within nested-name-specifiers, e.g., for the "apply" in
typename MetaFun::template apply<T1, T2>::type
At present, we can't instantiate these nested-name-specifiers, so our
testing is sketchy.
llvm-svn: 68081
From a front-end perspective, I believe this code should work for ObjC @-strings. At the moment, I believe we need to tweak the code generation for @-strings (which doesn't appear to handle them). Will be investigating.
llvm-svn: 68076
- Rip out various bits of logic from clang-cc's dependency file gen,
force driver to provide instead.
- -MD output now goes to proper location
<rdar://problem/6723948> clang -MD puts dep file in /tmp with wrong name
- -M and -MM still don't work correctly.
llvm-svn: 68022
LHS type and the computation result type; this encodes information into
the AST which is otherwise non-obvious. Fix Sema to always come up with the
right answer for both of these types. Fix IRGen and the analyzer to
account for these changes. This fixes PR2601. The approach is inspired
by PR2601 comment 2.
Note that this changes real *= complex in CodeGen from a silent
miscompilation to an explicit error.
I'm not really sure that the analyzer changes are correct, or how to
test them... someone more familiar with the analyzer should check those
changes.
llvm-svn: 67889
instantiation for C++ typename-specifiers such as
typename T::type
The parsing of typename-specifiers is relatively easy thanks to
annotation tokens. When we see the "typename", we parse the
typename-specifier and produce a typename annotation token. There are
only a few places where we need to handle this. We currently parse the
typename-specifier form that terminates in an identifier, but not the
simple-template-id form, e.g.,
typename T::template apply<U, V>
Parsing of nested-name-specifiers has a similar problem, since at this
point we don't have any representation of a class template
specialization whose template-name is unknown.
Semantic analysis is only partially complete, with some support for
template instantiation that works for simple examples.
llvm-svn: 67875
Treat @package the same as @public. The documentation for @package says it is analogous to private_extern for variables/functions. Fully implementing this requires some kind of linker support (so access is denied to code outside the classes executable image). I don't believe GCC fully implements this semantic. Will discuss with Fariborz offline.
llvm-svn: 67755
specializations can be treated as a template. Finally, we can parse
and process the first implementation of Fibonacci I wrote!
Note that this code does not handle all of the cases where
injected-class-names can be treated as templates. In particular,
there's an ambiguity case that we should be able to handle (but
can't), e.g.,
template <class T> struct Base { };
template <class T> struct Derived : Base<int>, Base<char> {
typename Derived::Base b; // error: ambiguous
typename Derived::Base<double> d; // OK
};
llvm-svn: 67720
templates, including in-class initializers. For example:
template<typename T, T Divisor>
class X {
public:
static const T value = 10 / Divisor;
};
instantiated with, e.g.,
X<int, 5>::value
to get the value '2'.
llvm-svn: 67715
the declarations of member classes are instantiated when the owning
class template is instantiated. The definitions of such member classes
are instantiated when a complete type is required.
This change also introduces the injected-class-name into a class
template specialization.
llvm-svn: 67707
class C {
C() { }
int a;
};
C::C() : a(10) { }
We also diagnose when initializers are used on declarations that aren't constructors:
t.cpp:1:10: error: only constructors take base initializers
void f() : a(10) { }
^
Doug and/or Sebastian: I'd appreciate a review, especially the nested-name-spec test results (from the looks of it we now match gcc in that test.)
llvm-svn: 67672
- -emit-llvm no longer changes what compilation steps are done.
- -emit-llvm and -emit-llvm -S write output files with .o and .s
suffixes, respectively.
- <rdar://problem/6714125> clang-driver should support -O4 and -flto,
like llvm-gcc
llvm-svn: 67645
- Don't default to using clang for C++ (use -ccc-clang-cxx to
override).
- Default to only using clang on i386 and x86_64 (use
-ccc-clang-archs "" to override).
- <rdar://problem/6712350> [driver] clang should not be used on
powerpc by default
- <rdar://problem/6705767> driver should default to -ccc-no-clang-cxx
I plan to add a warning that we are not using the clang compiler for
the given compilation so that users do not think clang is being used
in situations it isn't.
