Basically a rebase of D104980; most of that patch had already happened
via gradual drive-by changes, but this finishes it up.
Don't touch the inclusions from `<__functional_base>`, `<__hash_table>`,
or `<__locale>`; those could be removed if we propagated the
inclusions up to the includers of those files, but there are lots
of those includers.
`<algorithm>`, `<functional>`, and `<memory>` already include `<utility>`
at the top level. `<iterator>` did not, so I've added it there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119020
var-const points out that `ranges::begin` is (non-normatively
but explicitly) always supposed to return a `std::input_or_output_iterator`,
and `Incomplete*` is not a `std::input_or_output_iterator` because it
has no `operator++`. Therefore, we should never return `Incomplete*`
from `ranges::begin(x)`, even when `x` is `Incomplete(&)[]`. Instead,
just SFINAE away.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118963
For some reason `<string>` defines `std::fpos`, which should be defined in `<ios>`.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118914
It looks like we added some checks to try and use builtin type traits
in https://reviews.llvm.org/D67900, but some of those type traits are
never implemented as builtins, so this is essentially dead code.
Fixes llvm-project#53569
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118923
Discovered in the comments on D118748: we would like this namespace
to exist anytime Ranges exists, regardless of whether concepts syntax
is supported. Also, we'd like to fully granularize the <ranges> header,
which means not putting any loose declarations at the top level.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118809
Remove the vector base class as suggested by @ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117108
As per [time.duration.cons]/1, the constructor constraint should be on
const Rep2&. As it is now the code will fail to compile in certain
cases, for example (https://godbolt.org/z/c7fPrcTYM):
struct S{
operator int() const&& noexcept = delete;
operator int() const& noexcept;
};
const S &fun();
auto k = std::chrono::microseconds{fun()};
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118902
Removing the base class of std::basic_string is not an ABI break, so we can remove any references to it from the header.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118733
Per Discord discussion, we're normalizing on a simple `!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)`
so that we can do a big search-and-replace for `!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)`
back into `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17` when we're ready to abandon support for concept-syntax-less
compilers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118748
There is no practical difference between `_VSTD` and `std` so we should just remove `_VSTD`. This is the first step.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: jeroen.dobbelaere, wmaxey, EricWF, lebedev.ri, __simt__, dim, mgrang, sstefan1, wenlei, smeenai, libcxx-commits, #libc_vendors
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117811
In D117811 @Quuxplusone pointed out the friend declarations don't need
to be qualified. Removing the qualification should avoid needing to add
a GCC work-around when changing _VSTD to std.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, philnik, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118719
With this patch there should be no more namespaces without closing comment
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118668
The old `__regex_word` aliased the mask for `xdigit`, causing stray
test failures.
The diff may look surprising, as if the previous faulty value had
been set specifically for Windows - but this is due to a restructuring
in 411c630bae. Prior to that, there
were OS specific settings for some OSes, and one fallback used for
the rest (which turns out to not work for Windows).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118188
As discovered in D117817, `std::ranges::input_range<Holder<Incomplete>*[10]>`
hard-errored before this patch. That's because `input_range` requires
`iter_rvalue_reference_t`, which requires `iter_move`, which was
not ADL-proofed.
Add ADL-proofing tests to all the range refinements.
`output_range` and `common_range` shouldn't be affected,
and all the others subsume `input_range` anyway, but we might as
well be thorough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118213
This includes an experimental workaround for
LWG3664 "LWG3392 broke std::ranges::distance(a, a+3)",
but the workaround may be incomplete, I'm not sure.
This should be re-audited when LWG3664 is actually adopted,
to see if we need to change anything about our implementation.
See also https://github.com/microsoft/STL/pull/2500
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117940
Each "Nothing To Do" issue only changed nits in the English wording,
not anything to do with the code.
Each "Complete" issue was completed already, as far as I can tell.
I tried to err on the side of caution: I didn't mark a few issues
whose P/Rs were very invasive and would take time to verify, and I
didn't mark a lot of issues involving features we haven't even started
yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117960
The macro that opts out of `std::ranges::` functionality is called
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`, and is unrelated to this macro
which is specifically about _compiler_ support for the _syntax_.
The only non-mechanical diff here is in `<__config>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118507
These were omitted in all Windows configurations, but it turns out
that they work just fine in MinGW mode.
This allows converting a couple cases of "XFAIL: LIBCXX-WINDOWS-FIXME"
into "XFAIL: msvc" as the bug is specific to MSVC mode (clang-cl).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118192
The tests for these are just copy-pasted from the tests for std::{strong,weak,partial}_order,
and then I added an extra clause in each (test_2()) to test the stuff that's not just the same
as std::*_order.
This also includes the fix for https://wg21.link/LWG3465 (which falls naturally out of the
"you must write it three times" style, but I've added test cases for it also).
There is an action item here to go back and give good diagnostics for SFINAE failures
in these CPOs. I've filed this as https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53456 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111514
On targets that have limited atomic support, e.g. ones that define
ATOMIC_*_LOCK_FREE to '1' ("sometimes lock free"), we would end up
referencing yet-undefined __libcpp_{,un}signed_lock_free.
This commit adds a guard to prevent these references for such
targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118391
In `ranges::advance(iter, n, bound)`, we'd incorrectly handle the case
where bound < iter and n is 0:
int a[10];
int *p = a+5;
int *bound = a+3;
std::ranges::advance(p, 0, bound);
assert(p - a == 5); // we'd return 3 before this patch
This was caused by an incorrect handling of 0 inside __magnitude_geq.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117240
We were missing a constraint in common_iterator's iterator_traits and
we were eagerly instantiating iter_value_t even when invalid.
Thanks to Casey Carter for finding this bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117449
Fixed in counted_iterator and transform_view::iterator.
The LWG issue also affected elements_view::iterator, but we haven't
implemented that one yet, and whoever does implement it will get
the fix for free if they just follow the working draft's wording.
Drive-by stop calling `.base()` on test iterators in the test,
and improve the transform_view::iterator/sentinel tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117329
Remove a bunch of LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG. This is the result of a
rabbithole to re-eliminate the workaround I introduced into
std::cref in D117953. It turns out that Clang's C++03 mode
(the only compiler we care about C++03 for) now supports all
the things we were originally eschewing via LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG;
we can fully support these reference_wrapper features in
C++03 mode, and un-XFAIL the relevant tests.
Drive-by constexprify a few more tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117974
https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3422
Also add a static_assert to check the "Mandates:" on the
iterator-pair constructor. Oddly, the `InputIterator` parameter
itself is merely preconditioned, not constrained, to satisfy the
input iterator requirements.
Also drive-by rename `init` to `__init`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117962
Remove `std::basic_string`'s base class in ABI version 2
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116334
Since basic_string::reserve(n) is instantiated in the shared library but also
available to the compiler for inlining, its definition should not depend on
things like the Standard mode in use. Indeed, that flag may not match between
how the shared library is compiled and how users are compiling their own code,
resulting in ODR violations.
However, note that we retain the behavior of basic_string::reserve() to
shrink the string for backwards compatibility reasons. While it would
technically be conforming to not shrink, we believe user expectation is
for it to shrink, and so existing code might have been written based on
that assumption. We prefer to not break such code, even though that makes
basic_string::reserve() and basic_string::reserve(0) not equivalent anymore.
Fixes llvm-project#53170
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117332
This adjust the version macro and sets it as completed. All parts of the paper
have been implemented, except for the parts replaced by later papers and
LWG-issues.
