current attribute system, but it is enough to handle class templates which
specify parts of their alignment in terms of their template parameters.
This also replaces the attributes test in SemaTemplate with one that actually
tests working attributes instead of broken ones. I plan to add more tests here
for non-dependent attributes in a subsequent patch.
Thanks to John for walking me through some of this. =D
llvm-svn: 106818
attribute as part of the calculation. Sema::MarkDeclReferenced(), and
a few other places, want only to consider the "used" bit to determine,
e.g, whether to perform template instantiation. Fixes a linkage issue
with Boost.Serialization.
llvm-svn: 106252
(or operator-function-id) as a template, but the context is actually
non-dependent or the current instantiation, allow us to use knowledge
of what kind of template it is, e.g., type template vs. function
template, for further syntactic disambiguation. This allows us to
parse properly in the presence of stray "template" keywords, which is
necessary in C++0x and it's good recovery in C++98/03.
llvm-svn: 106167
disambiguation keywords outside of templates in C++98/03. Previously,
the warning would fire when the associated nested-name-specifier was
not dependent, but that was a misreading of the C++98/03 standard:
now, we complain only when we're outside of any template.
llvm-svn: 106161
virtual base class, but the class still has dependent base classes,
then don't diagnose the failed match as an error: the right base class
might magically appear. Fixes PR7259.
llvm-svn: 106103
any arguments that are default-argument expressions. The can show up
when we have a new expression whose constructor arguments are not
type-dependent and whose allocated type is not dependent and has a
constructor with default arguments. Fixes PR7202.
llvm-svn: 104690
in several important ways:
- VLAs of non-POD types are not permitted.
- VLAs cannot be used in conjunction with C++ templates.
These restrictions are intended to keep VLAs out of the parts of the
C++ type system where they cause the most trouble. Fixes PR5678 and
<rdar://problem/8013618>.
llvm-svn: 104443
the required "template" keyword, using the same heuristics we do for
dependent template names in member access expressions, e.g.,
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-template-recover.cpp:11:8: error: use 'template'
keyword to treat 'getAs' as a dependent template name
T::getAs<U>();
^
template
Fixes PR5404.
llvm-svn: 104409
that is missing the 'template' keyword, e.g.,
t->getAs<T>()
where getAs is a member of an unknown specialization. C++ requires
that we treat "getAs" as a value, but that would fail to parse since T
is the name of a type. We would then fail at the '>', since a type
cannot be followed by a '>'.
This is a very common error for C++ programmers to make, especially
since GCC occasionally allows it when it shouldn't (as does Visual
C++). So, when we are in this case, we use tentative parsing to see if
the tokens starting at "<" can only be parsed as a template argument
list. If so, we produce a diagnostic with a fix-it that states that
the 'template' keyword is needed:
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-template-recover.cpp:5:8: error: 'template' keyword
is required to treat 'getAs' as a dependent template name
t->getAs<T>();
^
template
This is just a start of this patch; I'd like to apply the same
approach to everywhere that a template-id with dependent template name
can be parsed.
llvm-svn: 104406
sure that the anonymous struct/union record declaration gets
instantiated before the variable declaration, and that it and its
fields (recursively) get entries in the local instantiation map. Fixes
PR7088.
llvm-svn: 104305
"used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and
when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function
definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential
definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting
vtables for classes without key functions.
The new scheme:
- For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate
the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member
function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type,
dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting
to/through a virtual base class, etc.
- For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to
indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation
unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can
delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also
occur with explicit template instantiation definitions.
- For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member
functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key
function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual
member functions when needed.
- At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the
ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define
them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the
vtables lazily).
From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are
permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions
whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers
were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance
issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke
Boost test cases, which now pass).
Notes:
(1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which
vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of
the larger tests from these issues.
(2) Some diagnostics related to
implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions
have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this
way.
(3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to
see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a
vtable.
Fixes PR7114 and PR6564.
llvm-svn: 103718
referenced unless we see one of them defined (or the key function
defined, if it as one) or if we need the vtable for something. Fixes
PR7114.
llvm-svn: 103497
explicit instantiations of template. C++0x clarifies the intent
(they're ill-formed in some cases; see [temp.explicit] for
details). However, one could squint at the C++98/03 standard and
conclude they are permitted, so reduce the error to a warning
(controlled by -Wc++0x-compat) in C++98/03 mode.
llvm-svn: 103482
value-dependent if their initializers are value-dependent; my recent
tweak to these dependent rules overstepped by taking away this
value-dependents. Fixes a Boost.GIL regression.
llvm-svn: 103476
of the current instantiation is value-dependent. The C++ standard
fails to enumerate this case and, therefore, we missed it. Chandler
did all of the hard work of reducing the last remaining
Boost.PtrContainer failure (which had to do with static initialization
in the Serialization library) down to this simple little test.
While I'm at it, clean up the dependence rules for template arguments
that are declarations, and implement the dependence rules for template
argument packs.
llvm-svn: 103464
particular, don't complain about unused variables that have dependent
type until instantiation time, so that we can look at the type of the
variable. Moreover, only complain about unused variables that have
neither a user-declared constructor nor a non-trivial destructor.
llvm-svn: 103362
for, and switch), be careful to construct the full expressions as soon
as we perform template instantation, so we don't either forget to call
temporary destructors or destroy temporaries at the wrong time. This
is the template-instantiation analogue to r103187, during which I
hadn't realized that the issue would affect the handling of these
constructs differently inside and outside of templates.
Fixes a regression in Boost.Function.
llvm-svn: 103357
specific message that includes the template arguments, e.g.,
test/SemaTemplate/overload-candidates.cpp:27:20: note: candidate template
ignored: substitution failure [with T = int *]
typename T::type get_type(const T&); // expected-note{{candidate ...
^
llvm-svn: 103348
conflicting deduced template argument values, give a more specific
reason along with those values, e.g.,
test/SemaTemplate/overload-candidates.cpp:4:10: note: candidate template
ignored: deduced conflicting types for parameter 'T' ('int' vs. 'long')
const T& min(const T&, const T&);
^
llvm-svn: 103339
ensure that we complete the type when we need to look at constructors
during reference binding.
When determining whether the two types involved in reference binding
are reference-compatible, reference-related, etc., do not complete the
type of the reference itself because it is not necessary to determine
well-formedness of the program. Complete the type that we are binding
to, since that can affect whether we know about a derived-to-base
conversion.
Re-fixes PR7080.
llvm-svn: 103283
are reference-compatible, reference-related, etc., do not complete the
type of the reference itself because it is not necessary to determine
well-formedness of the program. Complete the type that we are binding
to, since that can affect whether we know about a derived-to-base
conversion.
Fixes PR7080.
llvm-svn: 103220
different tag kind ("struct" vs. "class") than the primary template,
which has an affect on access control.
Should fix the last remaining Boost.Accumulors failure.
llvm-svn: 103144
ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier() only annotates the subset of
template-ids which are not subject to lexical ambiguity. Add support
for the more general case in ParseUnqualifiedId() to handle cases
such as A::template B().
Also improve some diagnostic locations.
Fixes PR7030, from Alp Toker!
llvm-svn: 103081
Douglas Gregor