by marking the decl invalid isn't. Make some steps towards supporting these
and then hastily shut them down at the last second by marking them as
unsupported.
llvm-svn: 116661
arguments in either the placement or constructor arguments. This is
important if the default arguments refer to a declaration or create a
temporary.
llvm-svn: 115700
-Wpadded warns when undesired padding is introduced in a struct. (rdar://7469556)
-Wpacked warns if a struct is given the packed attribute, but the packed attribute has no effect
on the layout or the size of the struct. Such structs may be mis-aligned for little benefit.
The warnings are emitted at the point where layout is calculated, that is at RecordLayoutBuilder.
To avoid calculating the layouts of all structs regardless of whether they are needed or not,
I let the layouts be lazily constructed when needed. This has the disadvantage that the above warnings
will be emitted only when they are used for IR gen, and not e.g with -fsyntax-only:
$ cat t.c
struct S {
char c;
int i;
};
void f(struct S* s) {}
$ clang -fsyntax-only -Wpadded t.c
$ clang -c -Wpadded t.c -o t.o
t.c:3:7: warning: padding struct 'struct S' with 3 bytes to align 'i' [-Wpadded]
int i;
^
1 warning generated.
This is a good tradeoff between providing the warnings and not calculating layouts for all
structs in case the user has enabled a couple of rarely used warnings.
llvm-svn: 114544
LHS and when conditional expression is an array. Since
it will be decayed, saved expression must be saved with
decayed expression. This is necessary to preserve semantics
of this extension (and prevent an IRGen crash which expects
an array to always be decayed). I am sure there will be other
cases in c++ (aggregate conditionals for example) when saving of the
expression must happen after some transformation on conditional
expression has happened.
Doug, please review. Fixes // rdar://8446940
llvm-svn: 114296
the bases are completely initialized. This won't work --- base
initializer expressions can rely on the vtables having been set up.
Check for uses of 'this' in the initializers and force a vtable
initialization if found.
This might not be good enough; we might need to extend this to handle
the possibility of arbitrary code finding an external reference to this
(not yet completely-constructed!) object and accessing through it,
in which case we'll probably find ourselves doing a lot more unnecessary
stores.
llvm-svn: 114153
the cleanup might not be dominated by the allocation code.
In this case, we have to store aside all the delete arguments
in case we need them later. There's room for optimization here
in cases where we end up not actually needing the cleanup in
different branches (or being able to pop it after the
initialization code).
Also make sure we only call this operator delete along the path
where we actually allocated something.
Fixes rdar://problem/8439196.
llvm-svn: 114145
slot. The easiest way to do that was to bundle up the information
we care about for aggregate slots into a new structure which demands
that its creators at least consider the question.
I could probably be convinced that the ObjC 'needs GC' bit should
be rolled into this structure.
Implement generalized copy elision. The main obstacle here is that
IR-generation must be much more careful about making sure that exactly
llvm-svn: 113962
complains when the element type of a C++ "delete" expression is
different from what we would expect from the pointer type. When
deleting a bool*, we end up with an i1 on one side (where we compute
the LLVM type from the Clang bool type) and i8 on the other (where we
grab the LLVM type from the LLVM pointer type). I've weakened the
assertion appropriately, and the Boost Parallel Graph Library now
passes its regression tests.
llvm-svn: 112821
constructing an LLVM PointerType directly from the "bool"'s LLVM type
(i1), which resulted in unfortunate pointer type i1*. The fix is to
build the LLVM PointerType from the corresponding Clang PointerType,
so that we get i8* in the case of a bool.
John, please review. I also left a FIXME there because we seem to be
dropping "volatile", which would be rather unfortunate.
llvm-svn: 112819
implement ARM array cookies. Also fix a few unfortunate bugs:
- throwing dtors in deletes prevented the allocation from being deleted
- adding the cookie to the new[] size was not being considered for
overflow (and, more seriously, was screwing up the earlier checks)
- deleting an array via a pointer to array of class type was not
causing any destructors to be run and was passing the unadjusted
pointer to the deallocator
- lots of address-space problems, in case anyone wants to support
free store in a variant address space :)
llvm-svn: 112814
caused by my ABI work. Passing:
struct outer {
int x;
struct epsilon_matcher {} e;
int f;
};
as {i32,i32} isn't safe, because the offset of the second element
needs to be at 8 when it is interpreted as a memory value.
llvm-svn: 112686
John McCall