realize that CXXConstructExpr is always implicit, so we should just
return its argument (if there is only one) rather than directly
invoking the constructor.
llvm-svn: 95192
- Don't use GlobalAliases with non-0 GEPs (GNU runtime) - this was unsupported and LLVM will be generating errors if you do it soon. This also simplifies the code generated by the GNU runtime a bit.
- Make GetSelector() return a constant (GNU runtime), not a load of a store of a constant.
- Recognise @selector() expressions as valid static initialisers (as GCC does).
- Add methods to GCObjCRuntime to emit selectors as constants (needed for using @selector() expressions as constants. These need implementing for the Mac runtimes - I couldn't figure out how to do this, they seem to require a load.
- Store an ObjCMethodDecl in an ObjCSelectorExpr so that we can get at the type information for the selector. This is needed for generating typed selectors from @selector() expressions (as GCC does). Ideally, this information should be stored in the Selector, but that would be an invasive change. We should eventually add checks for common uses of @selector() expressions. Possibly adding an attribute that can be applied to method args providing the types of a selector so, for example, you'd do something like this:
- (id)performSelector: __attribute__((selector_types(id, SEL, id)))(SEL)
withObject: (id)object;
Then, any @selector() expressions passed to the method will be check to ensure that it conforms to this signature. We do this at run time on the GNU runtime already, but it would be nice to do it at compile time on all runtimes.
- Made @selector() expressions emit type info if available and the runtime supports it.
Someone more familiar with the Mac runtime needs to implement the GetConstantSelector() function in CGObjCMac. This currently just assert()s.
llvm-svn: 95189
lvalue-to-rvalue conversion adjusts lvalues of qualified, non-class
type to rvalue expressions of the unqualified variant of that
type. For example, given:
const int i;
(void)(i + 17);
the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion for the subexpression "i" will turn it
from an lvalue expression (a DeclRefExpr) with type 'const int' into
an rvalue expression with type 'int'. Both C and C++ mandate this
conversion, and somehow we've slid through without implementing it.
We now have both DefaultFunctionArrayConversion and
DefaultFunctionArrayLvalueConversion, and which gets used depends on
whether we do the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion or not. Generally, we do
the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion, but there are a few notable
exceptions:
- the left-hand side of a '.' operator
- the left-hand side of an assignment
- a C++ throw expression
- a subscript expression that's subscripting a vector
Making this change exposed two issues with blocks:
- we were deducing const-qualified return types of non-class type
from a block return, which doesn't fit well
- we weren't always setting the known return type of a block when it
was provided with the ^return-type syntax
Fixes the current Clang-on-Clang compile failure and PR6076.
llvm-svn: 95167
WHAT!?!
It turns out that Type::isPromotableIntegerType() was not considering
enumeration types to be promotable, so we would never do the
promotion despite having properly computed the promotion type when the
enum was defined. Various operations on values of enum type just
"worked" because we could still compute the integer rank of an enum
type; the oddity, however, is that operations such as "add an enum and
an unsigned" would often have an enum result type (!). The bug
actually showed up as a spurious -Wformat diagnostic
(<rdar://problem/7595366>), but in theory it could cause miscompiles.
In this commit:
- Enum types with a promotion type of "int" or "unsigned int" are
promotable.
- Tweaked the computation of promotable types for enums
- For all of the ABIs, treat enum types the same way as their
underlying types (*not* their promotion types) for argument passing
and return values
- Extend the ABI tester with support for enumeration types
llvm-svn: 95117
arguments. Fix a bug where incomplete explicit specializations were being
passed through as legitimate. Fix a bug where the absence of an explicit
specialization in an overload set was causing overall deduction to fail.
Fixes PR6191.
llvm-svn: 95052
This is to address a serious performance problem observed when running
'clang -fsyntax-only' on really broken source files. In one case,
repeatedly calling CorrectTypo() caused one source file to be rejected
after 2 minutes instead of 1 second.
This patch causes typo correction to take neglible time on that file
while still providing correction results for the first 20 cases. I
felt this was a reasonable number for moderately broken source files.
I don't claim this is the best solution. Comments welcome. It is
necessary for us to address this issue because it is a serious
performance problem.
llvm-svn: 95049
forgetting a ';' at the end of a struct. For something like:
class c {
}
void foo() {}
we now produce:
t.cc:3:2: error: expected ';' after class
}
^
;
instead of:
t.cc:4:1: error: cannot combine with previous 'class' declaration specifier
void foo() {}
^
t.cc:2:7: error: 'class c' can not be defined in the result type of a function
class c {
^
GCC produces:
t.cc:4: error: new types may not be defined in a return type
t.cc:4: note: (perhaps a semicolon is missing after the definition of ‘c’)
t.cc:4: error: two or more data types in declaration of ‘foo’
I *think* I got the follow set right, but if I forgot anything, we'll start
getting spurious "expected ';' after class" errors, let me know if you see
any.
llvm-svn: 95042
t.cc:4:3: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int y;
^
t.cc:6:1: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
};
^
After:
t.cc:3:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int x
^
;
t.cc:5:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int z
^
;
llvm-svn: 95039
t.c:4:3: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int y;
^
t.c:4:8: warning: extra ';' inside a struct or union
int y;
^
t.c:6:1: warning: expected ';' at end of declaration list
};
^
After:
t.c:3:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int x // expected-error {{expected ';' at end of declaration list}}
^
;
t.c:5:8: warning: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int z
^
;
llvm-svn: 95038
- In C++, prior to the closing '}', set the type of enumerators
based on the type of their initializer. Don't perform unary
conversions on the enumerator values.
- In C++, handle overflow when an enumerator has no initializer and
its value cannot be represented in the type of the previous
enumerator.
- In C, handle overflow more gracefully, by complaining and then
falling back to the C++ rules.
- In C, if the enumerator value is representable in an int, convert the
expression to the type 'int'.
Fixes PR5854 and PR4515.
llvm-svn: 95031
Douglas Gregor