This change is motivated by the desire to be able to drop clang into a
build and have things "just work", even if it happens to get used to
compile C++ code or code for an architecture we don't support yet.
llvm-svn: 67640
- Substitutes both clang and clang-cc.
- Incorporates patch from Jon Simons to diagnose if clang or clang-cc
isn't found.
- Uses full path when running scripts, for more precision in the
output.
llvm-svn: 67610
class C {
void g(C c);
virtual void f() = 0;
};
In this case, C is not known to be abstract when doing semantic analysis on g. This is done by recursively traversing the abstract class and checking the types of member functions.
llvm-svn: 67594
a class template. At present, we can only instantiation normal
methods, but not constructors, destructors, or conversion operators.
As ever, this contains a bit of refactoring in Sema's type-checking. In
particular:
- Split ActOnFunctionDeclarator into ActOnFunctionDeclarator
(handling the declarator itself) and CheckFunctionDeclaration
(checking for the the function declaration), the latter of which
is also used by template instantiation.
- We were performing the adjustment of function parameter types in
three places; collect those into a single new routine.
- When the type of a parameter is adjusted, allocate an
OriginalParmVarDecl to keep track of the type as it was written.
- Eliminate a redundant check for out-of-line declarations of member
functions; hide more C++-specific checks on function declarations
behind if(getLangOptions().CPlusPlus).
llvm-svn: 67575
library function, accept this declaration and pretend that we do not
know that this is a library function. autoconf depends on this
(broken) behavior.
llvm-svn: 67541
<rdar://problem/6704930> involving SimpleConstraintManager not reasoning well
about symbolic constraint values involving arithmetic operators.
llvm-svn: 67534
incompatibilities in assignments from other pointer incompatibilities.
Based off of the patch in PR3342. (This doesn't implement -Wno-pointer-sign,
but I don't know the driver code very well.)
llvm-svn: 67494
isObjCObjectPointerType to work with qualified types. Adjust test for
changes.
If the SemaExpr changes are wrong or break existing code, feel free to
delete the "ExprTy.addConst();" line and revert my changes to
test/Sema/block-literal.c.
llvm-svn: 67489
functionality, fixing a crash on the attached testcase. Eliminate the
BuiltinFunctions cache, as it can contain dangling pointers. This fixes
a bunch of valgrind errors on test/CodeGen/builtins.c
llvm-svn: 67484
- PR3854.
I think it makes more sense to change MemoryBuffer::getSTDIN (return 0
should indicate error, not empty), but it is documented to return 0
for empty inputs, and some other code appears to rely on this.
llvm-svn: 67448
1. it wasn't applying to definitions, only declarations, e.g. int x __asm("foo")
2. multiple definitions were conflicting, they weren't getting merged.
3. the code was duplicated in several places.
llvm-svn: 67442
- <rdar://problem/6669441> ccc doesn't handle assembler-with-cpp
semantics correctly (but clang supports it)
- This is sad, because it requires a fairly useless target
hook. C'est la vie.
llvm-svn: 67418
allow non-literal format strings that are variables that (a) permanently bind to
a string constant and (b) whose string constants are resolvable within the same
translation unit.
llvm-svn: 67404
braces. We now build the appropriate fully-structured initializer list
for such things. Per PR3618, verified that we're getting the right
code generation.
llvm-svn: 67353
dot-syntax expression after earching the list of protocols
in the qualified-id, must keep searching the protocol list
of each of the protocols in the list.
llvm-svn: 67314
F f;
where F is a typedef of a function type, then the function "f" has a
prototype. This is a slight tweak to Chris's suggested fix in
PR3817. Fixes PR3817 and PR3840.
llvm-svn: 67313
dependent qualified-ids such as
Fibonacci<N - 1>::value
where N is a template parameter. These references are "unresolved"
because the name is dependent and, therefore, cannot be resolved to a
declaration node (as we would do for a DeclRefExpr or
QualifiedDeclRefExpr). UnresolvedDeclRefExprs instantiate to
DeclRefExprs, QualifiedDeclRefExprs, etc.
