The recently announced IBM z15 processor implements the architecture
already supported as "arch13" in LLVM. This patch adds support for
"z15" as an alternate architecture name for arch13.
Corrsponding LLVM support was committed as rev. 372435.
llvm-svn: 372436
RISC-V GCC use -mcmodel=medany and -mcmodel=medlow, but LLVM use
-mcmodel=small and -mcmodel=medium.
Add those two option aliases for provide same user interface between
GCC and LLVM.
Reviewed By: lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67066
llvm-svn: 372080
RISC-V LLVM was only implement small/medlow code model, so it defined
__riscv_cmodel_medlow directly without check.
Now, we have medium/medany code model in RISC-V back-end, it should
define according the actually code model.
Reviewed By: lewis-revill
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67065
llvm-svn: 372078
In `DirectoryLookup::LookupFile` parameter `HasBeenMapped` doesn't cover
the case when clang finds a file through a header map but doesn't remap
the lookup filename because the target path is an absolute path. As a
result, -Wnonportable-include-path suppression for header maps
introduced in r301592 wasn't triggered.
Change parameter `HasBeenMapped` to `IsInHeaderMap` and use parameter
`MappedName` to track the filename remapping. This way we can handle
both relative and absolute paths in header maps, and account for their
specific properties, like filename remapping being a property preserved
across lookups in multiple directories.
rdar://problem/39516483
Reviewers: dexonsmith, bruno
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Subscribers: jkorous, cfe-commits, ributzka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58094
llvm-svn: 371655
When running clang as a native compiler in RISC-V Linux the flag
-mabi=ilp32d / -mabi=lp64d is always mandatory. This change makes it the
default there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65634
llvm-svn: 371494
Summary:
r337347 added support for the Signal Processing Engine (SPE) to LLVM.
This follows that up with the clang side.
This adds -mspe and -mno-spe, to match GCC.
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49754
llvm-svn: 371066
-Deprecate -mmpx and -mno-mpx command line options
-Remove CPUID detection of mpx for -march=native
-Remove MPX from all CPUs
-Remove MPX preprocessor define
I've left the "mpx" string in the backend so we don't fail on old IR, but its not connected to anything.
gcc has also deprecated these command line options. https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=GCC-Patch-To-Drop-MPX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66669
llvm-svn: 370393
This gives library implementers a way to use standards-based attributes that do not conflict with user-defined macros of the same name. Attributes in C2x require this behavior normatively (C2x 6.7.11p4), but there's no reason to not have the same behavior in C++, especially given that such attributes may be used by a C library consumed by a C++ compilation.
llvm-svn: 369033
Summary:
Previously __has_builtin(__builtin_*) would return false for
__builtin_*s that we modeled as keywords rather than as functions
(because they take type arguments). With this patch, all builtins
that are called with function-call-like syntax return true from
__has_builtin (covering __builtin_* and also the __is_* and __has_* type
traits and the handful of similar builtins without such a prefix).
Update the documentation on __has_builtin and on type traits to match.
While doing this I noticed the type trait documentation was out of date
and incomplete; that's fixed here too.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jfb, kristina, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66100
llvm-svn: 368785
Support -march=tigerlake for x86.
Compare with Icelake Client, It include 4 more new features ,they are
avx512vp2intersect, movdiri, movdir64b, shstk.
Patch by Xiang Zhang (xiangzhangllvm)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65840
llvm-svn: 368543
This regressed in r368322, and was reported as PR42948 and on the
mailing list. The fix is to ignore the specific error code for this
case. The problem doesn't seem to reproduce on Windows, where a
different error code is used instead.
llvm-svn: 368475
Summary:
Preivously we would only discard it if we failed to parse parameter lists.
If we do not consume the body, parser sees tokens inside directive. In
turn, this leads to spurious diagnostics and a crash in TokenBuffer, see
the added tests.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65517
llvm-svn: 367530
The Arm C Language Extensions for SVE document specifies that
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE should be set when the compiler supports SVE and
implements all the extensions described in the document.
