Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Fangrui Song 3eef47407b [PPCInstPrinter] Change printBranchOperand(calltarget) to print the target address in hexadecimal form
```
// llvm-objdump -d output (before)
0: bl .-4
4: bl .+0
8: bl .+4

// llvm-objdump -d output (after) ; GNU objdump -d
0: bl 0xfffffffc / bl 0xfffffffffffffffc
4: bl 0x4
8: bl 0xc
```

Many Operand's are not annotated as OPERAND_PCREL.
They are not affected (e.g. `b .+67108860`). I plan to fix them in future patches.

Modified test/tools/llvm-objdump/ELF/PowerPC/branch-offset.s to test
address space wraparound for powerpc32 and powerpc64.

Reviewed By: sfertile, jhenderson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76591
2020-03-26 08:32:29 -07:00
Fangrui Song 71e2ca6e32 [llvm-objdump] -d: print `00000000 <foo>:` instead of `00000000 foo:`
The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier.

`.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive.
Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section`
line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail.

```
Disassembly of section .foo:

0000000000001634 .foo:
```

Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right"

Reviewed By: rupprecht

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
2020-03-05 18:05:28 -08:00
Fangrui Song 96e2376d02 [ELF] Don't special case weak symbols for pie with no shared objects
D59275 added the following clause to Symbol::includeInDynsym()

  if (isUndefWeak() && Config->Pie && SharedFiles.empty())
    return false;

D59549 explored the possibility to generalize it for -no-pie.

GNU ld's rules are architecture dependent and partly controlled by -z
{,no-}dynamic-undefined-weak. Our attempts to mimic its rules are
actually half-baked and don't provide perceivable benefits (it can save
a few more weak undefined symbols in .dynsym in a -static-pie
executable). Let's just delete the rule for simplicity. We will expect
cosmetic inconsistencies with ld.bfd in certain -static-pie scenarios.

This permits a simplification in D71795.

Reviewed By: peter.smith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71794
2020-01-08 09:38:49 -08:00
Fangrui Song 82442adfc0 [PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port
Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl
should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate
their lib32 (PR40888).

* Fix default image base and max page size.
* Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not
  implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't
  support Secure PLT yet.
* Support more initial relocation types:
  R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16.
  The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type
  but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA.
* Support GNU ifunc
* Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc
* Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub.
  It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24.

A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to
.got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative
addresses).
Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub
can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility,
change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to
`const InputSection &, const Relocation &`.

PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both
writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments,
which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable.
This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to
address the security issue.

TLS will be implemented in D62940.

glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can
not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack
(not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to
work around the issue:

    if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) {
      // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt
      Add(In.RelaDyn);
      if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent)
        In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt);
    }

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464

llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00