This diff includes the logic for setting the precision bits for each primary fixed point type in the target info and logic for initializing a fixed point literal.
Fixed point literals are declared using the suffixes
```
hr: short _Fract
uhr: unsigned short _Fract
r: _Fract
ur: unsigned _Fract
lr: long _Fract
ulr: unsigned long _Fract
hk: short _Accum
uhk: unsigned short _Accum
k: _Accum
uk: unsigned _Accum
```
Errors are also thrown for illegal literal values
```
unsigned short _Accum u_short_accum = 256.0uhk; // expected-error{{the integral part of this literal is too large for this unsigned _Accum type}}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46915
llvm-svn: 335148
The reasoning behind this change is similar to the previous commit, r334681.
Because members are already in scope when construction occurs, we are not
suffering from liveness problems, but we still want to figure out if the object
was constructed with construction context, because in this case we'll be able
to avoid trivial copy, which we don't always model perfectly. It'd also have
more importance when copy elision is implemented.
This also gets rid of the old CFG look-behind mechanism.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47350
llvm-svn: 334682
When analyzing C++ code, a common operation in the analyzer is to discover
target region for object construction by looking at CFG metadata ("construction
contexts"), and then track the region path-sensitively until object construction
is resolved, where the amount of information, again, depends on construction
context.
Scan construction context only once for both purposes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47304
llvm-svn: 334678
ExprEngine already maintains three internal program state traits to track
path-sensitive information related to object construction: pointer returned by
operator new, and pointer to temporary object for two different purposes - for
destruction and for lifetime extension. We'll need to add 2-3 more in a few
follow-up commits.
Merge these traits into one because they all essentially serve one purpose and
work similarly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47303
llvm-svn: 333719
The bindDefault() API of the ProgramState allows setting a default value
for reads from memory regions that were not preceded by writes.
It was used for implementing C++ zeroing constructors (i.e. default constructors
that boil down to setting all fields of the object to 0).
Because differences between zeroing consturctors and other forms of default
initialization have been piling up (in particular, zeroing constructors can be
called multiple times over the same object, probably even at the same offset,
requiring a careful and potentially slow cleanup of previous bindings in the
RegionStore), we split the API in two: bindDefaultInitial() for modeling
initial values and bindDefaultZero() for modeling zeroing constructors.
This fixes a few assertion failures from which the investigation originated.
The imperfect protection from both inability of the RegionStore to support
binding extents and lack of information in ASTRecordLayout has been loosened
because it's, well, imperfect, and it is unclear if it fixing more than it
was breaking.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46368
llvm-svn: 331561
Avoid crash when the sub-expression of operator delete[] is of array type.
This is not the same as simply using a delete[] syntax.
We're still not properly calling destructors in this case in the analyzer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46146
llvm-svn: 331014
If a pointer cast fails (evaluates to an UnknownVal, i.e. not implemented in the
analyzer) and such cast is in fact the last use of the pointer, the pointer
symbol is no longer referenced by the program state and a leak is
(mis-)diagnosed.
"Escape" the pointer upon a failed cast, i.e. inform the checker that we can no
longer reliably track it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45698
llvm-svn: 330380
Function return values can be constructed directly in variables or passed
directly into return statements, without even an elidable copy in between.
This is how the C++17 mandatory copy elision AST behaves. The behavior we'll
have in such cases is the "old" behavior that we've had before we've
implemented destructor inlining and proper lifetime extension support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44755
llvm-svn: 328253
Also use the opportunity to clean up the code and remove unnecessary duplication.
rdar://37625895
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44594
llvm-svn: 327926
My compiler (clang-3.8) complains that the RCC variable is unused.
That's not really true, as it's checked by the if-declaration, but it's
also kinda true, because we don't need to declaration if we only check
it in the if statement.
In reality, all this means that the dyn_cast<> can be replaced by isa<>,
so that's what I do here.
llvm-svn: 327491
This patch adds a new CFGStmt sub-class, CFGCXXRecordTypedCall, which replaces
the regular CFGStmt for the respective CallExpr whenever the CFG has additional
information to provide regarding the lifetime of the returned value.
This additional call site information is represented by a ConstructionContext
(which was previously used for CFGConstructor elements) that provides references
to CXXBindTemporaryExpr and MaterializeTemporaryExpr that surround the call.