Adjusted the synopsis to match the synopsis in the Standard. Not yet
implemented parts of P2216 and P2418 still use the P0645 wording.
Completes:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D115991
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115999
This implements the handler according to P0645. P2418 changes the wording
in the Standard. That isn't implemented and requires changes in more
places. LWG3631 applies modifications to P2418, but is currently
unresolved.
Implements parts of:
* P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D115989
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115991
[format.formatter.spec]/5 lists the requirements for the default
formatter. The original implementation didn't implement this. This
implements the default formatter according to the Standard.
This adds additional test to validate the default formatter is disabled
and the required standard formatters are enabled.
While adding the tests it seems the formatters needed a constraint for the
character types they were valid for.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D115988
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115989
This implements the last required formatter specialization.
Completes:
- LWG 3251 Are std::format alignment specifiers applied to string arguments?
- LWG 3340 Formatting functions should throw on argument/format string mismatch in §[format.functions]
- LWG 3540 §[format.arg] There should be no const in basic_format_arg(const T* p)
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D114001
Reviewed By: ldionne, vitaut, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115988
This properly implements the formatter for floating-point types.
Completes:
- P1652R1 Printf corner cases in std::format
- LWG 3250 std::format: # (alternate form) for NaN and inf
- LWG 3243 std::format and negative zeroes
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, vitaut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114001
Implement LWG3549 by making `view_interface` not inherit from `view_base`. Types
are still views if they have a public and unambiguous derivation from
`view_interface`, so adjust the `enable_view` machinery as such to account for
that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117714
This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<unordered_set>`.
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117917
This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<unordered_map>`.
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117393
This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<unordered_map>`.
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117393
It was not in P0355R7, nor has it ever been so in a working draft.
Drive-by:
* tests should test something: fix loop bounds so initial value is not >= final value
* calender type streaming tests are useless - let's remove them
* don't declare printf, especially if you don't intend to use it
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117638
As prefigured in the comments on D115315.
This gives us one unified style for all niebloids,
and also simplifies the modulemap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116570
... it's easier to suppress warnings internally, where we can detect the compiler.
* Rename `TEST_COMPILER_C1XX` to `TEST_COMPILER_MSVC`
* Rename all `TEST_WORKAROUND_C1XX_<meow>` to `TEST_WORKAROUND_MSVC_<meow>`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117422
`T` is not a valid identifier for libc++ to use, use `_Tp` instead. Caught from D116957
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117582
This change is the basis for a further refactoring where I'm going to
split up the various implementations we have in __threading_support to
make that code easier to understand.
Note that I had to make __convert_to_timespec a template to break
circular dependencies. Concretely, we never seem to use it with anything
other than ::timespec, but I am wary of hardcoding that assumption as
part of this change, since I suspect there's a reason for going through
these hoops in the first place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116944
This essentially reverts e02ed1c255 and puts in a new fix, which makes `path::iterator`
a true C++20 `bidirectional_iterator`, but downgrades it to an `input_iterator` in C++17.
Fixes#37852.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116489
Force semicolons or remove them in `experimental/simd`
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, miyuki
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117157
The aim of this patch is to break up the larger patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/D111323) to be more upstream friendly. In particular, this patch adds the char encoding sensitive changes but does not use inline namespaces as before. The use of namespaces to build both versions of the library, and localization of error messages will follow in a subsequent patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114813
I didn't split the calendar bits more than this because there was little
benefit to doing it, and I know our calendar support is incomplete.
Whoever picks up the missing calendar bits can organize these headers
at their leisure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116965
Also remove some bogus `std::forward`s. My impression is that these
forwards were actually harmless, because `ranges::begin(FWD(t))` is
always identical to `ranges::begin(t)` (except when it's ill-formed,
and that can't happen in this case). However, they're also superfluous
and don't reflect the wording in the standard, so let's eliminate them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117043
On Apple platforms, arc4random is faster than /dev/urandom, and it is
the recommended user-space RNG according to Apple's own OS folks.
This commit adds an ABI switch to guard ABI-break-protections in
std::random_device, and starts using arc4random instead of /dev/urandom
to implement std::random_device on Apple platforms.
Note that previously, `std::random_device` would allow passing a custom
token to its constructor, and that token would be interpreted as the name
of a file to read entropy from. This was implementation-defined and
undocumented. After this change, Apple platforms will be using arc4random()
instead, and any custom token passed to the constructor will be ignored.
This behavioral change will also impact other platforms that use the
arc4random() implementation, such as OpenBSD. This should be fine since
that is effectively a relaxation of the constructor's requirements.
rdar://86638350
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116045
Introduce `__fits_in_sso()` to put the constexpr tests into a central place.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116487
There are a lot of
```
#if _LIBCPP_DEBUG_LEVEL == 2
__get_db()->__insert_c(this);
#endif
```
This patch introduces `__debug_db_insert_c()` to put the `#if` in one central place.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116947
The NFC part of D116809. We still want to enforce this in CI,
but the mechanism for that is still to-be-determined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116809
Before this patch, the user needed to specialize both of
`is_placeholder<MyType>` and `is_placeholder<const MyType>`.
After this patch, only the former is needed (although the
latter is harmless if provided).
The new tests don't actually fail unless return type deduction
is used, which is a C++14 feature. Specializing `is_placeholder`
is still allowed in C++11, though.
Fixes#51095.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116388
The reason for those nested namespaces is explained in D115315:
> AIUI, this keeps the CPO's own type from ADL'ing into the `std::ranges`
> namespace; e.g. `foobar(std::ranges::uninitialized_default_construct)`
> should not consider `std::ranges::foobar` a candidate, even if
> `std::ranges::foobar` is not a CPO itself. Also, of course, consistency
> (Chesterton's Fence, the economist's hundred-dollar bill): if it were
> safe to omit the namespace, we'd certainly want to do it everywhere,
> not just here.
This makes these three niebloids more consistent with the other Ranges
niebloids we've already implemented, such as the `ranges::begin` group
and the `ranges::uninitialized_default_construct` group.
FWIW, we still have three different indentation-and-comment styles
among these three groups.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116569
This reverts commit 640beb38e7.
That commit caused performance degradtion in Quicksilver test QS:sGPU and a functional test failure in (rocPRIM rocprim.device_segmented_radix_sort).
Reverting until we have a better solution to s_cselect_b64 codegen cleanup
Change-Id: Ibf8e397df94001f248fba609f072088a46abae08
Reviewed By: kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115960
Change-Id: Id169459ce4dfffa857d5645a0af50b0063ce1105
The fix in D116381 makes an existing exception message wrong. This
improves the message and fixes the associated unit tests.
Note other message can be also be improved, but that will be done later.
Changing these messages may cause merge conflicts with other patches
that are under review or WIP.
Depends on D116381
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116495
@CaseyCarter reported that the tests for the std-format-spec rejects leading
zeroes for precision, which the Standard does not require. The Standard allows
them. Only for precision, not for the width or an arg-id.
Fixes the precision parser and adds some test for the arg-id since they
were missing.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116381
Remove duplicate header includes from `<algorithm>` and reorder the includes
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, Mordante, #libc, jloser
Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116507
`__cpp_lib_type_identity` was implemented way back in cf49ccd0 (Clang 8),
probably before the feature-test macro had been settled on.
`__cpp_lib_string_resize_and_overwrite` will be added by D113013 so I didn't add it here.
Fixes#46605.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116433
For example, `std::ranges::range<Holder<Incomplete>*>` should be
well-formed false, not a hard error at compile time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116239
The big change here is that they now work as intended for rvalues,
e.g. `ranges::cbegin(std::string_view("hello"))`.
