Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use find_package from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB,
HAVE_ZLIB, HAVE_ZLIB_H. Furthermore, require zlib if LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB is
set to YES, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
This is a reland of abb0075 with all followup changes and fixes that
should address issues that were reported in PR44780.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79219
Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use find_package from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB,
HAVE_ZLIB, HAVE_ZLIB_H. Furthermore, require zlib if LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB is
set to YES, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
This is a reland of abb0075 with all followup changes and fixes that
should address issues that were reported in PR44780.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79219
Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use find_package from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB,
HAVE_ZLIB, HAVE_ZLIB_H. Furthermore, require zlib if LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB is
set to YES, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
This is a reland of abb0075 with all followup changes and fixes that
should address issues that were reported in PR44780.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79219
This quietly disabled use of zlib on Windows even when building with
-DLLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB=FORCE_ON.
> Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use find_package from CMake
> to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB,
> HAVE_ZLIB, HAVE_ZLIB_H. Furthermore, require zlib if LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB is
> set to YES, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
> zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
> the rest of the tooling.
>
> This is a reland of abb0075 with all followup changes and fixes that
> should address issues that were reported in PR44780.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79219
This reverts commit 10b1b4a231 and follow-ups
64d99cc6ab and
f9fec0447e.
Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use find_package from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB,
HAVE_ZLIB, HAVE_ZLIB_H. Furthermore, require zlib if LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB is
set to YES, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
This is a reland of abb0075 with all followup changes and fixes that
should address issues that were reported in PR44780.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79219
Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use find_package from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB,
HAVE_ZLIB, HAVE_ZLIB_H. Furthermore, require zlib if LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB is
set to YES, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
This is a reland of abb0075 with all followup changes and fixes that
should address issues that were reported in PR44780.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79219
Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use find_package from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB,
HAVE_ZLIB, HAVE_ZLIB_H. Furthermore, require zlib if LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB is
set to YES, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
This is a reland of abb0075 with all followup changes and fixes that
should address issues that were reported in PR44780.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79219
and follow-ups:
a2ca1c2d "build: disable zlib by default on Windows"
2181bf40 "[CMake] Link against ZLIB::ZLIB"
1079c68a "Attempt to fix ZLIB CMake logic on Windows"
This changed the output of llvm-config --system-libs, and more
importantly it broke stand-alone builds. Instead of piling on more fix
attempts, let's revert this to reduce the risk of more breakages.
The problem was noticed by the Chrome OS toolchain folks
(crbug.com/1048445) because llvm-objcopy --add-gnu-debuglink would
insert the wrong checksum when processing a binary larger than 4 GB.
That use case regressed in 1e1e3ba252 when we started using
llvm::crc32() in more places.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74039
Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use `find_package` from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the `LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB`,
`HAVE_ZLIB`, `HAVE_ZLIB_H`. Furthermore, require zlib if `LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB` is
set to `YES`, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
This restores 68a235d07f,
e6c7ed6d21. The problem with the windows
bot is a need for clearing the cache.
This reverts commit 68a235d07f.
This commit broke the clang-x64-windows-msvc build bot and a follow-up
commit did not fix it. Reverting to fix the bot.
Rather than handling zlib handling manually, use `find_package` from CMake
to find zlib properly. Use this to normalize the `LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB`,
`HAVE_ZLIB`, `HAVE_ZLIB_H`. Furthermore, require zlib if `LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB` is
set to `YES`, which requires the distributor to explicitly select whether
zlib is enabled or not. This simplifies the CMake handling and usage in
the rest of the tooling.
David added the JamCRC implementation in r246590. More recently, Eugene
added a CRC-32 implementation in r357901, which falls back to zlib's
crc32 function if present.
These checksums are essentially the same, so having multiple
implementations seems unnecessary. This replaces the CRC-32
implementation with the simpler one from JamCRC, and implements the
JamCRC interface in terms of CRC-32 since this means it can use zlib's
implementation when available, saving a few bytes and potentially making
it faster.
JamCRC took an ArrayRef<char> argument, and CRC-32 took a StringRef.
This patch changes it to ArrayRef<uint8_t> which I think is the best
choice, and simplifies a few of the callers nicely.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68570
llvm-svn: 374148
Petr Hosek