Friend function template defined in a class template becomes available if
the enclosing class template is instantiated. Until the function template
is used, it does not have a body, but still is considered a definition for
the purpose of redeclaration checks.
This change modifies redefinition check so that it can find the friend
function template definitions in instantiated classes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21508
llvm-svn: 348473
We would issue a false-positive diagnostic for parameters in function declarations shadowing fields; we now only issue the diagnostic on a function definition instead.
llvm-svn: 348400
We should have been checking that this state is consistent, but its
possible for it to be filled later, so it isn't really sound to check
it here anyways.
Fixes llvm.org/PR39742
llvm-svn: 348325
Summary:
In our codebase, `static_assert(std::some_type_trait<Ts...>::value, "msg")`
(where `some_type_trait` is an std type_trait and `Ts...` is the
appropriate template parameters) account for 11.2% of the `static_assert`s.
In these cases, the `Ts` are typically not spelled out explicitly, e.g.
`static_assert(std::is_same<SomeT::TypeT, typename SomeDependentT::value_type>::value, "message");`
The diagnostic when the assert fails is typically not very useful, e.g.
`static_assert failed due to requirement 'std::is_same<SomeT::TypeT, typename SomeDependentT::value_type>::value' "message"`
This change makes the diagnostic spell out the types explicitly , e.g.
`static_assert failed due to requirement 'std::is_same<int, float>::value' "message"`
See tests for more examples.
After this is submitted, I intend to handle
`static_assert(!std::some_type_trait<Ts...>::value, "msg")`,
which is another 6.6% of static_asserts.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54903
llvm-svn: 348239
headers.
Previously, we would only check whether the new declaration is in a
system header, but that requires the user to be able to correctly guess
whether a declaration in a system header is declared as a struct or a
class when specializing standard library traits templates.
We now entirely ignore declarations for which the warning was disabled
when determining whether to warn on a tag mismatch.
Also extend the diagnostic message to clarify that
a) code containing such a tag mismatch is in fact valid and correct,
and
b) the (non-coding-style) reason to emit such a warning is that the
Microsoft C++ ABI is broken and includes the tag kind in decorated
names,
as it seems a lot of users are confused by our diagnostic here (either
not understanding why we produce it, or believing that it represents an
actual language rule).
llvm-svn: 348233
It seems the two failing tests can be simply fixed after r348037
Fix 3 cases in Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp
Delete the bad CodeGen/builtin-constant-p.c for now
llvm-svn: 348053
Kept the "indirect_builtin_constant_p" test case in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp
while we are investigating why the following snippet fails:
extern char extern_var;
struct { int a; } a = {__builtin_constant_p(extern_var)};
llvm-svn: 348039
This moves everything primarily testing the functionality of -ast-dump and -ast-print into their own directory, rather than leaving the tests spread around the testing directory.
llvm-svn: 348017
This was reverted in r347656 due to me thinking it caused a miscompile of
Chromium. Turns out it was the Chromium code that was broken.
llvm-svn: 347756
Summary:
Resubmit this with no changes because I think the build was broken
by a different diff.
-----
The prior diff had to be reverted because there were two tests
that failed. I updated the two tests in this diff
clang/test/Misc/pragma-attribute-supported-attributes-list.test
clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-speculative-load-hardening.cpp
----- Summary from Previous Diff (Still Accurate) -----
LLVM IR already has an attribute for speculative_load_hardening. Before
this commit, when a user passed the -mspeculative-load-hardening flag to
Clang, every function would have this attribute added to it. This Clang
attribute will allow users to opt into SLH on a function by function basis.
This can be applied to functions and Objective C methods.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo, kristof.beyls, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54915
llvm-svn: 347701
This caused a miscompile in Chrome (see crbug.com/908372) that's
illustrated by this small reduction:
static bool f(int *a, int *b) {
return !__builtin_constant_p(b - a) || (!(b - a));
}
int arr[] = {1,2,3};
bool g() {
return f(arr, arr + 3);
}
$ clang -O2 -S -emit-llvm a.cc -o -
g() should return true, but after r347417 it became false for some reason.
This also reverts the follow-up commits.
r347417:
> Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
>
> Don't try to emit a scalar expression for a non-scalar argument to
> __builtin_constant_p().
>
> Third time's a charm!
r347446:
> The result of is.constant() is unsigned.
r347480:
> A __builtin_constant_p() returns 0 with a function type.
r347512:
> isEvaluatable() implies a constant context.
