from a source file and changes clang-check to make use of this.
This makes clang-check just work on in-tree builds, and allows
easy setup via a symlink per source directory to make clang-check
work without any extra configuration.
llvm-svn: 159990
*errors* with fixits on them by following the recovery advised by the
fixit, but if it is a fixit on a warning, then obviously the AST
should be for the code as-written.
llvm-svn: 159980
void f(); // expected-note 0+ {{previous declaration is here}}
void g(); // expected-note 0-1 {{previous declaration is here}}
The old "+" syntax is still an alias for "1+", and single numbers still work.
Patch by Andy Gibbs!
llvm-svn: 159979
// expected-warning@10 {{some text}}
The line number may be absolute (as above), or relative to the current
line by prefixing the number with either '+' or '-'.
Patch by Andy Gibbs!
llvm-svn: 159978
Lots of tests are using an explicit target triple w/o first checking that the
target is actually available. Add a REQUIRES clause to a bunch of them. This should
hopefully unbreak bots which don't configure w/ all targets enabled.
llvm-svn: 159949
Previously it was possible to get an infinite-loop-on-invalid with a namespace
decl within @interface. Since 'namespace' is normally a safe place to retry
top-level parsing, we just didn't consume the token.
This adds a flag that tracks whether we have temporarily left Objective-C
scope to parse a C-like declaration, and uses that to better recover from
parse problems by stopping at possible method declarations and at @end. To
fix the original problem, we do /not/ stop at 'namespace' when in an
Objective-C @interface or @protocol context (but still do in @implementation).
llvm-svn: 159941
This was a regression introduced during the CallEvent changes; a call to
FunctionDecl::hasBody was also being used to replace the decl found by
lookup with the actual definition. To keep from making this mistake again
(particularly if/when we start inlining Objective-C methods), this commit
adds a "getDefinition()" method to CallEvent, which should do the right
thing under any circumstances.
llvm-svn: 159940
Chris pointed out that while the comparison is certainly problematic
and does not have well-defined behavior, it isn't any worse than some
of the other abuses that we merely warn about and doesn't need to make
the compilation fail.
Revert the release notes change (r159766) now that this is just a new warning.
llvm-svn: 159939
* When substituting a reference to a non-type template parameter pack where the
corresponding argument is a pack expansion, transform into an expression
which contains an unexpanded parameter pack rather than into an expression
which contains a pack expansion. This causes the SubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr
to be inside the PackExpansionExpr, rather than outside, so the expression
still looks like a pack expansion and can be deduced.
* Teach MarkUsedTemplateParameters that we can deduce a reference to a template
parameter if it's wrapped in a SubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr (such nodes are
added during alias template substitution).
llvm-svn: 159922
expression, skip over any SubstNonTypeTemplateParmExprs which alias templates
may have inserted before checking for a DeclRefExpr referring to a non-type
template parameter declaration.
llvm-svn: 159909
-ftemplate-depth limit. There are various ways to get an infinite (or merely
huge) stack of substitutions with no intervening instantiations. This is also
consistent with gcc's behavior.
llvm-svn: 159907
multidimensional array of class type. Also, preserve zero-initialization when
evaluating an initializer list for an array, in case the initializers refer to
later elements (which have preceding zero-initialization).
llvm-svn: 159904
which will appear in the vtable as used, not just those ones which were
declared within the class itself. Fixes an issue reported as comment#3 in
PR12763 -- we sometimes assert in codegen if we try to emit a reference to a
function declaration which we've not marked as referenced. This also matches
gcc's observed behavior.
llvm-svn: 159895
in the ABI arrangement, and leave a hook behind so that we can easily
tweak CCs on platforms that use different CCs by default for C++
instance methods.
llvm-svn: 159894
- Split pedantic driver flag test into separate test file, and XFAIL on cygwin,mingw32
- Fix bug in tablegen logic where a missing '{' caused errors to be included in -Wpedantic.
llvm-svn: 159892
I suspect FileCheck might match assertion failure, even if clang/test/Misc/warning-flags.c passed the test.
> 0. Program arguments: bin/./clang -### -pedantic -Wpedantic clang/test/Driver/warning-options.cpp
llvm-svn: 159886
This patch introduces some magic in tablegen to create a "Pedantic" diagnostic
group which automagically includes all warnings that are extensions. This
allows a user to suppress specific warnings traditionally under -pedantic used
an ordinary warning flag. This also allows users to use #pragma to silence
specific -pedantic warnings, or promote them to errors, within blocks of text
(just like any other warning).
-Wpedantic is NOT an alias for -pedantic. Instead, it provides another way
to (a) activate -pedantic warnings and (b) disable them. Where they differ
is that -pedantic changes the behavior of the preprocessor slightly, whereas
-Wpedantic does not (it just turns on the warnings).
The magic in the tablegen diagnostic emitter has to do with computing the minimal
set of diagnostic groups and diagnostics that should go into -Wpedantic, as those
diagnostics that already members of groups that themselves are (transitively) members
of -Wpedantic do not need to be included in the Pedantic group directly. I went
back and forth on whether or not to magically generate this group, and the invariant
was that we always wanted extension warnings to be included in -Wpedantic "some how",
but the bookkeeping would be very onerous to manage by hand.
-no-pedantic (and --no-pedantic) is included for completeness, and matches many of the
same kind of flags the compiler already supports. It does what it says: cancels out
-pedantic. One discrepancy is that if one specifies --no-pedantic and -Weverything or
-Wpedantic the pedantic warnings are still enabled (essentially the -W flags win). We
can debate the correct behavior here.
Along the way, this patch nukes some code in TextDiagnosticPrinter.cpp and CXStoredDiagnostic.cpp
that determine whether to include the "-pedantic" flag in the warning output. This is
no longer needed, as all extensions now have a -W flag.
This patch also significantly reduces the number of warnings not under flags from 229
to 158 (all extension warnings). That's a 31% reduction.
llvm-svn: 159875
Manuel Klimek