It's possible to specify defined input/output procedures either as a
type-bound procedure of a derived type or as a defined-io-generic-spec. This
means that you can specify the same procedure in both mechanisms, which does
not cause problems. Alternatively, you can specify two different procedures to
be the defined input/output procedure for the same derived type. This is an
error. This change catches this error. The situation is slightly complicated
by parameterized derived types. Types with the same value for a KIND parameter
are treated as the same type while types with different KIND parameters are
treated as different types.
I implemented this check by adding a vector to keep track of which defined
input/output procedures had been seen for which derived types along with the
kind of procedure (read vs write and formatted vs unformatted). I also added
tests for non-parameterized types and types parameterized by KIND and LEN type
parameters.
I also removed an erroneous check from the code that creates runtime type
information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103560
Each var argument to an attach or detach clause must be a
Fortran variable or array with the pointer or allocatable attribute.
This patch enforce this restruction.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103279
This patch adds the following Fortran specific semantic checks for the OpenMP
Allocate directive.
1) A type parameter inquiry cannot appear in an ALLOCATE directive.
2) List items specified in the ALLOCATE directive must not have the ALLOCATABLE
attribute unless the directive is associated with an ALLOCATE statement.
Co-authored-by: Irina Dobrescu <irina.dobrescu@arm.com>
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102061
Defined input/output procedures are specified in 12.6.4.8. There are different
versions for read versus write and formatted versus unformatted, but they all
share the same basic set of dummy arguments.
I added several checking functions to check-declarations.cpp along with a test.
In the process of implementing this, I noticed and fixed a typo in
.../lib/Evaluate/characteristics.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103045
Dummy arguments of ENTRY statements in execution parts were
not being created as objects, nor were they being implicitly
typed.
When the symbol corresponding to an alternate ENTRY point
already exists (by that name) due to having been referenced
in an earlier call, name resolution used to delete the extant
symbol. This isn't the right thing to do -- the extant
symbol will be pointed to by parser::Name nodes in the parse
tree while no longer being part of any Scope.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102948
- Replace class(*) member by a c_ptr member to avoid having to handle
polymorphic components in the type info table generation. Polymorphic
entity handling will require these very tables to be lowered properly.
Note: keep the init as NullPointer/Designators. This is technically
invalid Fortran, the init should have c_ptr type. But wrapping this
in a C_LOC intrinsic call would make runtime generation and lowering
more complex with no real benefits.
- ComponentIterator is crashing when used on the generated derived
types in GetScope. This patch makes GetScope more robust, but it
is not entirely clear to me why this is only happening with the
generated derived types.
- The type of generated character globals was incorrect because
Scope::FindType was matching character types with different
length. Add a CharacterTypeSpec == operator to fix this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102768
This patch implements the following semantic check:
```
A master region may not be closely nested inside a work-sharing, loop, atomic, task, or taskloop region.
```
Adds a test case and also modifies a couple of existing test cases to include the check.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100228
We sometimes unroll an ac-implied-do of an array constructor into a flat list
of values. We then re-analyze the array constructor that contains the
resulting list of expressions. Such a list may or may not contain errors.
But when processing an array constructor with an unrolled ac-implied-do, the
compiler was building an expression to represent the extent of the resulting
array constructor containing the list of values. The number of operands
in this extent expression was based on the number of elements in the
unrolled list of values. For very large lists, this created an
expression so large that it could not be evaluated by the compiler
without overflowing the stack.
I fixed this by continuously folding the extent expression as each operand is
added to it. I added the test .../flang/test/Semantics/array-constr-big.f90
that will cause the compiler to seg fault without this change.
Also, when the unrolled ac-implied-do expression contains errors, we were
repeating the same error message referencing the same source line for every
instance of the erroneous expression in the unrolled list. This potentially
resulted in a very long list of messages for a single error in the source code.
I fixed this by comparing the message being emitted to the previously emitted
message. If they are the same, I do not emit the message. This change is also
tested by the new test array-constr-big.f90.
Several of the existing tests had duplicate error messages for the same source
line, and this change caused differences in their output. So I adjusted the
tests to match the new message emitting behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102210
When producing the runtime type information for a component of a derived type
that had a LEN type parameter, we were not allowing a KIND parameter of the
derived type. This was causing one of the NAG correctness tests to fail
(.../hibiya/d5.f90).
I added a test to our own test suite to check for this.
Also, I fixed a typo in .../module/__fortran_type_info.f90.
I allowed KIND type parameters to be used for the declarations of components
that use LEN parameters by constant folding the value of the LEN parameter. To
make the constant folding work, I had to put the semantics::DerivedTypeSpec of
the associated derived type into the folding context. To get this
semantics::DerivedTypeSpec, I changed the value of the semantics::Scope object
that was passed to DescribeComponent() to be the derived type scope rather than
the containing non-derived type scope.
This scope change, in turn, caused differences in the symbol table output that
is checked in typeinfo01.f90. Most of these differences were in the order that
the symbols appeared in the dump. But one of them changed one of the values
from "CHARACTER(2_8,1)" to "CHARACTER(1_8,1)". I'm not sure if these changes
are significant. Please verify that the results of this test are still valid.
Also, I wonder if there are other situations in this code where we should be
folding constants. For example, what if the field of a component has a
component whose type is a PDT with a LEN type parameter, and the component's
declaration depends on the KIND type parameter of the current PDT. Here's an
example:
type string(stringkind)
integer,kind :: stringkind
character(stringkind) :: value
end type string
type outer(kindparam)
integer,kind :: kindparam
type(string(kindparam)) :: field
end type outer
I don't understand the code or what it's trying to accomplish well enough to
figure out if such cases are correctly handled by my new code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101482
We were not correctly handling structure constructors that had forward
references to parameterized derived types. I harvested the code that checks
for forward references that was used during analysis of function call
expressions and called it from there and also called it during the
analysis of structure constructors.