>
> Assume that we're in a constant context if we're asking if the expression can
> be compiled into a constant initializer. This fixes the issue where a
> __builtin_constant_p() in a compound literal was diagnosed as not being
> constant, even though it's always possible to convert the builtin into a
> constant.
r347531:
> A "constexpr" is evaluated in a constant context. Make sure this is reflected
> if a __builtin_constant_p() is a part of a constexpr.
llvm-svn: 347656
until I figure out why the build is failing or timing out
***************************
Summary:
The prior diff had to be reverted because there were two tests
that failed. I updated the two tests in this diff
clang/test/Misc/pragma-attribute-supported-attributes-list.test
clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-speculative-load-hardening.cpp
LLVM IR already has an attribute for speculative_load_hardening. Before
this commit, when a user passed the -mspeculative-load-hardening flag to
Clang, every function would have this attribute added to it. This Clang
attribute will allow users to opt into SLH on a function by function
basis.
This can be applied to functions and Objective C methods.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo, kristof.beyls, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54915
This reverts commit a5b3c232d1e3613f23efbc3960f8e23ea70f2a79.
(r347617)
llvm-svn: 347628
Summary:
The prior diff had to be reverted because there were two tests
that failed. I updated the two tests in this diff
clang/test/Misc/pragma-attribute-supported-attributes-list.test
clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-speculative-load-hardening.cpp
----- Summary from Previous Diff (Still Accurate) -----
LLVM IR already has an attribute for speculative_load_hardening. Before
this commit, when a user passed the -mspeculative-load-hardening flag to
Clang, every function would have this attribute added to it. This Clang
attribute will allow users to opt into SLH on a function by function basis.
This can be applied to functions and Objective C methods.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo, kristof.beyls, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54915
llvm-svn: 347617
Summary:
LLVM IR already has an attribute for speculative_load_hardening. Before
this commit, when a user passed the -mspeculative-load-hardening flag to
Clang, every function would have this attribute added to it. This Clang
attribute will allow users to opt into SLH on a function by function basis.
This can be applied to functions and Objective C methods.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54555
llvm-svn: 347586
Assume that we're in a constant context if we're asking if the expression can
be compiled into a constant initializer. This fixes the issue where a
__builtin_constant_p() in a compound literal was diagnosed as not being
constant, even though it's always possible to convert the builtin into a
constant.
llvm-svn: 347512
Summary:
A __builtin_constant_p may end up with a constant after inlining. Use
the is.constant intrinsic if it's a variable that's in a context where
it may resolve to a constant, e.g., an argument to a function after
inlining.
Reviewers: rsmith, shafik
Subscribers: jfb, kristina, cfe-commits, nickdesaulniers, jyknight
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54355
llvm-svn: 347294
If PerformConstructorInitialization of a direct initializer list constructor is
called while instantiating a template, it has brace locations in its BraceLoc
arguments but not in the Kind argument.
This reverts the hunk https://reviews.llvm.org/D41921#inline-468844.
Patch by Orivej Desh!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53231
llvm-svn: 347261
There are 2 function variations with vector type parameter. When we call them with argument of different vector type we would prefer to
choose the variation with implicit argument conversion of compatible vector type instead of incompatible vector type. For example,
typedef float __v4sf __attribute__((__vector_size__(16)));
void f(vector float);
void f(vector signed int);
int main {
__v4sf a;
f(a);
}
Here, we'd like to choose f(vector float) but not report an ambiguous call error.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53417
llvm-svn: 347019
This unfortunately results in a substantial breaking change when
switching to C++20, but it's not yet clear what / how much we should
do about that. We may want to add a compatibility conversion from
u8 string literals to const char*, similar to how C++98 provided a
compatibility conversion from string literals to non-const char*,
but that's not handled by this patch.
The feature can be disabled in C++20 mode with -fno-char8_t.
llvm-svn: 346892
This matches a similar behavior with GCC accepting [[gnu::__attr__]] as a alias for [[gnu::attr]] in that clang attributes can now be spelled with two leading and trailing underscores.
I had always intended for this to work, but missed the critical bit. We already had an existing test in test/Preprocessor/has_attribute.cpp for [[clang::__fallthrough__]] but using that spelling would still give an "unknown attribute" diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 346547
Currently, we only accept clang as the scoped attribute identifier for double square bracket attributes provided by Clang, but this has the potential to conflict with user-defined macros. To help alleviate these concerns, this introduces the _Clang scoped attribute identifier as an alias for clang. It also introduces a warning with a fixit on the off chance someone attempts to use __clang__ as the scoped attribute (which is a predefined compiler identification macro).
llvm-svn: 346521
Summary:
Compound literals, enums, file-scoped arrays, etc. require their
initializers and size specifiers to be constant. Wrap the initializer
expressions in a ConstantExpr so that we can easily check for this later
on.
Reviewers: rsmith, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jyknight, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53921
llvm-svn: 346455
Summary:
Previously the TemplateSpecialization instance for 'template_alias', in the example below, returned the type info of the canonical type (int). This ignored the type alias if the template type happen to be aliased.
