Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36788
M lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86DisassemblerDecoder.cpp
M lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86DisassemblerDecoder.h
A test/MC/Disassembler/X86/prefixes-i386.s
A test/MC/Disassembler/X86/prefixes-x86_64.s
M test/MC/Disassembler/X86/prefixes.txt
llvm-svn: 311882
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
We were frequently checking for a list of types and the different types
conveyed no real information. So lump them together explicitly.
llvm-svn: 292095
We were able to assemble, but not disassemble.
Note that fixupRMValue was truncating EA_REG_BND0-3 because we hit
the uint8_t max. The control registers were already squarely above
it, but I don't think they ever go in .r/m, only in .reg.
I also did notice an extra REX.W in our encoding, but I think that's
fine.
llvm-svn: 275427
Summary:
This patch is provided in preparation for removing autoconf on 1/26. The proposal to remove autoconf on 1/26 was discussed on the llvm-dev thread here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/093875.html
"I felt a great disturbance in the [build system], as if millions of [makefiles] suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something [amazing] has happened."
- Obi Wan Kenobi
Reviewers: chandlerc, grosbach, bob.wilson, tstellarAMD, echristo, whitequark
Subscribers: chfast, simoncook, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, jfb, danalbert, srhines, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dsanders, joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16471
llvm-svn: 258861
This is a fix for disassembling unusual instruction sequences in 64-bit
mode w.r.t the CALL rel16 instruction. It might be desirable to move the
check somewhere else, but it essentially mimics the special case
handling with JCXZ in 16-bit mode.
The current behavior accepts the opcode size prefix and causes the
call's immediate to stop disassembling after 2 bytes. When debugging
sequences of instructions with this pattern, the disassembler output
becomes extremely unreliable and essentially useless (if you jump midway
into what lldb thinks is a unified instruction, you'll lose %rip). So we
ignore the prefix and consume all 4 bytes when disassembling a 64-bit
mode binary.
Note: in Vol. 2A 3-99 the Intel spec states that CALL rel16 is N.S. N.S.
is defined as:
Indicates an instruction syntax that requires an address override
prefix in 64-bit mode and is not supported. Using an address
override prefix in 64-bit mode may result in model-specific
execution behavior. (Vol. 2A 3-7)
Since 0x66 is an operand override prefix we should be OK (although we
may want to warn about 0x67 prefixes to 0xe8). On the CPUs I tested
with, they all ignore the 0x66 prefix in 64-bit mode.
Patch by Matthew Barney!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9573
llvm-svn: 246038
- Deciding that insn->sibIndex is SIB_INDEX_NONE does not require another
check beyond the fully decoded bits being equal to 0x4.
The expression insn->sibIndex == SIB_INDEX_sib could not have been true unless
index were 0x4, because SIB_INDEX_sib is merely the range base (SIB_INDEX_EAX)
plus 4. Respectively SIB_INDEX_sib64.
- Don't use a switch statement to perform left-shift.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9762
llvm-svn: 240598
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first several times this was committed (e.g. r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
Apparently the reason for most failures was both clang and gcc's inability to deal with large numbers (> 10K) of bitset constructor calls in tablegen-generated initializers of instruction info tables.
This should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 238192
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first two times this was committed (r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
At least some of the ARM and MIPS ones were due to gcc/binutils issues, and should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 237234
This reverts commit r233055.
It still causes buildbot failures (gcc running out of memory on several platforms, and a self-host failure on arm), although less than the previous time.
llvm-svn: 233068
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first time this was committed (r229831), it caused several buildbot failures.
At least some of the ARM ones were due to gcc/binutils issues, and should now be fixed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8542
llvm-svn: 233055
Simplify boolean expressions with `true` and `false` with `clang-tidy`
Patch by Richard Thomson.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8519
llvm-svn: 233002
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7065
llvm-svn: 229831
Andrew V. Tischenko