I also added a test that will produce an internal error without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101330
We were not checking that attributes that are supposed to be specific to
dummy arguments were not being used for local entities. I added the checks
along with tests for them.
After implementing these new checks, I found that one of the tests in
separate-mp02.f90 was erroneous, and I fixed it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101126
When generating output for `-fdebug-dump-symbols`, make sure that
BuildRuntimeDerivedTypeTables is also run. This change is needed in
order to make the implementation of `-fdebug-dump-symbols` in
`flang-new` consistent with `f18`. It also allows us to port more tests
to use the new driver whenever it is enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100649
Switching from `%f18` to `%flang_fc1` in LIT tests added in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D91159. This way these tests are run with the
new driver, `flang-new`, when enabled (i.e. when
`FLANG_BUILD_NEW_DRIVER` is set).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101078
Andrezj W. @ Arm discovered that the runtime derived type table
building code in semantics was detecting fatal errors in the tests
that the f18 driver wasn't printing. This patch fixes f18 so that
these messages are printed; however, the messages were not valid user
errors, and the rest of this patch fixes them up.
There were two sources of the bogus errors. One was that the runtime
derived type information table builder was calculating the shapes of
allocatable and pointer array components in derived types, and then
complaining that they weren't constant or LEN parameter values, which
of course they couldn't be since they have to have deferred shapes
and those bounds were expressions like LBOUND(component,dim=1).
The second was that f18 was forwarding the actual LEN type parameter
expressions of a type instantiation too far into the uses of those
parameters in various expressions in the declarations of components;
when an actual LEN type parameter is not a constant value, it needs
to remain a "bare" type parameter inquiry so that it will be lowered
to a descriptor inquiry and acquire a captured expression value.
Fixing this up properly involved: moving some code into new utility
function templates in Evaluate/tools.h, tweaking the rewriting of
conversions in expression folding to elide needless integer kind
conversions of type parameter inquiries, making type parameter
inquiry folding *not* replace bare LEN type parameters with
non-constant actual parameter values, and cleaning up some
altered test results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101001
This patch adds semantic checks for the General Restrictions of the
Allocate Directive.
Since the requires directive is not yet implemented in Flang, the
restriction:
```
allocate directives that appear in a target region must
specify an allocator clause unless a requires directive with the
dynamic_allocators clause is present in the same compilation unit
```
will need to be updated at a later time.
A different patch will be made with the Fortran specific restrictions of
this directive.
I have used the code from https://reviews.llvm.org/D89395 for the
CheckObjectListStructure function.
Co-authored-by: Isaac Perry <isaac.perry@arm.com>
Reviewed By: clementval, kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91159
We were erroneously not taking into account the constant values of LEN type
parameters of parameterized derived types when checking for argument
compatibility. The required checks are identical to those for assignment
compatibility. Since argument compatibility is checked in .../lib/Evaluate and
assignment compatibility is checked in .../lib/Semantics, I moved the common
code into .../lib/Evaluate/tools.cpp and changed the assignment compatibility
checking code to call it.
After implementing these new checks, tests in resolve53.f90 were failing
because the tests were erroneous. I fixed these tests and added new tests
to call03.f90 to test argument passing of parameterized derived types more
completely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100989
This patch adds `-fget-definition` to `flang-new`. The semantics of this
option are identical in both drivers. The error message in the
"throwaway" driver is updated so that it matches the one from
`flang-new` (which is auto-generated and cannot be changed easily).
Tests are updated accordingly. A dedicated test for error handling was
added: get-definition.f90 (for the sake of simplicity,
getdefinition01.f90 no longer tests for errors).
The `ParseFrontendArgs` function is updated so that it can return
errors. This change is required in order to report invalid values
following `-fget-definition`.
The actual implementation of `GetDefinitionAction::ExecuteAction()` was
extracted from f18.cpp (i.e. the bit that deals with
`-fget-definition`).
Depends on: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100556
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100558
We were erroneously emitting error messages for assignments of derived types
where the associated objects were instantiated with non-constant LEN type
parameters.
I fixed this by adding the member function MightBeAssignmentCompatibleWith() to
the class DerivedTypeSpec and calling it to determine whether it's possible
that objects of parameterized derived types can be assigned to each other. Its
implementation first compares the uninstantiated values of the types. If they
are equal, it then compares the values of the constant instantiated type
parameters.
I added tests to assign04.f90 to exercise this new code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100868
This is similar to https://reviews.llvm.org/D100309, i.e. `%f18` is
replaced with `%flang_new`.
resolve105.f90 wasn't in tree when D100309 was worked on, so it's
updated here instead.
label14.f90 requires `-fsyntax-only`. I didn't notice that when
submitting D100309, hence updating it now instead. `-fsyntax-only` is
required to prevent `%f18` from calling an external compiler (which then
fails and returns a non-zero exit code).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100655
This patch updates most of the remaining regression tests (~400) to use
`flang-new` rather then `f18` when `FLANG_BUILD_NEW_DRIVER` is set.
This allows us to share more Flang regression tests between `f18` and
`flang-new`. A handful of tests have not been ported yet - these are
currently either failing or not supported by the new driver.