Also, add tests verifying their return types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116199
If `__first == __middle`, then `partial_sort` is a no-op; don't
bother to iterate all the way from `__middle` to `__end`.
Fixes#49431.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116296
Some headers which require the version header depend on other headers to
provide it. Include the version header in all top-level headers to make
sure a header cleanup can't remove the version header.
Note this doesn't add the version header to the c headers.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116172
Use the zx_cprng_draw system call directly rather than going
through the libc getentropy function. The libc function is a
trivial wrapper around the system call, and is not a standard C
function. Avoiding it reduces the Fuchsia libc ABI surface that
libc++ depends on.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116498
We didn't support noop_coroutine for GCC in previous conforming patch.
So that GCC couldn't use noop_coroutine() defined in <coroutine>. And
after this patch, GCC should be able to compile the whole <coroutine>
header.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116144
It was missing the cast to `bool` in `bool(__t.empty())`.
It was wrongly using `std::forward` in some places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115312
During the review of D115991 @vitaut pointed out the enum shouldn't
depend on whether or not _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INT128 is defined. The current
implementation lets the enum's ABI depend on this configuration option
without a good cause.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116120
These headers have stabilized; we don't expect anyone to be
blindly clang-formatting them anymore.
Leave the comments in `__format/*.h` for Mark to remove at his leisure.
Clang is gaining `auto(x)` support in D113393; sadly there
seems to be no feature-test macro for it. Zhihao is opening
a core issue for that macro.
Use `_LIBCPP_AUTO_CAST` where C++20 specifies we should use `auto(x)`;
stop using `__decay_copy(x)` in those places.
In fact, remove `__decay_copy` entirely. As of C++20, it's purely
a paper specification tool signifying "Return just `x`, but it was
perfect-forwarded, so we understand you're going to have to call
its move-constructor sometimes." I believe there's no reason we'd
ever need to do its operation explicitly in code.
This heisenbugs away a test failure on MinGW; see D112214.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115686
As discussed with ldionne. The problem with this static_assert
is that it makes ranges::begin a pitfall for anyone ever to use
inside a constraint or decltype. Many Ranges things, such as ranges::size,
are specified as "Does X if X is well-formed, or else Y if Y is well-formed,
or else `ranges::end(t) - ranges::begin(t)` if that is well-formed, or else..."
And if there's a static_assert hidden inside `ranges::begin(t)`, then you get
a hard error as soon as you ask the question -- even if the answer would have
been "no, that's not well-formed"!
Constraining on `requires { t + 0; }` or `requires { t + N; }` is verboten
because of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103700 . For ranges::begin,
we can just decay to a pointer even in the incomplete-type case. For ranges::end,
we can safely constrain on `sizeof(*t)`. Yes, this means that an array of incomplete
type has a `ranges::begin` but no `ranges::end`... just like an unbounded array of
complete type. This is a valid manifestation of IFNDR.
All of the new libcxx/test/std/ cases are mandatory behavior, as far as I'm aware.
Tests for the IFNDR cases in ranges::begin and ranges::end remain in `libcxx/test/libcxx/`.
The similar tests for ranges::empty and ranges::data were simply wrong, AFAIK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115838
This is similar to the existing setting LIBCXX_ABI_DEFINES, with
the difference that this also allows setting other defines than
ones that start with "_LIBCPP_ABI_", and allows setting defines
to a specific value.
This allows avoiding using LIBCXX_TEST_COMPILER_FLAGS in two
CI configurations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116109
Allow `__move_constexpr` to work with unrelated pointers and `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` that `__copy_constexpr`, `__move_constexpr` and `__assign_constexpr` are only run during constant evaluation
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115986
When P0883R2 was initially implemented in D103769 #pragma clang deprecated didn't exist yet.
We also forgot to cleanup usages in libc++ itself.
This takes care of both.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115995
__transaction is a helper class that allows rolling back code in case an
exception is thrown. The main goal is to reduce the clutter when code
needs to be guarded with `#if _LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115730
Also:
- refactor out `__voidify`;
- use the `destroy` algorithm internally;
- refactor out helper classes used in tests for `uninitialized_*`
algorithms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115626
The inline keyword is required on those functions because they are defined
in the headers, so we need them to be inline to avoid ODR violations.
While we're at it, slap _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI on them because they are
implementation details and we don't want them to be part of our ABI under
any circumstances.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115906
GCC currently does not allow `__builtin_strlen()` during constant evaluation. This PR adds a workaround in `std::char_traits<char>::length()`
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, #libc, Mordante
Spies: Mordante, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115795
However, there's a problem on both GCC and Clang: they can't mangle
`__is_same(T,U)` if it appears anywhere that affects mangling. That's
a hard error. And it turns out that GCC puts dependent return types
into the mangling more aggressively than Clang, so for GCC's benefit
we need to avoid using raw `_IsSame` in the return type of
`swap(tuple&, tuple&)`. Therefore, make `__all` into a named type
instead of an alias.
If we ever need to support a compiler without the __is_same builtin,
we can make this an alias template for `is_same<T,U>::type`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115100
Use `_LIBCPP_DEBUG_ASSERT` instead of `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` and guarding it with `LIBCPP_DEBUG_LEVEL == 2`
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115765
Defined in [`specialized.algorithms`](wg21.link/specialized.algorithms).
Also:
- refactor the existing non-range implementation so that most of it
can be shared between the range-based and non-range-based algorithms;
- remove an existing test for the non-range version of
`uninitialized_default_construct{,_n}` that likely triggered undefined
behavior (it read the values of built-ins after default-initializing
them, essentially reading uninitialized memory).
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115315
As explained in https://stackoverflow.com/a/70339311/627587, the fact
that shrink_to_fit wasn't defined as inline lead to issues when explicitly
instantiating basic_string. While explicit instantiations are always
somewhat brittle, this one was clearly a bug on our end.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115656
When `a` was an array type, `__decay_copy(a)` was incorrectly marking itself
noexcept(false), because it is false that `int[10]` is nothrow convertible to `int[10]`
(in fact it is not convertible at all).
We have no tests explicitly for `__decay_copy`, but the new ranges::begin
and ranges::end tests fail before this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115658
Just defensive CMake-ing. I pulled this from D115544 and D99484 which
are blocked on some lldb CI failures I don't yet understand. Hoping to land
something smaller in the meantime.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115566
Microsoft would like to contribute its implementation of floating-point to_chars to libc++. This uses the impossibly fast Ryu and Ryu Printf algorithms invented by Ulf Adams at Google. Upstream repos: https://github.com/microsoft/STL and https://github.com/ulfjack/ryu .
Licensing notes: MSVC's STL is available under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exception, intentionally chosen to match libc++. We've used Ryu under the Boost Software License.
This patch contains minor changes from Jorg Brown at Google, to adapt the code to libc++. He verified that it works in Google's Linux-based environment, but then I applied more changes on top of his, so any compiler errors are my fault. (I haven't tried to build and test libc++ yet.) Please tell me if we need to do anything else in order to follow https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#attribution-of-changes .
Notes:
* libc++'s integer charconv is unchanged (except for a small refactoring). MSVC's integer charconv hasn't been tuned for performance yet, so you're not missing anything.
* Floating-point from_chars isn't part of this patch because Jorg found that MSVC's implementation (derived from our CRT's strtod) was slower than Abseil's. If you're unable to use Abseil or another implementation due to licensing or technical considerations, Microsoft would be delighted if you used MSVC's from_chars (and you can just take it, or ask us to provide a patch like this). Ulf is also working on a novel algorithm for from_chars.
