`RewriteStatepointsForGC` iterates over function blocks and their predecessors
in order of declaration. One of outcomes of this is that callsites are placed in
arbitrary order which has nothing to do with travelsar order.
On the other hand, function `recomputeLiveInValues` asserts that bases are
added to `Info.PointerToBase` before their deried pointers are updated. But
if call sites are processed in order different from RPOT, this is not necessarily
true. We cannot guarantee that the base was placed there before every
pointer derived from it. All we can guarantee is that this base was marked as
known base by this point.
This patch replaces the fact that we assert from checking that the base was
added to the map with assert that the base was marked as known base.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41593
llvm-svn: 321517
If there are 17 or more leading zeros to the v4i32 elements, then we can use PMADD for the integer multiply when PMULLD is unavailable or slow.
The 17 bits need to be zero as the PMADDWD performs a v8i16 signed-mul-extend + pairwise-add - the upper 16 so we're adding a zero pair and the 17th bit so we don't incorrectly sign extend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41484
llvm-svn: 321516
This reverts r321138. It seems there are still underlying issues with
memdep. PR35519 seems to still be present if debug info is enabled. We
end up losing a memcpy. Somehow during store to memset merging, we
insert the memset after the memcpy or fail to update the memdep analysis
to account for the newly inserted memset of a pair.
Reduced test case:
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string>
#include <utility>
#include <vector>
void do_push_back(
std::vector<std::pair<std::string, std::vector<std::string>>>* crls) {
crls->push_back(std::make_pair(std::string(), std::vector<std::string>()));
}
int __attribute__((optnone)) main() {
// Put some data in the vector and then remove it so we take the push_back
// fast path.
std::vector<std::pair<std::string, std::vector<std::string>>> crl_set;
crl_set.push_back({"asdf", {}});
crl_set.pop_back();
printf("first word in vector storage: %p\n", *(void**)crl_set.data());
// Do the push_back which may fail to initialize the data.
do_push_back(&crl_set);
auto* first = &crl_set.back().first;
printf("first word in vector storage (should be zero): %p\n",
*(void**)crl_set.data());
assert(first->empty());
puts("ok");
}
Compile with libc++, enable optimizations, and enable debug info:
$ clang++ -stdlib=libc++ -g -O2 t.cpp -o t.exe -Wl,-rpath=llvm/build/lib
This program will assert with this change.
llvm-svn: 321510
My original implementation ran as a DAG combine post type legalization, but it turns out we don't run that DAG combine step if type legalization didn't change anything. Attempts to make the combine run before type legalization as well hit other issues.
So just do it in LowerMUL where we can catch more cases.
llvm-svn: 321496
r319980 added new patterns to the machine combiner for transforming (fsub (fmul
x y) z) into (fmla (fneg z) x y). That is, fsub's where the first source
operand is an fmul are transformed. We previously only matched the case where
the second source operand of an fsub was an fmul, transforming (fsub z (fmul x
y)) into (fmls z x y). Now, if we have an fsub where both source operands are
fmuls, both of the above patterns are applicable.
However, the order in which we add the patterns to the list of candidates
determines the transformation that takes place, since only the first pattern
that matches will be used. This patch changes the order these two patterns are
added to the list of candidates such that we prefer the case where the second
source operand is an fmul (the fmls case), rather than the other one (the
fmla/fneg case). When both source operands are fmuls, this ordering results in
fewer instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41587
llvm-svn: 321491
For example, float operations may fail to constant fold under certain circumstances (inf/nan/denormal creation etc.)
Reduced from oss-fuzz #4802 test case
llvm-svn: 321488
Summary:
When using byval, the data is effectively copied as part of the call
anyway, so we aren't actually passing the pointer and thus there is no
reason to issue a warning.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40118
llvm-svn: 321478
NFC.
Adding MC regressions tests to cover RDPMC, RDRAND, RDRAND, RDSEED, RDTSCP, DWRFSGS isa sets.
This patch is part of a larger task to cover MC encoding of all X86 isa sets started in revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39952
Reviewers: zvi, craig.topper, RKSimon, AndreiGrischenk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41328
Change-Id: Ie97b397546e6b1ed180c6abd7b41fccb136d2b82
llvm-svn: 321476
This is fix for the crash caused by ScalarEvolution::getTruncateExpr.
It expects that if it checked the condition that SCEV is not in UniqueSCEVs cache in
the beginning that it will not be there inside this method.
However during recursion and transformation/simplification for sub expression,
it is possible that these modifications will end up with the same SCEV as we started from.
So we must always check whether SCEV is in cache and do not insert item if it is already there.
