When dumping ToT clan's debug info with dwarfdump, we were seeing an
error saying that that the location list overflows the debug_loc
section. After reducing the testcase we figured out that we were
interpreting the DW_FORM_data4 as a section offset.
In DWARF3 DW_FORM_data4 and DW_FORM_data8 served also as a section
offset. Until now we didn't check check for the DWARF version, because
some producers (read old versions of clang) were still emitting this.
The relevant code/comment was added in 2013, and I believe it's now
reasonable to start checking the version.
The FormValue class is a little bit of a mess because it cashes the
DWARF unit and context when it extracted the value itself. Several
methods of the class rely on it being present, or return an Optional for
the code path that needs it. At the same time the FormValue class also
used in places where there's no DWARF unit.
For this patch I went with the least invasive change: checking the
version from the CU when it's available. If it's not (because the form
value was created from a value directly) we default to the old behavior.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58698
llvm-svn: 355456
Partly addresses PR15026.
There are a few tests that passed in invalid architectures, which are fixed in: rL355349 and D58931
Reviewers: echristo, efriedma, rengolin, atrick
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58933
llvm-svn: 355455
Be consistent about how we treat atomics in non-zero address spaces. If we get to the backend, we tend to lower them as if in address space 0. Do the same if we need to insert a libcall instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58760
llvm-svn: 355453
There was no proper test for that code in X86TargetLowering::LowerSELECT().
Noticed accidentally while trying to modify the last branch in that function.
llvm-svn: 355452
Otherwise, when testing trunk libc++ on an older system, lit will think
that the dylib features are disabled. Ideally, we'd have a notion of
running the tests with/without a deployment target (or, equivalently,
a deployment target representing trunk where everything is as recent
as can be). Since we always have a deployment target right now (which
defaults to the current system), we only enable those features when
we're going to also be testing with the system libc++.
We also need to disable the availability markup when we are not running
a system library flavor, because availability markup does not make sense
when building against the trunk libc++ (which has everything regardless
of what the current system is).
This is a re-application of r353319, which had been reverted due to
CI breakage. This time around, I made sure it didn't break our internal
CI before submitting.
This is also a partial undoing of r348296, in spirit at least. However,
with this patch, availability markup is enabled based on whether we're
using a system library or not, whereas previously one could enable
it or disable it arbitrarily. This was confusing as it led to testing
configurations that don't make sense (such as testing a system library
without availability markup, or trunk testing with availability markup).
llvm-svn: 355451
Summary:
A Lamdba with a return type template with a boolean literal (true,false) behaves differently to an integer literal
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40910
Reviewers: klimek, djasper, JonasToth, alexfh, krasimir, jkorous
Reviewed By: jkorous
Subscribers: jkorous, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58922
llvm-svn: 355450
Summary:
- Replaces some uses of `MachineFunction::iterator(MBB)` with
`MBB->getIterator()` and `MachineBasicBlock::iterator(MI)` with
`MI->getIterator()`, which are simpler.
- Replaces some uses of `std::prev` of `std::next` that takes a
MachineFunction or MachineBasicBlock iterator with `getPrevNode` and
`getNextNode`, which are also simpler.
Reviewers: sbc100
Subscribers: dschuff, sunfish, jgravelle-google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58913
llvm-svn: 355444
Getting rid of the name "optimization remarks" for anything that
involves handling remarks on the client side.
It's safer to do this now, before we get stuck with that name in all the
APIs and public interfaces we decide to export to users in the future.
This renames llvm/tools/opt-remarks to llvm/tools/remarks-shlib, and now
generates `libRemarks.dylib` instead of `libOptRemarks.dylib`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58535
llvm-svn: 355439
Summary:
We disabled MachineBlockPlacement pass in D58953, and this test result
changes as the result of it.
Reviewers: kripken
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58954
llvm-svn: 355438
Tests only for integers, not floating point or pointers.
The scalar 8-bit case uses branch instead of CMOV,
because there is no no 8-bit CMOV.
Vector tests are for consistency, since it can be vectorized.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40965
llvm-svn: 355436
A template specialization of a template foo<int N> can contain integer constants and a whole bunch of operators - e. g. foo< 1 ? !0 : (3+1)%4 >
Inspired by https://reviews.llvm.org/D58922
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58934
llvm-svn: 355434
This caused the first matcher in the isel table for many targets to Opc_Scope instead of Opc_SwitchOpcode. This leads to a significant increase in isel match failures.
llvm-svn: 355433
These arrays are both keyed by CPU name and go into the same tablegenerated file. Merge them so we only need to store keys once.
This also removes a weird space saving quirk where we used the ProcDesc.size() to create to build an ArrayRef for ProcSched.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58939
llvm-svn: 355431
The variable X86DomainReassignment::EnclosedEdges is used to store registers that have been enclosed in some closure, so those registers will be ignored when create new closures. But there is no registers has ever been put into this set, so a single register can be enclosed in multiple closures, it significantly increase compile time.
