Reverted by Eric Christopher (Thanks!) in r212203 after Bob Wilson
reported LTO issues. Duncan Exon Smith and Aditya Nandakumar helped
provide a reduced reproduction, though the failure wasn't too hard to
guess, and even easier with the example to confirm.
The assertion that the subprogram metadata associated with an
llvm::Function matches the scope data referenced by the DbgLocs on the
instructions in that function is not valid under LTO. In LTO, a C++
inline function might exist in multiple CUs and the subprogram metadata
nodes will refer to the same llvm::Function. In this case, depending on
the order of the CUs, the first intance of the subprogram metadata may
not be the one referenced by the instructions in that function and the
assertion will fail.
A test case (test/DebugInfo/cross-cu-linkonce-distinct.ll) is added, the
assertion removed and a comment added to explain this situation.
This was then reverted again in r213581 as it caused PR20367. The root
cause of this was the early exit in LiveDebugVariables meant that
spurious DBG_VALUE intrinsics that referenced dead variables were not
removed, causing an assertion/crash later on. The fix is to have
LiveDebugVariables strip all DBG_VALUE intrinsics in functions without
debug info as they're not needed anyway. Test case added to cover this
situation (that occurs when a debug-having function is inlined into a
nodebug function) in test/DebugInfo/X86/nodebug_with_debug_loc.ll
Original commit message:
If a function isn't actually in a CU's subprogram list in the debug info
metadata, ignore all the DebugLocs and don't try to build scopes, track
variables, etc.
While this is possibly a minor optimization, it's also a correctness fix
for an incoming patch that will add assertions to LexicalScopes and the
debug info verifier to ensure that all scope chains lead to debug info
for the current function.
Fix up a few test cases that had broken/incomplete debug info that could
violate this constraint.
Add a test case where this occurs by design (inlining a
debug-info-having function in an attribute nodebug function - we want
this to work because /if/ the nodebug function is then inlined into a
debug-info-having function, it should be fine (and will work fine - we
just stitch the scopes up as usual), but should the inlining not happen
we need to not assert fail either).
llvm-svn: 213952
Reverted by Eric Christopher (Thanks!) in r212203 after Bob Wilson
reported LTO issues. Duncan Exon Smith and Aditya Nandakumar helped
provide a reduced reproduction, though the failure wasn't too hard to
guess, and even easier with the example to confirm.
The assertion that the subprogram metadata associated with an
llvm::Function matches the scope data referenced by the DbgLocs on the
instructions in that function is not valid under LTO. In LTO, a C++
inline function might exist in multiple CUs and the subprogram metadata
nodes will refer to the same llvm::Function. In this case, depending on
the order of the CUs, the first intance of the subprogram metadata may
not be the one referenced by the instructions in that function and the
assertion will fail.
A test case (test/DebugInfo/cross-cu-linkonce-distinct.ll) is added, the
assertion removed and a comment added to explain this situation.
Original commit message:
If a function isn't actually in a CU's subprogram list in the debug info
metadata, ignore all the DebugLocs and don't try to build scopes, track
variables, etc.
While this is possibly a minor optimization, it's also a correctness fix
for an incoming patch that will add assertions to LexicalScopes and the
debug info verifier to ensure that all scope chains lead to debug info
for the current function.
Fix up a few test cases that had broken/incomplete debug info that could
violate this constraint.
Add a test case where this occurs by design (inlining a
debug-info-having function in an attribute nodebug function - we want
this to work because /if/ the nodebug function is then inlined into a
debug-info-having function, it should be fine (and will work fine - we
just stitch the scopes up as usual), but should the inlining not happen
we need to not assert fail either).
llvm-svn: 212649
If a function isn't actually in a CU's subprogram list in the debug info
metadata, ignore all the DebugLocs and don't try to build scopes, track
variables, etc.
While this is possibly a minor optimization, it's also a correctness fix
for an incoming patch that will add assertions to LexicalScopes and the
debug info verifier to ensure that all scope chains lead to debug info
for the current function.
Fix up a few test cases that had broken/incomplete debug info that could
violate this constraint.
Add a test case where this occurs by design (inlining a
debug-info-having function in an attribute nodebug function - we want
this to work because /if/ the nodebug function is then inlined into a
debug-info-having function, it should be fine (and will work fine - we
just stitch the scopes up as usual), but should the inlining not happen
we need to not assert fail either).
llvm-svn: 212203
We are going to drop debug info without a version number or with a different
version number, to make sure we don't crash when we see bitcode files with
different debug info metadata format.
llvm-svn: 195504
DICompositeType will have an identifier field at position 14. For now, the
field is set to null in DIBuilder.