This corresponds to the common C++ calling convention solution of providing
the target address for constructing the return value as an auxiliary implicit
argument during function call.
One of the use cases for such extra context at the call site would be to perform
any sort of inter-procedural analysis over the CFG that involves functions
returning objects by value. In this case the elidable constructor at the return
site would construct the object explained by the context at the call site, and
its lifetime would also be managed by the caller, not the callee.
The extra context would also be useful for properly handling the return-value
temporary at the call site, even if the callee is not being analyzed
inter-procedurally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44120
llvm-svn: 327343
This patch adds two new CFG elements CFGScopeBegin and CFGScopeEnd that indicate
when a local scope begins and ends respectively. We use first VarDecl declared
in a scope to uniquely identify it and add CFGScopeBegin and CFGScopeEnd elements
into corresponding basic blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D16403
llvm-svn: 327258
Proper modeling still remains to be done.
Note that BindingDecl#getHoldingVar() is almost always null, and this
should probably be handled by dealing with DecompositionDecl beforehand.
rdar://36852163
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44183
llvm-svn: 326951
Originally submitted as r326323 and r326324.
Reverted in r326432.
Reverting the commit was a mistake.
The breakage was due to invalid build files in our internal buildsystem,
CMakeLists did not have any cyclic dependencies.
llvm-svn: 326439
Also revert "[analyzer] Fix a compiler warning"
This reverts commits r326323 and r326324.
Reason: the commits introduced a cyclic dependency in the build graph.
This happens to work with cmake, but breaks out internal integrate.
llvm-svn: 326432
The aim of this patch is to be minimal to enable incremental development of
the feature on the top of the tree. This patch should be an NFC when the
feature is turned off. It is turned off by default and still considered as
experimental.
Technical details are available in the EuroLLVM Talk:
http://llvm.org/devmtg/2017-03//2017/02/20/accepted-sessions.html#7
Note that the initial prototype was done by A. Sidorin et al.: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-October/045730.html
Contributions to the measurements and the new version of the code: Peter Szecsi, Zoltan Gera, Daniel Krupp, Kareem Khazem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30691
llvm-svn: 326323
Sometimes it is not known at compile time which temporary objects will be
constructed, eg. 'x ? A() : B()' or 'C() || D()'. In this case we track which
temporary was constructed to know how to properly call the destructor.
Once the construction context for temporaries was introduced, we moved the
tracking code to the code that investigates the construction context.
Bring back the old mechanism because construction contexts are not always
available yet - eg. in the case where a temporary is constructed without a
constructor expression, eg. returned from a function by value. The mechanism
should still go away eventually.
Additionally, fix a bug in the temporary cleanup code for the case when
construction contexts are not available, which could lead to temporaries
staying in the program state and increasing memory consumption.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43666
llvm-svn: 326246
This patch uses the reference to MaterializeTemporaryExpr stored in the
construction context since r326014 in order to model that expression correctly.
When modeling MaterializeTemporaryExpr, instead of copying the raw memory
contents from the sub-expression's rvalue to a completely new temporary region,
that we conjure up for the lack of better options, we now have the better
option to recall the region into which the object was originally constructed
and declare that region to be the value of the expression, which is semantically
correct.
This only works when the construction context is available, which is worked on
independently.
The temporary region's liveness (in the sense of removeDeadBindings) is extended
until the MaterializeTemporaryExpr is resolved, in order to keep the store
bindings around, because it wouldn't be referenced from anywhere else in the
program state.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43497
llvm-svn: 326236
Array destructors, like constructors, need to be called for each element of the
array separately. We do not have any mechanisms to do this in the analyzer,
so for now all we do is evaluate a single constructor or destructor
conservatively and give up. It automatically causes the necessary invalidation
and pointer escape for the whole array, because this is how RegionStore works.
Implement this conservative behavior for temporary destructors. This fixes the
crash on the provided test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43149
llvm-svn: 325286
Inline them if possible - a separate flag is added to control this.
The whole thing is under the cfg-temporary-dtors flag, off by default so far.
Temporary destructors are called at the end of full-expression. If the
temporary is lifetime-extended, automatic destructors kick in instead,
which are not addressed in this patch, and normally already work well
modulo the overally broken support for lifetime extension.