* This assumes that float is IEEE 32-bit, double is IEEE 64-bit, and long double is also IEEE 64-bit.
* I have added MSVC's charconv tests (the whole thing: integer/floating from_chars/to_chars), but haven't adapted them to libcxx's harness at all. (These tests will be available in the microsoft/STL repo soon.)
* Jorg added int128 codepaths. These were originally present in upstream Ryu, and I removed them from microsoft/STL purely for performance reasons (MSVC doesn't support int128; Clang on Windows does, but I found that x64 intrinsics were slightly faster).
* The implementation is split into 3 headers. In MSVC's STL, charconv contains only Microsoft-written code. xcharconv_ryu.h contains code derived from Ryu (with significant modifications and additions). xcharconv_ryu_tables.h contains Ryu's large lookup tables (they were sufficiently large to make editing inconvenient, hence the separate file). The xmeow.h convention is MSVC's for internal headers; you may wish to rename them.
* You should consider separately compiling the lookup tables (see https://github.com/microsoft/STL/issues/172 ) for compiler throughput and reduced object file size.
* See https://github.com/StephanTLavavej/llvm-project/commits/charconv for fine-grained history. (If necessary, I can perform some rebase surgery to show you what Jorg changed relative to the microsoft/STL repo; currently that's all fused into the first commit.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70631
Use `= delete` for member functions that are marked with `// = delete;`
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc
Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115291
In addition to being more consistent with our approach for helpers, this
solves an actual issue where <cmath> was using numeric_limits but never
including the <limits> header directly. In a normal setup, this is not
an issue because the <math.h> header included by <cmath> does include
<limits>. However, I did stumble upon some code where that didn't work,
most likely because they were placing their own <math.h> header in front
of ours. I didn't bother investigating further.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115282
clang has `= default` as an extension in c++03, so just use it.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115275
Before this patch, the new test's `CountedInvocable<int*, int*>`
would hard-error instead of SFINAEing and cleanly returning false.
Notice that views::counted specifically does NOT work with pipes;
`counted(42)` is ill-formed. This is because `counted`'s first argument
is supposed to be an iterator, not a range.
Also, mark `views::counted(it, n)` as [[nodiscard]], and test that.
(We have a general policy now that range adaptors are consistently
marked [[nodiscard]], so that people don't accidentally think that
they have side effects. This matters mostly for `reverse` and
`transform`, arguably `drop`, and just generally let's be consistent.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115177
I assume nobody ever uses std::string_view::max_size() outside of
testing. However, we should still return a value that is based on
something with a reasonable rationale. Previously, we would forget
to take into account the size of the character type stored in the
string, and this patch takes that into account.
Thanks to @mclow.lists for pointing out this issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114395
Clang trunk rejects the new test case, but this is a Clang bug
(PR47414, 47509, 50864, 44833).
```
In module 'std' imported from /Users/aodwyer/llvm-project/libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.transform/general.pass.cpp:17:
/Users/aodwyer/llvm-project/build2/include/c++/v1/__ranges/transform_view.h:85:44: error: constraints not satisfied for alias template 'range_reference_t' [with _Rp = const NonConstView]
regular_invocable<const _Fn&, range_reference_t<const _View>>
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/Users/aodwyer/llvm-project/build2/include/c++/v1/__ranges/transform_view.h:416:25: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::ranges::transform_view<NonConstView, (lambda at /Users/aodwyer/llvm-project/libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.transform/general.pass.cpp:73:71)>' requested here
-> decltype( transform_view(_VSTD::forward<_Range>(__range), _VSTD::forward<_Fn>(__f)))
^
```
We can work around this by adding a layer of indirection: put the
problematic constraint into a named concept and Clang becomes more
amenable to SFINAE'ing instead of hard-erroring.
Drive-by simplify `range.transform/general.pass.cpp` to make it clearer
what it's actually testing in this area.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115116
As discussed on the Discord, 2021-12-01 through 2021-12-05.
Our new consistent style for this is "don't align the right-braces"
(but still align the left-braces, as shown).
Microsoft would like to contribute its implementation of floating-point to_chars to libc++. This uses the impossibly fast Ryu and Ryu Printf algorithms invented by Ulf Adams at Google. Upstream repos: https://github.com/microsoft/STL and https://github.com/ulfjack/ryu .
Licensing notes: MSVC's STL is available under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exception, intentionally chosen to match libc++. We've used Ryu under the Boost Software License.
This patch contains minor changes from Jorg Brown at Google, to adapt the code to libc++. He verified that it works in Google's Linux-based environment, but then I applied more changes on top of his, so any compiler errors are my fault. (I haven't tried to build and test libc++ yet.) Please tell me if we need to do anything else in order to follow https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#attribution-of-changes .
Notes:
* libc++'s integer charconv is unchanged (except for a small refactoring). MSVC's integer charconv hasn't been tuned for performance yet, so you're not missing anything.
* Floating-point from_chars isn't part of this patch because Jorg found that MSVC's implementation (derived from our CRT's strtod) was slower than Abseil's. If you're unable to use Abseil or another implementation due to licensing or technical considerations, Microsoft would be delighted if you used MSVC's from_chars (and you can just take it, or ask us to provide a patch like this). Ulf is also working on a novel algorithm for from_chars.
* This assumes that float is IEEE 32-bit, double is IEEE 64-bit, and long double is also IEEE 64-bit.
* I have added MSVC's charconv tests (the whole thing: integer/floating from_chars/to_chars), but haven't adapted them to libcxx's harness at all. (These tests will be available in the microsoft/STL repo soon.)
* Jorg added int128 codepaths. These were originally present in upstream Ryu, and I removed them from microsoft/STL purely for performance reasons (MSVC doesn't support int128; Clang on Windows does, but I found that x64 intrinsics were slightly faster).
* The implementation is split into 3 headers. In MSVC's STL, charconv contains only Microsoft-written code. xcharconv_ryu.h contains code derived from Ryu (with significant modifications and additions). xcharconv_ryu_tables.h contains Ryu's large lookup tables (they were sufficiently large to make editing inconvenient, hence the separate file). The xmeow.h convention is MSVC's for internal headers; you may wish to rename them.
* You should consider separately compiling the lookup tables (see https://github.com/microsoft/STL/issues/172 ) for compiler throughput and reduced object file size.
* See https://github.com/StephanTLavavej/llvm-project/commits/charconv for fine-grained history. (If necessary, I can perform some rebase surgery to show you what Jorg changed relative to the microsoft/STL repo; currently that's all fused into the first commit.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70631
Implement the exposition-only concepts specified in
`[special.mem.concepts]`. These are all thin wrappers over other
concepts.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114761
Implement P1989R2 which adds a range constructor for `string_view`.
Adjust `operator/=` in `path` to avoid atomic constraints caching issue
getting provoked from this PR.
Add defaulted template argument to `string_view`'s "sufficient
overloads" to avoid mangling issues in `clang-cl` builds. It is a
MSVC mangling bug that this works around.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113161
`__wrap_iter` is currently only constexpr if it's not a debug built, but it isn't used in a constexpr context currently. Making it always constexpr and disabling the debugging utilities at constant evaluation is more usful since it has to be always constexpr to be used in a constexpr context.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114733
Disable the constructors taking `(size_type, const value_type&,
allocator_type)` if `allocator_type` is not a valid allocator.
Otherwise, these constructors are considered when resolving e.g.
