Commit Graph

9510 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Reid Kleckner 8a1cd91016 [InstCombine] Add a flag to disable LowerDbgDeclare
Summary:
This should improve optimized debug info for address-taken variables at
the cost of inaccurate debug info in some situations.

We patched this into clang and deployed this change to Chromium
developers, and this significantly improved debuggability of optimized
code. The long-term solution to PR34136 seems more and more like it's
going to take a while, so I would like to commit this change under a
flag so that it can be used as a stop-gap measure.

This flag should really help so for C++ aggregates like std::string and
std::vector, which are typically address-taken, even after inlining, and
cannot be SROA-ed.

Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, probinson, dberlin

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36596

llvm-svn: 313108
2017-09-13 01:43:25 +00:00
Sanjay Patel ce2da1e6e4 [SimplifyCFG] update test comments; NFC
llvm-svn: 313090
2017-09-12 23:28:11 +00:00
Anna Thomas 9f1be02fa3 [LV] Clamp the VF to the trip count
Summary:
When the MaxVectorSize > ConstantTripCount, we should just clamp the
vectorization factor to be the ConstantTripCount.
This vectorizes loops where the TinyTripCountThreshold >= TripCount < MaxVF.

Earlier we were finding the maximum vector width, which could be greater than
the trip count itself. The Loop vectorizer does all the work for generating a
vectorizable loop, but in the end we would always choose the scalar loop (since
the VF > trip count). This allows us to choose the VF keeping in mind the trip
count if available.

This is a fix on top of rL312472.

Reviewers: Ayal, zvi, hfinkel, dneilson

Reviewed by: Ayal

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37702

llvm-svn: 313046
2017-09-12 16:32:45 +00:00
Alexey Bataev 7fac4b2f25 [SLP] Test with mutiple uses of conditional op and wrong parent.
llvm-svn: 313042
2017-09-12 16:15:04 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 2d4e6504af [InstCombine] move related tests together; NFC
llvm-svn: 313036
2017-09-12 15:29:28 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne b9b6025328 LowerTypeTests: Add import/export support for targets without absolute symbol constants.
The rationale is the same as for r312967.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37408

llvm-svn: 312968
2017-09-11 22:49:10 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne b15a35e604 WholeProgramDevirt: Add import/export support for targets without absolute symbol constants.
Not all targets support the use of absolute symbols to export
constants. In particular, ARM has a wide variety of constant encodings
that cannot currently be relocated by linkers. So instead of exporting
the constants using symbols, export them directly in the summary.
The values of the constants are left as zeroes on targets that support
symbolic exports.

This may result in more cache misses when targeting those architectures
as a result of arbitrary changes in constant values, but this seems
somewhat unavoidable for now.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37407

llvm-svn: 312967
2017-09-11 22:34:42 +00:00
Sanjay Patel bb1b1c97fa [InstSimplify] fix some test names; NFC
Too much division...the quotient is the answer.

llvm-svn: 312943
2017-09-11 20:38:31 +00:00
Sanjay Patel a36eb77118 [InstSimplify] add tests for possible sdiv/srem simplifications; NFC
As noted in PR34517, the handling of signed div/rem is not on par with
unsigned div/rem. Signed is harder to reason about, but it should be
possible to handle at least some of these using the same technique that
we use for unsigned: use icmp logic to see if there's a relationship
between the quotient and divisor.

llvm-svn: 312938
2017-09-11 19:42:41 +00:00
Hiroshi Yamauchi 9364432cec Unmerge GEPs to reduce register pressure on IndirectBr edges.
Summary:
GEP merging can sometimes increase the number of live values and register
pressure across control edges and cause performance problems particularly if the
increased register pressure results in spills.

This change implements GEP unmerging around an IndirectBr in certain cases to
mitigate the issue. This is in the CodeGenPrepare pass (after all the GEP
merging has happened.)

With this patch, the Python interpreter loop runs faster by ~5%.

