Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
River Riddle 3655069234 [mlir] Move the Builtin FuncOp to the Func dialect
This commit moves FuncOp out of the builtin dialect, and into the Func
dialect. This move has been planned in some capacity from the moment
we made FuncOp an operation (years ago). This commit handles the
functional aspects of the move, but various aspects are left untouched
to ease migration: func::FuncOp is re-exported into mlir to reduce
the actual API churn, the assembly format still accepts the unqualified
`func`. These temporary measures will remain for a little while to
simplify migration before being removed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121266
2022-03-16 17:07:03 -07:00
River Riddle 47f175b09b [mlir] Update FuncOp conversion passes to Pass/InterfacePass<FunctionOpInterface>
These passes generally don't rely on any special aspects of FuncOp, and moving allows
for these passes to be used in many more situations. The passes that obviously weren't
relying on invariants guaranteed by a "function" were updated to be generic pass, the
rest were updated to be FunctionOpinterface InterfacePasses.

The test updates are NFC switching from implicit nesting (-pass -pass2) form to
the -pass-pipeline form (generic passes do not implicitly nest as op-specific passes do).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121190
2022-03-08 12:25:32 -08:00
River Riddle 5a7b919409 [mlir][NFC] Rename StandardToLLVM to FuncToLLVM
The current StandardToLLVM conversion patterns only really handle
the Func dialect. The pass itself adds patterns for Arithmetic/CFToLLVM, but
those should be/will be split out in a followup. This commit focuses solely
on being an NFC rename.

Aside from the directory change, the pattern and pass creation API have been renamed:
 * populateStdToLLVMFuncOpConversionPattern -> populateFuncToLLVMFuncOpConversionPattern
 * populateStdToLLVMConversionPatterns -> populateFuncToLLVMConversionPatterns
 * createLowerToLLVMPass -> createConvertFuncToLLVMPass

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120778
2022-03-07 11:25:23 -08:00
River Riddle ace01605e0 [mlir] Split out a new ControlFlow dialect from Standard
This dialect is intended to model lower level/branch based control-flow constructs. The initial set
of operations are: AssertOp, BranchOp, CondBranchOp, SwitchOp; all split out from the current
standard dialect.

See https://discourse.llvm.org/t/standard-dialect-the-final-chapter/6061

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118966
2022-02-06 14:51:16 -08:00
Mogball a54f4eae0e [MLIR] Replace std ops with arith dialect ops
Precursor: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110200

Removed redundant ops from the standard dialect that were moved to the
`arith` or `math` dialects.

Renamed all instances of operations in the codebase and in tests.

Reviewed By: rriddle, jpienaar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110797
2021-10-13 03:07:03 +00:00
Alex Zinenko 8b58ab8ccd [mlir] Factor type reconciliation out of Standard-to-LLVM conversion
Conversion to the LLVM dialect is being refactored to be more progressive and
is now performed as a series of independent passes converting different
dialects. These passes may produce `unrealized_conversion_cast` operations that
represent pending conversions between built-in and LLVM dialect types.
Historically, a more monolithic Standard-to-LLVM conversion pass did not need
these casts as all operations were converted in one shot. Previous refactorings
have led to the requirement of running the Standard-to-LLVM conversion pass to
clean up `unrealized_conversion_cast`s even though the IR had no standard
operations in it. The pass must have been also run the last among all to-LLVM
passes, in contradiction with the partial conversion logic. Additionally, the
way it was set up could produce invalid operations by removing casts between
LLVM and built-in types even when the consumer did not accept the uncasted
type, or could lead to cryptic conversion errors (recursive application of the
rewrite pattern on `unrealized_conversion_cast` as a means to indicate failure
to eliminate casts).

In fact, the need to eliminate A->B->A `unrealized_conversion_cast`s is not
specific to to-LLVM conversions and can be factored out into a separate type
reconciliation pass, which is achieved in this commit. While the cast operation
itself has a folder pattern, it is insufficient in most conversion passes as
the folder only applies to the second cast. Without complex legality setup in
the conversion target, the conversion infra will either consider the cast
operations valid and not fold them (a separate canonicalization would be
necessary to trigger the folding), or consider the first cast invalid upon
generation and stop with error. The pattern provided by the reconciliation pass
applies to the first cast operation instead. Furthermore, having a separate
pass makes it clear when `unrealized_conversion_cast`s could not have been
eliminated since it is the only reason why this pass can fail.

Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109507
2021-09-09 16:51:24 +02:00
Eugene Zhulenev d43b23608a [mlir:Async] Add the size parameter to the async.group
Specify the `!async.group` size (the number of tokens that will be added to it) at construction time. `async.await_all` operation can potentially race with `async.execute` operations that keep updating the group, for this reason it is required to know upfront how many tokens will be added to the group.

Reviewed By: ftynse, herhut

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104780
2021-06-25 10:26:50 -07:00
Eugene Zhulenev d8c84d2a4e [mlir] Async: Add error propagation support to async groups
Depends On D103109

If any of the tokens/values added to the `!async.group` switches to the error state, than the group itself switches to the error state.

Reviewed By: mehdi_amini

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103203
2021-05-27 09:35:11 -07:00
Eugene Zhulenev 39957aa424 [mlir] Add error state and error propagation to async runtime values
Depends On D103102

Not yet implemented:
1. Error handling after synchronous await
2. Error handling for async groups

Will be addressed in the followup PRs

Reviewed By: mehdi_amini

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103109
2021-05-27 09:28:47 -07:00