The concept of G_GLOBAL_VALUE is nice and simple, but always using it as the
representation for global var addressing until selection time creates some
problems in optimizing accesses in certain code/relocation models.
The problem comes from trying to optimize adrp -> add -> load/store sequences
in the most common "small" code model. These accesses can be optimized into an
adrp -> load with the add offset being folded into the load's immediate field.
If we try to keep all global var references as a single generic instruction
then by the time we get to the complex operand trying to match these, we end up
generating an adrp at the point of use. The real issue here is that we don't
have any form of CSE during selection, so the code size will bloat from many
redundant adrp's.
This patch custom legalizes small code mode non-GOT G_GLOBALs into target ADRP
and a new "target specific generic opcode" G_ADD_LOW. We also teach the
localizer to localize these instructions via the custom hook that was added
recently. Finally, the complex pattern for indexed loads/stores is extended to
try to fold these G_ADD_LOW instructions into the load immediate.
On -O0 CTMark, we see a 0.8% geomean code size improvement. We should also see
some minor performance improvements too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78465
Just return once you emit the call, which is exactly what SelectionDAG does in
this situation.
Update call-translator-tail-call.ll.
Also update dllimport.ll to show that we tail call here in GISel again. Add
-verify-machineinstrs to the GISel line too, to defend against verifier
failures.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67282
llvm-svn: 371425
This adds support for basic sibling call lowering in AArch64. The intent here is
to only handle tail calls which do not change the ABI (hence, sibling calls.)
At this point, it is very restricted. It does not handle
- Vararg calls.
- Calls with outgoing arguments.
- Calls whose calling conventions differ from the caller's calling convention.
- Tail/sibling calls with BTI enabled.
This patch adds
- `AArch64CallLowering::isEligibleForTailCallOptimization`, which is equivalent
to the same function in AArch64ISelLowering.cpp (albeit with the restrictions
above.)
- `mayTailCallThisCC` and `canGuaranteeTCO`, which are identical to those in
AArch64ISelLowering.cpp.
- `getCallOpcode`, which is exactly what it sounds like.
Tail/sibling calls are lowered by checking if they pass target-independent tail
call positioning checks, and checking if they satisfy
`isEligibleForTailCallOptimization`. If they do, then a tail call instruction is
emitted instead of a normal call. If we have a sibling call (which is always the
case in this patch), then we do not emit any stack adjustment operations. When
we go to lower a return, we check if we've already emitted a tail call. If so,
then we skip the return lowering.
For testing, this patch
- Adds call-translator-tail-call.ll to test which tail calls we currently lower,
which ones we don't, and which ones we shouldn't.
- Updates branch-target-enforcement-indirect-calls.ll to show that we fall back
as expected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67189
........
This fails on EXPENSIVE_CHECKS builds due to a -verify-machineinstrs test failure in CodeGen/AArch64/dllimport.ll
llvm-svn: 371051
This adds support for basic sibling call lowering in AArch64. The intent here is
to only handle tail calls which do not change the ABI (hence, sibling calls.)
At this point, it is very restricted. It does not handle
- Vararg calls.
- Calls with outgoing arguments.
- Calls whose calling conventions differ from the caller's calling convention.
- Tail/sibling calls with BTI enabled.
This patch adds
- `AArch64CallLowering::isEligibleForTailCallOptimization`, which is equivalent
to the same function in AArch64ISelLowering.cpp (albeit with the restrictions
above.)
- `mayTailCallThisCC` and `canGuaranteeTCO`, which are identical to those in
AArch64ISelLowering.cpp.
- `getCallOpcode`, which is exactly what it sounds like.
Tail/sibling calls are lowered by checking if they pass target-independent tail
call positioning checks, and checking if they satisfy
`isEligibleForTailCallOptimization`. If they do, then a tail call instruction is
emitted instead of a normal call. If we have a sibling call (which is always the
case in this patch), then we do not emit any stack adjustment operations. When
we go to lower a return, we check if we've already emitted a tail call. If so,
then we skip the return lowering.
For testing, this patch
- Adds call-translator-tail-call.ll to test which tail calls we currently lower,
which ones we don't, and which ones we shouldn't.
- Updates branch-target-enforcement-indirect-calls.ll to show that we fall back
as expected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67189
llvm-svn: 370996
Previously, the dllimport attribute did the right thing in terms
of treating it as a pointer to a value, but this makes sure the
names get mangled properly, and calls to such functions load the
function from the __imp_ pointer.
This is based on SVN r212431 and r212430 where the same was
implemented for ARM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38530
llvm-svn: 316555
Amara Emerson