This is currently not yet the case, so the feature should be disabled
until the compiler can provide all the extensions as described.
Reviewers: c-rhodes, rengolin, rovka, ktkachov
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65404
llvm-svn: 367301
As passed in the Cologne meeting and treated by Core as a DR,
[[nodiscard]] was applied to constructors so that they can be diagnosed
in cases where the user forgets a variable name for a type.
The intent is to enable the library to start using this on the
constructors of scope_guard/lock_guard.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64914
llvm-svn: 367027
Rename lang mode flag to -cl-std=clc++/-cl-std=CLC++
or -std=clc++/-std=CLC++.
This aligns with OpenCL C conversion and removes ambiguity
with OpenCL C++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65102
llvm-svn: 367008
Clang :: Headers/max_align.c currently FAILs on 64-bit SPARC:
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/dist/test/Headers/max_align.c Line 12: static_assert failed due to requirement '8 == _Alignof(max_align_t)' ""
1 error generated.
This happens because SuitableAlign isn't defined for SPARCv9 unlike SPARCv8
(which uses the default of 64 bits). gcc's sparc/sparc.h has
#define BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT (TARGET_ARCH64 ? 128 : 64)
This patch sets SuitableAlign to match and updates the corresponding testcase.
Tested on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64487
llvm-svn: 366820
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:
* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s)
* Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars
This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.
Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.
Re-landed after backing out 366450 due to missed hunks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456
llvm-svn: 366480
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:
* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s) * Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the
above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars
This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.
Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456
llvm-svn: 366450
Summary:
Preprocessor/init.c contains a line that explicitly checks for the
string
__VERSION__ "Clang{{.*}}
It's valid to have a toolchain configured to emit a vendor prefix
before the word Clang. e.g.
__VERSION__ "Vendor Clang{{.*}}
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64772
llvm-svn: 366159
Teaches ARM::appendArchExtFeatures to account dependencies when processing
target features: i.e. when you say -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve.fp+nofp it
means mve.fp should get discarded too. (Split from D63936)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64048
llvm-svn: 366031
Some targets such as Python 2.7.16 still use VERSION in
their builds. Without VERSION defined, the source code
has syntax errors.
Reverting as it will probably break many other things.
Noticed by Sterling Augustine
llvm-svn: 365992
Summary:
It has been introduced in 2011 for gcc compat:
ad1a4c6e89
it is probably time to remove it
Reviewers: rnk, dexonsmith
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: dschuff, aheejin, fedor.sergeev, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64062
llvm-svn: 365962
This patch series adds support for the next-generation arch13
CPU architecture to the SystemZ backend.
This includes:
- Basic support for the new processor and its features.
- Support for low-level builtins mapped to new LLVM intrinsics.
- New high-level intrinsics in vecintrin.h.
- Indicate support by defining __VEC__ == 10303.
Note: No currently available Z system supports the arch13
architecture. Once new systems become available, the
official system name will be added as supported -march name.
llvm-svn: 365933
error: 'error' diagnostics expected but not seen:
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/local/test/Sema/wchar.c Line 22: initializing wide char array with non-wide string literal
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/local/test/Sema/wchar.c Line 20: array initializer must be an initializer list
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/local/test/Sema/wchar.c Line 22: array initializer must be an initializer list
It turns out the definition is wrong, as can be seen in GCC's gcc/config/sol2.h:
/* wchar_t is called differently in <wchar.h> for 32 and 64-bit
compilations. This is called for by SCD 2.4.1, p. 6-83, Figure 6-65
(32-bit) and p. 6P-10, Figure 6.38 (64-bit). */
#undef WCHAR_TYPE
#define WCHAR_TYPE (TARGET_64BIT ? "int" : "long int")
The following patch implements this, and at the same time corrects the wint_t
definition which is the same:
/* Same for wint_t. See SCD 2.4.1, p. 6-83, Figure 6-66 (32-bit). There's
no corresponding 64-bit definition, but this is what Solaris 8
<iso/wchar_iso.h> uses. */
#undef WINT_TYPE
#define WINT_TYPE (TARGET_64BIT ? "int" : "long int")
Clang :: Preprocessor/wchar_t.c and Clang :: Sema/format-strings.c need to
be adjusted to account for that.
Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11, x86_64-pc-solaris2.11, and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62944
llvm-svn: 363612
Summary:
vertical-line is not a BRE special character.
POSIX.1-2017 XBD Section 9.3.2 indicates that the interpretation of `\|`
is undefined. This patch uses EREs instead.
Additionally, the pattern is further fixed so that `SIZEOF` and `WIDTH`
macros are checked.
Reviewers: jlebar, daltenty, xingxue, jasonliu, tra
Reviewed By: tra
Subscribers: jfb, jsji, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63029
llvm-svn: 362991
If MVE is present at all, then the macro __ARM_FEATURE_MVE is defined
to a value which has bit 0 set for integer MVE, and bit 1 set for
floating-point MVE.
(Floating-point MVE implies integer MVE, so if this macro is defined
at all then it will be set to 1 or 3, never 2.)
Patch mostly by Simon Tatham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60710
llvm-svn: 362806
Change D60691 caused some knock-on failures that weren't caught by the
existing tests. Firstly, selecting a CPU that should have had a
restricted FPU (e.g. `-mcpu=cortex-m4`, which should have 16 d-regs
and no double precision) could give the unrestricted version, because
`ARM::getFPUFeatures` returned a list of features including subtracted
ones (here `-fp64`,`-d32`), but `ARMTargetInfo::initFeatureMap` threw
away all the ones that didn't start with `+`. Secondly, the
preprocessor macros didn't reliably match the actual compilation
settings: for example, `-mfpu=softvfp` could still set `__ARM_FP` as
if hardware FP was available, because the list of features on the cc1
command line would include things like `+vfp4`,`-vfp4d16` and clang
didn't realise that one of those cancelled out the other.
I've fixed both of these issues by rewriting `ARM::getFPUFeatures` so
that it returns a list that enables every FP-related feature
compatible with the selected FPU and disables every feature not
compatible, which is more verbose but means clang doesn't have to
understand the dependency relationships between the backend features.
Meanwhile, `ARMTargetInfo::handleTargetFeatures` is testing for all
the various forms of the FP feature names, so that it won't miss cases
where it should have set `HW_FP` to feed into feature test macros.
That in turn caused an ordering problem when handling `-mcpu=foo+bar`
together with `-mfpu=something_that_turns_off_bar`. To fix that, I've
arranged that the `+bar` suffixes on the end of `-mcpu` and `-march`
cause feature names to be put into a separate vector which is
concatenated after the output of `getFPUFeatures`.
Another side effect of all this is to fix a bug where `clang -target
armv8-eabi` by itself would fail to set `__ARM_FEATURE_FMA`, even
though `armv8` (aka Arm v8-A) implies FP-Armv8 which has FMA. That was
because `HW_FP` was being set to a value including only the `FPARMV8`
bit, but that feature test macro was testing only the `VFP4FPU` bit.
Now `HW_FP` ends up with all the bits set, so it gives the right
answer.
Changes to tests included in this patch:
* `arm-target-features.c`: I had to change basically all the expected
results. (The Cortex-M4 test in there should function as a
regression test for the accidental double-precision bug.)
* `arm-mfpu.c`, `armv8.1m.main.c`: switched to using `CHECK-DAG`
everywhere so that those tests are no longer sensitive to the order
of cc1 feature options on the command line.
* `arm-acle-6.5.c`: been updated to expect the right answer to that
FMA test.