For DICompositeTypes where the template argument field (the 13th field)
was optional, modify DIBuilder to make sure the template argument field is set.
Now DICompositeType has 15 fields.
Update DIBuilder to use NULL instead of "i32 0" for null value of a MDNode.
Update verifier to check that DICompositeType has 15 fields and the last
field is null or a MDString.
Update testing cases to include an extra field for DICompositeType.
The identifier field will be used by type uniquing so a front end can
genearte a DICompositeType with a unique identifer.
llvm-svn: 189282
Also remove checking of llvm.dbg.sp since it is not used in generating dwarf.
Current state of Finder:
DebugInfoFinder tries to list all debug info MDNodes used in a module. To
list debug info MDNodes used by an instruction, DebugInfoFinder provides
processDeclare, processValue and processLocation to handle DbgDeclareInst,
DbgValueInst and DbgLoc attached to instructions. processModule will go
through all DICompileUnits in llvm.dbg.cu and list debug info MDNodes
used by the CUs.
TODO:
1> Finder has a list of CUs, SPs, Types, Scopes and global variables. We
need to add a list of variables that are used by DbgDeclareInst and
DbgValueInst.
2> MDString fields should be null or isa<MDString> and MDNode fields should be
null or isa<MDNode>. We currently use empty string or int 0 to represent null.
3> Go though Verify functions and make sure that they check field types.
4> Clean up existing testing cases to remove llvm.dbg.sp and make sure each
testing case has a llvm.dbg.cu.
Re-apply r187609 with fix to pass ocaml binding. vmcore.ml generates a debug
location with scope being metadata !{}, in verifier we treat this as a null
scope.
llvm-svn: 187812
Also remove checking of llvm.dbg.sp since it is not used in generating dwarf.
Current state of Finder:
DebugInfoFinder tries to list all debug info MDNodes used in a module. To
list debug info MDNodes used by an instruction, DebugInfoFinder provides
processDeclare, processValue and processLocation to handle DbgDeclareInst,
DbgValueInst and DbgLoc attached to instructions. processModule will go
through all DICompileUnits in llvm.dbg.cu and list debug info MDNodes
used by the CUs.
TODO:
1> Finder has a list of CUs, SPs, Types, Scopes and global variables. We
need to add a list of variables that are used by DbgDeclareInst and
DbgValueInst.
2> MDString fields should be null or isa<MDString> and MDNode fields should be
null or isa<MDNode>. We currently use empty string or int 0 to represent null.
3> Go though Verify functions and make sure that they check field types.
4> Clean up existing testing cases to remove llvm.dbg.sp and make sure each
testing case has a llvm.dbg.cu.
llvm-svn: 187609
MDNodes used by DbgDeclareInst and DbgValueInst.
Another 16 testing cases failed and they are disabled with
-disable-debug-info-verifier.
A total of 34 cases are disabled with -disable-debug-info-verifier and will be
corrected.
llvm-svn: 186902
register-indirect address with an offset of 0.
It used to be that a DBG_VALUE is a register-indirect value if the offset
(operand 1) is nonzero. The new convention is that a DBG_VALUE is
register-indirect if the first operand is a register and the second
operand is an immediate. For plain registers use the combination reg, reg.
rdar://problem/13658587
llvm-svn: 180816
This reverts commit 342d92c7a0adeabc9ab00f3f0d88d739fe7da4c7.
Turns out we're going with a different schema design to represent
DW_TAG_imported_modules so we won't need this extra field.
llvm-svn: 178215
This is just the basic groundwork for supporting DW_TAG_imported_module but I
wanted to commit this before pushing support further into Clang or LLVM so that
this rather churny change is isolated from the rest of the work. The major
churn here is obviously adding another field (within the common DIScope prefix)
to all DIScopes (files, classes, namespaces, lexical scopes, etc). This should
be the last big churny change needed for DW_TAG_imported_module/using directive
support/PR14606.
llvm-svn: 178099
This is the first step to making all DIScopes have a common metadata prefix (so
that things (using directives, for example) that can appear in any scope can be
added to that common prefix). DIFile is itself a DIScope so the common prefix
of all DIScopes cannot be a DIFile - instead it's the raw filename/directory
name pair.
llvm-svn: 177239
These cases were found by further work to remove support for debug info
versioning. Common cleanups (other than changing the version info in the tag
field) included adding the last parameter to compile_units (recently added for
fission support) and other cases of trailing fields in lexical blocks, compile
units, and subprograms.
llvm-svn: 176834
David Blaikie