r233345 started being stricter about typedef names for linkage purposes
in non-visible modules, but broke languages without the ODR.
rdar://23527954
llvm-svn: 253123
When linking against text-based dynamic library SDKs the library name of a
framework has now more than one possible filename extensions. This fix tests for
both possible extensions (none, and .tbd).
This fixes rdar://problem/20609975
llvm-svn: 253060
the linkage of the enumeration. For enumerators of unnamed enumerations, extend
the -Wmodules-ambiguous-internal-linkage extension to allow selecting an
arbitrary enumerator (but only if they all have the same value, otherwise it's
ambiguous).
llvm-svn: 253010
declarations in redeclaration lookup. A declaration is now visible to
lookup if:
* It is visible (not in a module, or in an imported module), or
* We're doing redeclaration lookup and it's externally-visible, or
* We're doing typo correction and looking for unimported decls.
We now support multiple modules having different internal-linkage or no-linkage
definitions of the same name for all entities, not just for functions,
variables, and some typedefs. As previously, if multiple such entities are
visible, any attempt to use them will result in an ambiguity error.
This patch fixes the linkage calculation for a number of entities where we
previously didn't need to get it right (using-declarations, namespace aliases,
and so on). It also classifies enumerators as always having no linkage, which
is a slight deviation from the C++ standard's definition, but not an observable
change outside modules (this change is being discussed on the -core reflector
currently).
This also removes the prior special case for tag lookup, which made some cases
of this work, but also led to bizarre, bogus "must use 'struct' to refer to type
'Foo' in this scope" diagnostics in C++.
llvm-svn: 252960
internal linkage entities in different modules from r250884 to apply to all
names, not just function names.
This is really awkward: we don't want to merge internal-linkage symbols from
separate modules, because they might not actually be defining the same entity.
But we don't want to reject programs that use such an ambiguous symbol if those
internal-linkage symbols are in fact equivalent. For now, we're resolving the
ambiguity by picking one of the equivalent definitions as an extension.
llvm-svn: 252063
Introduce the notion of a module file extension, which introduces
additional information into a module file at the time it is built that
can then be queried when the module file is read. Module file
extensions are identified by a block name (which must be unique to the
extension) and can write any bitstream records into their own
extension block within the module file. When a module file is loaded,
any extension blocks are matched up with module file extension
readers, that are per-module-file and are given access to the input
bitstream.
Note that module file extensions can only be introduced by
programmatic clients that have access to the CompilerInvocation. There
is only one such extension at the moment, which is used for testing
the module file extension harness. As a future direction, one could
imagine allowing the plugin mechanism to introduce new module file
extensions.
llvm-svn: 251955
particular don't assume that two declarations of the same kind in the same
context are declaring the same entity. That's not true when the same name is
declared multiple times as internal-linkage symbols within a module.
(getCanonicalDecl is cheap now, so we can just use it here.)
llvm-svn: 251898
Use the *current* state of "is-moduleness" rather than the state at
serialization time so that if we read a builtin identifier from a module
that wasn't "interesting" to that module, we will still write it out to
a PCH that imports that module.
Otherwise, we would get mysterious "unknown builtin" errors when using
PCH+modules.
rdar://problem/23287656
llvm-svn: 251565
headers. If those headers end up being textually included twice into the same
module, we get ambiguity errors.
Work around this by downgrading the ambiguity error to a warning if multiple
identical internal-linkage functions appear in an overload set, and just pick
one of those functions as the lookup result.
llvm-svn: 250884
We model predefined declarations as not being from AST files, but in most ways
they act as if they come from some implicit prebuilt module file imported
before all others. Therefore, if we see an update to the predefined 'struct
__va_list_tag' declaration (and we've already loaded any modules), it needs a
corresponding update record, even though it didn't technically come from an AST
file.
llvm-svn: 250134
If an import directive was put into wrong context, the error message was obscure,
complaining on misbalanced braces. To get more descriptive messages, annotation
tokens related to modules are processed where they must not be seen.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11844
llvm-svn: 248085
it's not sufficient to prefer the declaration with more default arguments, or
the one that's visible; they might both be visible, but one of them might have
a visible default argument where the other has a hidden default argument.
llvm-svn: 247486
When -fmodule-format is set to "obj", emit debug info for all types
declared in a module or referenced by a declaration into the module's
object file container.
