Summary:
More tests for D45108:
* One use tests
* allow shift to be a variable, too
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45329
llvm-svn: 329348
This is the 32-bit mode version of LEAVE64. It should be at least somewhat similar to LEAVE64.
The Sandy Bridge version was missing a load port use.
llvm-svn: 329347
Currently it is 6. If the "feature" was not used, report dummy
hidden argument. Otherwise it does not match the kernarg size
reported in the kernel header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45129
llvm-svn: 329341
We were forcing the latency of these instructions to 5 cycles, but every other scheduler model had them as 1 cycle. I'm sure I didn't get everything, but this gets a big portion.
llvm-svn: 329339
Summary:
This is a fix to PR37005.
Essentially, rL328539 ([InstCombine] reassociate loop invariant GEP chains to enable LICM) contains a bug
whereby it will convert:
%src = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %base, <2 x i64> %val
%res = getelementptr inbounds i8, <2 x i8*> %src, i64 %val2
into:
%src = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %base, i64 %val2
%res = getelementptr inbounds i8, <2 x i8*> %src, <2 x i64> %val
By swapping the index operands if the GEPs are in a loop, and %val is loop variant while %val2
is loop invariant.
This fix recreates new GEP instructions if the index operand swap would result in the type
of %src changing from vector to scalar, or vice versa.
Reviewers: sebpop, spatel
Reviewed By: sebpop
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45287
llvm-svn: 329331
There used to be a fold that would handle this case more generally,
but it was removed at rL73243 to fix PR4374:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4374
llvm-svn: 329322
This patch adds a way for users to create their own custom sections to
be added to wasm files. At the LLVM IR layer, they are defined through
the "wasm.custom_sections" named metadata. The expected use case for
this is bindings generators such as wasm-bindgen.
Patch by Dan Gohman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45297
llvm-svn: 329315
This patch adds the ability to describe properties of the hardware retire
control unit.
Tablegen class RetireControlUnit has been added for this purpose (see
TargetSchedule.td).
A RetireControlUnit specifies the size of the reorder buffer, as well as the
maximum number of opcodes that can be retired every cycle.
A zero (or negative) value for the reorder buffer size means: "the size is
unknown". If the size is unknown, then llvm-mca defaults it to the value of
field SchedMachineModel::MicroOpBufferSize. A zero or negative number of
opcodes retired per cycle means: "there is no restriction on the number of
instructions that can be retired every cycle".
Models can optionally specify an instance of RetireControlUnit. There can only
be up-to one RetireControlUnit definition per scheduling model.
Information related to the RCU (RetireControlUnit) is stored in (two new fields
of) MCExtraProcessorInfo. llvm-mca loads that information when it initializes
the DispatchUnit / RetireControlUnit (see Dispatch.h/Dispatch.cpp).
This patch fixes PR36661.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45259
llvm-svn: 329304
Using cstfp_pred_ty in the definition allows us to match vectors with undef elements.
This replicates the change for m_Not from D44076 / rL326823 and continues
towards making all pattern matchers allow undef elements in vectors.
llvm-svn: 329303
A noreturn nounwind function can be expected to never return in any way, and by
never returning it will also never have to restore any callee-saved registers
for its caller. This makes it possible to skip spills of those registers during
function entry, saving some stack space and time in the process. This is rather
useful for embedded targets with limited stack space.
Should fix PR9970.
Patch by myeisha (pmb).
llvm-svn: 329287
LoopInterchange relies on LoopInfo being up-to-date, so we should
preserve it after interchanging. This patch updates restructureLoops to
move the BBs of the interchanged loops to the right place.
Reviewers: davide, efriedma, karthikthecool, mcrosier
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45278
llvm-svn: 329264
It's failing on the bots and I'm not sure why.
This reverts:
[X86] Synchronize the SchedRW on some EVEX instructions with their VEX equivalents.
[X86] Use WriteFShuffle256 for VEXTRACTF128 to be consistent with VEXTRACTI128 which uses WriteShuffle256.
[X86] Remove some InstRWs for plain store instructions on Sandy Bridge.
[X86] Auto-generate complete checks. NFC
llvm-svn: 329256
We were forcing the latency of these instructions to 5 cycles, but every other scheduler model had them as 1 cycle. I'm sure I didn't get everything, but this gets a big portion.
llvm-svn: 329252
Summary:
If the callsite is inside landing pad, do not perform callsite splitting.
Callsite splitting uses utility function llvm::DuplicateInstructionsInSplitBetween, which eventually calls llvm::SplitEdge. llvm::SplitEdge calls llvm::SplitCriticalEdge with an assumption that the function returns nullptr only when the target edge is not a critical edge (and further assumes that if the return value was not nullptr, the predecessor of the original target edge always has a single successor because critical edge splitting was successful). However, this assumtion is not true because SplitCriticalEdge returns nullptr if the destination block is a landing pad. This invalid assumption results assertion failure.
Fundamental solution might be fixing llvm::SplitEdge to not to rely on the invalid assumption. However, it'll involve a lot of work because current API assumes that llvm::SplitEdge never fails. Instead, this patch makes callsite splitting to not to attempt splitting if the callsite is in a landing pad.
Attached test case will crash with assertion failure without the fix.
Reviewers: fhahn, junbuml, dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45130
llvm-svn: 329250
A bug was found where an offset of -1 would generate an encoding
of max int64 which is invalid in the binary format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45280
llvm-svn: 329238
The implementation of shadow call stack on aarch64 is quite different to
the implementation on x86_64. Instead of reserving a segment register for
the shadow call stack, we reserve the platform register, x18. Any function
that spills lr to sp also spills it to the shadow call stack, a pointer to
which is stored in x18.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45239
llvm-svn: 329236
Summary: @llvm.icall.branch.funnel is musttail with variable number of
arguments. After inlining current backend can't separate call targets from call
arguments.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45116
llvm-svn: 329235
Sometimes instead of storing addresses as is, the kernel stores the address of
a page and an offset within that page, and then computes the actual address
when it needs to make an access. Because of this the pointer tag gets lost
(gets set to 0xff). The solution is to ignore all accesses tagged with 0xff.
This patch adds a -hwasan-match-all-tag flag to hwasan, which allows to ignore
accesses through pointers with a particular pointer tag value for validity.
Patch by Andrey Konovalov.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44827
llvm-svn: 329228
Summary:
Clang's __builtin_operator_new/delete was recently taught about the aligned allocation overloads (r328134). This patch makes LLVM aware of them as well.
This allows the compiler to perform certain optimizations including eliding new/delete calls.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer, dblaikie, vsk, bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: ckennelly, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44769
llvm-svn: 329218
Summary:
Clang's __builtin_operator_new/delete was recently taught about the aligned allocation overloads (r328134). This patch makes LLVM aware of them as well.
This allows the compiler to perform certain optimizations including eliding new/delete calls.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer, dblaikie, vsk, bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: ckennelly, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44769
llvm-svn: 329215
- MSVC was not OK with a static_assert referencing a non-static member
variable, even though it was just in a sizeof(expression). I move the
assert into the emit function, where it is probably more useful.
- Tests were failing in builds which did not have the X86 target
configured. Since this functionality is not target-specific, I have
removed the target specifiers from the .ll files.
llvm-svn: 329201
Roman Lebedev