Summary of changes:
* RUN lines in tests are updated to use `%flang_fc1` instead of `%f18`
* option spellings in tests are updated to forms accepted by both `f18` and
`flang-new`
* variables in Bash scripts are renamed (e.g. F18 --> FLANG_FC1)
The updated tests will now be run with the new driver, `flang-new`,
whenever it is enabled (i.e when `FLANG_BUILD_NEW_DRIVER` is set).
Although this patch touches many files, vast majority of the changes are
automatic:
```
grep -IEZlr "%f18" flang/test/ | xargs -0 -l sed -i 's/%f18/%flang_fc1/g
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100309
We were not instantiating procedure pointer components. If the instantiation
contained errors, we were not reporting them. This resulted in internal errors
in later processing.
I fixed this by adding code in .../lib/Semantics/type.cpp in
InstantiateComponent() to handle a component with ProcEntityDetails. I also
added several tests for various good and bad instantiations of procedure
pointer components.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100341
With the typo ($S instead of %s), the driver was expecting
input from stdin. In such cases, it prints:
```
Enter Fortran source
Use EOF character (^D) to end file
```
This was piped to FileCheck. Together with the available `CHECK-NOT`
statement, this was sufficient for the test to pass (incorrectly).
This patch makes sure that the provided input file is used instead of
stdin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100301
F18 supports the standard intrinsic function SELECTED_REAL_KIND
but not its synonym in the standard module IEEE_ARITHMETIC
named IEEE_SELECTED_REAL_KIND until this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100066
Check for two or more symbols that define a data object or entry point
with the same interoperable BIND(C) name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100067
We were not folding type parameter inquiries for the form 'var%typeParam'
where 'typeParam' was a KIND or LEN type parameter of a derived type and 'var'
was a designator of the derived type. I fixed this by adding code to the
function 'FoldOperation()' for 'TypeParamInquiry's to handle this case. I also
cleaned up the code for the case where there is no designator.
In order to make the error messages correctly refer to both the points of
declaration and instantiation, I needed to add an argument to the function
'InstantiateIntrinsicType()' for the location of the instantiation.
I also changed the formatting of 'TypeParamInquiry' to correctly format this
case. I also added tests for both KIND and LEN type parameter inquiries in
resolve104.f90.
Making these changes revealed an error in resolve89.f90 and caused one of the
error messages in assign04.f90 to be different.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99892
We were not folding type parameter inquiries for the form 'var%typeParam'
where 'typeParam' was a KIND or LEN type parameter of a derived type and 'var'
was a designator of the derived type. I fixed this by adding code to the
function 'FoldOperation()' for 'TypeParamInquiry's to handle this case. I also
cleaned up the code for the case where there is no designator.
In order to make the error messages correctly refer to both the points of
declaration and instantiation, I needed to add an argument to the function
'InstantiateIntrinsicType()' for the location of the instantiation.
I also changed the formatting of 'TypeParamInquiry' to correctly format this
case. I also added tests for both KIND and LEN type parameter inquiries in
resolve104.f90.
Making these changes revealed an error in resolve89.f90 and caused one of the
error messages in assign04.f90 to be different.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99892
f18 was emitting a bogus error message about the lack of a TARGET
attribute when a pointer was initialized with a component of a
variable that was a legitimate TARGET.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99665
When writing tests for a previous problem, I ran across situations where the
compiler was failing calls to CHECK(). In these situations, the compiler had
inconsistent semantic information because the programs were erroneous. This
inconsistent information was causing the calls to CHECK().
I fixed this by avoiding the code that ended up making the failed calls to
CHECK() and making sure that we were only avoiding these situations when the
associated symbols were erroneous.
I also added tests that would cause the calls to CHECK() without these changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99342
Binding labels start as expressions but they have to evaluate to
constant character of default kind, so they can be represented as an
std::string. Leading and trailing blanks have to be removed, so the
folded expression isn't exactly right anyway.
So all BIND(C) symbols now have a string binding label, either the
default or user-supplied one. This is recorded in the .mod file.
Add WithBindName mix-in for details classes that can have a binding
label so that they are all consistent. Add GetBindName() and
SetBindName() member functions to Symbol.
Add tests that verifies that leading and trailing blanks are ignored
in binding labels and that the default label is folded to lower case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99208
Binding labels start as expressions but they have to evaluate to
constant character of default kind, so they can be represented as an
std::string. Leading and trailing blanks have to be removed, so the
folded expression isn't exactly right anyway.
So all BIND(C) symbols now have a string binding label, either the
default or user-supplied one. This is recorded in the .mod file.
Add WithBindName mix-in for details classes that can have a binding
label so that they are all consistent. Add GetBindName() and
SetBindName() member functions to Symbol.
Add tests that verifies that leading and trailing blanks are ignored
in binding labels and that the default label is folded to lower case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99208
When writing tests for a previous problem, I ran across situations where we
were not producing error messages for declarations of specific procedures of
generic interfaces where every other compiler I tested (except nvfotran) did.
I added a check to CheckExtantExternal() and renamed it since it now checks for
erroneous extant symbols generally.
I also removed a call to this function from processing for ENTRY statements,
since it seemed unnecessary and its presence caused bogus error messages.
I also added some tests for erroneous declarations where we were not producing
error messages.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99111
If you specify a specific procedure of a generic interface that has the same
name as both the generic interface and a preceding derived type, the compiler
would fail an internal call to CHECK(). I fixed this by testing for this
situation when processing specific procedures. I also added a test that will
cause the call to CHECK() to fail without this new code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99085
This patch fixes a bug to allow ordered construct within a non-worksharing loop, also adds more sema checks.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98733
Replace semantics::SymbolSet with alternatives that clarify
whether the set should order its contents by source position
or not. This matters because positionally-ordered sets must
not be used for Symbols that might be subjected to name
replacement during name resolution, and address-ordered
sets must not be used (without sorting) in circumstances
where the order of their contents affects the output of the
compiler.