Also, be a bit more careful about keeping only a single set of
specializations for a class template, and instantiating from the
definition of that template rather than a previous declaration. In
general, we need a better solution for this for all TagDecls, because
it's too easy to accidentally look at a declaration that isn't the
definition.
We can now process a simple Fibonacci computation described as a
template metaprogram.
llvm-svn: 67308
QualifiedNameType and QualifiedDeclRefExpr. We now keep track of the
exact nested-name-specifier spelling for a QualifiedDeclRefExpr, and
use that spelling when printing ASTs. This fixes PR3493.
llvm-svn: 67283
specialization names. This way, we keep track of sugared types like
std::vector<Real>
I believe we are now using QualifiedNameTypes everywhere we can. Next
step: QualifiedDeclRefExprs.
llvm-svn: 67268
qualified name, e.g.,
foo::x
so that we retain the nested-name-specifier as written in the source
code and can reproduce that qualified name when printing the types
back (e.g., in diagnostics). This is PR3493, which won't be complete
until finished the other tasks mentioned near the end of this commit.
The parser's representation of nested-name-specifiers, CXXScopeSpec,
is now a bit fatter, because it needs to contain the scopes that
precede each '::' and keep track of whether the global scoping
operator '::' was at the beginning. For example, we need to keep track
of the leading '::', 'foo', and 'bar' in
::foo::bar::x
The Action's CXXScopeTy * is no longer a DeclContext *. It's now the
opaque version of the new NestedNameSpecifier, which contains a single
component of a nested-name-specifier (either a DeclContext * or a Type
*, bitmangled).
The new sugar type QualifiedNameType composes a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers with a representation of the type we're actually
referring to. At present, we only build QualifiedNameType nodes within
Sema::getTypeName. This will be extended to other type-constructing
actions (e.g., ActOnClassTemplateId).
Also on the way: QualifiedDeclRefExprs will also store a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers, so that we can print out the property
nested-name-specifier. I expect to also use this for handling
dependent names like Fibonacci<I - 1>::value.
llvm-svn: 67265
SVal::GetRValueSymbolVal do the checking if we can symbolicate a type instead of
having BasicStoreManager do it (which wasn't always doing the check
consistently). Having this check in SVal::GetRValueSymbolVal keeps the check in
one centralized place.
llvm-svn: 67245
quite as great as it sounds, because, while we can refer to the
enumerator values outside the template, e.g.,
adder<long, 3, 4>::value
we can't yet refer to them with dependent names, so no Fibonacci
(yet).
InstantiateClassTemplateSpecialization is getting messy; next commit
will put it into a less-ugly state.
llvm-svn: 67092
always, refactored the existing logic to tease apart the parser action
and the semantic analysis shared by the parser and template
instantiation.
llvm-svn: 66987
- C++ function casts, e.g., T(foo)
- sizeof(), alignof()
More importantly, this allows us to verify that we're performing
overload resolution during template instantiation, with
argument-dependent lookup and the "cached" results of name lookup from
the template definition.
llvm-svn: 66947
really horrible extensions that are disabled by default but that can
be accepted by -fheinous-gnu-extensions (but which always emit a
warning when enabled).
As our first instance of this, implement PR3788/PR3794, which allows
non-lvalues in inline asms in contexts where lvalues are required. bleh.
llvm-svn: 66910
conditions. Currently the analyzer does not reason well about
promotions/truncations of symbolic values, so at branch conditions when we see:
if (condition)
and condition is something like a 'short' or 'char', essentially ignore the
promotion to 'int' so that we track constraints on the original symbolic value.
We only ignore the casts if the underlying type has the same or fewer bits as
the converted type.
This fixes:
<rdar://problem/6619921>
llvm-svn: 66899
This solution is much simpler (and doesn't add any per-scope overhead, which concerned Chris).
The only downside is the LabelMap is now declared in two places (Sema and BlockSemaInfo). My original fix tried to unify the LabelMap in "Scope" (which would support nested functions in general). In any event, this fixes the bug given the current language definition. If/when we decide to support GCC style nested functions, this will need to be tweaked.
llvm-svn: 66896
Anders Carlsson