`(int*, int*, NotAnAllocator())`, leading to a hard error during
instantiation. A hard error makes the Standard's requirement to not
consider deduction guides of the form `(Iterator, Iterator,
BadAllocator)` during overload resolution essentially non-functional.
The previous approach was to SFINAE away `allocator_traits`. This patch
SFINAEs away the specific constructors instead, for consistency with
`basic_string` -- see [LWG3076](wg21.link/lwg3076) which describes
a very similar problem for strings (note, however, that unlike LWG3076,
no valid constructor call is affected by the bad instantiation).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114311
This removes the `format_args_t` from `<format>` and adjusts the type of
the `format_args` for the `vformat_to` overloads.
The `format_context` uses a `back_insert_iterator<string>` therefore the
new `output_iterator` function uses a `string` as its temporary storage
buffer. This isn't ideal. The next patches in this series will improve
this. These improvements make it easy to also improve `format_to_n` and
`formatted_size`.
This addresses P2216 `6. Binary size`.
P2216 `5. Compile-time checks` are not part of this change.
Implements parts of:
- P2216 std::format improvements
Depends on D103670
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110494
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR51520. The problem is that `uniform_int_distribution`
currently uses an unsigned integer with at most 64 bits internally, which
is then casted to the desired result type. If the result type is `int64_t`,
this will produce a negative number if the most significant bit is set,
but if the result type is `__int128_t`, the value remains non-negative
and will be out of bounds for the example in PR#51520. (The reason why
it also seems to work if the upper or lower bound is changed is
because the branch at [1] will then no longer be taken, and proper
rejection sampling takes place.)
The bigger issue here is probably that `uniform_int_distribution` can be
instantiated with `__int128_t` but will silently produce incorrect results
(only the lowest 64 bits can ever be set). libstdc++ also supports `__int128_t`
as a result type, so I have simply extended the maximum width of the
internal intermediate result type.
[1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/6d28dffb6/libcxx/include/__random/uniform_int_distribution.h#L266-L267
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114129
We only support Clangs that implement nullptr as an extension in C++03 mode,
and we don't support GCC in C++03 mode. Hence, this patch disables the
use of the std::nullptr_t emulation in C++03 mode by default. Doing that
is technically an ABI break since it changes the mangling for std::nullptr_t.
However:
(1) The only affected users are those compiling in C++03 mode that have
std::nullptr_t as part of their ABI, which should be reasonably rare.
(2) Those users already have a lingering problem in that their code will
be incompatible in C++03 and C++11 modes because of that very ABI break.
Hence, the only users that could really be inconvenienced about this
change is those that planned on compiling in C++03 mode forever - for
other users, we're just breaking them now instead of letting them break
themselves later on when they try to upgrade to C++11.
(3) The ABI break will cause a linker error since the mangling changed,
and will not result in an obscure runtime error.
Furthermore, if anyone is broken by this, they can define the
_LIBCPP_ABI_USE_CXX03_NULLPTR_EMULATION macro to return to the
previous behavior. We will then remove that macro after shipping
this for one release if we haven't seen widespread issues.
Concretely, the motivation for making this change is to make our own ABI
consistent in C++03 and C++11 modes and to remove complexity around the
definition of nullptr.
Furthermore, we could investigate making nullptr a keyword in C++03 mode
as a Clang extension -- I don't think that would break anyone, since
libc++ already defines nullptr as a macro to something else. Only users
that do not use libc++ and compile in C++03 mode could potentially be
broken by that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109459
I encountered this while reviewing an unrelated patch. Will land after
the CI passes.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114673
-Wformat-nonliteral was turned on in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112927,
however we forgot to apply some __format__ attributes in Linux specific
code paths, which led to warnings when building on Linux. This patch
addresses that oversight.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113876
This patch implements operator<=> for std::reverse_iterator and
also adds a test that checks that three-way comparison of different
instantiations of std::reverse_iterator works as expected (related to
D113417).
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113695
Rework `std::filesystem::path::operator==` and friends to avoid overload
resolution and atomic constraint caching issues shown from
https://reviews.llvm.org/D113161.
Always call `__compare(string_view)` from the comparison operators which avoids
overload resolution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114570
The `string_view` constructor taking an iterator/sentinel uses concepts
instead of type traits like the Standard states. Using `same_as` instead
of `is_same_v` should be harmless. Prefer `std::is_same_v` instead which is
cheaper to compile. Replace `convertible_to` with `is_convertible_v` as
well.
This observation came up while working on
https://reviews.llvm.org/D113161
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114561
According to the C++ standard, the stored pointer and the stored deleter
should be value-initialized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113612
In 1fa27f2a10, we made <filesystem>'s iterator types model concepts
from <ranges>, but we forgot to add the appropriate availability
annotations. This broke back-deployment to platforms that don't have
<filesystem> for which we have availability annotations.
For some reason, this wasn't caught by our back-deployment CI.
I believe this is due to the fact that we use a slightly older
compiler in the CI, and perhaps that compiler does not honour
our `#pragma clang attribute push` properly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114456
This does not include `std::compare_*_fallback`; those are coming later.
There's still an open question of how to implement std::strong_order
for `long double`, which has 80 value bits and 48 padding bits on x86-64,
and which is presumably *not* IEEE 754-compliant on PPC64 and so on.
So that part is left unimplemented.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110738
Actually there's one functional change here, which is that users can
no longer depend on <random> to include all of C++20 <concepts>. That
inclusion is so new that we believe nobody should be depending on it
yet, even in the presence of Hyrum's Law. We keep the includes of <vector>,
<algorithm>, etc., so as not to break pre-C++20 Hyrum's Law users.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114281
This is not mandated by the standard, so it goes in libcxx/test/libcxx/.
It's certainly arguable that the algorithms changed here
(`is_heap`, `is_sorted`, `min`, `max`) are harmless and we should
just let them copy their comparators once. But at the same time,
it's nice to have all our algorithms be 100% consistent and never
copy a comparator, not even once.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114136
We would have been defining it in <utility> instead of <charconv>. For
the time being, this doesn't change anything since we don't implement
the feature test macro anyways.
Also, as a fly-by, this removes obsolete feature test macro tests. There
was a brief time back in the days when we wrote feature test macro tests
manually. In particular, we had test files for __cpp_lib_to_chars and
__cpp_lib_memory_resource. Since we now have a principled way of generating
these tests with scripts, this commit removes the obsolete (and empty)
tests for these two feature test macros.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114243
std::atomic is, for the most part, just a thin veneer on top of compiler
builtins. Hence, it should be available even when threads are not available
on the system, and in fact there has been requests for such support.
This patch:
- Moves __libcpp_thread_poll_with_backoff to its own header so it can
be used in <atomic> when threads are disabled.
- Adds a dummy backoff policy for atomic polling that doesn't know about
threads.
- Adjusts the <atomic> feature-test macros so they are provided even when
threads are disabled.
- Runs the <atomic> tests when threads are disabled.
rdar://77873569
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114109
We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.
- Replace irrelevant synopsis by a comment
- Use a .verify.cpp test instead of .compile.fail.cpp
- Remove unnecessary includes in one of the tests (was a copy-paste error)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114094
This effort is dedicated to deflake the tests of the users which depend
on the unspecified behavior of algorithms and containers. This also
might help updating the sorting algorithm in libcxx which has the
quadratic worst case in the future or at least create a new one under
flag.
For detailed design, please see the design doc I provide in the patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96946
However, whether applications rely on the std::bad_function_call vtable
being in the dylib is still controlled by the ABI macro, since changing
that would be an ABI break.