Reviewers: sanjoy, hfinkel

Reviewed By: hfinkel

Subscribers: eastig, junbuml, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36772

llvm-svn: 312930
2017-09-11 17:52:08 +00:00
Michael Zuckerman 9707ba0957 [Interleved][Stride 3]Adding test for case the VF=64 target with AVX512.
llvm-svn: 312907
2017-09-11 10:57:15 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 5876189ff1 [InstSimplify] refactor udiv/urem code and add tests; NFCI
This removes some duplicated code and makes it easier to support signed div/rem
in a similar way if we want to do that. Note that the existing comments were not
accurate - we don't need a constant divisor to simplify; icmp simplification does
more than that. But as the added tests show, it could go even further.

llvm-svn: 312885
2017-09-10 17:55:08 +00:00
Nuno Lopes 404f106d71 Merge isKnownNonNull into isKnownNonZero
It now knows the tricks of both functions.
Also, fix a bug that considered allocas of non-zero address space to be always non null

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37628

llvm-svn: 312869
2017-09-09 18:23:11 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 59562ecb35 [DivRemPairs] split tests per target to account for bots that don't build for all targets
llvm-svn: 312863
2017-09-09 14:10:59 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 6fd4391ddd [DivRempairs] add a pass to optimize div/rem pairs (PR31028)
This is intended to be a superset of the functionality from D31037 (EarlyCSE) but implemented 
as an independent pass, so there's no stretching of scope and feature creep for an existing pass. 
I also proposed a weaker version of this for SimplifyCFG in D30910. And I initially had almost 
this same functionality as an addition to CGP in the motivating example of PR31028:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31028

The advantage of positioning this ahead of SimplifyCFG in the pass pipeline is that it can allow 
more flattening. But it needs to be after passes (InstCombine) that could sink a div/rem and
undo the hoisting that is done here.

Decomposing remainder may allow removing some code from the backend (PPC and possibly others).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37121 

llvm-svn: 312862
2017-09-09 13:38:18 +00:00
Alexey Bataev 6dd29fccb8 [SLP] Support for horizontal min/max reduction.
SLP vectorizer supports horizontal reductions for Add/FAdd binary
operations. Patch adds support for horizontal min/max reductions.
Function getReductionCost() is split to getArithmeticReductionCost() for
binary operation reductions and getMinMaxReductionCost() for min/max
reductions.
Patch fixes PR26956.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27846

llvm-svn: 312791
2017-09-08 13:49:36 +00:00
Max Kazantsev d7b0f74c64 Re-enable "[IRCE] Identify loops with latch comparison against current IV value"
Re-applying after the found bug was fixed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36215

llvm-svn: 312783
2017-09-08 10:15:05 +00:00
Max Kazantsev 57db44838d diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InductiveRangeCheckElimination.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InductiveRangeCheckElimination.cpp
index f72a808..9fa49fd 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InductiveRangeCheckElimination.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/InductiveRangeCheckElimination.cpp
@@ -450,20 +450,10 @@ struct LoopStructure {
   // equivalent to:
   //
   // intN_ty inc = IndVarIncreasing ? 1 : -1;
-  // pred_ty predicate = IndVarIncreasing
-  //                         ? IsSignedPredicate ? ICMP_SLT : ICMP_ULT
-  //                         : IsSignedPredicate ? ICMP_SGT : ICMP_UGT;
+  // pred_ty predicate = IndVarIncreasing ? ICMP_SLT : ICMP_SGT;
   //
-  //
-  // for (intN_ty iv = IndVarStart; predicate(IndVarBase, LoopExitAt);
-  //      iv = IndVarNext)
+  // for (intN_ty iv = IndVarStart; predicate(iv, LoopExitAt); iv = IndVarBase)
   //   ... body ...
-  //
-  // Here IndVarBase is either current or next value of the induction variable.
-  // in the former case, IsIndVarNext = false and IndVarBase points to the
-  // Phi node of the induction variable. Otherwise, IsIndVarNext = true and
-  // IndVarBase points to IV increment instruction.
-  //
 
   Value *IndVarBase;
   Value *IndVarStart;
@@ -471,13 +461,12 @@ struct LoopStructure {
   Value *LoopExitAt;
   bool IndVarIncreasing;
   bool IsSignedPredicate;
-  bool IsIndVarNext;
 
