When choosing the best successor for a block, ordinarily we would have preferred
a block that preserves the CFG unless there is a strong probability the other
direction. For small blocks that can be duplicated we now skip that requirement
as well, subject to some simple frequency calculations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28583
llvm-svn: 293716
This reverts commit ada6595a526d71df04988eb0a4b4fe84df398ded.
This needs a simple probability check because there are some cases where it is
not profitable.
llvm-svn: 291695
When choosing the best successor for a block, ordinarily we would have preferred
a block that preserves the CFG unless there is a strong probability the other
direction. For small blocks that can be duplicated we now skip that requirement
as well.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27742
llvm-svn: 291609
If a 64-bit value is tested against a bit which is known to be in the range
[0..31) (modulo 64), we can use the 32-bit BT instruction, which has a slightly
shorter encoding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25862
llvm-svn: 284864
The following condition expression ( a >> n) & 1 is converted to "bt a, n" instruction. It works on all intel targets.
But on AVX-512 it was broken because the expression is modified to (truncate (a >>n) to i1).
I added the new sequence (truncate (a >>n) to i1) to the BT pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22354
llvm-svn: 275950
Note: I removed the checks after each jump because that's noise, but we apparently
need branches rather than returning i1 to see the bt codegen in some cases.
llvm-svn: 275439
This changes the SelectionDAG scheduling preference to source
order. Soon, the SelectionDAG scheduler can be bypassed saving
a nice chunk of compile time.
Performance differences that result from this change are often a
consequence of register coalescing. The register coalescer is far from
perfect. Bugs can be filed for deficiencies.
On x86 SandyBridge/Haswell, the source order schedule is often
preserved, particularly for small blocks.
Register pressure is generally improved over the SD scheduler's ILP
mode. However, we are still able to handle large blocks that require
latency hiding, unlike the SD scheduler's BURR mode. MI scheduler also
attempts to discover the critical path in single-block loops and
adjust heuristics accordingly.
The MI scheduler relies on the new machine model. This is currently
unimplemented for AVX, so we may not be generating the best code yet.
Unit tests are updated so they don't depend on SD scheduling heuristics.
llvm-svn: 192750
X86ISelLowering has support to treat:
(icmp ne (and (xor %flags, -1), (shl 1, flag)), 0)
as if it were actually:
(icmp eq (and %flags, (shl 1, flag)), 0)
However, r179386 has code at the InstCombine level to handle this.
llvm-svn: 181145
dagcombines that help it match in several more cases. Add
several more cases to test/CodeGen/X86/bt.ll. This doesn't
yet include matching for BT with an immediate operand, it
just covers more register+register cases.
llvm-svn: 63266
to Eli for pointing out that these forms don't ignore the high bits of
their index operands, and as such are not immediately suitable for use
by isel.
llvm-svn: 62194
Kyle Butt