Also separate preprocessor definitions for whether to use a key function
and whether to use a `bad_function_call`-specific `what` message
(`what` message is mandated by [LWG2233](http://wg21.link/LWG2233)).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92397
The return type of the deleted functions doesn't match the synopsis in
the standard.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114000
Places `format_to_n_result` to its own file. While working on D112361 it
turns out the type will be used outside the format header.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113831
This patch fixes the warnings which shows up when libcxx library started to be compiled in 32-bit mode on z/OS.
More specifically, the assignment from unsigned int to time_t aka long was flags as follows:
```
libcxx/include/c++/v1/__support/ibm/nanosleep.h:31:11: warning: implicit conversion changes signedness: 'unsigned int' to 'time_t' (aka 'long') [-Wsign-conversion]
__sec = sleep(static_cast<unsigned int>(__sec));
~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
libcxx/include/c++/v1/__support/ibm/nanosleep.h:36:36: warning: implicit conversion changes signedness: 'unsigned int' to 'long' [-Wsign-conversion]
__rem->tv_nsec = __micro_sec * 1000;
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
libcxx/include/c++/v1/__support/ibm/nanosleep.h:47:36: warning: implicit conversion changes signedness: 'unsigned int' to 'long' [-Wsign-conversion]
__rem->tv_nsec = __micro_sec * 1000;
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
3 warnings generated.
```
Here is a small test case illustrating the issue:
```
typedef long time_t ;
unsigned int sleep(unsigned int );
int main() {
time_t sec = 0;
#ifdef FIX
sec = static_cast<time_t>(sleep(static_cast<unsigned int>(sec)));
#else
sec = sleep(static_cast<unsigned int>(sec));
#endif
}
```
clang++ -c -Wsign-conversion -m32 t.C
```
t.C:8:9: warning: implicit conversion changes signedness: 'unsigned int' to 'time_t' (aka 'long') [-Wsign-conversion]
sec = sleep(static_cast<unsigned int>(sec));
~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Quuxplusone, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112837
Since coroutine is merged in C++ standard and the support for coroutine
seems relatively stable. It's the time to move the implementation of
coroutine out of the experimental directory and the std::experimental
namespace. This patch creates header <coroutine> with conformed
implementation with C++ standard. To avoid breaking user's code too
fast, the <experimental/coroutine> header is remained. Note that
<experimental/coroutine> is deprecated and it would be removed in
LLVM15.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109433
The template std::is_assignable<T, U> checks that T is assignable from
U. Hence, the order of operands in the instantiation of
std::is_assignable in the std::reverse_iterator::operator= condition
should be reversed.
This issue remained unnoticed because std::reverse_iterator has an
implicit conversion constructor. This patch adds a test to check that
the assignment operator is used directly, without any implicit
conversions. The patch also adds a similar test for
std::move_iterator.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113417
Right now we drop the char_traits template argument, which presumes that
string<_CharT, _Traits> and string<_CharT> are interchangeable.
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112017
This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<list>`.
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112654
This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<forward_list>`.
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112660
Using user-provided data as a format string is a well known source of
security vulnerabilities. For this reason, it is a good idea to compile
our code with -Wformat-nonliteral, which basically warns if a non-constant
string is used as a format specifier. This is the compiler’s best signal
that a format string call may be insecure.
I audited the code after adding the warning and made sure that the few
places where we used a non-literal string as a format string were not
potential security issues. I either disabled the warning locally for
those instances or fixed the warning by using a literal. The idea is
that after we add the warning to the build, any new use of a non-literal
string in a format string will trigger a diagnostic, and we can either
get rid of it or disable the warning locally, which is a way of
acknowledging that it has been audited.
I also looked into enabling it in the test suite, which would perhaps
allow finding additional instances of it in our headers, however that
is not possible at the moment because Clang doesn't support putting
__attribute__((__format__(...))) on variadic templates, which would
be needed.
rdar://84571685
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112927
Deduction guides for containers should not participate in overload
resolution when called with certain incorrect types (e.g. when called
with a template argument in place of an `InputIterator` that doesn't
qualify as an input iterator). Similarly, class template argument
deduction should not select `unique_ptr` constructors that take a
a pointer.
The tests try out every possible incorrect parameter (but never more
than one incorrect parameter in the same invocation).
Also add deduction guides to the synopsis for associative and unordered
containers (this was accidentally omitted from [D112510](https://reviews.llvm.org/D112510)).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112904
`__vector_base` exists for historical reasons and cannot be eliminated
entirely without breaking the ABI. Member variables are left
untouched -- this patch only does changes that clearly cannot affect the
ABI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112976
However, whether applications rely on the std::bad_function_call vtable
being in the dylib is still controlled by the ABI macro, since changing
that would be an ABI break.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92397
Before this patch, `try_acquire` blocks instead of returning false.
This is because `__libcpp_thread_poll_with_backoff` interprets zero
as meaning infinite, causing `try_acquire` to wait indefinitely.
Thanks to Pablo Busse (pabusse) for the patch!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98334
These can't be made constexpr-constructible (constinit'able),
so they aren't C++20-conforming. Also, the platform versions are
going to be bigger than the atomic/futex version, so we'd have
the awkward situation that `semaphore<42>` could be bigger than
`semaphore<43>`, and that's just silly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110110
These are not standard methods, neither libstdc++ nor MSVC STL provide
them.
In practice, one of them was untested and the other one was only used in
one single test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113027
I was going to make a change in that area of the code and I noticed that
we basically duplicated the same code 5 times to handle integral types
and floating point types. This commit simply pulls the duplication into
a function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112830
Since we no longer officially support Clang 11 remove the work-arounds
for this version.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112727
Some types that inherit from `view_interface` do not meet the
preconditions. This came up during discussion
in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112631. Currently, the behavior is IFNDR,
but the preconditions can be easily checked, so let's do so.
In particular, we know each public member function calls the
`__derived()` private function, so we can do the check there. We
intentionally do it as a `static_assert` instead of a `requires` clause
to avoid hard erroring in some cases, such as with incomplete types. An
example hard error is:
```
llvm-project/build/include/c++/v1/__ranges/view_interface.h:48:14: note: because 'sizeof(_Tp)' would be invalid: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'MoveOnlyForwardRange'
requires { sizeof(_Tp); } &&
^
llvm-project/build/include/c++/v1/__ranges/view_interface.h:73:26: error: no matching member function for call to '__derived'
return ranges::begin(__derived()) == ranges::end(__derived());
^~~~~~~~~
llvm-project/libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.utility/view.interface/view.interface.pass.cpp:187:31: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::ranges::view_interface<MoveOnlyForwardRange>::empty<Mov
eOnlyForwardRange>' requested here
assert(!std::move(moveOnly).empty());
```
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112665
`is_error_condition_enum_v` and `is_error_code_enum_v` are currently of
type `size_t`, but the standard mandates they are of type `bool`.
This is an ABI break technically since the size of these variable
templates has changed. Document it as such in the release notes.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50755
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc, var-const
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112553
Add deduction guides to `valarray` and `scoped_allocator_adaptor`. This largely
finishes implementation of the paper:
* deduction guides for other classes mentioned in the paper were
implemented previously (see the list below);
* deduction guides for several classes contained in the proposal
(`reference_wrapper`, `lock_guard`, `scoped_lock`, `unique_lock`,
`shared_lock`) were removed by [LWG2981](https://wg21.link/LWG2981).
Also add deduction guides to the synopsis for the few classes (e.g. `pair`)
where they were missing.