   LoopStructure()
       : Tag(""), Header(nullptr), Latch(nullptr), LatchBr(nullptr),
         LatchExit(nullptr), LatchBrExitIdx(-1), IndVarBase(nullptr),
         IndVarStart(nullptr), IndVarStep(nullptr), LoopExitAt(nullptr),
-        IndVarIncreasing(false), IsSignedPredicate(true), IsIndVarNext(false) {}
+        IndVarIncreasing(false), IsSignedPredicate(true) {}
 
   template <typename M> LoopStructure map(M Map) const {
     LoopStructure Result;
@@ -493,7 +482,6 @@ struct LoopStructure {
     Result.LoopExitAt = Map(LoopExitAt);
     Result.IndVarIncreasing = IndVarIncreasing;
     Result.IsSignedPredicate = IsSignedPredicate;
-    Result.IsIndVarNext = IsIndVarNext;
     return Result;
   }
 
@@ -841,42 +829,21 @@ LoopStructure::parseLoopStructure(ScalarEvolution &SE,
     return false;
   };
 
-  // `ICI` can either be a comparison against IV or a comparison of IV.next.
-  // Depending on the interpretation, we calculate the start value differently.
+  // `ICI` is interpreted as taking the backedge if the *next* value of the
+  // induction variable satisfies some constraint.
 
-  // Pair {IndVarBase; IsIndVarNext} semantically designates whether the latch
-  // comparisons happens against the IV before or after its value is
-  // incremented. Two valid combinations for them are:
-  //
-  // 1) { phi [ iv.start, preheader ], [ iv.next, latch ]; false },
-  // 2) { iv.next; true }.
-  //
-  // The latch comparison happens against IndVarBase which can be either current
-  // or next value of the induction variable.
   const SCEVAddRecExpr *IndVarBase = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(LeftSCEV);
   bool IsIncreasing = false;
   bool IsSignedPredicate = true;
-  bool IsIndVarNext = false;
   ConstantInt *StepCI;
   if (!IsInductionVar(IndVarBase, IsIncreasing, StepCI)) {
     FailureReason = "LHS in icmp not induction variable";
     return None;
   }
 
-  const SCEV *IndVarStart = nullptr;
-  // TODO: Currently we only handle comparison against IV, but we can extend
-  // this analysis to be able to deal with comparison against sext(iv) and such.
-  if (isa<PHINode>(LeftValue) &&
-      cast<PHINode>(LeftValue)->getParent() == Header)
-    // The comparison is made against current IV value.
-    IndVarStart = IndVarBase->getStart();
-  else {
-    // Assume that the comparison is made against next IV value.
-    const SCEV *StartNext = IndVarBase->getStart();
-    const SCEV *Addend = SE.getNegativeSCEV(IndVarBase->getStepRecurrence(SE));
-    IndVarStart = SE.getAddExpr(StartNext, Addend);
-    IsIndVarNext = true;
-  }
+  const SCEV *StartNext = IndVarBase->getStart();
+  const SCEV *Addend = SE.getNegativeSCEV(IndVarBase->getStepRecurrence(SE));
+  const SCEV *IndVarStart = SE.getAddExpr(StartNext, Addend);
   const SCEV *Step = SE.getSCEV(StepCI);
 
   ConstantInt *One = ConstantInt::get(IndVarTy, 1);
@@ -1060,7 +1027,6 @@ LoopStructure::parseLoopStructure(ScalarEvolution &SE,
   Result.IndVarIncreasing = IsIncreasing;
   Result.LoopExitAt = RightValue;
   Result.IsSignedPredicate = IsSignedPredicate;
-  Result.IsIndVarNext = IsIndVarNext;
 
   FailureReason = nullptr;
 
@@ -1350,9 +1316,8 @@ LoopConstrainer::RewrittenRangeInfo LoopConstrainer::changeIterationSpaceEnd(
                                       BranchToContinuation);
 
     NewPHI->addIncoming(PN->getIncomingValueForBlock(Preheader), Preheader);
-    auto *FixupValue =
-        LS.IsIndVarNext ? PN->getIncomingValueForBlock(LS.Latch) : PN;
-    NewPHI->addIncoming(FixupValue, RRI.ExitSelector);
+    NewPHI->addIncoming(PN->getIncomingValueForBlock(LS.Latch),
+                        RRI.ExitSelector);
     RRI.PHIValuesAtPseudoExit.push_back(NewPHI);
   }
 
@@ -1735,10 +1700,7 @@ bool InductiveRangeCheckElimination::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) {
   }
   LoopStructure LS = MaybeLoopStructure.getValue();
   const SCEVAddRecExpr *IndVar =
-      cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getSCEV(LS.IndVarBase));
-  if (LS.IsIndVarNext)
-    IndVar = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getMinusSCEV(IndVar,
-                                                  SE.getSCEV(LS.IndVarStep)));
+      cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getMinusSCEV(SE.getSCEV(LS.IndVarBase), SE.getSCEV(LS.IndVarStep)));
 
