This would error in C++ mode unless the variable also had a cv
qualifier.
e.g.
__attribute__((address_space(2))) float foo = 1.0f; would error but
__attribute__((address_space(2))) const float foo = 1.0f; would not.
llvm-svn: 176121
GCC applies a pragma weak to a decl if it matches the mangled name. We used
to apply if it matched the plain name.
This patch is a compromise: we apply the pragma only if it matches the name
and the decl has C language linkage.
llvm-svn: 176110
These are two related changes (one in llvm, one in clang).
LLVM:
- rename address_safety => sanitize_address (the enum value is the same, so we preserve binary compatibility with old bitcode)
- rename thread_safety => sanitize_thread
- rename no_uninitialized_checks -> sanitize_memory
CLANG:
- add __attribute__((no_sanitize_address)) as a synonym for __attribute__((no_address_safety_analysis))
- add __attribute__((no_sanitize_thread))
- add __attribute__((no_sanitize_memory))
for S in address thread memory
If -fsanitize=S is present and __attribute__((no_sanitize_S)) is not
set llvm attribute sanitize_S
llvm-svn: 176076
just using ASTConsumer::HandleCXXStaticMemberVarInstantiation(), don't pass it with
ASTConsumer::HandleTopLevelDecl.
ASTConsumer::HandleTopLevelDecl is intended for user-written top-level decls;
a consumer can treat an instantiated static data member however it wants of course.
llvm-svn: 175976
Use Optional<CFG*> where invalid states were needed previously. In the one case
where that's not possible (beginAutomaticObjDtorsInsert) just use a dummy
CFGAutomaticObjDtor.
Thanks for the help from Jordan Rose & discussion/feedback from Ted Kremenek
and Doug Gregor.
Post commit code review feedback on r175796 by Ted Kremenek.
llvm-svn: 175938
Weather we should give C language linkage to functions and variables with
internal linkage probably depends on how much code assumes it. The standard
says they should have no language linkage, but gcc and msvc assign them
C language linkage.
This commit removes the hack that was preventing the mangling on static
functions declare in extern C contexts. It is an experiment to see if we
can implement the rules in the standard.
If it turns out that many users depend on these functions and variables
having C language linkage, we should change isExternC instead and try
to convince the CWG to change the standard.
llvm-svn: 175937
Introduce a new AST Decl node "EmptyDecl" to model empty-declaration. Have attributes from attribute-declaration appertain
to the EmptyDecl node by creating the AST representations of these attributes and attach them to the EmptyDecl node so these
attributes can be sema checked just as attributes attached to "normal" declarations.
llvm-svn: 175900
This reduces the "ambiguous reference" errors (which are rather strange in C/ObjC) and fixes an assertion hit
with an invalid code test case.
llvm-svn: 175869
the normal attribute-merging path, because we can't merge alignment attributes
without knowing the complete set of alignment attributes which apply to a
particular declaration.
llvm-svn: 175861
accessible in its declaring class; otherwise we might
fail to apply [class.protected] when considering
accessibility in derived classes.
Noticed by inspection; <rdar://13270329>.
I had an existing test wrong. Here's why it's wrong:
Follow the rules (and notation) of [class.access]p5.
The naming class (N) is B and the context (R) is D::getX.
- 'x' as a member of B is protected, but R does not occur
in a member or friend of a class derived from B.
- There does exist a base class of B, A, which is accessible
from R, and 'x' is accessible at R when named in A because
'x' as a member of A is protected and R occurs in a member
of a class, D, that is derived from A; however, by
[class.protected], the class of the object expression must
be equal to or derived from that class, and A does not
derive from D.
llvm-svn: 175858
control the visibility of a type for the purposes of RTTI
and template argument restrictions independently of how
visibility propagates to its non-type member declarations.
Also fix r175326 to not ignore template argument visibility
on a template explicit instantiation when a member has
an explicit attribute but the instantiation does not.
The type_visibility work is rdar://11880378
llvm-svn: 175587
for the data specific to a macro definition (e.g. what the tokens are), and
MacroDirective class which encapsulates the changes to the "macro namespace"
(e.g. the location where the macro name became active, the location where it was undefined, etc.)
(A MacroDirective always points to a MacroInfo object.)
Usually a macro definition (MacroInfo) is where a macro name becomes active (MacroDirective) but
splitting the concepts allows us to better model the effect of modules to the macro namespace
(also as a bonus it allows better modeling of push_macro/pop_macro #pragmas).
Modules can have their own macro history, separate from the local (current translation unit)
macro history; MacroDirectives will be used to model the macro history (changes to macro namespace).
For example, if "@import A;" imports macro FOO, there will be a new local MacroDirective created
to indicate that "FOO" became active at the import location. Module "A" itself will contain another
MacroDirective in its macro history (at the point of the definition of FOO) and both MacroDirectives
will point to the same MacroInfo object.
Introducing the separation of macro concepts is the first part towards better modeling of module macros.
llvm-svn: 175585
attributes yet, so just issue the appropriate diagnostics. Also generalize the
fixit for attributes-in-the-wrong-place code and reuse it here, if attributes
are placed after the access-specifier or 'virtual' in a base specifier.
llvm-svn: 175575
The TypeLoc hierarchy used the llvm::cast machinery to perform undefined
behavior by casting pointers/references to TypeLoc objects to derived types
and then using the derived copy constructors (or even returning pointers to
derived types that actually point to the original TypeLoc object).
Some context is in this thread:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-December/056804.html
Though it's spread over a few months which can be hard to read in the mail
archive.
llvm-svn: 175462
David Blaikie