Moves:
* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
`__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges` and `std::iter_swap` into
`__algorithm/${FUNCTION_NAME}`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103734
This will avoid typos like `_LIBCPP_STD_VERS` (<future>) or using `#if TEST_STD_VER > 17` without including "test_macros.h".
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99515
This affects only vectors with weird/malicious allocators,
the same corner case covered in D91708, but for `vector<bool>` this time.
Also ADL-proof <__tree>, which affects only sets and maps with weird/malicious
allocators where the ADL trap is in the *fancy pointer type*.
Also drive-by _VSTD:: qualification in the guts of std::bind,
std::packaged_task, std::condition_variable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93424
Everywhere, normalize the whitespace to `::new (EXPR) T`.
Everywhere, normalize the spelling of the cast to `(void*)EXPR`.
Without the cast to `(void*)`, the expression triggers ADL on GCC.
(I think this is a GCC bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98249)
Even if it doesn't trigger ADL, it still seems incorrect to use any argument
that's not exactly `(void*)` because that opens the possibility of overload
resolution picking a user-defined overload of `operator new`, which would be
wrong.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93153
I used a lot of `git grep` to find places where `std::` was being used
outside of comments and assert-messages. There were three outcomes:
- Qualified function calls, e.g. `std::move` becomes `_VSTD::move`.
This is the most common case.
- Typenames that don't need qualification, e.g. `std::allocator` becomes `allocator`.
Leaving these as `_VSTD::allocator` would also be fine, but I decided
that removing the qualification is more consistent with existing practice.
- Names that specifically need un-versioned `std::` qualification,
or that I wasn't sure about. For example, I didn't touch any code in
<atomic>, <math.h>, <new>, or any ext/ or experimental/ headers;
and I didn't touch any instances of `std::type_info`.
In some deduction guides, we were accidentally using `class Alloc = typename std::allocator<T>`,
despite `std::allocator<T>`'s type-ness not being template-dependent.
Because `std::allocator` is a qualified name, this did parse as we intended;
but what we meant was simply `class Alloc = allocator<T>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92250
Currently, vendor-specific availability markup is enabled by default.
This means that even when building against trunk libc++, the headers
will by default prevent you from using some features that were not
released in the dylib on your target platform. This is a source of
frustration since people building libc++ from sources are usually not
trying to use some vendor's released dylib.
For that reason, I've been thinking for a long time that availability
annotations should be off by default, which is the primary change that
this commit enables.
In addition, it reworks the implementation to make it easier for new
vendors to add availability annotations for their platform, and it
refreshes the documentation to reflect the current state of the codebase.
Finally, a CMake configuration option is added to control whether
availability annotations should be turned on for the flavor of libc++
being created. The intent is for vendors like Apple to turn it on, and
for the upstream libc++ to leave it off (the default).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90843
We don't support GCC in C++03 mode, and Clang provides variadic templates
even in C++03 mode. So there's effectively no supported compiler that
doesn't support variadic templates.
This effectively gets rid of all uses of _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_VARIADICS, but
some workarounds for the lack of variadics remain.
We don't support GCC in C++03 mode, and Clang provides rvalue references
even in C++03 mode. So there's effectively no supported compiler that
doesn't support rvalue references.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84943
This change fixes errors reported by Control Flow Integrity (CFI) checking when using `std::packaged_task`. The errors mostly stem from casting the underlying storage (`__buf_`) to `__base*`, even if it is uninitialized. The solution is to wrap `__base*` access to `__buf_` behind a getter marked with _LIBCPP_NO_CFI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82627
Summary:
The former are like:
libcxx/include/typeinfo:322:11: warning: definition of implicit copy constructor for 'bad_cast' is deprecated because it has a user-declared destructor [-Wdeprecated-copy-dtor]
virtual ~bad_cast() _NOEXCEPT;
^
libcxx/include/typeinfo:344:11: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'std::bad_cast' first required here
throw bad_cast();
^
Fix these by adding an explicitly defaulted copy constructor.
