Use `getUnsignedMax` directly instead of special casing a wrapped
ConstantRange.
The previous code would have been "buggy" (and this would have been a
semantic change) if LLVM allowed !range metadata to denote full
ranges. E.g. in
%val = load i1, i1* %ptr, !range !{i1 1, i1 1} ;; == full set
ValueTracking would conclude that the high bit (IOW the only bit) in
%val was zero.
Since !range metadata does not allow empty or full ranges, this change
is just a minor stylistic improvement.
llvm-svn: 251380
Even though we may not know the value of the shifter operand, it's possible we know the shifter operand is non-zero. This can allow us to infer more known bits - for example:
%1 = load %p !range {1, 5}
%2 = shl %q, %1
We don't know %1, but we do know that it is nonzero so %2[0] is known zero, and importantly %2 is known non-zero.
Calling isKnownNonZero is nontrivially expensive so use an Optional to run it lazily and cache its result.
llvm-svn: 251294
The loop idiom creating a ConstantRange is repeated twice in the
codebase, time to give it a name and a home.
The loop is also repeated in `rangeMetadataExcludesValue`, but using
`getConstantRangeFromMetadata` there would not be an NFC -- the range
returned by `getConstantRangeFromMetadata` may contain a value that none
of the subranges did.
llvm-svn: 251180
First, the motivation: LLVM currently does not realize that:
((2072 >> (L == 0)) >> 7) & 1 == 0
where L is some arbitrary value. Whether you right-shift 2072 by 7 or by 8, the
lowest-order bit is always zero. There are obviously several ways to go about
fixing this, but the generic solution pursued in this patch is to teach
computeKnownBits something about shifts by a non-constant amount. Previously,
we would give up completely on these. Instead, in cases where we know something
about the low-order bits of the shift-amount operand, we can combine (and
together) the associated restrictions for all shift amounts consistent with
that knowledge. As a further generalization, I refactored all of the logic for
all three kinds of shifts to have this capability. This works well in the above
case, for example, because the dynamic shift amount can only be 0 or 1, and
thus we can say a lot about the known bits of the result.
This brings us to the second part of this change: Even when we know all of the
bits of a value via computeKnownBits, nothing used to constant-fold the result.
This introduces the necessary code into InstCombine and InstSimplify. I've
added it into both because:
1. InstCombine won't automatically pick up the associated logic in
InstSimplify (InstCombine uses InstSimplify, but not via the API that
passes in the original instruction).
2. Putting the logic in InstCombine allows the resulting simplifications to become
part of the iterative worklist
3. Putting the logic in InstSimplify allows the resulting simplifications to be
used by everywhere else that calls SimplifyInstruction (inlining, unrolling,
and many others).
And this requires a small change to our definition of an ephemeral value so
that we don't break the rest case from r246696 (where the icmp feeding the
@llvm.assume, is also feeding a br). Under the old definition, the icmp would
not be considered ephemeral (because it is used by the br), but this causes the
assume to remove itself (in addition to simplifying the branch structure), and
it seems more-useful to prevent that from happening.
llvm-svn: 251146
isKnownNonEqual(A, B) returns true if it can be determined that A != B.
At the moment it only knows two facts, that a non-wrapping add of nonzero to a value cannot be that value:
A + B != A [where B != 0, addition is nsw or nuw]
and that contradictory known bits imply two values are not equal.
This patch also hooks this up to InstSimplify; InstSimplify had a peephole for the first fact but not the second so this teaches InstSimplify a new trick too (alas no measured performance impact!)
llvm-svn: 251012
This is a cleaned up patch from the one written by John Regehr based on the findings of the Souper superoptimizer.
The basic idea here is that input bits that are known zero reduce the maximum count that the intrinsic could return. We know that the number of bits required to represent a particular count is at most log2(N)+1.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13253
llvm-svn: 250338
Remove implicit ilist iterator conversions from LLVMAnalysis.
I came across something really scary in `llvm::isKnownNotFullPoison()`
which relied on `Instruction::getNextNode()` being completely broken
(not surprising, but scary nevertheless). This function is documented
(and coded to) return `nullptr` when it gets to the sentinel, but with
an `ilist_half_node` as a sentinel, the sentinel check looks into some
other memory and we don't recognize we've hit the end.
