There are very few tests here because SValBuilder is fairly aggressive
about not building SymExprs that we can't evaluate, which saves memory
and CPU but also makes it very much tied to the current constraint
manager. We should probably scale back here and let things decay to
UnknownVal later on.
bitwise-ops.c tests that for the SymExprs we do create, we persist our
assumptions about them. traversal-path-unification.c tests that we do
clean out constraints on arbitrary SymExprs once they have actually died.
llvm-svn: 164623
Previously, we'd just keep constraints around forever, which means we'd
never be able to merge paths that differed only in constraints on dead
symbols.
Because we now allow constraints on symbolic expressions, not just single
symbols, this requires changing SymExpr::symbol_iterator to include
intermediate symbol nodes in its traversal, not just the SymbolData leaf
nodes.
This depends on the previous commit to be correct. Originally applied in
r163444, reverted in r164275, now being re-applied.
llvm-svn: 164622
While we definitely want this optimization in the future, we're not
currently handling constraints on symbolic /expressions/ correctly.
These should stay live even if the SymExpr itself is no longer referenced
because could recreate an identical SymExpr later. Only once the SymExpr
can no longer be recreated -- i.e. a component symbol is dead -- can we
safely remove the constraints on it.
This liveness issue is tracked by <rdar://problem/12333297>.
This reverts r163444 / 24c7f98828e039005cff3bd847e7ab404a6a09f8.
llvm-svn: 164275
Previously, we'd just keep constraints around forever, which means we'd
never be able to merge paths that differed only in constraints on dead
symbols.
Because we now allow constraints on symbolic expressions, not just single
symbols, this requires changing SymExpr::symbol_iterator to include
intermediate symbol nodes in its traversal, not just the SymbolData leaf
nodes.
llvm-svn: 163444
Anna Zaks