The latter are like:
libcxx/include/codecvt:105:37: warning: dynamic exception specifications are deprecated [-Wdeprecated-dynamic-exception-spec]
virtual int do_encoding() const throw();
^~~~~~~
Fix these by using the _NOEXCEPT macro instead.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, ldionne, #libc
Reviewed By: EricWF, #libc
Subscribers: dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76150
This patch de-duplicates most compressed pair constructors
to use the same code in C++11 and C++03.
Part of doing that is deleting the "__second_tag()" and replacing
it with a "__value_init_tag()" which has the same effect, but
allows for the removal of the special "one-arg" first element
constructor.
This patch is intended to have no semantic change.
All the compilers we support provide these builtins. We don't
need to do a configuration dance anymore.
This patch also cleans up some dead or almost dead
C++11 feature detection macros.
llvm-svn: 364047
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Summary:
The state associated to the future was set in one thread (with synchronization)
but read in another thread without synchronization, which led to a data race.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38181
rdar://problem/42548261
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51170
llvm-svn: 340608
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Note that this commit had originally been applied in r336369 and then
reverted in r336382 because of unforeseen problems. Both of these problems
have now been fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336866
This reverts commit r336369. The commit had two problems:
1. __pbump was marked as _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY instead of
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which lead to two symbols being added in the
dylib and the check-cxx-abilist failing.
2. The LLDB tests started failing because they undefine
`_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`. I need to figure out why they do that and
fix the tests before we can go forward with this change.
llvm-svn: 336382
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336369
Libc++ is used as a system library on macOS and iOS (amongst others). In order
for users to be able to compile a binary that is intended to be deployed to an
older version of the platform, clang provides the
availability attribute <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#availability>_
that can be placed on declarations to describe the lifecycle of a symbol in the
library.
See docs/DesignDocs/AvailabilityMarkup.rst for more information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31739
llvm-svn: 302172
Summary:
Most classes annotated with _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS need to have at least some
of their members exported, otherwise we have a lot of link errors when
linking against a libc++ built with hidden visibility. This also makes
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS be consistent across platforms, since on Windows it
already exports members.
With this change made, any template methods of a class marked
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS will also get default visibility when instantiatied,
which is not desirable for clients of libc++ headers who wish to control
their visibility; this is the same issue as PR30642. Annotate all
problematic methods with an explicit visibility specifier to avoid this.
The problematic methods were found by running bad-visibility-finder [1]
against the libc++ headers after making the _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS change. The
small methods were marked for inlining; the larger ones hidden.
[1] https://github.com/smeenai/bad-visibility-finder
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25208
llvm-svn: 296732
The name _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY is no longer accurate because both
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY expand to
__attribute__((__type_visibility__)) with Clang. The only remaining difference
is that _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY can be applied to templates whereas
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS cannot (due to dllimport/dllexport not being allowed on
templates).
This patch renames _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS.
llvm-svn: 291035
This patch addresses the following issues in the test suite:
1. Move "std::bad_array_length" test from std/ to libcxx/ test directory
since the feature is not a part of the standard.
2. Rename "futures.tas" test directory to "futures.task" since that is the
correct stable name.
3. Move tests for "packaged_task<T>::result_type" from std/ to libcxx/
test directory since the typedef is a libc++ extension.
llvm-svn: 271430
This change moves visibility attributes from out-of-class method
definitions to in-class declaration. This is needed for a switch to
attribute((internal_linkage)) (see http://reviews.llvm.org/D13925)
which can only appear on the first declaration.
This change does not touch istream/ostream/streambuf. They are
handled separately in http://reviews.llvm.org/D14409.
llvm-svn: 252385
Summary:
Hi Marshall,
Could you please test this patch and see if you run into the same linker errors we talked about?
I can't reproduce on linux or OS X.
Hopefully you can't find any problems and we can fix the C++03 bot.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13337
llvm-svn: 249192
Within the shared state methods do not unlock the lock guards manually. This
could cause a race condition where the shared state is destroyed before the
method is complete.
llvm-svn: 239577
Summary:
This patch is very closely related to D4859. Please see http://reviews.llvm.org/D4859 for more information.
This patch adds support for "fancy" pointers and allocators to promise and packaged_task. The changes made to support this are exactly the same as in D4859.
Test Plan: "fancy" pointer tests were added to each constructor affected by the change.
Reviewers: danalbert, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4862
llvm-svn: 220471
Christopher Di Bella