   Optional<InductiveRangeCheck::Range> SafeIterRange;
   Instruction *ExprInsertPt = Preheader->getTerminator();
diff --git a/test/Transforms/IRCE/latch-comparison-against-current-value.ll b/test/Transforms/IRCE/latch-comparison-against-current-value.ll
deleted file mode 100644
index afea0e6..0000000
--- a/test/Transforms/IRCE/latch-comparison-against-current-value.ll
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,182 +0,0 @@
-; RUN: opt -verify-loop-info -irce-print-changed-loops -irce -S < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
-
-; Check that IRCE is able to deal with loops where the latch comparison is
-; done against current value of the IV, not the IV.next.
-
-; CHECK: irce: in function test_01: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
-; CHECK: irce: in function test_02: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
-; CHECK-NOT: irce: in function test_03: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
-; CHECK-NOT: irce: in function test_04: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
-
-; SLT condition for increasing loop from 0 to 100.
-define void @test_01(i32* %arr, i32* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
-
-; CHECK:      test_01
-; CHECK:        entry:
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %exit.mainloop.at = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
-; CHECK-NEXT:     [[COND2:%[^ ]+]] = icmp slt i32 0, %exit.mainloop.at
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 [[COND2]], label %loop.preheader, label %main.pseudo.exit
-; CHECK:        loop:
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %idx = phi i32 [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ], [ 0, %loop.preheader ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %idx.next = add nuw nsw i32 %idx, 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %abc = icmp slt i32 %idx, %exit.mainloop.at
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 true, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds.loopexit1
-; CHECK:        in.bounds:
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
-; CHECK-NEXT:     store i32 0, i32* %addr
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %next = icmp slt i32 %idx, 100
-; CHECK-NEXT:     [[COND3:%[^ ]+]] = icmp slt i32 %idx, %exit.mainloop.at
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 [[COND3]], label %loop, label %main.exit.selector
-; CHECK:        main.exit.selector:
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %idx.lcssa = phi i32 [ %idx, %in.bounds ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:     [[COND4:%[^ ]+]] = icmp slt i32 %idx.lcssa, 100
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 [[COND4]], label %main.pseudo.exit, label %exit
-; CHECK-NOT: loop.preloop:
-; CHECK:        loop.postloop:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %idx.postloop = phi i32 [ %idx.copy, %postloop ], [ %idx.next.postloop, %in.bounds.postloop ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %idx.next.postloop = add nuw nsw i32 %idx.postloop, 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %abc.postloop = icmp slt i32 %idx.postloop, %exit.mainloop.at
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 %abc.postloop, label %in.bounds.postloop, label %out.of.bounds.loopexit
-
-entry:
-  %len = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
-  br label %loop
-
-loop:
-  %idx = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
-  %idx.next = add nsw nuw i32 %idx, 1
-  %abc = icmp slt i32 %idx, %len
-  br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
-
-in.bounds:
-  %addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
-  store i32 0, i32* %addr
-  %next = icmp slt i32 %idx, 100
-  br i1 %next, label %loop, label %exit
-
-out.of.bounds:
-  ret void
-
-exit:
-  ret void
-}
-
-; ULT condition for increasing loop from 0 to 100.
-define void @test_02(i32* %arr, i32* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
-
-; CHECK:      test_02
-; CHECK:        entry:
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %exit.mainloop.at = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
-; CHECK-NEXT:     [[COND2:%[^ ]+]] = icmp ult i32 0, %exit.mainloop.at