This patch adds a register into EnclosedEdges when it is enclosed into a closure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58646
llvm-svn: 355430
The description for CPUs was just the CPU name wrapped with "Select the " and " processor". We can just do that directly in the help printer instead of making a separate version in the binary for each CPU.
Also remove the Value field that isn't needed and was always 0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58938
llvm-svn: 355429
The SubtargetFeature class managed a list of features as strings. And it also had functions for setting bits in a FeatureBitset.
The methods that operated on the Feature list as strings are used in other parts of the backend. But the parts that operate on FeatureBitset are very tightly coupled to MCSubtargetInfo and requires passing in the arrays that MCSubtargetInfo owns. And the same struct type is used for ProcFeatures and ProcDesc.
This has led to MCSubtargetInfo having 2 arrays keyed by CPU name. One containing a mapping from a CPU name to its features. And one containing a mapping from CPU name to its scheduler model.
I would like to make a single CPU array containing all CPU information and remove some unneeded fields the ProcDesc array currently has. But I don't want to make SubtargetFeatures.h have to know about the scheduler model type and have to forward declare or pull in the header file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58937
llvm-svn: 355428
We already do this for 16/32/64 as well as 8-bit add with register/immediate. Might as well do it for 8-bit INC/DEC too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58869
llvm-svn: 355424
We already support 8-bits adds in convertToThreeAddress. But we can also support 8-bit OR if the bits are disjoint. We already do this for 16/32/64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58863
llvm-svn: 355423
If a kernel template has a function as its template parameter, a device function should be
allowed as template argument since a kernel can call a device function. However,
currently if the kernel template is instantiated in a host function, clang will emit an error
message saying the device function is an invalid candidate for the template parameter.
This happens because clang checks the reference to the device function during parsing
the template arguments. At this point, the template is not instantiated yet. Clang incorrectly
assumes the device function is called by the host function and emits the error message.
This patch fixes the issue by disabling checking of device function during parsing template
arguments and deferring the check to the instantion of the template. At that point, the
template decl is already available, therefore the check can be done against the instantiated
function template decl.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56411
llvm-svn: 355421
x86-64 is an invalid architecture in triples. Changing it to the correct
triple (x86_64) changes some tests, because SLP is not deemed profitable
any more.
Reviewers: ABataev, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58931
llvm-svn: 355420
HIP uses clang-offload-bundler to create fat binary. The bundle for host is empty.
Currently clang-offload-bundler checks if the bundle size is 0 when unbundling.
If so it will exit without unbundling the remaining bundles. This causes
clang-offload-bundler not being able to unbundle fat binaries generated for HIP.
This patch allows bundles size to be 0 when clang-offload-bundler unbundles
input files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58057
llvm-svn: 355419
memory.
If the variable with the constant non-scalar type is firstprivatized in
the target region, the local copy is created with the data copying.
Instead, we allocate the copy in the constant memory and avoid extra
copying in the outlined target regions. This global copy is used in the
target regions without loss of the performance.
llvm-svn: 355418
Revert "[libc++] Fix <atomic> failures on GCC"
Revert "[libc++] Change memory_order to an enum class"
Revert "[libc++] decoupling Freestanding atomic<T> from libatomic.a"
The lldb formatter nededs to be updated. Shafik and Louis will
coordinate to do so.
llvm-svn: 355417
Summary:
The bytemap classes will be used by the primary32 allocator to associate
classes with memory regions. It's similar to the sanitizer_common one
except for the fact that the base (level1) maps are mapped instead of
being static to reduce the memory footprint of an uninitialized allocator.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, eugenis, morehouse, flowerhack, dmmoore415, mcgrathr
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, morehouse
Subscribers: mgorny, delcypher, jfb, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58723
llvm-svn: 355416
Currently one can concatenate strings using hash(#),
but not lists, although that would be a natural thing to do.
This patch allows one to write something like:
def : A<!listconcat([1,2], [3,4])>;
simply as :
def : A<[1,2] # [3,4]>;
This was missing feature was highlighted by Nicolai
at FOSDEM talk.
Reviewed by: nhaehnle, hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58895
llvm-svn: 355414
When -fno-gpu-rdc is set, device code is compiled, linked, and assembled into fat binary
and embedded as string in object files. The object files are normal object files which
can be linked by host linker. In the linking stage, the object files should not be unbundled
when -fno-gpu-rdc is set since they are normal object files, not bundles. The object files
only need to be unbundled when -fgpu-rdc is set.
Currently clang always unbundles object files, disregarding -fgpu-rdc option.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58917
llvm-svn: 355410
Summary:
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D58201, we turned memory_order into an enum
class in C++20 mode. However, we were not casting memory_order to its
underlying type correctly for the GCC implementation, which broke the
build bots. I also fixed a test that was failing in C++17 mode on GCC 5.
Reviewers: EricWF, jfb, mclow.lists
Subscribers: zoecarver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58966
llvm-svn: 355409
Adrian Prantl