Not all targets generate 'store atomic' instructions for
'_Atomic(_Complex int)'. Some targets use the __atomic_store builtin instead.
This commit makes the test accept either one.
llvm-svn: 229676
Bools are a little tricky, they are i8 in memory and must be coerced
back to i1 before further operations can be performed on them.
This fixes PR22577.
llvm-svn: 229204
- Generate atomicrmw operations in most of the cases when it's sensible to do
so.
- Don't crash in several common cases (and hopefully don't crash in more of
them).
- Add some better tests.
We now generate significantly better code for things like:
_Atomic(int) x;
...
x++;
On MIPS, this now generates a 4-instruction ll/sc loop, where previously it
generated about 30 instructions in two nested loops. On x86-64, we generate a
single lock incl, instead of a lock cmpxchgl loop (one instruction instead of
ten).
llvm-svn: 176420
- Add atomic-to/from-nonatomic cast types
- Emit atomic operations for arithmetic on atomic types
- Emit non-atomic stores for initialisation of atomic types, but atomic stores and loads for every other store / load
- Add a __atomic_init() intrinsic which does a non-atomic store to an _Atomic() type. This is needed for the corresponding C11 stdatomic.h function.
- Enables the relevant __has_feature() checks. The feature isn't 100% complete yet, but it's done enough that we want people testing it.
Still to do:
- Make the arithmetic operations on atomic types (e.g. Atomic(int) foo = 1; foo++;) use the correct LLVM intrinsic if one exists, not a loop with a cmpxchg.
- Add a signal fence builtin
- Properly set the fenv state in atomic operations on floating point values
- Correctly handle things like _Atomic(_Complex double) which are too large for an atomic cmpxchg on some platforms (this requires working out what 'correctly' means in this context)
- Fix the many remaining corner cases
llvm-svn: 148242