* `Preprocessor/arm-target-features.c`: added a regression test for
the `mfpu=softvfp` issue.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, dmgreen, ostannard, samparker, JamesNagurne
Reviewed By: ostannard
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62998
llvm-svn: 362791
The magnitude range of normalized _Float16 is 2^-14 (~6e-5) to
(2-2^-10)*2^15 (65504). You might think, then, that the code is
correct to defne FLT16_MIN_EXP and FLT16_MAX_EXP to be -14 and 15
respectively. However, for some reason the C specification actually
specifies a bias for these macros:
C11 5.2.4.2.2:
- minimum negative integer such that FLT_RADIX raised to one less than
that power is a normalized floating-point number, e_min:
FLT_MIN_EXP
DBL_MIN_EXP
LDBL_MIN_EXP
- maximum integer such that FLT_RADIX raised to one less than that
power is a representable finite floating-point number, e_max:
FLT_MAX_EXP
DBL_MAX_EXP
LDBL_MAX_EXP
FLT16_MIN_EXP and FLT16_MAX_EXP should clearly be biased the same way,
and other compilers do in fact do so, as do our OpenCL headers for `half`.
Additionally, FLT16_MIN_10_EXP is just wrong.
llvm-svn: 362183
The source location builtins are implemented as keywords, but
__has_builtin should still report true for them.
This patch also fixes a test failure on systemz where the alignment
of string literals is 2 not 1.
llvm-svn: 361920
A filename can be remapped with a header map to point to a framework
header and we can find the corresponding framework without the header.
But if the original filename doesn't have a remapped framework name,
we'll fail to find its location and will dereference a null pointer
during diagnostics emission.
Fix by tracking remappings better and emit the note only if a framework
is found before any of the remappings.
rdar://problem/48883447
Reviewers: arphaman, erik.pilkington, jkorous
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61707
llvm-svn: 361779
Summary:
These features will both be implemented soon, so I thought I would
save time by adding the boilerplate for both of them at the same time.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62047
llvm-svn: 361516
Defines macro ARM_FEATURE_CMSE to 1 for v8-M targets and introduces
-mcmse option which for v8-M targets sets ARM_FEATURE_CMSE to 3.
A diagnostic is produced when the option is given on architectures
without support for Security Extensions.
Reviewed By: dmgreen, snidertm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59879
llvm-svn: 361261
This relands commit rL360833 which caused issues on Win32
bots due to path handling/normalization differences. Now
this uses `sys::path::filename` which should handle
additional edge cases on Win32.
Original commit:
"[Clang][PP] Add the __FILE_NAME__ builtin macro"
This patch adds the __FILE_NAME__ macro that expands to the
last component of the path, similar to __FILE__ except with
a guarantee that only the last path component (without the
separator) will be rendered.
I intend to follow through with discussion of this with WG14
as a potential inclusion in the C standard or failing that,
try to discuss this with GCC developers since this extension
is desired by GCC and Clang users/developers alike.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61756
llvm-svn: 360938
Previously we were doing this so that the 256 bit selectw builtin could be used in the implementation of the 512->256 bit conversion intrinsic.
After this commit we now use a masked convert builtin that will emit the intrinsic call and the 256-bit select from custom code in CGBuiltin. Then the header only needs to call that one intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 360924
Summary:
- This patch checks the AIX version and defines the appropriate macros.
- Follow up to a comment on D59048.
Author: andusy
Reviewers: hubert.reinterpretcast, jasonliu, sfertile, xingxue
Reviewed By: sfertile
Subscribers: jsji, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61530
llvm-svn: 360900
This reverts "r360833: [Clang][PP] Add the __FILE_NAME__ builtin macro."
The tests are failing on Windows bots, reverting the patchset until I can
work out why.
llvm-svn: 360842
This patch adds the `__FILE_NAME__` macro that expands to the
last component of the path, similar to `__FILE__` except with
a guarantee that only the last path component (without the
separator) will be rendered.
I intend to follow through with discussion of this with WG14
as a potential inclusion in the C standard or failing that,
try to discuss this with GCC developers since this extension
is desired by GCC and Clang users/developers alike.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61756
llvm-svn: 360833