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 [[COND2]], label %loop.preheader, label %main.pseudo.exit
-; CHECK:        loop:
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %idx = phi i32 [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ], [ 0, %loop.preheader ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %idx.next = add nuw nsw i32 %idx, 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %abc = icmp ult i32 %idx, %exit.mainloop.at
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 true, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds.loopexit1
-; CHECK:        in.bounds:
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
-; CHECK-NEXT:     store i32 0, i32* %addr
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %next = icmp ult i32 %idx, 100
-; CHECK-NEXT:     [[COND3:%[^ ]+]] = icmp ult i32 %idx, %exit.mainloop.at
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 [[COND3]], label %loop, label %main.exit.selector
-; CHECK:        main.exit.selector:
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %idx.lcssa = phi i32 [ %idx, %in.bounds ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:     [[COND4:%[^ ]+]] = icmp ult i32 %idx.lcssa, 100
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 [[COND4]], label %main.pseudo.exit, label %exit
-; CHECK-NOT: loop.preloop:
-; CHECK:        loop.postloop:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %idx.postloop = phi i32 [ %idx.copy, %postloop ], [ %idx.next.postloop, %in.bounds.postloop ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %idx.next.postloop = add nuw nsw i32 %idx.postloop, 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:     %abc.postloop = icmp ult i32 %idx.postloop, %exit.mainloop.at
-; CHECK-NEXT:     br i1 %abc.postloop, label %in.bounds.postloop, label %out.of.bounds.loopexit
-
-entry:
-  %len = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
-  br label %loop
-
-loop:
-  %idx = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
-  %idx.next = add nsw nuw i32 %idx, 1
-  %abc = icmp ult i32 %idx, %len
-  br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
-
-in.bounds:
-  %addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
-  store i32 0, i32* %addr
-  %next = icmp ult i32 %idx, 100
-  br i1 %next, label %loop, label %exit
-
-out.of.bounds:
-  ret void
-
-exit:
-  ret void
-}
-
-; Same as test_01, but comparison happens against IV extended to a wider type.
-; This test ensures that IRCE rejects it and does not falsely assume that it was
-; a comparison against iv.next.
-; TODO: We can actually extend the recognition to cover this case.
-define void @test_03(i32* %arr, i64* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
-
-; CHECK:      test_03
-
-entry:
-  %len = load i64, i64* %a_len_ptr, !range !1
-  br label %loop
-
-loop:
-  %idx = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
-  %idx.next = add nsw nuw i32 %idx, 1
-  %idx.ext = sext i32 %idx to i64
-  %abc = icmp slt i64 %idx.ext, %len
-  br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
-
-in.bounds:
-  %addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
-  store i32 0, i32* %addr
-  %next = icmp slt i32 %idx, 100
-  br i1 %next, label %loop, label %exit
-
-out.of.bounds:
-  ret void
-
-exit:
-  ret void
-}
-
-; Same as test_02, but comparison happens against IV extended to a wider type.
-; This test ensures that IRCE rejects it and does not falsely assume that it was
-; a comparison against iv.next.
-; TODO: We can actually extend the recognition to cover this case.
-define void @test_04(i32* %arr, i64* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
-
-; CHECK:      test_04
-
-entry:
-  %len = load i64, i64* %a_len_ptr, !range !1
-  br label %loop
-
-loop:
-  %idx = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
-  %idx.next = add nsw nuw i32 %idx, 1
-  %idx.ext = sext i32 %idx to i64
-  %abc = icmp ult i64 %idx.ext, %len
-  br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
-
-in.bounds:
-  %addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
-  store i32 0, i32* %addr
-  %next = icmp ult i32 %idx, 100
-  br i1 %next, label %loop, label %exit
-
-out.of.bounds:
-  ret void
-
-exit:
-  ret void
-}
-
-!0 = !{i32 0, i32 50}
-!1 = !{i64 0, i64 50}