All set<> and map<> instances in the compiler that are keyed
by Symbols now have explicit Compare types in their template
instantiations. Symbol::operator< is no more.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98878
Adds support for `-fget-symbols-sources` in the new Flang driver. All
relevant tests are updated to use the new driver when
`FLANG_BUILD_NEW_DRIVER` is set.
`RUN` lines in tests are updated so `-fsyntax-only`
comes before `-fget-symbols-sources`. That's because:
* both `-fsyntax-only` and `-fget-symbols-sources` are
action flags, and
* the new driver, flang-new, will only consider the right-most
action flag.
In other words, this change is needed so that the tests work with both
`f18` (requires both flags) and `flang-new` (only considers the last
action flag).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98191
In parser::AllCookedSources, implement a map from CharBlocks to
the CookedSource instances that they cover. This permits a fast
Find() operation based on std::map::equal_range to map a CharBlock
to its enclosing CookedSource instance.
Add a creation order number to each CookedSource. This allows
AllCookedSources to provide a Precedes(x,y) predicate that is a
true source stream ordering between two CharBlocks -- x is less
than y if it is in an earlier CookedSource, or in the same
CookedSource at an earlier position.
Add a reference to the singleton SemanticsContext to each Scope.
All of this allows operator< to be implemented on Symbols by
means of a true source ordering. From a Symbol, we get to
its Scope, then to the SemanticsContext, and then use its
AllCookedSources reference to call Precedes().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98743
Fortran permits a reference to a function whose result is a pointer
to be used as a definable variable in any context where a
designator could appear. This patch wrings out remaining bugs
with such usage and adds more testing.
The utility predicate IsProcedurePointer(expr) had a misleading
name which has been corrected to IsProcedurePointerTarget(expr).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98555
If you specify a type-bound procedure with an alternate return, there
will be no symbol associated with that dummy argument. In such cases,
the compiler's list of dummy arguments will contain a nullptr. In our
analysis of the PASS arguments of type-bound procedures, we were
assuming that all dummy arguments had non-null symbols associated with
them and were using that assumption to get the name of the dummy
argument. This caused the compiler to try to dereference a nullptr.
I fixed this by explicitly checking for a nullptr and, in such cases, emitting
an error message. I also added tests that contain type-bound procedures with
alternate returns in both legal and illegal constructs to ensure that semantic
analysis is working for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98430
You can define a base type with a type-bound procedure which is erroneously
missing a NOPASS attribute and then define another type that extends the base
type and overrides the erroneous procedure. In this case, when we perform
semantic checking on the overriding procedure, we verify the "pass index" of
the overriding procedure. The attempt to get the procedure's pass index fails
a call to CHECK().
I fixed this by calling SetError() on the symbol of the overridden procedure in
the base type. Then, I check HasError() before executing the code that invokes
the failing call to CHECK(). I also added a test that will cause the compiler
to fail the call to CHECK() without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98355
We have a "<" operator defined on the type semantics::Symbol that's based on
the symbols' locations in the cooked character stream. This is potentially
problematic when comparing symbols from .mod files when the cooked character
streams themselves might be allocated to varying memory locations.
This change fixes that by using the order in which symbols are created as the
basis for the "<" operator. Thanks to Tim and Peter for consultation on the
necessity of doing this and the idea for what to use as the basis of the sort.
This change in the "<" operator changed the expected results for three of the
tests. I manually inspected the new results, and they look OK to me. The
differences in data05.f90 and typeinfo01.f90 are entirely the order, offsets,
and sizes of the derived type components. The changes in resolve102.f90 are
due to the new, different "<" operator used for sorting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98225
When we have a subprogram that has been determined to contain errors, we do not
perform name resolution on its execution part. In this case, if the subprogram
contains a NULLIFY statement, the parser::Name of a pointer object in a NULLIFY
statement will not have had name resolution performed on it. Thus, its symbol
will not have been set. Later, however, we do semantic checking on the NULLIFY
statement. The code that did this assumed that the parser::Name of the
pointer object was non-null.
I fixed this by just removing the null pointer check for the "symbol" member of
the "parser::Name" of the pointer object when doing semantic checking for
NULLIFY statements. I also added a test that will make the compiler crash
without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98184
We were allowing procedures with the MODULE prefix to be declared at the global
scope. This is prohibited by C1547 and was causing an internal check of the
compiler to fail.
I fixed this by adding a check. I also added a test that would trigger a crash
without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97875
It's possible to define a procedure whose interface depends on a procedure
which has an interface that depends on the original procedure. Such a circular
definition was causing the compiler to fall into an infinite loop when
resolving the name of the second procedure. It's also possible to create
circular dependency chains of more than two procedures.
I fixed this by adding the function HasCycle() to the class DeclarationVisitor
and calling it from DeclareProcEntity() to detect procedures with such
circularly defined interfaces. I marked the associated symbols of such
procedures by calling SetError() on them. When processing subsequent
procedures, I called HasError() before attempting to analyze their interfaces.
Unfortunately, this did not work.
With help from Tim, we determined that the SymbolSet used to track the
erroneous symbols was instantiated using a "<" operator which was defined using
the location of the name of the procedure. But the location of the procedure
name was being changed by a call to ReplaceName() between the times that the
calls to SetError() and HasError() were made. This caused HasError() to
incorrectly report that a symbol was not in the set of erroneous symbols.