Rooting out these scary cases is the reason I'm removing the implicit
conversions before doing anything else with `ilist`; I'm not at all
surprised that clients rely on badness.
I found another scary case -- this time, not relying on badness, just
bad (but I guess getting lucky so far) -- in
`ObjectSizeOffsetEvaluator::compute_()`. Here, we save out the
insertion point, do some things, and then restore it. Previously, we
let the iterator auto-convert to `Instruction*`, and then set it back
using the `Instruction*` version:
Instruction *PrevInsertPoint = Builder.GetInsertPoint();
/* Logic that may change insert point */
if (PrevInsertPoint)
Builder.SetInsertPoint(PrevInsertPoint);
The check for `PrevInsertPoint` doesn't protect correctly against bad
accesses. If the insertion point has been set to the end of a basic
block (i.e., `SetInsertPoint(SomeBB)`), then `GetInsertPoint()` returns
an iterator pointing at the list sentinel. The version of
`SetInsertPoint()` that's getting called will then call
`PrevInsertPoint->getParent()`, which explodes horribly. The only
reason this hasn't blown up is that it's fairly unlikely the builder is
adding to the end of the block; usually, we're adding instructions
somewhere before the terminator.
llvm-svn: 249925
This was requested in D13076: if we're going to canonicalize to fabs(), ValueTracking
should know that fabs() clears sign bits.
In this patch (as in D13076), we're not handling vectors yet even though computeKnownBits'
fabs() case itself should be vector-ready via the splat in this patch.
Fixing this will require follow-on patches to correct other logic that uses 'getScalarType'.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13222
llvm-svn: 249701
This is a cleaned up patch from the one written by John Regehr based on the findings of the Souper superoptimizer.
When writing tests, I was surprised to find that instsimplify apparently doesn't know how to collapse bit test sequences based purely on known bits. This required me to split my tests across both instsimplify and instcombine.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13250
llvm-svn: 249453
On some of our benchmarks this change shows about 50% compile time improvement without any noticeable performance difference.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13248
llvm-svn: 248801
If a PHI starts at a non-negative constant, monotonically increases
(only adds of a constant are supported at the moment) and that add
does not wrap, then the PHI is known never to be zero.
llvm-svn: 248796
If the shifter operand is a constant, and all of the bits shifted out
are known to be zero, then if X is known non-zero at least one
non-zero bit must remain.
llvm-svn: 248508
Turns out that not every basic block is guaranteed to have a node within the DominatorTree. This is really hard to trigger, but the test case from the PR managed to do so. There's active discussion continuing about what documentation and/or invariants needed cleaned up.
llvm-svn: 248216
Summary: This patch replaces isKnownNonNull() with isKnownNonNullAt() when checking nullness of passing arguments at callsite. In this way it can handle cases where the argument does not have nonnull attribute but has a dominating null check from the CFG. It also adds assertions in isKnownNonNull() and isKnownNonNullFromDominatingCondition() to make sure the value checked is pointer type (as defined in LLVM document). These assertions might trip failures in things which are not covered under llvm/test, but fixes should be pretty obvious.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12779
llvm-svn: 247587
Summary:
Add a `cleanupendpad` instruction, used to mark exceptional exits out of
cleanups (for languages/targets that can abort a cleanup with another
exception). The `cleanupendpad` instruction is similar to the `catchendpad`
instruction in that it is an EH pad which is the target of unwind edges in
the handler and which itself has an unwind edge to the next EH action.
The `cleanupendpad` instruction, similar to `cleanupret` has a `cleanuppad`
argument indicating which cleanup it exits. The unwind successors of a
`cleanuppad`'s `cleanupendpad`s must agree with each other and with its
`cleanupret`s.