llvm-svn: 312775
2017-09-08 04:26:41 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 88a58cf9e7 WholeProgramDevirt: When promoting for single-impl devirt, also rename the comdat.
This is required when targeting COFF, as the comdat name must match
one of the names of the symbols in the comdat.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37550

llvm-svn: 312767
2017-09-08 00:10:53 +00:00
Richard Trieu c7828ebea4 Revert r312318, r312325, r312424, r312489
r312318 - Debug info for variables whose type is shrinked to bool
r312325, r312424, r312489 - Test case for r312318

Revision 312318 introduced a null dereference bug.
Details in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34490

llvm-svn: 312758
2017-09-07 23:20:35 +00:00
Michael Zuckerman 5a385940d3 [X86][LLVM]Expanding Supports lowerInterleavedLoad() in X86InterleavedAccess (VF{8|16|32} stride 3).
This patch expands the support of lowerInterleavedload to {8|16|32}x8i stride 3.

LLVM creates suboptimal shuffle code-gen for AVX2. In overall, this patch is a specific fix for the pattern (Strid=3 VF={8|16|32}) and we plan to include the store (deinterleved side).

The patch goal is to optimize the following sequence:
a0 b0 c0 a1 b1 c1 a2 b2
c2 a3 b3 c3 a4 b4 c4 a5
b5 c5 a6 b6 c6 a7 b7 c7

into

a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7
b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7
c0 c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 c6 c7

Reviewers
1. zvi
2. igor
3. guyblank
4. dorit
5. Ayal

llvm-svn: 312722
2017-09-07 14:02:13 +00:00
Matt Arsenault 3ced3d90c3 InstSimplify: canonicalize is idempotent
llvm-svn: 312685
2017-09-07 01:21:43 +00:00
Krzysztof Parzyszek 1dc313727e Disable jump threading into loop headers
Consider this type of a loop:
    for (...) {
      ...
      if (...) continue;
      ...
    }
Normally, the "continue" would branch to the loop control code that
checks whether the loop should continue iterating and which contains
the (often) unique loop latch branch. In certain cases jump threading
can "thread" the inner branch directly to the loop header, creating
a second loop latch. Loop canonicalization would then transform this
loop into a loop nest. The problem with this is that in such a loop
nest neither loop is countable even if the original loop was. This
may inhibit subsequent loop optimizations and be detrimental to
performance.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36404

llvm-svn: 312664
2017-09-06 19:36:58 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 6840c5ff75 [ValueTracking, InstCombine] canonicalize fcmp ord/uno with non-NAN ops to null constants
This is a preliminary step towards solving the remaining part of PR27145 - IR for isfinite():
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27145

In order to solve that one more generally, we need to add matching for and/or of fcmp ord/uno
with a constant operand.

But while looking at those patterns, I realized we were missing a canonicalization for nonzero
constants. Rather than limiting to just folds for constants, we're adding a general value
tracking method for this based on an existing DAG helper.

By transforming everything to 0.0, we can simplify the existing code in foldLogicOfFCmps()
and pick up missing vector folds.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37427

llvm-svn: 312591
2017-09-05 23:13:13 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 18e126e5d4 [InstCombine] add nnan tests; NFC
As suggested in D37427, we could have a value tracking function and folds that use
it to simplify these cases. 

llvm-svn: 312578
2017-09-05 21:20:35 +00:00
Reid Kleckner e33c94f1b0 Add llvm.codeview.annotation to implement MSVC __annotation
Summary:
This intrinsic represents a label with a list of associated metadata
strings. It is modelled as reading and writing inaccessible memory so
that it won't be removed as dead code. I think the intention is that the
annotation strings should appear at most once in the debug info, so I
marked it noduplicate. We are allowed to inline code with annotations as
long as we strip the annotation, but that can be done later.

Reviewers: majnemer

Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits, hiraditya

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36904

llvm-svn: 312569
2017-09-05 20:14:58 +00:00
Adam Nemet 9c35f6383b Split opt-remark YAML and opt output testing on this test
This prepares for https://reviews.llvm.org/D33514

llvm-svn: 312544
2017-09-05 18:03:39 +00:00
Craig Topper 43c80be2e5 [InstCombine] Add test cases for folding (select (icmp ne/eq (and X, C1), (bitwiseop Y, C2), Y -> (bitwiseop Y, (shl/shr (and X, C1), C3)) or similar.
This is possible if C1 and C2 are both powers of 2. Or if binop is 'and' then ~C2 needs to be a power of 2.

We already support this for 'or', but we should be able to support 'and' and 'xor'. This will be enhanced by D37274.

llvm-svn: 312519
2017-09-05 05:26:38 +00:00
Daniel Berlin f9c9455d3f NewGVN: Fix PR 34430 - we need to look through predicateinfo copies to detect self-cycles of phi nodes. We also need to not ignore certain types of arguments when testing whether the phi has a backedge or was originally constant.
llvm-svn: 312510
2017-09-05 02:17:43 +00:00
Daniel Berlin 54a92fcc5d NewGVN: Fix PR 34452 by passing instruction all the way down when we do aggregate value simplification
llvm-svn: 312509
2017-09-05 02:17:42 +00:00
Strahinja Petrovic ee5dc70c79 Fix test/Transforms/GlobalOpt/integer-bool-dwarf
This patch fixes regression related with 
integer-bool-dwarf test.