I fixed this by changing SymbolSet to be an unordered set that uses the
contents of the name of the symbol as the basis for its hash function. This
works because the contents of the name of the symbol is preserved by
ReplaceName() even though its location changes.
I also fixed the error message used when reporting recursively defined
dummy procedure arguments by removing extra apostrophes and sorting the
list of symbols.
I also added tests that will crash the compiler without this change.
Note that the "<" operator is used in other contexts, for example, in the map
of characterized procedures, maps of items in equivalence sets, maps of
structure constructor values, ... All of these situations happen after name
resolution has been completed and all calls to ReplaceName() have already
happened and thus are not subject to the problem I ran into when ReplaceName()
was called when processing procedure entities.
Note also that the implementation of the "<" operator uses the relative
location in the cooked character stream as the basis of its implementation.
This is potentially problematic when symbols from diffent compilation units
(for example symbols originating in .mod files) are put into the same map since
their names will appear in two different source streams which may not be
allocated in the same relative positions in memory. But I was unable to create
a test that caused a problem. Using a direct comparison of the content of the
name of the symbol in the "<" operator has problems. Symbols in enclosing or
parallel scopes can have the same name. Also using the location of the symbol
in the cooked character stream has the advantage that it preserves the the
order of the symbols in a structure constructor constant, which makes matching
the values with the symbols relatively easy.
This patch supersedes D97749.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97774
It's possible to define a procedure whose interface depends on a procedure
which has an interface that depends on the original procedure. Such a circular
definition was causing the compiler to fall into an infinite loop when
resolving the name of the second procedure. It's also possible to create
circular dependency chains of more than two procedures.
I fixed this by adding the function HasCycle() to the class DeclarationVisitor
and calling it from DeclareProcEntity() to detect procedures with such
circularly defined interfaces. I marked the associated symbols of such
procedures by calling SetError() on them. When processing subsequent
procedures, I called HasError() before attempting to analyze their interfaces.
Unfortunately, this did not work.
With help from Tim, we determined that the SymbolSet used to track the
erroneous symbols was instantiated using a "<" operator which was defined using
the location of the name of the procedure. But the location of the procedure
name was being changed by a call to ReplaceName() between the times that the
calls to SetError() and HasError() were made. This caused HasError() to
incorrectly report that a symbol was not in the set of erroneous symbols.
I fixed this by changing SymbolSet to be an unordered set that uses the
contents of the name of the symbol as the basis for its hash function. This
works because the contents of the name of the symbol is preserved by
ReplaceName() even though its location changes.
I also fixed the error message used when reporting recursively defined dummy
procedure arguments.
I also added tests that will crash the compiler without this change.
Note that the "<" operator is used in other contexts, for example, in the map
of characterized procedures, maps of items in equivalence sets, maps of
structure constructor values, ... All of these situations happen after name
resolution has been completed and all calls to ReplaceName() have already
happened and thus are not subject to the problem I ran into when ReplaceName()
was called when processing procedure entities.
Note also that the implementation of the "<" operator uses the relative
location in the cooked character stream as the basis of its implementation.
This is potentially problematic when symbols from diffent compilation units
(for example symbols originating in .mod files) are put into the same map since
their names will appear in two different source streams which may not be
allocated in the same relative positions in memory. But I was unable to create
a test that caused a problem. Using a direct comparison of the content of the
name of the symbol in the "<" operator has problems. Symbols in enclosing or
parallel scopes can have the same name. Also using the location of the symbol
in the cooked character stream has the advantage that it preserves the the
order of the symbols in a structure constructor constant, which makes matching
the values with the symbols relatively easy.
This change supersedes D97201.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97749
Semantic checks for the following OpenMP 4.5 clauses.
1. 2.15.4.2 - Copyprivate clause
2. 2.15.3.4 - Firstprivate clause
3. 2.15.3.5 - Lastprivate clause
Add related test cases and resolve test cases marked as XFAIL.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91920
This reverts commit 07de0846a5.
The original patch has caused 6 out 8 of Flang's public buildbots to
fail. As I'm not sure what the fix should be, I'm reverting this for
now. Please see https://reviews.llvm.org/D97201 for more context and
discussion.
It's possible to define a procedure whose interface depends on a procedure
which has an interface that depends on the original procedure. Such a circular
definition was causing the compiler to fall into an infinite loop when
resolving the name of the second procedure. It's also possible to create
circular dependency chains of more than two procedures.
I fixed this by adding the function HasCycle() to the class DeclarationVisitor
and calling it from DeclareProcEntity() to detect procedures with such
circularly defined interfaces. I marked the associated symbols of such
procedures by calling SetError() on them. When processing subsequent
procedures, I called HasError() before attempting to analyze their interfaces.
Unfortunately, this did not work.
With help from Tim, we determined that the SymbolSet used to track the
erroneous symbols was instantiated using a "<" operator which was
defined using the name of the procedure. But the procedure name was
being changed by a call to ReplaceName() between the times that the
calls to SetError() and HasError() were made. This caused HasError() to
incorrectly report that a symbol was not in the set of erroneous
symbols. I fixed this by making SymbolSet be an ordered set, which does
not use the "<" operator.
I also added tests that will crash the compiler without this change.
And I fixed the formatting on an error message from a previous update.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97201
Most Fortran compilers accept the following benign extension,
and it appears in some applications:
SUBROUTINE FOO(A,N)
IMPLICIT NONE
REAL A(N) ! N is used before being typed
INTEGER N
END
Allow it in f18 only for default integer scalar dummy arguments.
