Enable scalar hoisting at -Oz as it is safe to hoist scalars to a place
where they are partially needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27111
llvm-svn: 288141
This is with an extra change to avoid calling MemoryLocation::get() on a call instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25542
llvm-svn: 284098
This CL didn't actually address the test case in PR30499, and clang
still crashes.
Also revert dependent change "Memory-SSA cleanup of clobbers interface, NFC"
Reverts r283965 and r283967.
llvm-svn: 284093
This implements the cleanup that Danny asked to commit separately from the
previous fix to GVN-hoist in https://reviews.llvm.org/D25476#inline-219818
Tested with ninja check on x86_64-linux.
llvm-svn: 283967
This is a refreshed version of a patch that was reverted: it fixes
the problems reported in both PR30216 and PR30499, and
contains all the test-cases from both bugs.
To hoist stores past loads, we used to search for potential
conflicting loads on the hoisting path by following a MemorySSA
def-def link from the store to be hoisted to the previous
defining memory access, and from there we followed the def-use
chains to all the uses that occur on the hoisting path. The
problem is that the def-def link may point to a store that does
not alias with the store to be hoisted, and so the loads that are
walked may not alias with the store to be hoisted, and even as in
the testcase of PR30216, the loads that may alias with the store
to be hoisted are not visited.
The current patch visits all loads on the path from the store to
be hoisted to the hoisting position and uses the alias analysis
to ask whether the store may alias the load. I was not able to
use the MemorySSA functionality to ask for whether load and
store are clobbered: I'm not sure which function to call, so I
used a call to AA->isNoAlias().
Store past store is still working as before using a MemorySSA
query: I added an extra test to pr30216.ll to make sure store
past store does not regress.
Tested on x86_64-linux with check and a test-suite run.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25476
llvm-svn: 283965
and also the dependent r282175 "GVN-hoist: do not dereference null pointers"
It's causing compiler crashes building Harfbuzz (PR30499).
llvm-svn: 282199
To hoist stores past loads, we used to search for potential
conflicting loads on the hoisting path by following a MemorySSA
def-def link from the store to be hoisted to the previous
defining memory access, and from there we followed the def-use
chains to all the uses that occur on the hoisting path. The
problem is that the def-def link may point to a store that does
not alias with the store to be hoisted, and so the loads that are
walked may not alias with the store to be hoisted, and even as in
the testcase of PR30216, the loads that may alias with the store
to be hoisted are not visited.
The current patch visits all loads on the path from the store to
be hoisted to the hoisting position and uses the alias analysis
to ask whether the store may alias the load. I was not able to
use the MemorySSA functionality to ask for whether load and
store are clobbered: I'm not sure which function to call, so I
used a call to AA->isNoAlias().
Store past store is still working as before using a MemorySSA
query: I added an extra test to pr30216.ll to make sure store
past store does not regress.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24517
llvm-svn: 282168
Without this patch, GVN-hoist would think that a branch instruction is a scalar instruction
and would try to value number it. The patch filters out all such kind of irrelevant instructions.
A bit frustrating is that there is no easy way to discard all those very infrequent instructions,
a bit like isa<TerminatorInst> that stands for a large family of instructions. I'm thinking that
checking for those very infrequent other instructions would cost us more in compilation time
than just letting those instructions getting numbered, so I'm still thinking that a simpler check:
if (isa<TerminatorInst>(I))
return false;
is better than listing all the other less frequent instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23929
llvm-svn: 282160
Without invalidating the entries in the MD cache we would try to access instructions
that were removed in previous iterations of hoisting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23927
llvm-svn: 279907
It is invalid to hoist stores or loads if they are not executed on all paths
from the hoisting point to the exit of the function. In the testcase, there are
paths in the loop that do not execute the stores or the loads, and so hoisting
them within the loop is unsafe.
