Summary:
As discussed in https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues/933,
it would be really awesome to be able to use ThinLTO for fuzzing.
However, as @kcc has pointed out, it is currently undefined (untested)
whether the sanitizers actually function properly with LLD and/or LTO.
This patch is inspired by the cfi test, which already do test with LTO
(and/or LLD), since LTO is required for CFI to function.
I started with UBSan, because it's cmakelists / lit.* files appeared
to be the cleanest. This patch adds the infrastructure to easily add
LLD and/or LTO sub-variants of the existing lit test configurations.
Also, this patch adds the LLD flavor, that explicitly does use LLD to link.
The check-ubsan does pass on my machine. And to minimize the [initial]
potential buildbot breakage i have put some restrictions on this flavour.
Please review carefully, i have not worked with lit/sanitizer tests before.
The original attempt, r319525 was reverted in r319526 due
to the failures in compiler-rt standalone builds.
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: #sanitizers, pcc, kubamracek, mgorny, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini, inglorion, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39508
llvm-svn: 319575
This reverts commit r319525.
This change has introduced a problem with the Lit tests build for compiler-rt using Gold: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/6047/steps/test%20standalone%20compiler-rt/logs/stdio
llvm-lit: /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/utils/lit/lit/TestingConfig.py:101: fatal: unable to parse config file '/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/test/profile/Linux/lit.local.cfg', traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/utils/lit/lit/TestingConfig.py", line 88, in load_from_path
exec(compile(data, path, 'exec'), cfg_globals, None)
File "/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/test/profile/Linux/lit.local.cfg", line 37, in <module>
if root.host_os not in ['Linux'] or not is_gold_linker_available():
File "/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/test/profile/Linux/lit.local.cfg", line 27, in is_gold_linker_available
stderr = subprocess.PIPE)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 390, in __init__
errread, errwrite)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 1024, in _execute_child
raise child_exception
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
llvm-svn: 319529
Summary:
As discussed in https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues/933,
it would be really awesome to be able to use ThinLTO for fuzzing.
However, as @kcc has pointed out, it is currently undefined (untested)
whether the sanitizers actually function properly with LLD and/or LTO.
This patch is inspired by the cfi test, which already do test with LTO
(and/or LLD), since LTO is required for CFI to function.
I started with UBSan, because it's cmakelists / lit.* files appeared
to be the cleanest. This patch adds the infrastructure to easily add
LLD and/or LTO sub-variants of the existing lit test configurations.
Also, this patch adds the LLD flavor, that explicitly does use LLD to link.
The check-ubsan does pass on my machine. And to minimize the [initial]
potential buildbot breakage i have put some restrictions on this flavour.
Please review carefully, i have not worked with lit/sanitizer tests before.
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: #sanitizers, pcc, kubamracek, mgorny, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini, inglorion, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39508
llvm-svn: 319525
At the moment almost every lit.site.cfg.in contains two lines comment:
## Autogenerated by LLVM/Clang configuration.
# Do not edit!
The patch adds variable LIT_SITE_CFG_IN_HEADER, that is replaced from
configure_lit_site_cfg with the note and some useful information.
llvm-svn: 266520
Roman Lebedev