Differential Revesion: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96982
Add the following options:
* -fdebug-dump-symbols
* -fdebug-dump-parse-tree
* -fdebug-dump-provenance
Summary of changes:
- Add 3 new frontend actions: DebugDumpSymbolsAction, DebugDumpParseTreeAction and DebugDumpProvenanceAction
- Add a unique pointer to the Semantics instance created in PrescanAndSemaAction
- Move fatal semantic error reporting to its own method, FrontendActions#reportFatalSemanticErrors
- Port most tests using `-fdebug-dump-symbols` and `-fdebug-dump-parse-tree` to the new driver if built, otherwise default to f18
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96716
Fortran 2018 explicitly permits an ignored type declaration
for the result of a generic intrinsic function. See the comment
added to Semantics/expression.cpp for an explanation of why this
is somewhat dangerous and worthy of a warning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96879
The intrinsic procedure table properly classify the various
intrinsics, but the PURE and ELEMENTAL attributes that these
classifications imply don't always make it to the utility
predicates that test symbols for them, leading to spurious
error messages in some contexts. So set those attribute flags
as appropriate in name resolution, using a new function to
isolate the tests.
An alternate solution, in which the predicates would query
the intrinsic procedure table for these attributes on demand,
was something I also tried, so that this information could
come directly from an authoritative source; but it would have
required references to the intrinsic table to be passed along
on too many seemingly unrelated APIs and ended up looking messy.
Several symbol table tests needed to have their expected outputs
augmented with the PURE and ELEMENTAL flags. Some bogus messages
that were flagged as such in test/Semantics/doconcurrent01.f90 were
removed, since they are now correctly not emitted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96878
It's possible to define a procedure that has a procedure dummy argument which
names the procedure that contains it. This was causing the compiler to fall
into an infinite loop when characterizing a call to the procedure.
Following a suggestion from Peter, I fixed this be maintaining a set of
procedure symbols that had already been seen while characterizing a procedure.
This required passing a new parameter to the functions that characterized a
Procedure, a DummyArgument, and a DummyProcedure.
I also added several tests that will crash the compiler without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96631
Add the following options:
* -fimplicit-none and -fno-implicit-none
* -fbackslash and -fno-backslash
* -flogical-abbreviations and -fno-logical-abbreviations
* -fxor-operator and -fno-xor-operator
* -falternative-parameter-statement
* -finput-charset=<value>
Summary of changes:
- Enable extensions in CompilerInvocation#ParseFrontendArgs
- Add encoding_ to Fortran::frontend::FrontendOptions
- Add encoding to Fortran::parser::Options
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96407
This patch adds the following compiler frontend driver options:
* -fdebug-unparse (f18 spelling: -funparse)
* -fdebug-unparse-with-symbols (f18 spelling: -funparse-with-symbols)
The new driver will only accept the new spelling. `f18` will accept both
the original and the new spelling.
A new base class for frontend actions is added: `PrescanAndSemaAction`.
This is added to reduce code duplication that otherwise these new
options would lead to. Implementation from
* `ParseSyntaxOnlyAction::ExecutionAction`
is moved to:
* `PrescanAndSemaAction::BeginSourceFileAction`
This implementation is now shared between:
* PrescanAndSemaAction
* ParseSyntaxOnlyAction
* DebugUnparseAction
* DebugUnparseWithSymbolsAction
All tests that don't require other yet unimplemented options are
updated. This way `flang-new -fc1` is used instead of `f18` when
`FLANG_BUILD_NEW_DRIVER` is set to `On`. In order to facilitate this,
`%flang_fc1` is added in the LIT configuration (lit.cfg.py).
`asFortran` from f18.cpp is duplicated as `getBasicAsFortran` in
FrontendOptions.cpp. At this stage it's hard to find a good place to
share this method. I suggest that we revisit this once a switch from
`f18` to `flang-new` is complete.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96483
The following _action_ options are always used with `-fsyntax-only`
(also an _action_ option):
* -fdebug-dump-symbols
* -fdebug-dump-parse-tree
This patch makes the above options imply `-fsyntax-only`.
From the perspective of `f18` this change saves typing and is otherwise
a non-functional change. But it will simplify things in the new driver,
`flang-new`, in which only the last action option is taken into account
and executed. In other words, the following would only run
`-fsyntax-only`:
```
flang-new -fdebug-dump-symbols -fsyntax-only <input>
```
whereas this would only run `-fdebug-dump-symbols`:
```
flang-new -fsyntax-only -fdebug-dump-symbols <input>
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96528
Implementation of Do loop iteration variable check, Do while loop check, Do loop cycle restrictions.
Also to check whether the ordered clause is present on the loop construct if any ordered region ever
binds to a loop region arising from the loop construct.
Files:
check-omp-structure.h
check-omp-structure.cpp
resolve-directives.cpp
Testcases:
omp-do06-positivecases.f90
omp-do06.f90
omp-do08.f90
omp-do09.f90
omp-do10.f90
omp-do11.f90
omp-do12.f90
omp-do13.f90
omp-do14.f90
omp-do15.f90
omp-do16.f90
omp-do17.f90
Reviewed by: Kiran Chandramohan @kiranchandramohan , Valentin Clement @clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92732
Instead of using a message attachment with further details,
emit the details as part of a single message.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96465
Some state in name resolution is stored in the DeclarationVisitor
instance and processed at the end of the specification part.
This state needs to accommodate nested specification parts, namely
the ones that can be nested in a subroutine or function interface
body.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96466
Add support for the following options:
* -fopenmp
* -fopenacc
Update OpenMP and OpenACC semantics tests to use the new driver if it is built, otherwise use f18.
