previously was very hard to implement in
LCG. We could easily replace the function a node in the graph
represents. The challenging part is how to handle updating the edges in
the graph.
LCG previously used an edge to a raw function to represent a node that
had not yet been scanned for calls and references. This was the core
of its laziness. However, that model causes this kind of update to be
very hard:
1) The keys to lookup an edge need to be `Function*`s that would all
need to be updated when we update the node.
2) There will be some unknown number of edges that haven't transitioned
from `Function*` edges to `Node*` edges.
All of this complexity isn't necessary. Instead, we can always build
a node around any function, always pointing edges at it and always using
it as the key to lookup an edge. To maintain the laziness, we need to
sink the *edges* of a node into a secondary object and explicitly model
transitioning a node from empty to populated by scanning the function.
This design seems much cleaner in a number of ways, but importantly
there is now exactly *one* place where the `Function*` has to be
updated!
Some other cleanups that fall out of this include having something to
model the *entry* edges more accurately. Rather than hand rolling parts
of the node in the graph itself, we have an explicit `EdgeSequence`
object that gives us exactly the functionality needed. We also have
a consistent place to define the edge iterators and can use them for
both the entry edges and the internal edges of the graph.
The API used to model the separation between a node and its edges is
intentionally very thin as most clients are expected to deal with nodes
that have populated edges. We model this exactly as an optional does
with an additional method to populate the edges when that is
a reasonable thing for a client to do. This is based on API design
suggestions from Richard Smith and David Blaikie, credit goes to them
for helping pick how to model this without it being either too explicit
or too implicit.
The patch is somewhat noisy due to shifting around iterator types and
new syntax for walking the edges of a node, but most of the
functionality change is in the `Edge`, `EdgeSequence`, and `Node` types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29577
llvm-svn: 294653
This is a stub for a new concrete implementation of IPDBRawSymbol.
Nothing uses this uses this implementation yet. My plan is to
locally switch lldb-pdbdump from the DIA reader to the Native one
and flesh out the implementations of these method stubs in the order
they're needed.
llvm-svn: 294633
I intend to use the same type with the same semantics in the WholeProgramDevirt
pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29746
llvm-svn: 294629
Summary:
Convert all obvious node_begin/node_end and child_begin/child_end
pairs to range based for.
Sending for review in case someone has a good idea how to make
graph_children able to be inferred. It looks like it would require
changing GraphTraits to be two argument or something. I presume
inference does not happen because it would have to check every
GraphTraits in the world to see if the noderef types matched.
Note: This change was 3-staged with clang as well, which uses
Dominators/etc from LLVM.
Reviewers: chandlerc, tstellarAMD, dblaikie, rsmith
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29767
llvm-svn: 294620
Summary:
This patch allows JumpThreading also thread through guards.
Virtually, guard(cond) is equivalent to the following construction:
if (cond) { do something } else {deoptimize}
Yet it is not explicitly converted into IFs before lowering.
This patch enables early threading through guards in simple cases.
Currently it covers the following situation:
if (cond1) {
// code A
} else {
// code B
}
// code C
guard(cond2)
// code D
If there is implication cond1 => cond2 or !cond1 => cond2, we can transform
this construction into the following:
if (cond1) {
// code A
// code C
} else {
// code B
// code C
guard(cond2)
}
// code D
Thus, removing the guard from one of execution branches.
Patch by Max Kazantsev!
Reviewers: reames, apilipenko, igor-laevsky, anna, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29620
llvm-svn: 294617
Stack Smash Protection is not completely free, so in hot code, the overhead it causes can cause performance issues. By adding diagnostic information for which function have SSP and why, a user can quickly determine what they can do to stop SSP being applied to a specific hot function.
This change adds an SSP-specific DiagnosticInfo class and uses of it to the Stack Protection code. A subsequent change to clang will cause the remarks to be emitted when enabled.
Patch by: James Henderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29023
llvm-svn: 294590
This patch does the following.
1. Adds an Intrinsic int_x86_clzero which works with __builtin_ia32_clzero
2. Identifies clzero feature using cpuid info. (Function:8000_0008, Checks if EBX[0]=1)
3. Adds the clzero feature under znver1 architecture.
4. The custom inserter is added in Lowering.
5. A testcase is added to check the intrinsic.
6. The clzero instruction is added to assembler test.
Patch by Ganesh Gopalasubramanian with a couple formatting tweaks, a disassembler test, and using update_llc_test.py from me.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29385
llvm-svn: 294558
It'll usually be immediately legalized back to a libcall, but occasionally
something can be done with it so we'd just as well enable that flexibility from
the start.
llvm-svn: 294530
AArch64 has specific instructions to multiply two numbers at double the width
and produce the high part of the result. These can be used to implement LLVM's
mul.with.overflow instructions fairly simply. Helps with C++ operator new[].
llvm-svn: 294519
Eugene Zelenko