This patch adds support for Objective-C types and methods.
llvm-svn: 247068
When -fmodule-format is set to "obj", emit debug info for all types
declared in a module or referenced by a declaration into the module's
object file container.
This patch adds support for C and C++ types.
llvm-svn: 247049
context is the class itself but lookups should be performed starting with the
lookup parent of the class (class and base members don't shadow types from the
surrounding context because they have not been declared yet).
llvm-svn: 245236
Summary:
If a module was unavailable (either a missing requirement on the module
being imported, or a missing file anywhere in the top-level module (and
not dominated by an unsatisfied `requires`)), we would silently treat
inclusions as textual. This would cause all manner of crazy and
confusing errors (and would also silently "work" sometimes, making the
problem difficult to track down).
I'm really not a fan of the `M->isAvailable(getLangOpts(), getTargetInfo(),
Requirement, MissingHeader)` function; it seems to do too many things at
once, but for now I've done things in a sort of awkward way.
The changes to test/Modules/Inputs/declare-use/module.map
were necessitated because the thing that was meant to be tested there
(introduced in r197805) was predicated on silently falling back to textual
inclusion, which we no longer do.
The changes to test/Modules/Inputs/macro-reexport/module.modulemap
are just an overlooked missing header that seems to have been missing since
this code was committed (r213922), which is now caught.
Reviewers: rsmith, benlangmuir, djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10423
llvm-svn: 245228
This preserves backwards compatibility for two hacks in the Darwin
system module map files:
1. The use of 'requires excluded' to make headers non-modular, which
should really be mapped to 'textual' now that we have this feature.
2. Silently removes a bogus cplusplus requirement from IOKit.avc.
Once we start diagnosing missing requirements and headers on
auto-imports these would have broken compatibility with existing Darwin
SDKs.
llvm-svn: 244912
emit lexical contents for a declaration for another module. Track which module
those contents came from, and ensure that we only grab the lexical contents
from a single such instantiation.
llvm-svn: 244682
arguments because the reloaded form might have become non-canonical across the
serialization/deserialization step (this particularly happens when the
canonical form of the type involves an expression).
llvm-svn: 244409
... and add aarch32 to specifically refer to the 32-bit ones.
Previously, 'arm' meant only 32-bit architectures and there was no way
for a module to build with both 32 and 64 bit ARM architectures.
Now a module that is intended to work on both architectures can specify
requires arm
whereas a module only for 32-bit platforms can say
requires aarch32
and just like before, 64-bit only can say
requires aarch64
llvm-svn: 244306
Also fix completely broken and untested code which was hiding the
primary bug. The !LLVM_ON_UNIX branch of the ifdef was actually a no-op.
I ran into this in the wild. It was causing failures in our SDK build.
Ideally we'd have a perfect llvm::sys::fs::canonical, but at least this
is a step in the right direction, and fixes an obviously broken case.
In some sense the test case I've added here is an integration test. We
should have these routines thoroughly unit tested in llvm::sys::fs.
llvm-svn: 243597
UsingShadowDecls over other declarations of the same entity in the lookup
results. This ensures that we build correct redeclaration chains for the
UsingShadowDecls (otherwise we could see assertions and other misbehavior in
modules builds, when merging combines multiple redeclaration chains for the
same entity from the same module into one chain).
llvm-svn: 243592
And make the module unavailable without breaking any parent modules.
If there's a missing requirement after we've already seen a missing
header, still update the IsMissingRequiement bit correctly. Also,
diagnose missing requirements before missing headers, since the
existence of the header is moot if there are missing requirements.
llvm-svn: 242055
visible in the module we're considering entering. Previously we assumed that if
we knew the include guard for a modular header, we'd already parsed it, but
that need not be the case if a header is present in the current module and one
of its dependencies; the result of getting this wrong was that the current
module's submodule for the header would end up empty.
llvm-svn: 241953
instantiation, use the set of modules visible from the template definition, not
from whichever declaration the specialization was instantiated from.
llvm-svn: 241662
We use findModuleForHeader() in several places, but in header search we
were not calling it when a framework module didn't show up with the
expected name, which would then lead to unexpected non-modular includes.
Now we will find the module unconditionally for frameworks. For regular
frameworks, we use the spelling of the module name from the module map
file, and for inferred ones we use the canonical directory name.
In the future we might want to lock down framework modules sufficiently
that these name mismatches cannot happen.
rdar://problem/20465870
llvm-svn: 241258
Richard Smith