OpenMP tests that include `use omp_lib` or run `test_symbols.sh` have not been updated as they require options `-intrinsic-module-directory` and `-funparse-with-symbols` which are currently not implemented in the new driver.
Similarly OpenACC tests that run `test_symbols.sh` have not been updated.
This patch also moves semanticsContext to CompilerInvocation and creates it in CompilerInvocation#setSemanticsOpts so that the semantics context can use Fortran::parser::Options#features.
Summary of changes:
- Move semanticsContext to CompilerInvocation.h
- Update OpenMP and OpenACC semantics tests that do not rely on `-intrinsic-module-directory` and `-funparse-with-symbols` to use %flang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96032
Now that semantics is working, the standard -fsyntax-only option of
GNU and Clang should be used as the name of the option that causes
f18 to just run the front-end. Support both options in f18, silently
accepting the old option as a synonym for the new one (as
preferred by the code owner), and replace all instances of the
old -fparse-only option with -fsyntax-only throughout the source base.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95887
Legacy Fortran implementations support an alternative form of the
PARAMETER statement; it differs syntactically from the standard's
PARAMETER statement by lacking parentheses, and semantically by
using the type and shape of the initialization expression to define
the attributes of the named constant. (GNU Fortran gets that part
wrong; Intel Fortran and nvfortran have full support.)
This patch disables the old style PARAMETER statement by default, as
it is syntactically ambiguous with conforming assignment statements;
adds a new "-falternative-parameter-statement" option to enable it;
and implements it correctly when enabled.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48774, in which a user
tripped over the syntactic ambiguity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95697
There were two problems with constant arrays whose lower bound is not 1.
First, when folding the arrays, we were creating the folded array to have lower
bounds of 1 but, we were not re-adjusting their lower bounds to the
declared values. Second, we were not calculating the extents correctly.
Both of these problems led to bogus error messages.
I fixed the first problem by adjusting the lower bounds in
NonPointerInitializationExpr() in Evaluate/check-expression.cpp. I wrote the
class ArrayConstantBoundChanger, which is similar to the existing class
ScalarConstantExpander. In the process of implementing and testing it, I found
a bug that I fixed in ScalarConstantExpander which caused it to infinitely
recurse on parenthesized expressions. I also removed the unrelated class
ScalarExpansionVisitor, which was not used.
I fixed the second problem by changing the formula that calculates upper bounds
in in the function ComputeUpperBound() in Evaluate/shape.cpp.
I added tests that trigger the bogus error messages mentioned above along with
a constant folding tests that uses array operands with shapes that conform but
have different bounds.
In the process of adding tests, I discovered that tests in
Evaluate/folding09.f90 and folding16.f90 were written incorrectly, and I
fixed them. This also revealed a bug in contant folding of the
intrinsic "lbounds" which I plan to fix in a later change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95449
kernels loop and enter data had a too restrictive constraint for the wait clause.
The wait clause is allowed multiple times and not only once. This patch fix this problem.
Reviewed By: SouraVX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95469
Restriction on clauses for the EXIT DATA directive were not fully correct.
This patch fixes the situation. The async, if and finalize clauses are allowed
only once.
Reviewed By: SouraVX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95470
Restriction on clauses for the HOST_DATA directive were not fully correct.
This patch fixes the situation. The if and if_present clauses are allowed
only once.
Reviewed By: SouraVX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95473
Split the tests from acc-clause-validity.f90 in dedicated files by directives.
The file acc-clause-validity.f90 was getting too big to be correctly maintained.
Tests are identical.
Reviewed By: SouraVX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95328
Expressions emitted to module files and error messages
sometimes contain conversions of integer results of inquiry
intrinsics; these are usually not needed, and can conflict
with "int" in the user's namespace. Improve folding so that
these conversions don't appear, and do some other clean-up
in adjacent code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95172
It's possible to declare deferred shape array using the POINTER
statement, for example:
POINTER :: var(:)
When analyzing POINTER declarations, we were not capturing the array
specification information, if present. I fixed this by changing the
"Post" function for "parser::PointerDecl" to check to see if the
declaration contained a "DeferredShapeSpecList". In such cases, I
analyzed the shape and used to information to declare an "ObjectEntity"
that contains the shape information rather than an "UnknownEntity".
I also added a couple of small tests that fail to compile without these
changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95080
* IsArrayElement() needs another option to control whether it
should ignore trailing component references.
* Add IsObjectPointer().
* Add const Scope& variants of IsFunction() and IsProcedure().
* Make TypeAndShape::Characterize() work with procedure bindings.
* Handle CHARACTER length in MeasureSizeInBytes().
* Fine-tune FindExternallyVisibleObject()'s handling of dummy arguments
to conform with Fortran 2018: only INTENT(IN) and dummy pointers
in pure functions signify; update two tests accordingly.
Also: resolve some stylistic inconsistencies and add a missing
"const" in the expression traversal template framework.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95011
F18 Clause 19.4p9 says:
The associate names of an ASSOCIATE construct have the scope of the
block.
Clause 11.3.1p1 says the ASSOCIATE statement is not itself in the block:
R1102 associate-construct is: associate-stmt block end-associate-stmt
Associate statement associations are currently fully processed from left
to right, incorrectly interposing associating entities earlier in the
list on same-named entities in the host scope.
1 program p
2 logical :: a = .false.
3 real :: b = 9.73
4 associate (b => a, a => b)
5 print*, a, b
6 end associate
7 print*, a, b
8 end
Associating names 'a' and 'b' at line 4 in this code are now both
aliased to logical host entity 'a' at line 2. This happens because the
reference to 'b' in the second association incorrectly resolves 'b' to
the entity in line 4 (already associated to 'a' at line 2), rather than
the 'b' at line 3. With bridge code to process these associations,
f18 output is:
F F
F 9.73
It should be:
9.73 F
F 9.73
To fix this, names in right-hand side selector variables/expressions
must all be resolved before any left-hand side entities are resolved.
