attributes yet, so just issue the appropriate diagnostics. Also generalize the
fixit for attributes-in-the-wrong-place code and reuse it here, if attributes
are placed after the access-specifier or 'virtual' in a base specifier.
llvm-svn: 175575
If the member has an initializer, assume it was probably intended to be static
and suggest/recover with that.
If the member doesn't have an initializer, assume it was probably intended to
be const instead of constexpr and suggest that.
(if the attempt to apply these changes fails, don't make any suggestion &
produce the same diagnostic experience as before. The only case where this can
come up that I know of is with a mutable constexpr with an initializer, since
mutable is incompatible with static (but it's already incompatible with
const anyway))
llvm-svn: 173873
the diagnostic's warn_ name. Switch some places (notably C++11 attributes)
which really wanted an error over to a different diagnostic. Finally, suppress
the diagnostic entirely for __ptr32, __ptr64 and __w64, to avoid producing
diagnostics in important system headers.
llvm-svn: 173788
It turns out that there's no correctness bug here (because we can't have a type
definition in this location), but there was a diagnostic bug.
llvm-svn: 173766
r159549 / r159164 regressed clang to reject
struct s {};
struct s
operator++(struct s a)
{ return a; }
This fixes the regression. Richard, pleas check if this looks right.
llvm-svn: 172834
it apart from [[gnu::noreturn]] / __attribute__((noreturn)), since their
semantics are not equivalent (for instance, we treat [[gnu::noreturn]] as
affecting the function type, whereas [[noreturn]] does not).
llvm-svn: 172691
Following r168626, in class declaration or definition, there are a combination of syntactic locations
where C++11 attributes could appear, and among those the only valid location permitted by standard is
between class-key and class-name. So for those attributes appear at wrong locations, fixit is used to
move them to expected location and we recover by applying them to the class specifier.
llvm-svn: 171757
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
This change list implemented logic that explicitly detects several combinations of locations where C++11 attribute
specifiers might be incorrectly placed within a class specifier. Previously we emit generic diagnostics like
"expected identifier" for such cases; now we emit specific diagnostic against the misplaced attributes, this also
fixed a bug in old code where attributes appear at legitimate locations were incorrectly rejected.
Thanks to Richard Smith for reviewing!
llvm-svn: 168626
- General C++11 attributes were previously parsed and ignored. Now they are parsed and stored in AST.
- Add support to parse arguments of attributes that in 'gnu' namespace.
- Differentiate unknown attributes and known attributes that can't be applied to statements when emitting diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 165082
scope to -Wc++11-extensions. Move extra semicolon after member function
definition diagnostic out of -pedantic, since C++ allows a single semicolon
there. Keep it in -Wextra-semi, though, since it's still questionable.
llvm-svn: 160618
attributes in more places where we didn't and catching a lot more issues.
This implements nearly every aspect of C++11 attribute parsing, except for:
- Attributes are permitted on explicit instantiations inside the declarator
(but not preceding the decl-spec)
- Attributes are permitted on friend declarations of functions.
- Multiple instances of the same attribute in an attribute-list (e.g.
[[noreturn, noreturn]], not [[noreturn]] [[noreturn]] which is conforming)
are allowed.
The first two are marked as expected-FIXME in the test file and the latter
is probably a defect and is currently untested.
Thanks to Richard Smith for providing the lion's share of the testcases.
llvm-svn: 159072
The original r158700 caused crashes in the gcc test suite,
g++.abi/vtable3a.C among others. It also caused failures in the libc++
test suite.
llvm-svn: 158749
Note that this is mostly a structural patch that handles the change from the old
spelling style to the new one. One consequence of this is that all AT_foo_bar
enum values have changed to not be based off of the first spelling, but rather
off of the class name, so they are now AT_FooBar and the like (a straw poll on
IRC showed support for this). Apologies for code churn.
Most attributes have GNU spellings as a temporary solution until everything else
is sorted out (such as a Keyword spelling, which I intend to add if someone else
doesn't beat me to it). This is definitely a WIP.
I've also killed BaseCheckAttr since it was unused, and I had to go through
every attribute anyway.
llvm-svn: 158700
Now, as long as the 'Namespaces' variable is correct inside Attr.td, the
generated code will correctly admit a C++11 attribute only when it has the
appropriate namespace(s).
llvm-svn: 158661
a warning for an extra semi-colon after function definitions. Added logic
so that a block of semi-colons on a line will only get one warning instead
of a warning for each semi-colon.
llvm-svn: 156934
so that we actually accumulate all the delayed diagnostics. Do
this so that we can restore those diagnostics to good standing
if it turns out that we were wrong to suppress, e.g. if the
tag specifier is actually an elaborated type specifier and not
a declaration.
llvm-svn: 156291
cases in switch statements. Also add a [[clang::fallthrough]] attribute, which
can be used to suppress the warning in the case of intentional fallthrough.
