applied to CXXRecordDecls, where functions with that return type will
inherit the warn_unused_result attribute.
Also includes a tiny fix (with no discernable behavior change for
existing code) to re-sync AttributeDeclKind enum and
err_attribute_wrong_decl_type with warn_attribute_wrong_decl_type since
the enum is used with both diagnostic messages to chose the correct
description.
llvm-svn: 167783
assignment generation. This incidentally avoids reusing the same Expr* across
multiple statements in the same object; that was generating slightly broken
ASTs, but I couldn't trigger any observable bad behavior, so no test.
llvm-svn: 167779
There was enough consensus that we *can* get a good language solution
to have an annotation outside of C++11, and without this annotation
this warning doesn't quite mean's completeness criteria for this
kind of warning. For now, restrict this warning to C++11 (where an
annotation exists), and make this the behavior for the LLVM 3.2 release.
Afterwards, we will hammer out a language solution that we are all
happy with.
llvm-svn: 167749
The 'a', 'c', and 'd' constraints on i386 mean a 32-bit register. We cannot
place a 64-bit value into the 32-bit register. Error out instead of causing the
compiler to spew general badness.
<rdar://problem/12415959>
llvm-svn: 167717
The rationale is that there is no good workflow to silence the warning
for specific cases, other than using pragmas. This is because the
attribute to decorate an explicit fall through is only available
in C++11.
By that argument, this should probably also be disabled unless one
is using C++11, but apparently there is an explicit test case for
this warning when using C++98. This will require further discussion
on cfe-commits.
Fixes: <rdar://problem/12584746>
llvm-svn: 167655
would have diagnosed this at instantiation time anyway, if only we
didn't hang on all of these test cases. Fixes <rdar://problem/12629723>
llvm-svn: 167651
C++11 3.3.3/2 "A parameter name shall not be redeclared in the outermost block
of the function definition nor in the outermost block of any handler associated
with a function-try-block."
It's not totally clear to me whether the "FIXME" case is covered by this, but
Richard Smith thinks it probably should be. It's just a bit more involved to
fix that case.
llvm-svn: 167650
This warning was failing to fire under ARC because of the implicit
lifetime casts added around the object literal expression.
<rdar://problem/11300873>, again.
llvm-svn: 167648
I couldn't think of a way to make an operator() invalid without returning
earlier from this function other than making it static, so no new test.
llvm-svn: 167609
function that takes a const Foo&, where Foo is convertible from a large number
of pointer types, we print ALL the overloads, no matter the setting of
-fshow-overloads.
There is potential follow-on work in unifying the "print candidates, but not
too many" logic between OverloadCandidateSet::NoteCandidates and
ImplicitConversionSequence::DiagnoseAmbiguousConversion.
llvm-svn: 167596
the base class. If the base class deduction succeeds, use those results. If
it fails, keep using the results from the derived class template deduction.
This prevents an assertion later where the type of deduction failure doesn't
match up with the template deduction info.
llvm-svn: 167550
instantiate it if it can be instantiated and implicitly define it if it can be
implicitly defined. This matches g++'s approach. Remove some cases from
SemaOverload which were marking functions as referenced when just planning how
overload resolution would proceed; such cases are not actually references.
llvm-svn: 167514
Spent longer than reasonable looking for a nice way to test this & decided to
give up for now. Open to suggestions/requests. Richard Smith suggested adding
something to ASTMatchers but it wasn't readily apparent how to test this with
that.
llvm-svn: 167507
The problem is as follows: C++11 has contexts which are not
potentially-evaluated, and yet in which we are required or encouraged to
perform constant evaluation. In such contexts, we are not permitted to
implicitly define special member functions for literal types, therefore
we cannot evalaute those constant expressions.
Punt on this in one more context for now by skipping checking constexpr
variable initializers if they occur in dependent contexts.
llvm-svn: 166956
Previously, the warning would erroneously fire on this:
for (Test *a in someArray)
use(a.weakProp);
...because it looks like the same property is being accessed over and over.
However, clearly this is not the case. We now ignore loops like this for
local variables, but continue to warn if the base object is a parameter,
global variable, or instance variable, on the assumption that these are
not repeatedly usually assigned to within loops.
Additionally, do-while loops where the condition is 'false' are not really
loops at all; usually they're just used for semicolon-swallowing macros or
using "break" like "goto".
<rdar://problem/12578785&12578849>
llvm-svn: 166942
whether the initializer is value-dependent rather than whether we are in a
dependent context. This allows us to detect some errors sooner, and fixes a
crash-on-invalid if a dependent type leaks out to a non-dependent context in
error recovery.
llvm-svn: 166898
might have been used in constant expressions, rather than suppressing it for
variables which are const. The important thing here is that such variables
can have their values used without actually being marked as 'used'.
llvm-svn: 166896
This code checks the ASM string to see if the output size is able to fit within
the variable specified as the output. For instance, scalar-to-vector conversions
may not really work. It's on by default, but can be turned off with a flag if
you think you know what you're doing.
This is placed under a flag ('-Wasm-operand-widths') and flag group ('-Wasm').
<rdar://problem/12284092>
llvm-svn: 166737
defined without a previous declaration. This is similar to
-Wmissing-prototypes, but for variables instead of functions.
Patch by Ed Schouten.
llvm-svn: 166498
libraries have an incorrect definition of std::common_type (inherited from a
bug in the standard -- see LWG issue 2141), whereby they produce reference
types when they should not.