The problem is that the current implementation of hoistingFromAllPaths is
incomplete: it walks all blocks dominated by the hoisting point, and does not
return false when the loop contains a path on which the hoisted ld/st is
not executed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23843
llvm-svn: 279732
Summary: GVNHoist: Use the pass version of MemorySSA and preserve it.
Reviewers: sebpop, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23782
llvm-svn: 279504
Summary:
This fixes PR 28933 by making sure GVNHoist does not try to recreate memory
accesses when it has not actually moved them.
Reviewers: sebpop
Subscribers: llvm-commits, george.burgess.iv
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23411
llvm-svn: 278401
Besides a general consistently benefit, the extra layer of indirection
allows the mechanical part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23256 that
requires touching every transformation and analysis to be factored out
cleanly.
Thanks to David for the suggestion.
llvm-svn: 278077
The patch splits a complex && if condition into easier to read and understand
logic. That wrong early exit condition was letting some instructions with not
all operands available pass through when HoistingGeps was true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23174
llvm-svn: 277785
Limit the number of times the while(1) loop is executed. With this restriction
the number of hoisted instructions does not change in a significant way on the
test-suite.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23028
llvm-svn: 277651
With this patch we compute the DFS numbers of instructions only once and update
them during the code generation when an instruction gets hoisted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23021
llvm-svn: 277650
With this patch we compute the MemorySSA once and update it in the code generator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22966
llvm-svn: 277649
When loading or storing in a field of a struct like "a.b.c", GVN is able to
detect the equivalent expressions, and GVN-hoist would fail in the code
generation. This is because the GEPs are not hoisted as scalar operations to
avoid moving the GEPs too far from their ld/st instruction when the ld/st is not
movable. So we end up having to generate code for the GEP of a ld/st when we
move the ld/st. In the case of a GEP referring to another GEP as in "a.b.c" we
need to code generate all the GEPs necessary to make all the operands available
at the new location for the ld/st. With this patch we recursively walk through
the GEP operands checking whether all operands are available, and in the case of
a GEP operand, it recursively makes all its operands available. Code generation
happens from the inner GEPs out until reaching the GEP that appears as an
operand of the ld/st.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22599
llvm-svn: 276841
The patch replaces a function that walks the IR with a call to firstInBB() that
uses the DFS numbering. NFC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22809
llvm-svn: 276840
Instead of DFS numbering basic blocks we now DFS number instructions that avoids
the costly operation of which instruction comes first in a basic block.
Patch mostly written by Daniel Berlin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22777
llvm-svn: 276714
This patch adds an option to specify the maximum depth in a BB at which to
consider hoisting instructions. Hoisting instructions from a deeper level is
not profitable as it increases register pressure and compilation time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22772
llvm-svn: 276713
If we two loads of two different alignments, we must use the minimum of
the two alignments when hoisting. Same deal for stores.
For allocas, use the maximum of the two allocas.
llvm-svn: 276601
Do not clone stored values unless they are GEPs that are special cased to avoid
hoisting them without hoisting their associated ld/st.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22652
llvm-svn: 276358
While debugging GVNHoist, I found it confusing that the entries in a
VNtoInsns were not always value numbers. They _usually_ were except for
StoreInst in which case they were a hash of two different value numbers.
This leads to two observations:
- It is more difficult to debug things when the semantic contents of
VNtoInsns changes over time.
- Using a single value number is not much cheaper, the value of
VNtoInsns is a SmallVector.
- It is not immediately clear what the algorithm would do if there were
hash collisions in the StoreInst case.
Using a DenseMap of std::pair sidesteps all of this.
N.B. The changes in the test were due their sensitivity to the
iteration order of VNtoInsns which has changed.
llvm-svn: 275761
This pass hoists duplicated computations in the program. The primary goal of
gvn-hoist is to reduce the size of functions before inline heuristics to reduce
the total cost of function inlining.
Pass written by Sebastian Pop, Aditya Kumar, Xiaoyu Hu, and Brian Rzycki.
Important algorithmic contributions by Daniel Berlin under the form of reviews.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19338
llvm-svn: 275561
Aditya Kumar