Patch by Alexander Kornienko!
The handling of C++11 attribute namespaces in this patch is temporary, and will
be replaced with a cleaner mechanism in a subsequent patch.
llvm-svn: 156086
refactorings in that revision, and some of the subsequent bugfixes, which
seem to be relevant even without delayed exception specification parsing.
llvm-svn: 156031
victim. Don't crash if we have a delay-parsed exception specification for a
class member which is invalid in a way which precludes building a FunctionDecl.
llvm-svn: 155788
exception specifications on member functions until after the closing
'}' for the containing class. This allows, for example, a member
function to throw an instance of its own class. Fixes PR12564 and a
fairly embarassing oversight in our C++98/03 support.
llvm-svn: 154844
* Alternative tokens (such as 'compl') are treated as identifiers in
attribute names.
* An attribute-list can start with a comma.
* An ellipsis may not be used with either of our currently-supported
C++11 attributes.
llvm-svn: 154381
* In C++11, '[[' is ill-formed unless it starts an attribute-specifier. Reject
array sizes and array indexes which begin with a lambda-expression. Recover by
parsing the lambda as a lambda.
* In Objective-C++11, either '[' could be the start of a message-send.
Fully disambiguate this case: it turns out that the grammars of message-sends,
lambdas and attributes do not actually overlap. Accept any occurrence of '[['
where either '[' starts a message send, but reject a lambda in an array index
just like in C++11 mode.
Implement a couple of changes to the attribute wording which occurred after our
attributes implementation landed:
* In a function-declaration, the attributes go after the exception specification,
not after the right paren.
* A reference type can have attributes applied.
* An 'identifier' in an attribute can also be a keyword. Support for alternative
tokens (iso646 keywords) in attributes to follow.
And some bug fixes:
* Parse attributes after declarator-ids, even if they are not simple identifiers.
* Do not accept attributes after a parenthesized declarator.
* Accept attributes after an array size in a new-type-id.
* Partially disamiguate 'delete' followed by a lambda. More work is required
here for the case where the lambda-introducer is '[]'.
llvm-svn: 154369
being defined here: [] () -> struct S {} does not define struct S.
In passing, implement DR1318 (syntactic disambiguation of 'final').
llvm-svn: 152551
defined here, but not semantically, so
new struct S {};
is always ill-formed, even if there is a struct S in scope.
We also had a couple of bugs in ParseOptionalTypeSpecifier caused by it being
under-loved (due to it only being used in a few places) so merge it into
ParseDeclarationSpecifiers with a new DeclSpecContext. To avoid regressing, this
required improving ParseDeclarationSpecifiers' diagnostics in some cases. This
also required teaching ParseSpecifierQualifierList about constexpr... which
incidentally fixes an issue where we'd allow the constexpr specifier in other
bad places.
llvm-svn: 152549
grammar requires a string-literal and not a user-defined-string-literal. The
two constructs are still represented by the same TokenKind, in order to prevent
a combinatorial explosion of different kinds of token. A flag on Token tracks
whether a ud-suffix is present, in order to prevent clients from needing to look
at the token's spelling.
llvm-svn: 152098
(Hopefully, common usage of these pragmas isn't irregular enough to break our current handling. Doug has ideas for a more crazy approach if necessary.)
llvm-svn: 151307
function call (or a comma expression with a function call on its right-hand
side), possibly parenthesized, then the return type is not required to be
complete and a temporary is not bound. Other subexpressions inside a decltype
expression do not get this treatment.
This is implemented by deferring the relevant checks for all calls immediately
within a decltype expression, then, when the expression is fully-parsed,
checking the relevant constraints and stripping off any top-level temporary
binding.
Deferring the completion of the return type exposed a bug in overload
resolution where completion of the argument types was not attempted, which
is also fixed by this change.
llvm-svn: 151117
This is the last piece of N3031 (decltype in weird places) - supporting
the use of decltype in a class ctor's member-initializer-list to
specify the base classes to initialize.
Reviewed by Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 148789
function body. This keeps the brace count accurate to prevent
additional errors. Also, moved the caret from the brace to the function
name.
Code:
class F{ int Foo{ return 1; } };
Fixed error:
parameters.cc:1:14: error: function definition does not declare parameters
class F{ int Foo{ return 1; } };
^
1 error generated.