Update WinEHPrepare (and docs/tests) to accomodate `cleanupendpad`.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12433
llvm-svn: 246751
We only looked through casts when one operand was a constant. We can also look through casts when both operands are non-constant, but both are in fact the same cast type. For example:
%1 = icmp ult i8 %a, %b
%2 = zext i8 %a to i32
%3 = zext i8 %b to i32
%4 = select i1 %1, i32 %2, i32 %3
llvm-svn: 246678
This reverts isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute's use of ReadNone until we
split ReadNone into two pieces: one attribute which reasons about how
the function reasons about memory and another attribute which determines
how it may be speculated, CSE'd, trap, etc.
llvm-svn: 246331
A readnone tailcall may still have a chain of computation which follows
it that would invalidate a tailcall lowering. Don't skip the analysis
in such cases.
This fixes PR24613.
llvm-svn: 246304
Any call which is side effect free is trivially OK to speculate. We
already had similar logic in EarlyCSE and GVN but we were missing it
from isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute.
This fixes PR24601.
llvm-svn: 246232
Globals in address spaces other than one may have 0 as a valid address,
so we should not assume that they can be null.
Reviewed by Philip Reames.
llvm-svn: 246137
Summary:
Refactor, NFC
Extracts computeOverflowForSignedAdd and isKnownNonNegative from NaryReassociate to ValueTracking in case
others need it.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11313
llvm-svn: 245591
The select pattern recognition in ValueTracking (as used by InstCombine
and SelectionDAGBuilder) only knew about integer patterns. This teaches
it about minimum and maximum operations.
matchSelectPattern() has been extended to return a struct containing the
existing Flavor and a new enum defining the pattern's behavior when
given one NaN operand.
C minnum() is defined to return the non-NaN operand in this case, but
the idiomatic C "a < b ? a : b" would return the NaN operand.
ARM and AArch64 at least have different instructions for these different cases.
llvm-svn: 244580
iisUnmovableInstruction() had a list of instructions hardcoded which are
considered unmovable. The list lacked (at least) an entry for the va_arg
and cmpxchg instructions.
Fix this by introducing a new Instruction::mayBeMemoryDependent()
instead of maintaining another instruction list.
Patch by Matthias Braun <matze@braunis.de>.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11577
rdar://problem/22118647
llvm-svn: 244244
This introduces new instructions neccessary to implement MSVC-compatible
exception handling support. Most of the middle-end and none of the
back-end haven't been audited or updated to take them into account.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11097
llvm-svn: 243766
Summary:
Make Scalar Evolution able to propagate NSW and NUW flags from instructions to SCEVs in some cases. This is based on reasoning about when poison from instructions with these flags would trigger undefined behavior. This gives a 13% speed-up on some Eigen3-based Google-internal microbenchmarks for NVPTX.
There does not seem to be clear agreement about when poison should be considered to propagate through instructions. In this analysis, poison propagates only in cases where that should be uncontroversial.
This change makes LSR able to create induction variables for expressions like &ptr[i + offset] for loops like this:
for (int i = 0; i < limit; ++i) {
sum += ptr[i + offset];
}
Here ptr is a 64 bit pointer and offset is a 32 bit integer. For NVPTX, LSR currently creates an induction variable for i + offset instead, which is not as fast. Improving this situation is what brings the 13% speed-up on some Eigen3-based Google-internal microbenchmarks for NVPTX.
There are more details in this discussion on llvmdev.
June: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2015-June/thread.html#87234
July: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2015-July/thread.html#87392
Patch by Bjarke Roune
Reviewers: eliben, atrick, sanjoy
Subscribers: majnemer, hfinkel, jingyue, meheff, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11212
llvm-svn: 243460
From the linker's perspective, an available_externally global is equivalent
to an external declaration (per isDeclarationForLinker()), so it is incorrect
to consider it to be a weak definition.
Also clean up some logic in the dead argument elimination pass and clarify
its comments to better explain how its behavior depends on linkage,
introduce GlobalValue::isStrongDefinitionForLinker() and start using
it throughout the optimizers and backend.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10941
llvm-svn: 241413
Summary:
ValueTracking used to overwrite the analysis results computed from
assumes and dominating conditions. This patch fixes this issue.
Test Plan: test/Analysis/ValueTracking/assume.ll
Reviewers: hfinkel, majnemer
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10283
llvm-svn: 239718
For GEP instructions isDereferenceablePointer checks that all indices are constant and within bounds. Replace this index calculation logic to a call to accumulateConstantOffset. Separated from the http://reviews.llvm.org/D9791
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9874
llvm-svn: 239299
Make sure if we're truncating a constant that would then be sign extended
that the sign extension of the truncated constant is the same as the
original constant.
