This is a follow on from a similar LLVM commit: r253511.
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.
This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments. The alignment
argument itself is removed.
The only code change to clang is hidden in CGBuilder.h which now passes
both dest and source alignment to IRBuilder, instead of taking the minimum of
dest and source alignments.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 253512
Code in CGCall.cpp that loads up function arguments that need to be
coerced to a different type may in some cases ignore the fact that
the source of the argument is not naturally aligned. This may cause
incorrect code to be generated. In some places in CreateCoercedLoad,
we already have setAlignment calls to address this, but I ran into one
where it was missing, causing wrong code generation on SystemZ.
However, in that location, we do not actually know what alignment of
the source location we can rely on; the callers do not pass anything
to this routine. This is already an issue in other places in
CreateCoercedLoad; and the same problem exists for CreateCoercedStore.
To avoid pessimising code, and to fix the FIXMEs already in place,
this patch also adds an alignment argument to the CreateCoerced*
routines and uses it instead of forcing an alignment of 1. The
callers are changed to pass in the best information they have.
This actually requires changes in a number of existing test cases
since we now get better alignment in many places.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11033
llvm-svn: 241898
Reuse the PPC64 HVA detection algorithm for ARM and AArch64. This is a
nice code deduplication, since they are roughly identical. A few virtual
method extension points are needed to understand how big an HVA can be
and what element types it can have for a given architecture.
Also make the record expansion code work in the presence of non-virtual
bases.
Reviewed By: uweigand, asl
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6045
llvm-svn: 220972
In addition to enabling ELFv2 homogeneous aggregate handling,
LLVM support to pass array types directly also enables a performance
enhancement. We can now pass (non-homogeneous) aggregates that fit
fully in registers as direct integer arrays, using an element type
to encode the alignment requirement (that would otherwise go to the
"byval align" field).
This is preferable since "byval" forces the back-end to write the
aggregate out to the stack, even if it could be passed fully in
registers. This is particularly annoying on ELFv2, if there is
no parameter save area available, since we then need to allocate
space on the callee's stack just to hold those aggregates.
Note that to implement this optimization, this patch does not attempt
to fully anticipate register allocation rules as (defined in the
ABI and) implemented in the back-end. Instead, the patch is simply
passing *any* aggregate passed by value using the array mechanism
if its size is up to 64 bytes. This means that some of those will
end up being passed in stack slots anyway, but the generated code
shouldn't be any worse either. (*Large* aggregates remain passed
using "byval" to enable optimized copying via memcpy etc.)
llvm-svn: 213495
This patch implements clang support for the PowerPC ELFv2 ABI.
Together with a series of companion patches in LLVM, this makes
clang/LLVM fully usable on powerpc64le-linux.
Most of the ELFv2 ABI changes are fully implemented on the LLVM side.
On the clang side, we only need to implement some changes in how
aggregate types are passed by value. Specifically, we need to:
- pass (and return) "homogeneous" floating-point or vector aggregates in
FPRs and VRs (this is similar to the ARM homogeneous aggregate ABI)
- return aggregates of up to 16 bytes in one or two GPRs
The second piece is trivial to implement in any case. To implement
the first piece, this patch makes use of infrastructure recently
enabled in the LLVM PowerPC back-end to support passing array types
directly, where the array element type encodes properties needed to
handle homogeneous aggregates correctly.
Specifically, the array element type encodes:
- whether the parameter should be passed in FPRs, VRs, or just
GPRs/stack slots (for float / vector / integer element types,
respectively)
- what the alignment requirements of the parameter are when passed in
GPRs/stack slots (8 for float / 16 for vector / the element type
size for integer element types) -- this corresponds to the
"byval align" field
With this support in place, the clang part simply needs to *detect*
whether an aggregate type implements a float / vector homogeneous
aggregate as defined by the ELFv2 ABI, and if so, pass/return it
as array type using the appropriate float / vector element type.
llvm-svn: 213494
Pete Cooper