Summary:
This fixes the missing space before the designated initializer when `Cpp11BracedListStyle=false` :
const struct A a = { .a = 1, .b = 2 };
^
Also, wrapping between opening brace and designated array initializers used to have an excessive penalty (like breaking between an expression and the subscript operator), leading to unexpected wrapping:
const struct Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa =
{[1] = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
[2] = bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb};
instead of:
const struct Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = {
[1] = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
[2] = bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb};
Finally, designated array initializers are not binpacked, just like designated member initializers.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, krasimir, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33491
llvm-svn: 305696
Move the DiagnosticRenderer and its dependents to using FullSourceLocs
instead of a SourceLocation and SourceManager pointer. The changeset is
rather large but entirely mechanical.
This is step one to allow DiagnosticRenderer to take either
llvm::SMLocs or clang::SourceLocations.
Patch by Sanne Wouda
Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31709
Change-Id: If351a112cdf6718e2d3ef6721b8da9c6376b32dd
llvm-svn: 305684
That commit failed on non-macOS buildbots as I've forgotten to make sure that
the system on which Clang is running on is actually macOS.
llvm-svn: 305680
if the SDK is newer than the system
This commit improves the driver by making sure that it picks the system version
for the deployment target when the version of the macOS SDK is newer than the
system version.
rdar://29449467
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34175
llvm-svn: 305678
Fixes an issue where struct A { int X; }; would be broken onto multiple
lines, but typedef struct A { int X; } A2; was collapsed onto a single
line.
Patch by Jacob Bandes-Storch. Thank you.
llvm-svn: 305667
c++1z adds the following constructions to the language:
if constexpr (cond)
statement1;
else if constexpr (cond)
statement2;
else if constexpr (cond)
statement3;
else
statement4;
A first version of this was proposed in reviews.llvm.org/D26953 by
Francis Visoiu Mistrih, but never commited. This patch additionally
fixes the behavior when allowing short if statements on a single line
and was authored by Jacob Bandes-Storch. Thank you to both authors.
llvm-svn: 305666
Fix the type for a (runtime) library call to match both the comment and
the runtime implementation. As it happens, the type being used matched,
this just makes it more precise.
llvm-svn: 305638
Summary:
setMustBuildLookupTable should be called on imported TagDecls otherwise we may fail
to import their member decls (if they have any).
Not calling the setMustBuildLookupTable method results in a failure in the attached test
case when lookup for the 'x' member fails on struct S, which hasn't had its decls imported
elsewhere. (By contrast the member-in-struct testcase hasn't run into this issue
because the import of its decls is triggered when the struct instance is defined, and the
member access follows this).
Reviewers: spyffe, rsmith
Reviewed By: spyffe, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34253
llvm-svn: 305619
for preprocessing
r300667 added support for editor placeholder to Clang. That commit didn’t take
into account that users who use Clang for preprocessing only (-E) will get the
"editor placeholder in source file" error when preprocessing their source
(PR33394). This commit ensures that Clang doesn't lex editor placeholders when
running a preprocessor only action.
rdar://32718000
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34256
llvm-svn: 305576
This is a patch for bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6817
Warnings should not be emitted with -M and -MM flags, because this mode
is only used for generate MakeFiles.
llvm-svn: 305561
Skip checks for null dereference, alignment violation, object size
violation, and dynamic type violation if the pointer points to volatile
data.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34262
llvm-svn: 305546
Summary:
Before this change, we couldn't capture the `this` pointer that's
implicitly the first argument of class member functions. There are some
interesting things we can do with capturing even just this single
argument for zero-argument member functions.
Reviewers: rnk, pelikan
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34052
llvm-svn: 305544
These VarDecl's are static data members of classes. Since the initializers are
also hashed, this also provides checking for default arguments to methods.
llvm-svn: 305543
This commit is a follow up to r302797 which added support for dependent
completions after the '.' and '->' operators. This commit adds support for
dependent completions after the '::' operator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34173
llvm-svn: 305511
static_assert declarations have to be visited while indexing so that we can
gather the references to declarations that are present in their assert
expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33913
llvm-svn: 305504
Summary:
The title says it all.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: rjmccall, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34194
llvm-svn: 305496
If a regular LTO module has a summary index, then instead of linking
it into the combined regular LTO module right away, add it to the
combined summary index and associate it with a special module that
represents the combined regular LTO module.