The patch operates by attaching the this-region to the CXXBindTemporaryExpr in
the program state, and then recalling it during destruction that was triggered
by that CXXBindTemporaryExpr. It has become possible because
CXXBindTemporaryExpr is part of the construction context since r325210.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43104
llvm-svn: 325282
EvalCallOptions were introduced in r324018 for allowing various parts of
ExprEngine to notify the inlining mechanism, while preparing for evaluating a
function call, of possible difficulties with evaluating the call that they
foresee. Then mayInlineCall() would still be a single place for making the
decision.
Use that mechanism for destructors as well - pass the necessary flags from the
CFG-element-specific destructor handlers.
Part of this patch accidentally leaked into r324018, which led into a change in
tests; this change is reverted now, because even though the change looked
correct, the underlying behavior wasn't. Both of these commits were not intended
to introduce any function changes otherwise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42991
llvm-svn: 325209
This expression may or may not be evaluated in compile time, so tracking the
result symbol is of potential interest. However, run-time offsetof is not yet
supported by the analyzer, so for now this callback is only there to assist
future implementation.
Patch by Henry Wong!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42300
llvm-svn: 324790
This patch adds a new CFGStmt sub-class, CFGConstructor, which replaces
the regular CFGStmt with CXXConstructExpr in it whenever the CFG has additional
information to provide regarding what sort of object is being constructed.
It is useful for figuring out what memory is initialized in client of the
CFG such as the Static Analyzer, which do not operate by recursive AST
traversal, but instead rely on the CFG to provide all the information when they
need it. Otherwise, the statement that triggers the construction and defines
what memory is being initialized would normally occur after the
construct-expression, and the client would need to peek to the next CFG element
or use statement parent map to understand the necessary facts about
the construct-expression.
As a proof of concept, CFGConstructors are added for new-expressions
and the respective test cases are provided to demonstrate how it works.
For now, the only additional data contained in the CFGConstructor element is
the "trigger statement", such as new-expression, which is the parent of the
constructor. It will be significantly expanded in later commits. The additional
data is organized as an auxiliary structure - the "construction context",
which is allocated separately from the CFGElement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42672
llvm-svn: 324668
It makes it easier to discriminate between values of similar expressions
in different stack frames.
It also makes the separate backtrace section in ExplodedGraph dumps redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42552
llvm-svn: 324660
No in-tree checkers use this callback so far, hence no tests. But better fix
this now than remember to fix this when the checkers actually appear.
Patch by Henry Wong!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42785
llvm-svn: 324053
PreStmt<CXXNewExpr> was never called.
Additionally, under c++-allocator-inlining=true, PostStmt<CXXNewExpr> was
called twice when the allocator was inlined: once after evaluating the
new-expression itself, once after evaluating the allocator call which, for the
lack of better options, uses the new-expression as the call site.
This patch fixes both problems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41934
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322797
Add PostAllocatorCall program point to represent the moment in the analysis
between the operator new() call and the constructor call. Pointer cast from
"void *" to the correct object pointer type has already happened by this point.
The new program point, unlike the previously used PostImplicitCall, contains a
reference to the new-expression, which allows adding path diagnostics over it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41800
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322796
Represent the symbolic value for results of pointer arithmetic on void pointers
in a different way: instead of making void-typed element regions, make
char-typed element regions.
Add an assertion that ensures that no void-typed regions are ever constructed.
This is a refactoring of internals that should not immediately affect
the analyzer's (default) behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40939
llvm-svn: 322775
The -analyzer-config c++-allocator-inlining experimental option allows the
analyzer to reason about C++ operator new() similarly to how it reasons about
regular functions. In this mode, operator new() is correctly called before the
construction of an object, with the help of a special CFG element.
However, the subsequent construction of the object was still not performed into
the region of memory returned by operator new(). The patch fixes it.
Passing the value from operator new() to the constructor and then to the
new-expression itself was tricky because operator new() has no call site of its
own in the AST. The new expression itself is not a good call site because it
has an incorrect type (operator new() returns 'void *', while the new expression
is a pointer to the allocated object type). Additionally, lifetime of the new
expression in the environment makes it unsuitable for passing the value.
For that reason, an additional program state trait is introduced to keep track
of the return value.