The only part of the paper that isn't fully implemented after this patch is
making sure certain deduction guides don't participate in overload resolution
when given incorrect template parameters.
List of significant commits implementing the other parts of P0433 (omitting some
minor fixes):
* [pair](af65856eec)
* [basic_string](6d9f750dec)
* [array](0ca8c0895c)
* [deque](dbb6f8a817)
* [forward_list](e076700b77)
* [list](4a227e582b)
* [vector](df8f754792)
* [queue/stack/priority_queue](5b8b8b5dce)
* [basic_regex](edd5e29cfe)
* [optional](f35b4bc395)
* [map/multimap](edfe8525de)
* [set/multiset](e20865c387)
* [unordered_set/unordered_multiset](296a80102a)
* [unordered_map/unordered_multimap](dfcd4384cb)
* [function](e1eabcdfad)
* [tuple](1308011e1b)
* [shared_ptr/weak_ptr](83564056d4)
Additional notes:
* It was revision 2 of the paper that was voted into the Standard.
P0433R3 is a separate paper that is not part of the Standard.
* The paper also mandates removing several `make_*_searcher` functions
(e.g. `make_boyer_moore_searcher`) which are currently not implemented
(except in `experimental/`).
* The `__cpp_lib_deduction_guides` feature test macro from the paper was
accidentally omitted from the Standard.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112510
This is going to be necessary to implement some range adaptors.
As a fly-by fix, rename _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI
and remove a redundant inline keyword.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112650
Mark LWG2731 as complete. The type alias `mutex_type` is only provided if
`scoped_lock` is given one mutex type and it has been implemented that
way since the beginning of Clang 5 it seems. There already are tests for
verifying existence (and lack thereof) for `mutex_type` type alias
depending on the number of mutex types, so there is nothing to
do for this LWG issue.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112462
This patch refactors the shared_ptr methods from being defined out-of-line
to being defined inline in the class, like what we do for all new code in
the library. The benefits of doing that are that code is not as scattered
around and is hence easier to understand, and it avoids a ton of duplication
due to SFINAE checks. Defining the method where it is declared also removes
the possibility for mismatched attributes.
As a fly-by change, this also:
- Adds a few _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI attributes
- Uses __enable_if_t instead of enable_if as a function argument, to match
the style that we use everywhere else.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112478
Several parts in the `chrono` synopsis for C++20 are not yet
implemented. The current recommendation is that things are added to the
synopsis when implemented -- not beforehand. As such, remove the
not-yet-implemented parts to avoid confusion.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111922
Also fix a few places in the `shared_ptr` implementation where
`element_type` was passed to the `__is_compatible` helper. This could
result in `remove_extent` being applied twice to the pointer's template
type (first by the definition of `element_type` and then by the helper),
potentially leading to somewhat less readable error messages for some
incorrect code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112092
Based on the comment of @Quuxplusone in D111961. It seems no tests are
affected, but give it a run on the CI to be sure.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112231
This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<vector>`.
I now added tests for the current offending cases. I wonder whether it
would be better to add one addressof test per directory and test all
possible violations. Also to guard against possible future errors?
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111961
According to the standard [vector.capacity]/5, std::vector<T>::reserve
shall throw an exception of type std::length_error when the requested
capacity exceeds max_size().
This behavior is not implemented correctly: the function 'reserve'
simply propagates the exception from allocator<T>::allocate. Before
D110846 that exception used to be of type std::length_error (which is
correct for vector<T>::reserve, but incorrect for
allocator<T>::allocate).
This patch fixes the issue and adds regression tests.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112068
std::vector<bool> rebinds the supplied allocator to construct objects
of type '__storage_type' rather than 'bool'. Allocators are allowed to
use explicit conversion constructors, so care must be taken when
performing conversions.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112150
The path functions in this patch are unimplemented (as per the TODO comment from upstream). To avoid running into a linker error (missing symbol), this patch raises a compile error by commenting out the functions, which is more user friendly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111892
`weekday` has a static member function `__weekday_from_days` which is
not part of the mandated public interface of `weeekday` according to the
standard. Since it is only used internally in the constructors of
`weekday`, let's make it private.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112072
Currently the member functions std::allocator<T>::allocate,
std::experimental::pmr::polymorphic_allocator::allocate and
std::resource_adaptor<T>::do_allocate throw an exception of type
std::length_error when the requested size exceeds the maximum size.
According to the C++ standard ([allocator.members]/4,
[mem.poly.allocator.mem]/1), std::allocator<T>::allocate and
std::pmr::polymorphic_allocator::allocate must throw a
std::bad_array_new_length exception in this case.
The patch fixes the issue with std::allocator<T>::allocate and changes
the type the exception thrown by
std::experimental::pmr::resource_adaptor<T>::do_allocate to
std::bad_array_new_length as well for consistency.
The patch resolves LWG 3237, LWG 3038 and LWG 3190.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110846
Implement LWG3480 which enables `directory_iterator` and
`recursive_directory_iterator` to be both a `borrowed_range` and a
`view`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111644
Mark LWG3274 as complete. The feature test macro `__cpp_lib_span` was added in
`6d2599e4f776d0cd88438cb82a00c4fc25cc3f67`.
https://wg21.link/p1024 mentions marking `span:::empty()` with
`[[nodiscard]]` which is not done yet. So, do that and add tests.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111516
Fixes the tests added in D110852 for the debug iterators.
Similar issues with hijacking `operator&` still exist, they will be
addressed separately.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111564
While looking at LWG-2988 and P0558 it seems the issues were already
implemented, but the synopsis wasn't updated. Some of the tests didn't
validate the `noexcept` status. A few tests were missing completely:
- `atomic_wait_explicit`
- `atomic_notify_one`
- `atomic_notify_all`
Mark P0558 as complete, didn't investigate which version of libc++ first
includes this. It seems the paper has been retroactively applied. I
couldn't find whether this is correct, but looking at cppreference it
seems intended.
Completes
- LWG-2988 Clause 32 cleanup missed one typename
- P0558 Resolving atomic<T> named base class inconsistencies
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103765
Some embedded platforms do not wish to support the C library functionality
for handling wchar_t because they have no use for it. It makes sense for
libc++ to work properly on those platforms, so this commit adds a carve-out
of functionality for wchar_t.
Unfortunately, unlike some other carve-outs (e.g. random device), this
patch touches several parts of the library. However, despite the wide
impact of this patch, I still think it is important to support this
configuration since it makes it much simpler to port libc++ to some
embedded platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111265
Implement P2401 which adds a `noexcept` specification to
`std::exchange`. Treated as a defect fix which is the motivation for
applying this change to all standards mode rather than just C++23 or
later as the paper suggests.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111481
There is an empty `namespace std` in `type_traits` which was originally
used when `std::byte` was added in
c97d8aa866. At some point, the bitwise operators
on `std::byte` got relocated but this empty namespace was left around.
Remove it.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111512
Implement parts of P1614, including three-way comparison for tuples, and expand testing.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108250
While looking at the review comments in D103765 there was an oddity in
the tests for the following functions:
- atomic_fetch_add
- atomic_fetch_add_explicit
- atomic_fetch_sub
- atomic_fetch_sub_explicit
Libc++ allows usage of
`atomic_fetch_add<int>(atomic<int*>*, atomic<int*>::difference_type);`
MSVC and GCC reject this code: https://godbolt.org/z/9d8WzohbE
This makes the atomic `fetch(add|sub).*` Standard conforming and removes the non-conforming extensions.
