Previously, on long branches (relative jumps of >4 kB), an assertion
failure was hit, as AVRInstrInfo::insertIndirectBranch was not
implemented. Despite its name, it is called by the branch relaxator
for *all* unconditional jumps.
Patch by Thomas Backman.
llvm-svn: 314891
In some cases, the code generator attempts to generate instructions such as:
lddw r24, Y+63
which expands to:
ldd r24, Y+63
ldd r25, Y+64 # Oops! This is actually ld r25, Y in the binary
This commit limits the first offset to 62, and thus the second to 63.
It also updates some asserts in AVRExpandPseudoInsts.cpp, including for
INW and OUTW, which appear to be unused.
Patch by Thomas Backman.
llvm-svn: 314890
Also enables '__do_clear_bss'.
These functions are automaticalled called by the CRT if they are
declared.
We need these to be called otherwise RAM will start completely
uninitialised, even though we need to copy RAM variables from progmem to
RAM.
llvm-svn: 312905
We should rewrite this using the generic branch relaxation pass, but for
the moment having this pass is better than hitting an assertion error.
llvm-svn: 307109
Previously, if a basic block ended with a FRMIDX instruction, we would
end up doing something like this.
*std::next(MBB.end())
Which would hit an error:
"Assertion `!NodePtr->isKnownSentinel()' failed."
llvm-svn: 307057
A bunch of tests failed because memory operations have been reordered.
I am unsure which commit changed this behaviour as the AVR build was
failing at that point with an unrelated error.
This commit just reoders some of the CHECK lines in some tests to suit
current llc output.
llvm-svn: 300682
This is recommit of r287553 after fixing the invalid loop info after eliminating an empty block and unit test failures in AVR and WebAssembly :
Summary: Merging an empty case block into the header block of switch could cause ISel to add COPY instructions in the header of switch, instead of the case block, if the case block is used as an incoming block of a PHI. This could potentially increase dynamic instructions, especially when the switch is in a loop. I added a test case which was reduced from the benchmark I was targetting.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, manmanren, wmi, joerg, davidxl
Subscribers: joerg, qcolombet, danielcdh, hfinkel, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22696
llvm-svn: 289988
Summary:
This pass will be used to relax instructions which use out of bounds
memory accesses to equivalent operations that can work with the
addresses.
The pass currently implements relaxation for the STDWPtrQRr instruction.
Without this pass, an assertion error would be hit in the pseudo expansion pass.
In the future, we will need to add more instructions to this pass. We can do
that on a case-by-case basic.
Reviewers: arsenm, kparzysz
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27650
llvm-svn: 289517
There was a bug where we would hit an assertion if 'Q' was used as a
constraint.
I also removed hardcoded register names to prefer regexes so the tests
don't break when the register allocator changes.
llvm-svn: 289325
Summary: This gets rid of the hardcoded 'r0' that was used previously.
Reviewers: asl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27567
llvm-svn: 289322
Dylan McKay