several places. isTerminator() returns true for a superset
of cases, and includes things like FP_REG_KILL, which are
nither return or branch but aren't safe to move/remat/etc.
llvm-svn: 61373
- Encode the token length with 2 bytes instead of 4.
- This reduces the size of the .pth file for Cocoa.h by 12%.
- This speeds up PTH time (-Eonly) on Cocoa.h by 1.6%.
llvm-svn: 61364
- In PTHLexer::Lex read all of the token data from PTH file before
constructing the token. The idea is to enhance locality.
- Do not use Read8/Read32 in PTHLexer::Lex. Inline these operations manually.
- Change PTHManager::ReadIdentifierInfo() to PTHManager::GetIdentifierInfo().
They are functionally the same except that PTHLexer::Lex() reads the
persistent id.
These changes result in a 3.3% speedup for PTH on Cocoa.h (-Eonly).
llvm-svn: 61363
my last patch to this file.
The issue there was that all uses of an IV inside a loop
are actually references to Base[IV*2], and there was one
use outside that was the same but LSR didn't see the base
or the scaling because it didn't recurse into uses outside
the loop; thus, it used base+IV*scale mode inside the loop
instead of pulling base out of the loop. This was extra bad
because register pressure later forced both base and IV into
memory. Doing that recursion, at least enough
to figure out addressing modes, is a good idea in general;
the change in AddUsersIfInteresting does this. However,
there were side effects....
It is also possible for recursing outside the loop to
introduce another IV where there was only 1 before (if
the refs inside are not scaled and the ref outside is).
I don't think this is a common case, but it's in the testsuite.
It is right to be very aggressive about getting rid of
such introduced IVs (CheckForIVReuse and the handling of
nonzero RewriteFactor in StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers).
In the testcase in question the new IV produced this way
has both a nonconstant stride and a nonzero base, neither
of which was handled before. And when inserting
new code that feeds into a PHI, it's right to put such
code at the original location rather than in the PHI's
immediate predecessor(s) when the original location is outside
the loop (a case that couldn't happen before)
(RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase); better to avoid making
multiple copies of it in this case.
Also, the mechanism for keeping SCEV's corresponding to GEP's
no longer works, as the GEP might change after its SCEV
is remembered, invalidating the SCEV, and we might get a bad
SCEV value when looking up the GEP again for a later loop.
This also couldn't happen before, as we weren't recursing
into GEP's outside the loop.
I owe some testcases for this, want to get it in for nightly runs.
llvm-svn: 61362
- Embed 'eom' tokens in PTH file.
- Use embedded 'eom' tokens to not lazily generate them in the PTHLexer.
This means that PTHLexer can always advance to the next token after
reading a token (instead of buffering tokens using a copy).
- Moved logic of 'ReadToken' into Lex. GetToken & ReadToken no longer exist.
- These changes result in a 3.3% speedup (-Eonly) on Cocoa.h.
- The code is a little gross. Many cleanups are possible and should be done.
llvm-svn: 61360
DeclContext. Instead, just keep the list of currently-active
declarations and only build the OverloadedFunctionDecl when we
absolutely need it.
This is a half-step toward eliminating the need to explicitly build
OverloadedFunctionDecls that store sets of overloaded
functions. This was suggested by Argiris a while back, and it's a good
thing for several reasons: first, it eliminates the messy logic that
currently tries to keep the OverloadedFunctionDecl in sync with the
declarations that are being added. Second, it will (eventually)
eliminate the need to allocate memory for overload sets, which could
help performance. Finally, it helps set us up for when name lookup can
return multiple (possibly ambiguous) results, as can happen with
lookup of class members in C++.
Next steps: make the IdentifierResolver store overloads as separate
entries in its list rather than replacing them with an
OverloadedFunctionDecl now, then see how far we can go toward
eliminating OverloadedFunctionDecl entirely.
llvm-svn: 61357
- Overloading has to cope with having both static and non-static
member functions in the overload set.
- The call may or may not have an implicit object argument,
depending on the syntax (x.f() vs. f()) and the context (static
vs. non-static member function).
- We now generate MemberExprs for implicit member access expression.
- We now cope with mutable whenever we're building MemberExprs.
llvm-svn: 61329
Ted Kremenek