Old errors:
parameters.cc:1:17: error: function definition does not declare parameters
class F{ int Foo{ return 1; } };
^
parameters.cc:1:30: error: expected ';' after class
class F{ int Foo{ return 1; } };
^
;
parameters.cc:1:31: error: expected external declaration
class F{ int Foo{ return 1; } };
^
3 errors generated.
llvm-svn: 148621
- If the declarator is at the start of a line, and the previous line contained
another declarator and ended with a comma, then that comma was probably a
typo for a semicolon:
int n = 0, m = 1, l = 2, // k = 5;
myImportantFunctionCall(); // oops!
- If removing the parentheses would correctly initialize the object, then
produce a note suggesting that fix.
- Otherwise, if there is a simple initializer we can suggest which performs
value-initialization, then provide a note suggesting a correction to that
initializer.
Sema::Declarator now tracks the location of the comma prior to the declarator in
the declaration, if there is one, to facilitate providing the note. The code to
determine an appropriate initializer from the -Wuninitialized warning has been
factored out to allow use in both that and -Wvexing-parse.
llvm-svn: 148072
- reject definitions of enums within friend declarations
- require 'enum', not 'enum class', for non-declaring references to scoped
enumerations
llvm-svn: 147824
default", make a note of which is used when creating the
initial declaration. Previously, we would wait until later to handle
default/delete as a definition, but this is too late: when adding the
declaration, we already treated the declaration as "user-provided"
when in fact it was merely "user-declared".
Fixes PR10861 and PR10442, along with a bunch of FIXMEs.
llvm-svn: 144011
analysis to separate dependent names from non-dependent names. For
dependent names, we'll behave differently from Visual C++:
- For __if_exists/__if_not_exists at class scope, we'll just warn
and then ignore them.
- For __if_exists/__if_not_exists in statements, we'll treat the
inner statement as a compound statement, which we only instantiate
in templates where the dependent name (after instantiation)
exists. This behavior is different from VC++, but it's as close as
we can get without encroaching ridiculousness.
The latter part (dependent statements) is not yet implemented.
llvm-svn: 142864
the information on to Sema. There's still an incorrectness in the way template instantiation
works now, but that is due to a far larger underlying representational problem.
Also add a test case for various list initialization cases of scalars, which test this
commit as well as the previous one.
llvm-svn: 140460
Previously we would cut off the source file buffer at the code-completion
point; this impeded code-completion inside C++ inline methods and,
recently, with buffering ObjC methods.
Have the code-completion inserted into the source buffer so that it can
be buffered along with a method body. When we actually hit the code-completion
point the cut-off lexing or parsing.
Fixes rdar://10056932&8319466
llvm-svn: 139086
template<typename T> struct S { } f() { return 0; }
This case now produces a missing ';' diagnostic, since that seems like a much more likely error than an attempt to declare a function or variable in addition to the class template.
Treat this
llvm-svn: 135195
declaration, determine whether the declaration will end up declaring a
function using semantic criteria (e.g., it will have function type)
rather than purely syntactic criteria (e.g., it has the form of a
function declarator). Fixes <rdar://problem/9670557>.
llvm-svn: 133854
lifetime is well-known and restricted, cleaning them up manually is easy to miss and cause a leak.
Use it to plug the leaking of TemplateIdAnnotation objects. rdar://9634138.
llvm-svn: 133610
struct {
typedef int A = 0;
};
According to the C++11 standard, this is not ill-formed, but does not have any ascribed meaning. We can't reasonably accept it, so treat it as ill-formed.
Also switch C++ from an incorrect 'fields can only be initialized in constructors' diagnostic for this case to C's 'illegal initializer (only variables can be initialized)'
llvm-svn: 132890
type that turns one type into another. This is used as the basis to
implement __underlying_type properly - with TypeSourceInfo and proper
behavior in the face of templates.
llvm-svn: 132017
They are actually grammatically considered definitions and parsed
accordingly.
This fixes the outstanding bugs regarding defaulting functions after
their declarations.
We now really nicely diagnose the following construct (try it!)
int foo() = delete, bar;
Still todo: Defaulted functions other than default constructors
Test cases (including for the above construct)
llvm-svn: 131228
Explictly defaultedness is correctly reflected on the AST, but there are
no changes to how that affects the definition of functions or much else
really.
llvm-svn: 130974
parameters on the floor in certain cases:
class X {
template <typename T> friend typename A<T>::Foo;
};
This was parsed as a *non* template friend declaration some how, and
received an ExtWarn. Fixing the parser to actually provide the template
parameters to the freestanding declaration parse triggers the code which
specifically looks for such constructs and hard errors on them.
Along the way, this prevents us from trying to instantiate constructs
like the above inside of a outer template. This is important as loosing
the template parameters means we don't have a well formed declaration
and template instantiation will be unable to rebuild the AST. That fixes
a crash in the GCC test suite.
llvm-svn: 130772
Richard Smith