Reviewers: sanjoy, mkazantsev, craig.topper
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41380
llvm-svn: 321472
This is a preliminary step for the patch discussed in D41136 (and denoted here with the FIXME comment).
When we match an FP min/max that is cast to integer, any intermediate difference between +0.0 or -0.0
should be muted in the result by the conversion (either fptosi or fptoui) of the result. Thus, we can
enable 'nsz' for the purpose of matching fmin/fmax.
Note that there's probably room to generalize this more, possibly by fixing the current calls to the
weak version of isKnownNonZero() in matchSelectPattern() to the more powerful recursive version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41333
llvm-svn: 321456
This fixes parseGroup() so that it always sets error condition on error.
Previously it was not done, because parseIdentifier looks never do that,
assuming that caller should do it if he wants to.
So previously cases from test were silently accepted and produced broken output.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41559
llvm-svn: 321439
PHI that has at least one unrelocated input cannot cause any issues by itself,
though its uses should be carefully verified. With this patch PHIs are allowed
to have any inputs but when all inputs are unrelocated the PHI is marked as
unrelocated and if not all inputs are unrelocated then the PHI is marked as
poisoned. Poisoned pointers can be used only in three ways: to derive new
pointers, in PHIs or in comparisons against constants that are exclusively
derived from null.
Patch by Daniil Suchkov!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41006
llvm-svn: 321438
Normally we catch this during lowering, but vXi64 mul is considered legal when we have AVX512DQ.
This DAG combine allows us to avoid PMULLQ with AVX512DQ if we can prove its unnecessary. PMULLQ is 3 uops that take 4 cycles each. While pmuldq/pmuludq is only one 4 cycle uop.
llvm-svn: 321437
It's nice that pmullq exists, but it has higher latency and probably lower throughput than pmuldq/pmuludq. We should prefer those if we can.
llvm-svn: 321436
Match regular x87 memory fold instructions with load/sideeffects tags, to prevent the schedulers from re-ordering them across the fnstcw/fldcw sequences for truncating stores while they are still pseudo during the stack conversion pass.
llvm-svn: 321424
Previously we extended v2i1 to v2f64 and then tried to use cvtuqq2pd/cvtqq2pd, but that only works with avx512dq. So we ended up scalarizing it. Now we widen to v4i1 first and extend to v4i32.
llvm-svn: 321420
Currently llvm-mc ignores COMDATs whose names are numbers,
for example following code:
.section .foo,"G",@progbits,123,comdat
would produce no COMDATs at all.
Patch fixes the issue.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41552
llvm-svn: 321419
This moves the combine for turning ANDs into shuffle with zero out of SimplifyVBinOps and places it only in visitAND below the reassociate handling. This fixes the specific case I noticed where we failed to combine two ands with constants.
llvm-svn: 321417
By following the single predecessors of the predecessors of the call
site, we do not need to restrict the control flow.
Reviewed By: junbuml, davide
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40729
llvm-svn: 321413
Previously, taking the address for an alias would result in:
"Symbol not found in table index space"
Increase test coverage for weak aliases.
This code should be more efficient too as it avoids building
the `IsAddressTaken` set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41510
llvm-svn: 321384
Summary:
Make MemorySSA allow reordering of two loads that may alias, when one is volatile.
This makes MemorySSA less conservative and behaving the same as the AliasSetTracker.
For more context, see D16875.
LLVM language reference: "The optimizers must not change the number of volatile operations or change their order of execution relative to other volatile operations. The optimizers may change the order of volatile operations relative to non-volatile operations. This is not Java’s “volatile” and has no cross-thread synchronization behavior."
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv, dberlin
Subscribers: sanjoy, reames, hfinkel, llvm-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41525
llvm-svn: 321382
If after if-conversion, most of the instructions in this new BB construct a long and slow dependence chain, it may be slower than cmp/branch, even if the branch has a high miss rate, because the control dependence is transformed into data dependence, and control dependence can be speculated, and thus, the second part can execute in parallel with the first part on modern OOO processor.
This patch checks for the long dependence chain, and give up if-conversion if find one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39352
llvm-svn: 321377
This seems to improve X86's ability to match this into an address computation. Otherwise the other operand gets assigned to the base register and the stack pointer + frame index ends up in the index register. But index registers can't encode ESP/RSP so we end up having to move it into another register to meet the constraint.
I could try to improve the address matcher in X86, but swapping the producer seemed easier. Several other places already have the operands in this order so this is at least consistent.
llvm-svn: 321370
Despite what the comment said there isn't better codegen for 512-bit vectors. The 128/256/512 bit implementation jus stores to memory and loads an element. There's no advantage to doing that with a larger size. In fact in many cases it causes a stack realignment and generates worse code.
llvm-svn: 321369
Max Kazantsev