Finally this patch relaxes restrictions on the memory region class that are
required for inlining the constructor. This change affects the old mode as well
(c++-allocator-inlining=false) and seems safe because these restrictions were
an overkill compared to the actual problems observed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40560
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322774
Array subscript is almost always an lvalue, except for a few cases where
it is not, such as a subscript into an Objective-C property, or a
return from the function.
This commit prevents crashing in such cases.
Fixes rdar://34829842
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40584
llvm-svn: 319834
We were crashing whenever a C++ pointer-to-member was taken, that was pointing
to a member of an anonymous structure field within a class, eg.
struct A {
struct {
int x;
};
};
// ...
&A::x;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39800
llvm-svn: 319055
The analyzer now realizes that C++ std::initializer_list objects and
Objective-C boxed structure/array/dictionary expressions can potentially
maintain a reference to the objects that were put into them. This avoids
false memory leak posivites and a few other issues.
This is a conservative behavior; for now, we do not model what actually happens
to the objects after being passed into such initializer lists.
rdar://problem/32918288
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35216
llvm-svn: 314975
This way the unrolling can be restricted for loops which will take at most a
given number of steps. It is defined as 128 in this patch and it seems to have
a good number for that purpose.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37181
llvm-svn: 311883
1. The LoopUnrolling feature needs the LoopExit included in the CFG so added this
dependency via the config options
2. The LoopExit element can be encountered even if we haven't encountered the
block of the corresponding LoopStmt. So the asserts were not right.
3. If we are caching out the Node then we get a nullptr from generateNode which
case was not handled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37103
llvm-svn: 311880
The LoopExit CFG information provides the opportunity to not mark the loops but
having a stack which tracks if a loop is unrolled or not. So in case of
simulating a loop we just add it and the information if it meets the
requirements to be unrolled to the top of the stack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35684
llvm-svn: 311346
This patch adds handling of the LoopExit CFGElements to the StaticAnalyzer.
This is reached by introducing a new ProgramPoint.
Tests will be added in a following commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35670
llvm-svn: 311344
This patch introduces a new CFG element CFGLoopExit that indicate when a loop
ends. It does not deal with returnStmts yet (left it as a TODO).
It hidden behind a new analyzer-config flag called cfg-loopexit (false by
default).
Test cases added.
The main purpose of this patch right know is to make loop unrolling and loop
widening easier and more efficient. However, this information can be useful for
future improvements in the StaticAnalyzer core too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35668
llvm-svn: 311235
Adding escape check for the counter variable of the loop.
It is achieved by jumping back on the ExplodedGraph to its declStmt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35657
llvm-svn: 311234
This feature allows the analyzer to consider loops to completely unroll.
New requirements/rules (for unrolling) can be added easily via ASTMatchers.
Right now it is hidden behind a flag, the aim is to find the correct heuristic
and create a solution which results higher coverage % and more precise
analysis, thus can be enabled by default.
Right now the blocks which belong to an unrolled loop are marked by the
LoopVisitor which adds them to the ProgramState.
Then whenever we encounter a CFGBlock in the processCFGBlockEntrance which is
marked then we skip its investigating. That means, it won't be considered to
be visited more than the maximal bound for visiting since it won't be checked.
llvm-svn: 309006
requirements/rules (for unrolling) can be added easily via ASTMatchers.
The current implementation is hidden behind a flag.
Right now the blocks which belong to an unrolled loop are marked by the
LoopVisitor which adds them to the ProgramState. Then whenever we encounter a
CFGBlock in the processCFGBlockEntrance which is marked then we skip its
investigating. That means, it won't be considered to be visited more than the
maximal bound for visiting since it won't be checked.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34260
llvm-svn: 308558
Summary:
This mimics the implementation for the implicit destructors. The
generation of this scope leaving elements is hidden behind
a flag to the CFGBuilder, thus it should not affect existing code.
Currently, I'm missing a test (it's implicitly tested by the clang-tidy
lifetime checker that I'm proposing).
I though about a test using debug.DumpCFG, but then I would
have to add an option to StaticAnalyzer/Core/AnalyzerOptions
to enable the scope leaving CFGElement,
which would only be useful to that particular test.
Any other ideas how I could make a test for this feature?
Reviewers: krememek, jordan_rose
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15031
llvm-svn: 307759
Leonard Chan