Patch by Nikola Prica.

llvm-svn: 312489
2017-09-04 15:14:37 +00:00
Michael Zuckerman 4ab4e3b95c Update test for testing avx512
llvm-svn: 312487
2017-09-04 14:15:34 +00:00
Zvi Rackover 9a087a357a LoopVectorize: MaxVF should not be larger than the loop trip count
Summary:
Improve how MaxVF is computed while taking into account that MaxVF should not be larger than the loop's trip count.

Other than saving on compile-time by pruning the possible MaxVF candidates, this patch fixes pr34438 which exposed the following flow:
1. Short trip count identified -> Don't bail out, set OptForSize:=True to avoid tail-loop and runtime checks.
2. Compute MaxVF returned 16 on a target supporting AVX512.
3. OptForSize -> choose VF:=MaxVF.
4. Bail out because TripCount = 8, VF = 16, TripCount % VF !=0 means we need a tail loop.

With this patch step 2. will choose MaxVF=8 based on TripCount.

Reviewers: Ayal, dorit, mkuper, hfinkel

Reviewed By: hfinkel

Subscribers: hfinkel, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37425

llvm-svn: 312472
2017-09-04 08:35:13 +00:00
Sam Parker 7cd826a321 [LoopUnroll][DebugInfo] Don't add metadata to unrolled remainder loop
Debug information can be, and was, corrupted when the runtime
remainder loop was fully unrolled. This is because a !null node can
be created instead of a unique one describing the loop. In this case,
the original node gets incorrectly updated with the NewLoopID
metadata.

In the case when the remainder loop is going to be quickly fully
unrolled, there isn't the need to add loop metadata for it anyway.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37338

llvm-svn: 312471
2017-09-04 08:12:16 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 661beccdd9 [InstCombine] add tests for fcmp ord/uno canonicalization; NFC
Currently, we canonicalize some cases to use 0.0, but we miss others.

llvm-svn: 312445
2017-09-03 15:35:10 +00:00
Don Hinton 4cfdc8a04c Fix buildbot failures for new test that requires the X86 target be built.
llvm-svn: 312424
2017-09-02 22:56:58 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 69ac66cf8b [InstSimplify] regenerate checks; NFC
llvm-svn: 312413
2017-09-02 14:38:15 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 8ae3630fee [InstCombine] put 2 related tests in the same file; NFC
llvm-svn: 312412
2017-09-02 14:35:18 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 16019c5a68 [InstSimplify] move fcmp simplification tests from InstCombine
These are all tests that result in a constant, so moving the tests over to where they are actually handled.

llvm-svn: 312411
2017-09-02 14:27:00 +00:00
Daniel Berlin 94090dd13b Fix PR/33305. caused by trying to simplify expressions in phi of ops that should have no leaders.
Summary:
After a discussion with Rekka, i believe this (or a small variant)
should fix the remaining phi-of-ops problems.

Rekka's algorithm for completeness relies on looking up expressions
that should have no leader, and expecting it to fail (IE looking up
expressions that can't exist in a predecessor, and expecting it to
find nothing).

Unfortunately, sometimes these expressions can be simplified to
constants, but we need the lookup to fail anyway.  Additionally, our
simplifier outsmarts this by taking these "not quite right"
expressions, and simplifying them into other expressions or walking
through phis, etc.  In the past, we've sometimes been able to find
leaders for these expressions, incorrectly.

This change causes us to not to try to phi of ops such expressions.
We determine safety by seeing if they depend on a phi node in our
block.

This is not perfect, we can do a bit better, but this should be a
"correctness start" that we can then improve.  It also requires a
bunch of caching that i'll eventually like to eliminate.

The right solution, longer term, to the simplifier issues, is to make
the query interface for the instruction simplifier/constant folder
have the flags we need, so that we can keep most things going, but
turn off the possibly-invalid parts (threading through phis, etc).
This is an issue in another wrong code bug as well.

Reviewers: davide, mcrosier

Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37175

llvm-svn: 312401
2017-09-02 02:18:44 +00:00
Craig Topper 924f20262b [InstCombine][InstSimplify] Teach decomposeBitTestICmp to look through truncate instructions
This patch teaches decomposeBitTestICmp to look through truncate instructions on the input to the compare. If a truncate is found it will now return the pre-truncated Value and appropriately extend the APInt mask.

