It turns out that nullptr pointers to data members act differently in
function templates vs class templates. Class templates use a variable
width representation proportional to the number of fields needed to
materialize it. Function templates always use a single '0' template
parameter. However, using '0' all the time is problematic if the class
uses single or multiple inheritance. In those cases, use -1.
llvm-svn: 241251
Summary:
Previously, we would mangle nullptr pointer-to-member-functions in class
templates with a mangling we invented because contemporary versions of
MSVC would crash when trying to compile such code.
However, VS "14" can successfully compile these sorts of template
instantiations. This commit updates our mangling to be compatible with
theirs.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4059
llvm-svn: 210637
This can actually be non-zero if you override a function from a virtual
base and you have forced the most_general pointer to member
representation.
llvm-svn: 205727
David Majnemer