Fixes PR47908
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103983
Replace `&__rhs` with `_VSTD::addressof(__rhs)` to guard against ADL hijacking
of `operator&` in `operator=`. Thanks to @CaseyCarter for bringing it to our
attention.
Similar issues with hijacking `operator&` still exist, they will be
addressed separately.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110852
Implements the formatter for Boolean types.
[format.formatter.spec]/2.3
For each charT, for each cv-unqualified arithmetic type ArithmeticT other
than char, wchar_t, char8_t, char16_t, or char32_t, a specialization
```
template<> struct formatter<ArithmeticT, charT>;
```
This removes the stub implemented in D96664.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
- P1652 Printf corner cases in std::format
Completes:
- P1868 width: clarifying units of width and precision in std::format
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103670
Implements the formatter for all fundamental integer types.
[format.formatter.spec]/2.1
The specializations
```
template<> struct formatter<char, char>;
template<> struct formatter<char, wchar_t>;
template<> struct formatter<wchar_t, wchar_t>;
```
This removes the stub implemented in D96664.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103466
Implements the formatter for all fundamental integer types
(except `char`, `wchar_t`, and `bool`).
[format.formatter.spec]/2.3
For each charT, for each cv-unqualified arithmetic type ArithmeticT other
than char, wchar_t, char8_t, char16_t, or char32_t, a specialization
```
template<> struct formatter<ArithmeticT, charT>;
```
This removes the stub implemented in D96664.
As an extension it adds partial support for 128-bit integer types.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
- P1652 Printf corner cases in std::format
Completes:
- LWG-3248 #b, #B, #o, #x, and #X presentation types misformat negative numbers
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, vitaut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103433
Implements the formatter for all string types.
[format.formatter.spec]/2.2
For each charT, the string type specializations
```
template<> struct formatter<charT*, charT>;
template<> struct formatter<const charT*, charT>;
template<size_t N> struct formatter<const charT[N], charT>;
template<class traits, class Allocator>
struct formatter<basic_string<charT, traits, Allocator>, charT>;
template<class traits>
struct formatter<basic_string_view<charT, traits>, charT>;
```
This removes the stub implemented in D96664.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
- P1868 width: clarifying units of width and precision in std::format
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, vitaut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103425
Priorities below 101 are reserved for the implementation, so that's what
we should be using here. That is unfortunately only supported on more
recent versions of Clang. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D31413 for details.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95972
Implement P1391 (https://wg21.link/p1391) which allows
`std::string_view` to be constructible from any contiguous range of
characters.
Note that a different paper (http://wg21.link/P1989) handles the generic
range constructor for `std::string_view`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110718
In basic_string and vector, we've been encapsulating all exception
throwing code paths in helper functions of a base class, which are defined
in the compiled library. For example, __vector_base_common defines two
methods, __throw_length_error() and __throw_out_of_range(), and the class
is externally instantiated in the library. This was done a long time ago,
but after investigating, I believe the goal of the current design was to:
1. Encapsulate the code to throw an exception (which is non-trivial) in
an externally-defined function so that the important code paths that
call it (e.g. vector::at) are free from that code. Basically, the
intent is for the "hot" code path to contain a single conditional jump
(based on checking the error condition) to an externally-defined function,
which handles all the exception-throwing business.
2. Avoid defining this exception-throwing function once per instantiation
of the class template. In other words, we want a single copy of
__throw_length_error even if we have vector<int>, vector<char>, etc.
3. Encapsulate the passing of the container-specific string (i.e. "vector"
and "basic_string") to the underlying exception-throwing function
so that object files don't contain those duplicated string literals.
For example, we'd like to have a single "vector" string literal for
passing to `std::__throw_length_error` in the library, instead of
having one per translation unit.
However, the way this is achieved right now has two problems:
- Using a base class and exporting it is really weird - I've been confused
about this ever since I first saw it. It's just a really unusual way of
achieving the above goals. Also, it's made even worse by the fact that
the definitions of __throw_length_error and __throw_out_of_range appear
in the headers despite always being intended to be defined in the compiled
library (via the extern template instantiation).
- We end up exporting those functions as weak symbols, which isn't great
for load times. Instead, it would be better to export those as strong
symbols from the library.
This patch fixes those issues while retaining ABI compatibility (e.g. we
still export the exact same symbols as before). Note that we need to
keep the base classes as-is to avoid breaking the ABI of someone who
might inherit from std::basic_string or std::vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111173
e9ee517930 added support for using
winpthreads on Windows, enabled if `__WINPTHREADS_VERSION` was
defined (i.e. if winpthreads headers have been included before
including libcxx `__config`). This was fragile (libcxx changed
behaviour depending on what headers had been included externally
before), and was changed in a1bc823a59
to use pthreads on Windows whenever the pthread.h header was
available.
This is also fragile; pthread.h might be unavailable while building
libcxx but installed later, and available when users include the
libcxx headers.
In practice, in every modern setup for building libcxx for Windows
I've seen, users end up manually configuring it with
`LIBCXX_HAS_WIN32_THREAD_API=ON`, as the users may have winpthreads
installed (for other libraries/projects to use) while wanting to
build libcxx with the default win32 threading.
Don't automatically pick up pthreads on Windows even if the header
is available. Instead require the user to configure the libcxx
build with `LIBCXX_HAS_PTHREAD_API=ON` if that's desired.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110975
The existing tests for transform_view::iterator weren't quite right,
and can be simplified now that we have more of C++20 available to us.
Having done that, let's use the same pattern for iota_view::iterator
as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110774
This adds the width estimation functions to the std-format-spec.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
- P1868 width: clarifying units of width and precision in std::format
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, vitaut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103413
This reverts part of commit b82683b2eb.
I hadn't intended to remove the `// -*- C++ -*-` comment line
from `libcxx/include/version`, only from the generated tests.
Thanks to Raul Tambre for the catch.
Even if these comments have a benefit in .h files (for editors that
care about language but can't be configured to treat .h as C++ code),
they certainly have no benefit for files with the .cpp extension.
Discussed in D110794.
Some of these were previously half-implemented in "ordering.h";
now they're all implemented, and tested.
Note that `constexpr` functions are implicitly `inline`, so the
standard wording omits `inline` on these; but Louis and I agree
that that's surprising and it's better to be explicit about it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110515
Instead of using a base class to store the members and the optional
size, use [[no_unique_address]] to achieve the same thing without
needing a base class.
Also, as a fly-by:
- Change subrange from struct to class (per the standard)
- Improve the diagnostic for when one doesn't provide a size to the ctor of a sized subrange
- Replace this->member by just member since it's not in a dependent base anymore
This change would be an ABI break due to [[no_unique_address]], but we
haven't shipped ranges anywhere yet, so this shouldn't affect anyone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110370
There's really no reason to even have two different enums here,
but *definitely* we shouldn't have *three*, and they don't need
so many synonymous enumerator values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110516
In reaction to the issues raised by Richard in https://llvm.org/D109066,
this commit does not apply P1951 as a DR in previous standard modes,
since it breaks valid code.
I do believe it should be applied as a DR, however ideally we'd get some
sort of statement from the Committee to this effect (and all implementations
would behave consistently). In the meantime, only implement P1951 starting
with C++23 -- we can always come back and apply it as a DR if that's what
the Committee says.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110347
That macro was being defined but not used anywhere in libc++, so it
must be safe to remove it.
As a fly-by fix, also remove mentions of this macro in other places
in LLVM, to make sure they were not depending on the value defined in
libc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110289
Arthur O'Dwyer