This allows some code to be removed from InstSimplify that was doing this functionality.

This allows InstCombine's bit test combining code to match a pre-truncate Value with the same Value appear with an 'and' on another icmp. Or it allows us to combine a truncate to i16 and a truncate to i8. This also required removing the type check from the beginning of getMaskedTypeForICmpPair, but I believe that's ok because we still have to find two values from the input to each icmp that are equal before we'll do any transformation. So the type check was really just serving as an early out.

There was one user of decomposeBitTestICmp that didn't want to look through truncates, so I've added a flag to prevent that behavior when necessary.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37158

llvm-svn: 312382
2017-09-01 21:27:34 +00:00
Davide Italiano c36039f462 [TTI] Fix getGEPCost() for geps with a single operand.
Previously this would sporadically crash as TargetType
was never initialized. We special-case the single-operand
case returning earlier and trying to mimic the behaviour of
isLegalAddressingMode as closely as possible.

Differential Revision:  https://reviews.llvm.org/D37277

llvm-svn: 312357
2017-09-01 19:54:08 +00:00
Daniel Berlin 86932104db NewGVN: Make sure we don't incorrectly use PredicateInfo when doing PHI of ops
Summary: When we backtranslate expressions, we can't use the predicateinfo, since we are evaluating them in a different context.

Reviewers: davide, mcrosier

Subscribers: sanjoy, Prazek, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37174

llvm-svn: 312352
2017-09-01 19:20:18 +00:00
Strahinja Petrovic d6ee877b23 Adding missing test case in rL312318
Adding test for debug info for integer 
variables whose type is shrinked to bool.

Patch by Nikola Prica.

llvm-svn: 312325
2017-09-01 11:37:53 +00:00
Clement Courbet 65130e2d8d Reland rL312315: [MergeICmps] MergeICmps is a new optimization pass that turns chains of integer
Add missing header.

This reverts commit 86dd6335cf7607af22f383a9a8e072ba929848cf.

llvm-svn: 312322
2017-09-01 10:56:34 +00:00
Clement Courbet 316212575b Revert "[MergeICmps] MergeICmps is a new optimization pass that turns chains of integer"
Break build

This reverts commit d07ab866f7f88f81e49046d691a80dcd32d7198b.

llvm-svn: 312317
2017-09-01 09:43:08 +00:00
Clement Courbet 9473c01e96 [MergeICmps] MergeICmps is a new optimization pass that turns chains of integer
comparisons into memcmp.

Thanks to recent improvements in the LLVM codegen, the memcmp is typically
inlined as a chain of efficient hardware comparisons.
This typically benefits C++ member or nonmember operator==().

For now this is disabled by default until:
 - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33329 is complete
 - Benchmarks show that this is always useful.

Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33987

llvm-svn: 312315
2017-09-01 09:07:05 +00:00
Akira Hatanaka 13d2beb14d [ObjCARC] Pass the correct BasicBlock to fix assertion failure.
The BasicBlock passed to FindPredecessorRetainWithSafePath should be the
parent block of Autorelease. This fixes a crash that occurs in
FindDependencies when StartInst is not in StartBB.

rdar://problem/33866381

llvm-svn: 312266
2017-08-31 18:27:47 +00:00
Sanjay Patel e6b48a1b02 [InstCombine] improve demanded vector elements analysis of insertelement
Recurse instead of returning on the first found optimization. Also, return early in the caller
instead of continuing because that allows another round of simplification before we might
potentially lose undef information from a shuffle mask by eliminating the shuffle.

As noted in the review, we could probably do better and be more efficient by moving all of
demanded elements into a separate pass, but this is yet another quick fix to instcombine.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37236

llvm-svn: 312248
2017-08-31 15:57:17 +00:00
Max Kazantsev 0a9c1ef2eb [IRCE] Identify loops with latch comparison against current IV value
Current implementation of parseLoopStructure interprets the latch comparison as a
comarison against `iv.next`. If the actual comparison is made against the `iv` current value
then the loop may be rejected, because this misinterpretation leads to incorrect evaluation
of the latch start value.

This patch teaches the IRCE to distinguish this kind of loops and perform the optimization
for them. Now we use `IndVarBase` variable which can be either next or current value of the
induction variable (previously we used `IndVarNext` which was always the value on next iteration).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36215

llvm-svn: 312221
2017-08-31 07:04:20 +00:00