Before this patch, the assert would trigger with an alignment of 4:
```
typedef int __attribute__(( aligned( 16 ) )) aligned_int;
template < typename >
using template_alias = aligned_int;
static_assert( alignof( template_alias<void>) == 16, "" );
```
This patch checks if the TemplateSpecialization type has an alias, and if so will return the type information for the aliased type, else the canonical type's info is returned (original behavior). I believe that this is the desired behavior.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54048
llvm-svn: 346146
Summary:
The test case added in this diff would incorrectly warn that control
flow may fall through without returning. Here's a standalone example:
https://godbolt.org/z/dCwXEi
The same program, but using `return` instead of `co_return`, does not
produce a warning: https://godbolt.org/z/mVldqQ
The issue was in how Clang analysis would structure its representation
of the control-flow graph. Specifically, when constructing the CFG,
`CFGBuilder::Visit` had special handling of a `ReturnStmt`, in which it
would place object destructors in the same CFG block as a `return` statement,
immediately after it. Doing so would allow the logic in
`lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarning.cpp` `CheckFallThrough` to work properly in the
program that used `return`, correctly determining that no "plain edges" preceded
the exit block of the function.
Because a `co_return` statement would not enjoy the same treatment when
it was being built into the control-flow graph, object destructors
would not be placed in the same CFG block as the `co_return`, thus
resulting in a "plain edge" preceding the exit block of the function,
and so the warning logic would be triggered.
Add special casing for `co_return` to Clang analysis, thereby
remedying the mistaken warning.
Test Plan: `check-clang`
Reviewers: GorNishanov, tks2103, rsmith
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: EricWF, lewissbaker, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54075
llvm-svn: 346074
Summary:
- Add `UETT_PreferredAlignOf` to account for the difference between `__alignof` and `alignof`
- `AlignOfType` now returns ABI alignment instead of preferred alignment iff clang-abi-compat > 7, and one uses _Alignof or alignof
Patch by Nicole Mazzuca!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53207
llvm-svn: 345419
Summary:
This change rejects the shadowing of a capture by a parameter in lambdas in C++17.
```
int main() {
int a;
auto f = [a](int a) { return a; };
}
```
results in:
```
main.cpp:3:20: error: a lambda parameter cannot shadow an explicitly captured entity
auto f = [a](int a) { return a; };
^
main.cpp:3:13: note: variable a is explicitly captured here
auto f = [a](int a) { return a; };
^
```
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, erik.pilkington, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53595
llvm-svn: 345308
Summary:
When -faligned-allocation is specified in C++03 libc++ defines std::align_val_t as an unscoped enumeration type (because Clang didn't provide scoped enumerations as an extension until 8.0).
Unfortunately Clang confuses the `align_val_t` overloads of delete with the sized deallocation overloads which aren't enabled. This caused Clang to call the aligned deallocation function as if it were the sized deallocation overload.
For example: https://godbolt.org/z/xXJELh
This patch fixes the confusion.
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53508
llvm-svn: 345296
MicrosoftExt allows explicit constructor calls. Prevent lookup of constructor name unless the name has explicit scope.
This avoids a compile-time crash due to confusing a member access for a constructor name.
Test case included. All tests pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53441
llvm-svn: 345258
There is a small difference in the scope flags for C89 versus the other C/C++
dialects. This change ensures that the -Wcomma warning won't be duplicated or
issued in the wrong location. Also, the test case is refactored into C and C++
parts, with the C++ parts guarded by a #ifdef to allow the test to run in both
modes.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32370
llvm-svn: 345228
Summary:
When -faligned-allocation is specified in C++03 libc++ defines std::align_val_t as an unscoped enumeration type (because Clang didn't provide scoped enumerations as an extension until 8.0).
Unfortunately Clang confuses the `align_val_t` overloads of delete with the sized deallocation overloads which aren't enabled. This caused Clang to call the aligned deallocation function as if it were the sized deallocation overload.
For example: https://godbolt.org/z/xXJELh
This patch fixes the confusion.
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53508
llvm-svn: 345211
When there is a dependent type inside a cast, the CastKind becomes CK_Dependent
instead of CK_ToVoid. This fix will check that there is a dependent cast,
the original type is dependent, and the target type is void to ignore the cast.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39375
llvm-svn: 345111
Amends r344259 so that enumerators shadowing types are not diagnosed, as shadowing under those circumstances is rarely (if ever) an issue in practice.
llvm-svn: 344898
For now, disable the "variable in loop condition not modified" warning to not
be emitted when there is a structured binding variable in the loop condition.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39285
llvm-svn: 344828
Serge Pavlov