Any such modules are linked during LTO::run(), at which time we use
the results of summary-based dead stripping to control whether to
link prevailing symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33922
llvm-svn: 305482
This reverts commit r305399.
This breaks a build in libcxx:
libcxx/src/system_error.cpp:90:16: error: assigning to 'int' from incompatible type 'char *'
if ((ret = ::strerror_r(ev, buffer, strerror_buff_size)) != 0) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
Which makes sense according to:
https://linux.die.net/man/3/strerror_r
Not entirely sure how this needs to be fixed.
llvm-svn: 305456
correct getNumArguments
StringifiedArguments is allocated (resized) based on the size the
getNumArguments function. However, this function ACTUALLY currently
returns the amount of total UnexpArgTokens which is minimum the same as
the new implementation of getNumMacroArguments, since empty/omitted arguments
result in 1 UnexpArgToken, and included ones at minimum include 2
(1 for the arg itself, 1 for eof).
This patch renames the otherwise unused getNumArguments to be more clear
that it is the number of arguments that the Macro expects, and thus the maximum
number that can be stringified. This patch also replaces the explicit memset
(which results in value instantiation of the new tokens, PLUS clearing the
memory) with brace initialization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32046
llvm-svn: 305425
Summary:
It seems -flto must be either "thin" or "full". I think the use of
containValue is just a typo.
Reviewers: ruiu, tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34055
llvm-svn: 305392
Summary:
Add CompactNamespaces option, to pack namespace declarations on the
same line (somewhat similar to C++17 nested namespace definition).
With this option, consecutive namespace declarations are kept on the
same line:
namespace foo { namespace bar {
...
}} // namespace foo::bar
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: kimgr, cfe-commits, klimek
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32480
llvm-svn: 305384
While a function body is being parsed, the function declaration is not considered
as a definition because it does not have a body yet. In some cases it leads to
incorrect interpretation, the case is presented in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14785:
```
template<typename T> struct Somewhat {
void internal() const {}
friend void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<T> const &) {}
};
void operator+(int const &, Somewhat<char> const &x) { x.internal(); }
```
When statement `x.internal()` in the body of global `operator+` is parsed, the type
of `x` must be completed, so the instantiation of `Somewhat<char>` is started. It
instantiates the declaration of `operator+` defined inline, and makes a check for
redefinition. The check does not detect another definition because the declaration
of `operator+` is still not defining as does not have a body yet.
To solves this problem the function `isThisDeclarationADefinition` considers
a function declaration as a definition if it has flag `WillHaveBody` set.
This change fixes PR14785.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30375
llvm-svn: 305379
Summary:
Currently we build the co_await expressions on the wrong implicit statements of the implicit ranged for; Specifically we build the co_await expression wrapping the range declaration, but it should wrap the begin expression.
This patch fixes co_await on range for.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34021
llvm-svn: 305363
Summary:
This patch is part of 3 patches that together form a single patch, but must be introduced in stages in order not to break things.
The way that LLVM interprets DW_OP_plus in DIExpression nodes is basically that of the DW_OP_plus_uconst operator since LLVM expects an unsigned constant operand. This unnecessarily restricts the DW_OP_plus operator, preventing it from being used to describe the evaluation of runtime values on the expression stack. These patches try to align the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus with that of the DWARF definition, which pops two elements off the expression stack, performs the operation and pushes the result back on the stack.
This is done in three stages:
• The first patch (LLVM) adds support for DW_OP_plus_uconst and changes all uses (and tests) of DW_OP_plus to use DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The second patch (Clang) contains changes to use DW_OP_plus_uconst instead of DW_OP_plus.
• The third patch (LLVM) changes the semantics of DW_OP_plus to be in line with it’s DWARF meaning. It also does this for DW_OP_minus.
Patch by Sander de Smalen.
Reviewers: echristo, pcc, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: aprantl, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33893
llvm-svn: 305312
Summary:
This option supplements the AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine flag, to
merge empty function body at the beginning of the line: e.g. when the
function is not short-enough and breaking braces after function.
int f()
{}
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33447
llvm-svn: 305272
Francois Ferrand