If we instantiate a typedef named std::common_type<...>::type, which is defined
in a system header as decltype(... ? ... : ...), and the decltype produces a
reference type, convert it to the non-reference type. (This doesn't affect any
LWG2141-conforming implementation of common_type, such as libc++'s, because the
default implementation of common_type<...>::type isn't supposed to produce a
reference type.)
This is horrible. I'm really sorry. :( Better ideas appreciated!
llvm-svn: 166455
found: if an overloaded operator& is present before a template definition,
the expression &T::foo is represented as a CXXOperatorCallExpr, not as a
UnaryOperator, so we didn't notice that it's permitted to reference a non-static
data member of an unrelated class.
While investigating this, I discovered another problem in this area: we are
treating template default arguments as unevaluated contexts during substitution,
resulting in performing incorrect checks for uses of non-static data members in
C++11. That is not fixed by this patch (I'll look into this soon; it's related
to the failure to correctly instantiate constexpr function templates), but was
resulting in this bug not firing in C++11 mode (except with -Wc++98-compat).
Original message:
PR14124: When performing template instantiation of a qualified-id outside of a
class, diagnose if the qualified-id instantiates to a non-static class member.
llvm-svn: 166385
since it also has an implicit exception specification. Downgrade the error to
an extwarn, since at least for operator delete, system headers like to declare
it as 'noexcept' whereas the implicit definition does not have an explicit
exception specification. Move the exception specification for user-declared
'operator delete' functions from the type-as-written into the type, to reflect
reality and to allow us to detect whether there was an implicit exception spec
or not.
llvm-svn: 166372
initialized by a reference constant expression.
Our odr-use modeling still needs work here: we don't yet implement the 'set of
potential results of an expression' DR.
llvm-svn: 166361
Also, unify ObjCShouldCallSuperDealloc and ObjCShouldCallSuperFinalize.
The two have identical behavior and will never be active at the same time.
There's one last simplification now, which is that if we see a call to
[super foo] and we are currently in a method named 'foo', we will
/unconditionally/ clear the ObjCShouldCallSuper flag, rather than check
first to see if we're in a method where calling super is required. There's
no reason to pay the extra lookup price here.
llvm-svn: 166285
source locations in places where it is necessary for diagnostics. By itself,
this causes assertions, so while I'm here, also fix property synthesis
for properties of C++ class type so we use so we properly set up a scope
and mark variable declarations.
<rdar://problem/12514189>.
llvm-svn: 166219
Within the body of the loop the underlying map may be modified via
Sema::AddOverloadCandidate
-> Sema::CompareReferenceRelationship
-> Sema::RequireCompleteType
to avoid the use of invalid iterators the sequence is copied first.
A reliable, though large, test case is available - it will be reduced and
committed shortly.
Patch by Robert Muth. Review by myself, Nico Weber, and Rafael Espindola.
llvm-svn: 166188
GCC and Clang both do not warn on:
struct a { virtual void func(); };
struct b: a { virtual void func(); void func(int); };
struct c: b { void func(int); using b::func; };
but if the "using" was using a::func GCC would still remain silent where Clang
would warn. This change makes Clang consistent with GCC's existing behavior.
llvm-svn: 166154
Because PNaCl bitcode must be target-independent, it uses some
different bitcode representations from other targets (e.g. byval and
sret for structures). This means that without additional type
information, it cannot meet some native ABI requirements for some
targets (e.g. passing structures containing unions by value on
x86-64). To allow generation of code which uses the correct native
ABIs, we also support triples such as x86_64-nacl, which uses
target-dependent IR (as opposed to le32-nacl, which uses byval and
sret).
To allow interoperation between the two types of code, this patch adds
a calling convention attribute to be used in code compiled with the
target-dependent triple, which will generate code using the le32-style
bitcode. This calling convention does not need to be explicitly
supported in the backend because it determines bitcode representation
rather than native conventions (the backend just needs to undersand
how to handle byval and sret for the Native Client OS).
This patch implements __attribute__((pnaclcall)) to generate calls in
bitcode according to the le32 bitcode conventions, an attribute which
is accepted by any Native Client target, but issues a warning
otherwise.
llvm-svn: 166065
This implementation doesn't warn on anything that GCC doesn't warn on with the
exception of templates specializations (GCC doesn't warn, Clang does). The
specific skipped cases (boolean, constant expressions, enums) are open for
debate/adjustment if anyone wants to demonstrate that GCC is being overly
conservative here. The only really obvious false positive I found was in the
Clang regression suite's MPI test - apparently MPI uses specific flag values in
pointer constants. (eg: #define FOO (void*)~0)
llvm-svn: 166039
-The front-end now builds a single assembly string and feeds it to the
AsmParser. The front-end iterates on a per statement basis by calling the
ParseStatement() function. Please note, the calling of ParseStatement() and
and any notion of MCAsmParsedOperands will be sunk into the MC layer in the
near future. I plan to expose more basic APIs such as getClobbers, etc.
-The enumeration of the AsmString expressions have been reworked to use SMLocs
rather than assembly Pieces, which were being parsed in the front-end.
-The test case, t8(), was modified due to r129223. I'll have to find a way to
work around things such as these.
Sorry for the large commit, but breaking this in multiple smaller commits proved
too irritating.
llvm-svn: 165957
Nick Lewycky