This is done by maintaining a stack of lists of associations, rather
than a stack of associations. Each ASSOCIATE statement's list of
assocations is then visited once for right-hand side processing, and
once for left-hand side processing.
Note that other construct associations do not have this problem.
SELECT RANK and SELECT TYPE each have a single assocation, not a list.
Constraint C1113 prohibits the right-hand side of a CHANGE TEAM
association from referencing any left-hand side entity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95010
The utility routine WhyNotModifiable() needed to become more
aware of the use of pointers in data-refs; the targets of
pointer components are sometimes modifiable even when the
leftmost ("base") symbol of a data-ref is not.
Added a new unit test for WhyNotModifiable() that uses internal
READ statements (mostly), since I/O semantic checking uses
WhyNotModifiable() for all its definability checking.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94849
Add Semantic checks for OpenMP 4.5 - 2.7.4 Workshare Construct.
- The structured block in a workshare construct may consist of only
scalar or array assignments, forall or where statements,
forall, where, atomic, critical or parallel constructs.
- All array assignments, scalar assignments, and masked array
assignments must be intrinsic assignments.
- The construct must not contain any user defined function calls unless
the function is ELEMENTAL.
Test cases : omp-workshare03.f90, omp-workshare04.f90, omp-workshare05.f90
Resolve test cases (omp-workshare01.f90 and omp-workshare02.f90) marked as XFAIL
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93091
When a reference to a generic interface occurs in a specification
expression that must be emitted to a module file, we have a problem
when the generic resolves to a function whose name is inaccessible
due to being PRIVATE or due to a conflict with another use of the
same name in the scope. In these cases, construct a new name for
the specific procedure and emit a renaming USE to the module file.
Also, relax enforcement of PRIVATE when analyzing module files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94815
C843 states that "An entity with the INTENT attribute shall be a dummy
data object or a dummy procedure pointer." This change enforces that
and fixes some tests that erroneously violated this rule.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94781
Semantic checks added to check the worksharing 'single' region closely nested inside a worksharing 'do' region. And also to check whether the 'do' iteration variable is a variable in 'Firstprivate' clause.
Files:
check-directive-structure.h
check-omp-structure.h
check-omp-structure.cpp
Testcases:
omp-do01-positivecase.f90
omp-do01.f90
omp-do05-positivecase.f90
omp-do05.f90
Reviewed by: Kiran Chandramohan @kiranchandramohan , Valentin Clement @clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93205
When a use-associated procedure was included in a generic, we weren't
correctly recording that fact. The ultimate symbol was added rather than
the local symbol.
Also, improve the message emitted for the specific procedure by
mentioning the module it came from.
This fixes one of the problems in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48648.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94696
Generic type-bound interfaces for user-defined operators need to be formatted
as "OPERATOR(.op.)", not just ".op."
PRIVATE generics need to be marked as such.
Declaration ordering: when a generic interface shadows a
derived type of the same name, it needs to be emitted to the
module file at the point of definition of the derived type;
otherwise, the derived type's definition may appear after its
first use.
The module symbol for a module read from a module file needs
to be marked as coming from a module file before semantic
processing is performed on the contents of the module so that
any special handling for declarations in module files can be
properly activated.
IMPORT statements were sometimes missing for use-associated
symbols in surrounding scopes; fine-tune NeedImport().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94636
It's possible to declare an external procedure and then pass it as an
actual argument to a subprogram expecting a procedure argument. I added
tests for this and added an error message to distinguish passing an
actual argument with an implicit interface from passing an argument with
a mismatched explicit interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94505
If a module specifies default private accessibility, names that have
been use-associated are private by default. This was not reflected in
.mod files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94602
In some contexts, including the motivating case of determining whether
the expressions that define the shape of a variable are "constant expressions"
in the sense of the Fortran standard, expression rewriting via Fold()
is not necessary, and should not be required. The inquiry intrinsics LBOUND,
UBOUND, and SIZE work correctly now in specification expressions and are
classified correctly as being constant expressions (or not). Getting this right
led to a fair amount of API clean-up as a consequence, including the
folding of shapes and TypeAndShape objects, and new APIs for shapes
that do not fold for those cases where folding isn't needed. Further,
the symbol-testing predicate APIs in Evaluate/tools.h now all resolve any
associations of their symbols and work transparently on use-, host-, and
construct-association symbols; the tools used to resolve those associations have
been defined and documented more precisely, and their clients adjusted as needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94561
`CheckNoBranching` is currently handling only illegal branching out for constructs
with `Parser::Name` in them.
Extend the same for handling illegal branching out caused by `Parser::Label` based statements.
This patch could possibly solve one of the issues(typically branching out) mentioned in D92735.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93447
Remove duplicated function to check for required clauses on a directive. This was
still there from the merging of OpenACC and OpenMP common semantic checks and it can now be
removed so we use only one function.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93575
Internal subprograms have explicit interfaces. If an internal subprogram has
an alternate return, we check its explicit interface. But we were not
putting the label values of alternate returns into the actual argument.
I fixed this by changing the definition of actual arguments to be able
to contain a common::Label and putting the label for an alternate return
into the actual argument.
I also verified that we were already doing all of the semantic checking
required for alternate returns and removed a "TODO" for this.
I also added the test altreturn06.f90.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94017
Peter Steinfeld