> Canonicalize min/max expressions correctly.
>
> This patch introduces a canonical form for min/max idioms where one operand
> is extended or truncated. This often happens when the other operand is a
> constant. For example:
>
> %1 = icmp slt i32 %a, i32 0
> %2 = sext i32 %a to i64
> %3 = select i1 %1, i64 %2, i64 0
>
> Would now be canonicalized into:
>
> %1 = icmp slt i32 %a, i32 0
> %2 = select i1 %1, i32 %a, i32 0
> %3 = sext i32 %2 to i64
>
> This builds upon a patch posted by David Majenemer
> (https://www.marc.info/?l=llvm-commits&m=143008038714141&w=2). That pass
> passively stopped instcombine from ruining canonical patterns. This
> patch additionally actively makes instcombine canonicalize too.
>
> Canonicalization of expressions involving a change in type from int->fp
> or fp->int are not yet implemented.
llvm-svn: 237821
Summary:
Introduce dereferenceable, dereferenceable_or_null metadata for loads
with the same semantic as corresponding attributes.
This patch depends on http://reviews.llvm.org/D9253
Patch by Artur Pilipenko!
Reviewers: hfinkel, sanjoy, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9365
llvm-svn: 237720
Summary:
Allow hoisting of loads from values marked with dereferenceable_or_null
attribute. For values marked with the attribute perform
context-sensitive analysis to determine whether it's known-non-null or
not.
Patch by Artur Pilipenko!
Reviewers: hfinkel, sanjoy, reames
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9253
llvm-svn: 237593
This teaches the min/max idiom detector in ValueTracking to see through
casts such as SExt/ZExt/Trunc. SCEV can already do this, so we're bringing
non-SCEV analyses up to the same level.
The returned LHS/RHS will not match the type of the original SelectInst
any more, so a CastOp is returned too to inform the caller how to
convert to the SelectInst's type.
No in-tree users yet; this will be used by InstCombine in a followup.
llvm-svn: 237452
Summary:
Extract method haveNoCommonBitsSet so that we don't have to duplicate this logic in
InstCombine and SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP.
This patch also makes SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP more precise by passing
DominatorTree to computeKnownBits.
Test Plan: value-tracking-domtree.ll that tests ValueTracking indeed leverages dominating conditions
Reviewers: broune, meheff, majnemer
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9734
llvm-svn: 237407
We already had a method to iterate over all the incoming values of a PHI. This just changes all eligible code to use it.
Ineligible code included anything which cared about the index, or was also trying to get the i'th incoming BB.
llvm-svn: 237169
Specifically, if a pointer accesses different underlying objects in each
iteration, don't look through the phi node defining the pointer.
The motivating case is the underlyling-objects-2.ll testcase. Consider
the loop nest:
int **A;
for (i)
for (j)
A[i][j] = A[i-1][j] * B[j]
This loop is transformed by Load-PRE to stash away A[i] for the next
iteration of the outer loop:
Curr = A[0]; // Prev_0
for (i: 1..N) {
Prev = Curr; // Prev = PHI (Prev_0, Curr)
Curr = A[i];
for (j: 0..N)
Curr[j] = Prev[j] * B[j]
}
Since A[i] and A[i-1] are likely to be independent pointers,
getUnderlyingObjects should not assume that Curr and Prev share the same
underlying object in the inner loop.
If it did we would try to dependence-analyze Curr and Prev and the
analysis of the corresponding SCEVs would fail with non-constant
distance.
To fix this, the getUnderlyingObjects API is extended with an optional
LoopInfo parameter. This is effectively what controls whether we want
the above behavior or the original. Currently, I only changed to use
this approach for LoopAccessAnalysis.
The other testcase is to guard the opposite case where we do want to
look through the loop PHI. If we step through an array by incrementing
a pointer, the underlying object is the incoming value of the phi as the
loop is entered.
Fixes rdar://problem/19566729
llvm-svn: 235634
Sanjoy Das